「And a」を含む日記

■anond:20240726203724

『「IQの低い人たちは子供をたくさん産む」という主張は、統計データや社会科学研究の文脈で慎重に取り扱うべきです。このような議論は多くの場合、根拠が不十分であり、社会的な偏見や誤解を助長する可能性があります。以下に、信頼できる学術論文やデータをもとにこの主張を批判します。

### 1. **因果関係の混同**

この主張は、因果関係と相関関係を混同している可能性があります。相関があるからといって、因果関係があるとは限りません。例えば、IQと出生率の関係を調べる際、教育水準、経済状況、文化的背景など、他の多くの要因が影響を与えるため、単純にIQだけを原因とすることはできません。

### 2. **教育と経済的要因**

教育水準や経済的要因が出生率に影響を与えるという研究があります。例えば、教育水準が高い人々は、一般的に子供の数が少ない傾向にあります。これは、教育が遅くまで続くことや、キャリアを重視する傾向があるためです 。また、経済的に豊かな地域では、子供にかかるコストが高いため、子供の数を制限する傾向があります。

### 3. **社会経済的地位と健康**

社会経済的地位（SES）が健康やIQ、出生率に影響を与えるという証拠があります。SESが低い人々は、健康状態が悪く、教育機会が限られているため、IQが低くなる傾向があります。しかし、これは直接的な因果関係ではなく、複数の要因が絡み合った結果です 。

### 4. **統計データの解釈**

統計データの解釈には注意が必要です。例えば、特定の地域や集団でのデータをもとに一般化すると、誤解を招く可能性があります。データの収集方法や解析手法にも影響を受けるため、慎重な解釈が求められます。

### 5. **倫理的問題**

「IQの低い人たちは子供をたくさん産む」という主張は、倫理的な問題を含んでいます。このような主張は、特定の集団に対する偏見や差別を助長し、人権を侵害する可能性があります。科学的な議論は、常に倫理的な配慮を伴うべきです 。

### 結論

「IQの低い人たちは子供をたくさん産む」という主張は、科学的根拠が不十分であり、多くの要因を考慮に入れていない単純化された見解です。このような議論は、統計データの解釈や倫理的な問題を慎重に扱う必要があります。

---

: "Education and Fertility: Evidence from a National Family Planning Program in Colombia," by Melanie Morten and Atheendar Venkataramani.

: "The Impact of Women's Education on Fertility: Evidence from Uganda," by Oriana Bandiera, Niklas Buehren, Robin Burgess, Markus Goldstein, Selim Gulesci, Imran Rasul, and Munshi Sulaiman.

: "Socioeconomic Status and Health: Dimensions and Mechanisms," by Nancy E. Adler and Katherine Newman.

: "The Influence of Childhood Socioeconomic Status on Health in Adulthood: A Review of the Evidence," by Diana Kuh and Yoav Ben-Shlomo.

: "Ethics in Research: Protecting Human Subjects," by Eleanor Singer and Felice J. Levine.』

Permalink | 記事への反応(0) | 03:17

ツイートシェア

■日本のアカデミアは本当にどうしようもないところにまで来ている・1

日本には大学教授や研究者を適切に評価するシステムが無いため、多くの人は下記のタイプと接する機会が多かった😭

• 研究者としては有能かもしれないが、やる気がなく雑な授業をして開き直る／単なる好き嫌いで対応をする／直球で居眠りなど、『教員』や『社会人』としては問題外なタイプ
• 水俣病・様々な薬害・東日本大震災・コロナで見かける、御用学者タイプ
• JAXAなど何をかましても失敗ではない！と特権階級ムーブするタイプ
• リトラクションウォッチ(撤回論文を監視してるやつ)で世界上位を占める不正研究タイプ
• 自分の専門外に対して安易にSNS・TV・雑誌・書籍で言及するタイプ
• まさかの自分の専門分野で、不誠実もしくは直球で単純に正しくない (少なくとも日米の学会の見解とは異なる)ことをSNS・TV・雑誌・書籍・機関誌で発信するタイプ
• 今までやりたいことだけやってきて、働く訓練をしなかった、単純に働く or 稼ぐ気がないだけなのに、声高に自分が贅沢をする権利をSNSで主張するタイプ
  （自分の専門性を編集してプレゼンしたり、社会に還元する気が皆無。○○が出来ないとイヤ・贅沢したい気持ちだけ強く強く主張)

あと、日本の平均賃金から見たら、大学教授や研究者の賃金は、べつに低いとは言えない。むしろ上位を占めている。

そのため、賃金を上げろと言われても、日々の生活や老後のことを考える我々的には、『いや、十分な額でしょ。ナメとんのか？』となってしまい、

ほとんどの人は、大学教授や研究者の賃金を上げることに賛成しなかった

(つか、上記の状況を見続けて、おけおけ！上げとこ上げとこ👌なんて感情にはまずならんでしょ😒)

そんでまぁ招いたのが今日の日本の状況ですよ

高学報酬による競争で全体の質を担保するのではなく、個人の情熱と能力と使命感と倫理観だけに全てお任せしてしまった結果、もう本当にどうしようもないことになった

社会の基礎を担う公立の小中学校の先生の問題と似てるよね。尊敬に値する素晴らしい先生もいれば、残念ながらどーしようもない先生もいるみたいな

でも、そういった感情はグッと飲み込んで、羽振りのいいヘッジファンド並みのお賃金を大学教授や研究者に払うべきだったんでしょうね。苛烈な競争で質を担保するために

まずはこれ

"民" とか時代劇の殿様かな？っていうスゲー文章だが、2024年の東京大学准教授の投稿である(成りすましでなければ)

アサシン・クリード・シャドウズの問題、いつか鎮静化すれば良いと思っていたが、民が暴徒化しており、お気楽なパブリックヒストリアンたちは口を噤んでいるようなので、Xなるものを稼働させることにした。時々呟く。

そして、これもまさかの2024年の日本の大学教授（わざわざプロフィールで所属と身分を明かしている)の投稿である、うっへぇ～ありがてぇ～～～

PSA: It's not only "white racists" who are angry about the new Assassin's Creed game. A lot of Japanese internet users are angry too. Why?

Check this image for some examples of Japanese netizens expressing their views about Assassin's Creed Shadows.

(お知らせ：新しいアサシン・クリードゲームに怒っているのは「白人の人種差別主義者」だけではありません。多くの日本のインターネットユーザーも怒っています。なぜでしょうか？

アサシン・クリード・シャドウズについて日本のネットユーザーが意見を表明している例をこの画像で確認してください。)

　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　↓

（南京事件・慰安婦問題などに対して配慮のない主張を繰り返す属性の人、某氏の信者の人の画像を羅列＆投稿)

https://x.com/mrjeffu/status/1816040391990468666?s=61

悪いけど、ワイは明確に、南京事件・慰安婦問題などに対して配慮のない主張を繰り返す属性の人、某氏の信者の人では無いです

だけど、アジア人蔑視・日本文化軽視のプロモーションと表現を重ねてきた UBI の姿勢と アサクリ シャドウズ は非常に不愉快です😠

いわゆる "坂上田村麻呂黒人説" や "African Samurai: The True Story of Yasuke, a Legendary Black Warrior in Feudal Japan" (←実話・真実の物語とされている) などは、

日本文化に対してさらなる誤解を招く可能性があります

それに便乗する白人至上主義者によるアジア人の透明化と文化の盗用（ホワイトウォッシュしながらアフロセントリズムを押つけ、アジア人を透明化する糞ムーブ)、

上記に類するアクション（『日本人は怒ってない』とSNSでお気持ちを勝手に代弁するありがてぇ白人様たち）に対して懸念を持っています

1. まず、"坂上田村麻呂黒人説" について言及します

これは、司馬遼太郎氏やカジュアルな歴史小説家の作品、あるいは娯楽時代劇のフィクションを真に受けるのとは、ほんのちょっとだけ毛色が違います。

"坂上田村麻呂黒人説" の言い出しっぺは、今から100年以上前、カナダの人類学者、Alexander Francis Chamberlain 氏です。

米国の非営利団体 Internet Archive で原著を確認できると思うんですけど、

氏は『The Contribution of the Negro to Human Civilization』(1911年)という論文の中でこう書いてます。

484 ALEXANDER FRANCIS CHAMBERLAIN

[...]

And we can cross the whole of Asia and find the Negro again, for, when, in far-off Japan, the ancestors of the modern Japanese were making their way northward against the Ainu, the aborigines of that country.

（そして、我々はアジア全土を横断して再び黒人を見出すことができる。遠く離れた日本では、現代日本人の祖先がその国の先住民であるアイヌに対して北上を進めていた時に。）

　

THE CONTRIBUTION OF THE NEGRO 485

the leader of their armies was Sakanouye Tamuramaro,

a famous general and a Negro.

（彼らの軍隊の指導者は 坂上田村麻呂 であり、有名な将軍であり、黒人であった。)

　

---

　　Full text of "The Contribution of the Negro to Human Civilization"

　　 https://archive.org/stream/jstor-29737886/29737886_djvu.txt

まぁこんなこんな感じで唐突に 『坂上田村麻呂 は黒人である』 と論文の中で言い出してるんですね。

そして、この論文の記述を 全米黒人地位向上協会（NAACP) の設立者の一人である W・E・B・デュボイス氏 が、『The Negro』（1915年）にもしたため、

As rulers and warriors we remember such Negroes as Queen Nefertari and Amenhotep III among many others in Egypt; Candace and Ergamenes in Ethiopia; Mansa Musa, Sonni Ali, and Mohammed Askai in the Sudan; Diaz in Brazil, Toussaint L'Ouverture in Hayti, Hannivalov in Russia, Sakanouye Tamuramaro in Japan, the elder Dumas in France, Cazembe and Chaka among the Bantu, and Menelik, of Abyssinia; the numberless black leaders of India, and the mulatto strain of Alexander Hamilton.

　

(統治者や戦士としては、エジプトの多くの中でもネフェルタリ女王とアメンホテプ3世、エチオピアのカンダケとエルガメネス、スーダンのマンサ・ムーサ、ソンニ・アリ、モハメド・アスカイ、ブラジルのディアス、ハイチのトゥサン・ルヴェルチュール、ロシアのハンニバロフ、日本の坂上田村麻呂、フランスの父デュマ、バントゥ族のカゼンベとチャカ、アビシニアのメネリク2世などの黒人を思い出します。また、インドの無数の黒人指導者たち、そしてアレクサンダー・ハミルトンの混血の血筋も挙げられます。)

---

The Negro

https://archive.org/details/negro0000dubo_w7n3

さらに後続の米国黒人公民権運動で活用されたり、歴史フィクションのアイデア元になった歴史があります。

そのため、一部の児童向けサイトや教師向けサイトでYASUKEと共に今も見掛けることが稀にあります。

この界隈では、次のことわざが日本にあるとされています。

For a Samurai to be brave, he must have a bit of black blood

"侍が勇敢であるためには、少しの黒人の血を持っていなければならない"

日本人ならそんなことわざは無いこと知っていると思うんですけど、ググると色んなところで見掛けます

Why do Afro-centrists claim that the first samurai warrior was a black African? | Quora

https://www.quora.com/Why-do-Afro-centrists-claim-that-the-first-samurai-warrior-was-a-black-African

2. そして、弥助ぇぇぇ～ぇえ🎵↑

弥助(YASUKE)は、取得難易度が高い日本語を解する多言語話者の黒人の方で、しかも剛力で恵体、世が世なら・・・と言うとても優秀な方だったみたいです。

弥助はえらい人の覚えがめでたく、織田信長は彼を大変気に入って、連れて歩いていたようです。彼は道具持ちを任され、わざわざそのことが記録にも残っています。

頭が良くて体格もいいとかカッコイイし、本来であれば正当にその実力が報われて欲しかったし、彼がヒーローして描かれるフィクションが作られるのは共感できます。

というかフィクションであれば、もっとアフロサムライやキンバリーみたいな肌の色が濃い侍や忍者が増えて欲しいですね。

(最近のゲームでは Rise of the Ronin みたいに、主人公の人種を自由に設定できるオプションがデフォだけど)

ただ、史実では、さまざまなことが重なって、弥助は一般的に武士(侍)ではありませんでした。そもそも、有力武将や宣教師などでは無かった為、ほとんど記録には残っていません。

わずかに残される記録(ネットでも確認できる)からわかることは、下記くらいです。

• 短刀と私宅を与えられた（諸説あるが、"信長公記" の写本には記述がある)
• 姓は与えられていなかった（そもそも豊臣秀吉ですら、1～2年で足軽組頭になってないし、"羽柴" の姓を与えられるまでに10年以上掛かっている)
• 明確な役職は与えられていなかった (少なくとも記録には残っていないし、織田信長家臣人名辞典 にも 弥助 の名前はない)
• "耶蘇会の日本年報 第1輯" を見ると、弥助はルイス・フロイトと同じ場所にいた。弥助の戦闘記録が残されているのは"世子の邸"（これはおそらく妙覚寺のこと）
  弥助は武士（侍）とは見なされておらず、信長の仇討ちを行う者や覇権争いで障害となる者とも見なされていなかった為、解放され、南蛮寺へ送られた

耶蘇会の日本年報 第1輯

https://dl.ndl.go.jp/pid/1041119/1/164

弥助は、格 (家柄・役割) が無いため、一般的な意味で武士(侍)では無いことが、極端に歴史をサボっていない日本人なら誰にでもわかるとだと思います。

『武器を持てば武士(侍)』、最近そのように日本のアカデミアの中で定義を変えたのであれば、お知らせして頂きたいところです。

今まで、農民の子孫という自認だった人は、一度でもご先祖様が戦に参加していれば、これからは武士(侍)の子孫です。

あるいは、ご先祖様が用心棒として武器を持ったことがあれば、これからは武士(侍)の子孫です。

『ゆうて、一部の歴史オタク が 弥助は武士(侍)って言ってるだけでしょ』『時代劇でもよくフィクション入るじゃん』って思うでしょ？🤔

それが、どういうわけか、YASUKE の 英語版の Wikipedia 見ると、日本のアカデミアのお墨付き貰ってるのとか、参考文献に引っ張ってきてるのよね。それも京都大学とかの

ZINBUN は査読付き学術誌と京大で紹介されてるんですけど、その中でこんな風に書かれてます。

Perhaps more extraordinary is that Yasuke’s story does not end here. Retained as an attendant by Nobunaga, he later accompanied him into battle against the rival lord Akechi Mitsuhide (1528? - 1582) who upon defeating Nobunaga at Horyuji, spared the African and subsequently released him.

　

(さらに驚くべきことに、弥助の話はここで終わりません。信長の従者として残された彼は、後に信長と共に、ライバルの大名(rival lord)である明智光秀（1528? -1582）との戦いに参加しました。光秀は法隆寺で信長を破った際、このアフリカ人の命を助け、その後解放しました。)

　

---

Excluded Presence : Shoguns, Minstrels, Bodyguards, and Japan's Encounters with the Black Other

https://repository.kulib.kyoto-u.ac.jp/dspace/bitstream/2433/71097/1/40_15.pdf

Horyuji(法隆寺)かぁ。あと、さすが魔王ノッブ、1万を超えたとも言われる大軍勢を前に、自刃することなく弥助と共に立ち向かっちゃうぜ。諦めたらそこで試合終了だもんな(白目)

更にこれに加えて、日大の教授が、いろんなところで、弥助は日本で最も有名な外国生まれの武士(侍)となった、

弥助は本能寺にいて伝令の役割を担った、弥助の最後の使命は首を守ることだったとか、いろいろ言って回ってますからね

例えば、大手ニュースメディアのCNNとかで

African samurai: The enduring legacy of a black warrior in feudal Japan ｜CNN

https://edition.cnn.com/2019/05/19/asia/black-samurai-yasuke-africa-japan-intl/index.html

そんなわけで、YASUKEの件も、司馬遼太郎氏やカジュアルな歴史小説家の作品、あるいは娯楽時代劇のフィクションを真に受けるのとは、ほんのちょっとだけ毛色が違います

文字数制限に引っ掛かったから続く → 日本のアカデミアは本当にどうしようもないところにまで来ている・２

関連増田

• 大手ニュースメディアのCNNインタビューで『信長は弥助を神だと思っていた』と語った根拠は気になる
• UBI(アサクリ)はUBIで普通に問題なんで。ただ、アジア人蔑視それに付随する日本の歴史改竄は一朝一夕にはどうにもできないのでは？
• アサクリ シャドウズ が燃えたのは、誤訳ではなく燃えるなりのことをしたから。別にフィクション満載で主人公を日本人以外の人種にも出来て同性愛描写もある 『Rise of the Ronin』 燃えてませんけど？

Permalink | 記事への反応(5) | 18:06

ツイートシェア

■【朗報】黒人・弥助を神とした元ネタ論文が見つかる。

アサクリの弥助・黒人奴隷と、そこから派生したロックリー・岡美穂子両氏の言説の元ネタっぽいものを見つけたので要約しておく。

○著者：David Wright

○題名：The Use of Race and Racial Perceptions among Asians and Blacks: The Case of the Japanese and African Ameridans

○出典：1998年、一橋大学社会学ジャーナル（https://hermes-ir.lib.hit-u.ac.jp/hermes/ir/re/8321/）

○概要（俺の読解なので是非原本にあたられたし）

・16世紀半ばから、ポルトガル人の奴隷等としてかなりの数の黒人が日本を訪れていた。

・日本人は彼らに好意的で、彼らは尊敬の対象だった。特に弥助という者について、信長は厚遇した。

・ポルトガル人が頻繁に黒人奴隷を献上するので、日本人も彼らを見下すようになり、明治維新の頃にはその見方が定着していた。

・というか白人との接触前から日本では白い肌が美しいと言われてたけどね。（その割にはお歯黒は何故？）

・一方で、肌の黒い聖人もいたことから黒い肌に対する欧米のような差別感情は持ってなかった。オランダから入れ知恵されてたのに不思議だね。

（以下開国時の話が続く）

この、「日本人は彼らを尊敬していた」「肌の黒い聖者もいた」が、ロックリー・岡美穂子両氏による「弥助は神とされた」等に変換されていったのではないだろうか。

なお、知る限り弥助を神とした、または神に近かった、神のようだったなどとする史料は発見されておらず、専門家によるものでは、ロックリー氏や岡美穂子氏が述べているものがすべてのようだ。

特に八幡神は南無八幡大菩薩（那須与一）で有名な武士の神であり、これになぞらえるというのはとてつもない厚遇だし、文献にも残っていると思うのだが何を根拠にされたのだろうか。

（岡美穂子氏インタビュー記事より）

信長に関する史料では弥助のビジュアルイメージが「八幡神に近かった」と言われています。あるいは、中国の史料ではアフリカ系の人を「黒鬼」と表記している。ですから、実用的な屈強さを求めただけでなく、そういう人間を自分の近くに置くことで「こんなに強いヤツを従えているんだ」という格付けに役立つと考えた、イメージ戦略の部分もあったと思います。

https://www.cyzo.com/2021/02/post_268095_entry.html

（岡美穂子氏インタビュー記事より）

弥助もそもそもアフリカ大陸内の部族間闘争で生け捕りにされ、外国人に売られたといわれます。

（略）

中国では「黒鬼」と呼ばれていましたが、差別的な意味だけでなく強いものに対する憧れ、神格化も含まれているでしょう。

https://books.google.co.jp/books?id=ueI9EAAAQBAJ&pg=PA45&lpg=PA45&dq=%22%E7%A5%9E%E6%A0%BC%E5%8C%96%E3%82%82%E5%90%AB%E3%81%BE%E3%82%8C%E3%81%A6%E3%81%84%E3%82%8B%E3%81%A7%E3%81%97%E3%82%87%E3%81%86%22&source=bl&ots=VL8Mdfp5xc&sig=ACfU3U0mVfcGBaVjLwU6pkAfd6NYXORlew&hl=ja&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwj1_bTS7sOHAxWrb_UHHZRqGX8Q6AF6BAgcEAI#v=onepage&q=%22%E7%A5%9E%E6%A0%BC%E5%8C%96%E3%82%82%E5%90%AB%E3%81%BE%E3%82%8C%E3%81%A6%E3%81%84%E3%82%8B%E3%81%A7%E3%81%97%E3%82%87%E3%81%86%22&f=false

ロックリー・トーマス氏によると、当時の都だった京都の住民と同様、信長は弥助の背丈や体格、肌の色に畏怖の念を抱いたという。

（略）

信長は弥助を「大黒天」ではないかと考えた。大黒天は豊穣（ほうじょう）の神で、寺院では通常、黒い像によって表現されている。信長は弥助の肌の色は墨によるものだろうと思い、こすり落とそうとした。本当に黒人だと納得すると、直ちに宴会を開いて敬意を表したという。

https://www.cnn.co.jp/world/35138192.html

追記

○中国語の「黒鬼」に屈強なという意味はないのでは？

→通常の中国語ではその通りで、日本語に訳すと「黒い幽霊」といった意味合いになる。

あとは道教では鬼というのは死後の世界の人に該当するもので、鬼世界があって普通に鬼が暮らしていて鬼の役人がいたりもする。

いずれにしても中国語の「鬼」には日本のように「強い」「屈強な」という意味はない。（例えば「悪党（中世）」・「悪源太（源義平）」・「悪太郎（堀内恒夫）」という使い方はしない）。

なので、岡美穂子氏が「屈強な黒人」「神格化」という意味で取り上げたのは、解釈の誤りのように思う。御本人の説明を求めたいところだが。

ただ中国史については良く分からないので、昔はそういう使い方をしていたというのであれば補足よろしく。

追記2

○そもそも弥助ってアフリカ系であるとは限らないのでは？

→弥助はモザンビーク出身って記述があるんだけど、前半生は全くの不明で、岡美穂子氏が「部族間闘争の結果生け捕りになった」とした根拠は不明。

当時のモザンビークってインド人も大勢住み着いてるので、インド人とか混血の可能性は十分にある。

追記3

○信長が弥助のことを大黒天（神）と思った

→トップブコメにこうあったが、そんな証拠はどこにもない。

現時点ではロックリー氏と岡美穂子氏の頭の中だけに存在すると言って良い

Permalink | 記事への反応(16) | 14:24

ツイートシェア

■歴史改竄でどうこうはアサクリより前からやっている。坂上田村麻呂黒人に始まり、ネトフリでYASUKEアニメ化の時も SHOGUN の時も増田でやってたでしょ

ま～た日本語すら検索すら検索しない人による謎の主張が出ているので、コピペしとくね

Why do Afro-centrists claim that the first samurai warrior was a black African? - Quora

https://www.quora.com/Why-do-Afro-centrists-claim-that-the-first-samurai-warrior-was-a-black-African

一例：

　

7mo

The original answer and your comment are both wrong. It is very easy to prove Yasuke was a samurai, you just have to check a Japanese dictionary. I searched for 侍・士 (samurai) on the Japanese online encyclopedia コトバンク (Kotobank), which produced a result from 精選版　日本国語大辞典 (Carefully Selected Edition of the Nihon Kokugo Daijiten, aka Shogakukan’s Japanese Dictionary). I’ll post the link at the bottom, but here is the relevant section in Japanese and my translation in English.

　

(3)鎌倉幕府では、侍は僕従を有し、騎上の資格ある武士で、郎従等の凡下と厳重に区別する身分規定が行なわれた。しかし、鎌倉中期以降、その範囲が次第に拡大、戦国時代以降は、諸国の大名の家臣をも広く侍と称するようになり、武士一般の称として用いられるようになる。

　

(3) In the Kamakura Shogunate (1185 - 1333 AD), samurai were professional warriors who had servants and were qualified to ride on horseback, and their status was strictly differentiated from ordinary subordinates such as roju. However, from the middle of the Kamakura Shogunate onwards, its scope gradually expanded, and from the Sengoku Period (1467 - 1615 AD) onwards, vassals of feudal lords in various provinces came to be widely referred to as samurai, and it came to be used as a general term for professional warriors.

　

Now we have to ask three questions to see whether Yasuke met this definition:

　

Q: When did Yasuke work for the feudal lord Oda Nobunaga?

　

A: From April 1581 to June 1582. We know this from multiple eyewitness accounts, which I also mention below.

　

Q: Was Yasuke a vassal of Oda Nobunaga?

　

A: Yes, as evidenced by the fact that he was given a stipend, a house, and a job as spear-bearer (a type of bodyguard for the leader of a samurai family). He was also given a short sword called a koshigatana, which was worn as a status symbol and weapon for self-defense at all times by high status samurai. This we know from the Chronicle of Lord Nobunaga, written by Oda Nobunaga’s vassal Ota Gyuichi.

　

Q: Was Yasuke a warrior fighting for Oda Nobunaga?

　

A: Yes, as evidenced by the fact that he fought in three important conflicts. One, Yasuke fought in the Second Tensho Iga War in September 1581. This we can infer because the Jesuits said Oda Nobunaga took Yasuke everywhere with him and he led his own troops into this war. Two, Yasuke fought in the Koshu Conquest from February to March 1582. This we know from the Diary of Ietada, written by Matsudaira Ietada, a vassal of Tokugawa Ieyasu, who was himself a vassal of Oda Nobunaga. Three, Yasuke fought in the Honno-ji Incident of June 1582, in which he tried but failed to save the lives of both Oda Nobunaga and his son Oda Nobutada until Yasuke was the last Oda man standing and surrendered to the traitor Akechi Mitsuhide, who spared his life and returned him to the Jesuits. This we know from letters written by the Jesuits, who were glad to have Yasuke back. According to the Oda family today, Nobunaga’s final order was for Yasuke to help him commit seppuku (ritual suicide by stomach cutting) by decapitating him and bring his head to a courier that returned it to the Oda family, so it could not be used as evidence of victory by Akechi Mitsuhide.

　

So there you have it. Yasuke was a vassal and a warrior for the most powerful feudal lord in all of Japan, during the Sengoku Period. He even assisted his lord’s suicide, a role strictly reserved for samurai. Therefore, he was a samurai. Below is a link to the definition of samurai on Kotobank.

この界隈で定番な日本のことわざは、

"For a Samurai to be brave, he must have a bit of black blood "

(侍が勇敢であるためには、少しの黒人の血を持っていなければならない)

日本人ならそんなことわざないこと誰でも知ってると思うんですけど、当然アサクリ関係ないサイトで見ることになる

Where Are The Black People in 'Shogun'? | LEVEL

https://www.levelman.com/where-black-people-fx-shogun/

リンク貼れないけど下記とか

"For a Samurai to be brave, he must have a bit of black blood" is an old Japanese proverb. What do they mean with that? : r/AskHistorians

ちな、悪気なさそうな教師向けサイト・子ども向けサイトでも、YASUKEサイキョーは見ますよ

というか、そもそもUBIがインタビュー動画の中で日系人っぽいアジアンの監修スタッフに『YASUKEは日本で広く受け入れらている』とか言わせてますし

参考になりましたか？

anond:20240724030834

Permalink | 記事への反応(1) | 03:29

ツイートシェア

■anond:20240721134326

14本ですね。

Permalink | 記事への反応(1) | 18:45

ツイートシェア

■VMwareに何が起こっているのか、どうなるのか

はじめに

IT業界であればVMwareの周辺で発生している騒動について多少なりとも聞いていると思います。業界外の人でもその名前ぐらいは耳にされているのではないでしょうか。では実際にVMwareに何が起こっているのか、どのような背景があるのか、今後どうなるのかを知っている範囲で書いてみます。

VMwareとは何であるか

VMwareとは仮想化ソフトウェアです。この説明だけで理解できる人にはこのセクションの説明は不要です。

VMware自体は1998年創業の会社ですが、広く世に知られるようになったのはおそらく2000年前後ぐらいからでしょうか。仮想化とはハードウェアと抽象化して物理的なハードウェアをソフトウェア的に再現する技術の一種です。Windowsの上でさらに別のOSを実行できるようにすることができるようになります。この別のOSのことを仮想マシン(VM)と呼びます。個人レベルではテスト環境などに使えることがメリットですが、企業レベルでは大量のハードウェアを効率的に集約できることが期待されていました。特に2010年以降のマルチコア化の急速な進展の結果、多くの用途でボリュームゾーンのサーバーハードウェアは高速・大容量になり過ぎました。企業内のアプリケーションを動作させるために単体のハードウェアは過剰になって久しいです。そのため、VMwareによって1台の物理ハードウェアを複数のVMで利用する使い方が一般化しました。社内で新しいサーバーが必要になってもわざわざ新規で物理的なハードウェアを購入してセットアップと設置などをしなくてよくなるわけです。個人向けのVMware Workstationは単にPC上にVMを複数起動できるだけでしたが、企業向けの上位版では複数のサーバーやストレージを束ねてプライベートクラウドを構成することも可能でした。

企業としてのVMwareはEMCというストレージメーカーに買収後、2007年に上場します。EMCがDELLに買収されたこともあり、DELLの傘下になったあと2021年にスピンオフされ独立した企業となりました。その後、2022年にBoradcomに買収されます。

Broadcomとは

現在のBroadcomは源流をたどればHPに繋がります。HPからアジレントという計測機器を作る会社がスピンオフし、その会社から半導体事業をファンドが買収し独立させたAvagoという会社が現在のBoradcomの母体です。BroadcomはAvagoとは別の半導体設計・製造を行っていた会社ですが、Avagoに買収され存続会社の社名をBroadcomとしたことで現在の形になっています。

Broadcomの製品で一番有名なところとしては、ネットワーク関連のチップだと思います。サーバー用のNICなどで名前を見る機会も多いはずです。それ以外にも様々な用途のチップを作っていましたし、買収によりラインナップを拡充してきました。

転機となったのは2017年にQualcommを買収しようとしたことです。これは先方の役員から拒絶され、また規制当局からも懸念を表明されたことで失敗に終わります。これ以降、Broadcomはソフトウェア企業の買収に軸足を移しました。CAテクノロジーズやSymantecのセキュリティ部門を買収しました。Symantecのセキュリティ部門はその後、アクセンチュアに売却します。もちろん、今回のVMwareも買収しています。

Computer Associatesとそのビジネス

Broadcomが買収したCAテクノロジーズはかつてComputer Associatesと呼ばれる会社でした。1976年創業でメインフレームのころからビジネスを行っており一時は業界2位の地位まで上り詰めた会社ですが、今一つ有名なプロダクトがない会社と記憶しています。

List of mergers and acquisitions by CA Technologies - Wikipediaと、CAが買収した会社はWikipediaで専用のページが用意されるほど数多くあります。この会社のビジネスモデルはさほど成長度は望めないがシェアが大きい企業向けシステムなど確実にキャッシュを生み出すソフトウェア(いわゆるcash cow)を作る会社を買収し、新規開発を一切止めることで費用を削減しキャッシュを絞り出すというモデルだったようです。私も以前CAのロゴの入ったソフトウェアを使ったことがありますが、なぜこのような使いにくいソフトを使い続けるのか疑問でした。企業システムの一部として使い始めてしまうと簡単には変更することができず、ランニングコストがかかり続けたとしても変更するためのコストを考えると使い続けざるを得なくなることは非常によくあります。

どこかで聞いた話ですね。これと同じことがVMwareでも起こりました。BoradcomがCAテクノロジーズを買収したのはこのビジネスモデルを吸収するためだったのではないかと思われます。

VMwareに起こったこと

Broadcomに買収されて以降、VMwareはそのビジネスを大きく転換しました。日本法人では社員が大幅に削減されたようです。ライセンスについても売り切りモデルの新規販売を止めサブスクリプションだけにしたり、ランナップを大幅に整理しました。

このようなビジネスモデルの転換は既存ユーザーから反発を食らいますが、前述の通り企業システムの根幹で使われているソフトであるため簡単に使用を止めることができないのが現状です。日経BPなどでは移行先の候補の比較記事なども掲載していますが、変更するための人的コストを考えると使い続ける企業は少なからずあるのではないでしょうか。

より悲惨なのはクラウドサービスをVMwareを中核に構築してしまったところです。こちらはもっと乗り換えるのが難しいはずで、IaaSから撤退する会社も出てくるのではないでしょうか。

我々に何ができるのか

ソフト産業は製造業と違い成功すれば小規模ながら利益率の高いビジネスを生み出せる可能性があります。一方で製造施設などの固定資産や従業員数は多くないため、企業価値が過小評価されている企業もあります。そのような会社を買収してキャッシュを搾り取るビジネスを行ってきたのがCAという会社でした。少なくともこのモデルで数十年間ソフト業界で生き続けていました。そのため、このモデルを根絶することはかなり難しいのではないかと考えています。

Permalink | 記事への反応(0) | 21:58

ツイートシェア

■anond:20240712170337

腺の風邪になって（せんのかぜになって）は、アメリカ合衆国で公開された詩『Do not stand at my grave and weep』の日本語訳。また、それを歌詞とする歌。

Permalink | 記事への反応(1) | 10:59

ツイートシェア

■anond:20240708185755

やるも何もググればいくらで出てくるぞ。下記のように

double minority asexuality asd adhd

Are Autism Spectrum Disorder and Asexuality Connected?

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/356247505_Are_Autism_Spectrum_Disorder_and_Asexuality_Connected

Asexuality is a lack of sexual attraction to any gender. There is some evidence to suggest that many self-identified asexuals have a formal diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder which is characterized by deficits in social interaction and communication, as well as by restricted and repetitive interests and behaviors. Additionally, the literature shows that asexuality and lack of sexual attraction or low sexual interest is overrepresented in people with autism spectrum disorder compared with neurotypical samples. Nevertheless, no studies have been conducted to investigate the relationship between autism and asexuality in depth. We conducted a systematic review of the literature to examine whether asexuality and autism spectrum disorder are connected. We conclude that asexuality and autism share various aspects, such as a possible role of prenatal factors, reference to romantic dimensions of sexual attraction and sexual orientation, and non-partner-oriented sexual desire, but future research should explore and clarify this link.

　

無性愛とは、どの性別にも性的魅力を感じないことを指します。多くの自己認識された無性愛者が、自閉症スペクトラム障害（ASD）の正式な診断を受けているという証拠があります。ASDは、社会的相互作用とコミュニケーションの欠陥、ならびに制限された反復的な興味や行動によって特徴付けられます。さらに、文献によると、無性愛や性的魅力の欠如、または低い性的関心は、神経典型的なサンプルと比較して、自閉症スペクトラム障害を持つ人々に過剰に表れています。それにもかかわらず、自閉症と無性愛の関係を深く調査する研究は行われていません。私たちは、無性愛と自閉症スペクトラム障害が関連しているかどうかを調べるために、文献の体系的なレビューを行いました。私たちは、無性愛と自閉症が、出生前の要因の役割、性的魅力と性的指向のロマンチックな側面への言及、パートナー指向でない性的欲望など、さまざまな側面を共有していると結論付けましたが、将来の研究はこのリンクを探求し、明確にする必要があります。

あるものなんか下記から始まって笑っちゃったw そっかw一般的な概念だったんだw

This chapter challenges the commonly held notion that individuals with ASD are asexual or inappropriate in their sexual behaviors.

この章では、自閉症スペクトラム障害（ASD）を持つ個人が無性愛者であるか、性的行動が不適切であるという一般的な概念に挑戦しています

アセクシャルやセックス依存症が発達障害である可能性は高いだろうけど、別にイコールではないだろうよってねw

発達障害じゃないアセクシャルもいるでしょうよw

ちなみにこれは発達障害＝アセクシャルは不適切、社会的助けがあれば、異性愛者として楽しめるとかいう内容みたいよ

あと、ずっと『なんでセックスするんだ😡』って言ってるが、アセクシャルはセックスするやつはするぞ。なんなら性依存症だっているし

セックスで情が深められないだけ、恋愛以前に人や気持ちに対する関する関心が無いか薄い、それにグラデーションがあるだけ

それから、アイデンティティは自分で定めるものだから、今日から私はアセクシャルって決めたらアセクシャルだぞ

Permalink | 記事への反応(1) | 19:33

ツイートシェア

■anond:20240629114150

占いにそんなこと言われても(整合性を求められても)だが、フツーにこう言う感じやで？

ADHD ENTP で検索する
https://www.google.com/search?q=ADHD+ENTP　

ENTP(討論者)の取扱説明書【恋愛観〜キャリアと適職などを ...

note

https://note.com › mbti_brain16

note.com からのADHD ENTP

2022/12/11 — 【ADHD(多動症)やADD(注意欠陥障害)の可能性が最も高い】. これらの弱みが組み合わさることで、ENTPさんは、比較的ADHDやADDの傾向が強いとされます。単一 ...

紫先生 on X: "ENTP、ADHDの説明書だと思ったけど

X · Dr_murasaki_

高評価 70+ 件 · 2 年前

twitter.com からのADHD ENTP

ENTP、ADHDの説明書だと思ったけど、意外とADHDで1番多いのはINFPだった。 絶対ADHD兼アスペであろう身近な人はINFPだった。 ノリで本格的なIQテスト ...

Entp Adhd 多い

TikTok

https://www.tiktok.com › Discover

75M件の投稿。Entp Adhd 多い関連の動画をTikTokで探そう。 Entp and Adhd, Adhd何型が多い, Adhdだけが見える, Que Es Adhd, Iep for Adhd, Adhdあるあるに関する動画 ...

ENTPとADHD・ASD/アスペルガーなどの発達障害の関係を ...

生きづらさ×MBTI

https://minoritymbti.com › MBTI

2021/08/25 — ENTPは優勢機能に外向的直感(Ne)というADHDと親和性の高い心理機能を持っているため、ADHDの特徴に当てはまる人が比較的多いタイプです。

Permalink | 記事への反応(0) | 13:30

ツイートシェア

■To you, the creator, I sincerely hope this message reaches you.

It's sudden, but right now in Japan, creativity is facing a true crisis. Characters like Uzaki-chan, Onsen Musume, and Tojo Rika are being targeted and flamed, game character designs are being infiltrated by political correctness, Johnny's Entertainment is being dismantled, swimsuit photo sessions in parks are being canceled, Hitoshi Matsumoto is being publicly shamed, and the new AV law was enacted without considering the opinions of those directly involved. Every form of expression in every venue is currently under unreasonable pressure.

How does this connect to the Tokyo gubernatorial election? In fact, a major event directly linked to this is occurring in the 2024 Tokyo gubernatorial election. As a creator, I hope this message reaches you.

What I am about to share is a story about someone named Himasora Akane, who you should know about to resist such pressures. But before I dive into that story, I want to express my deep gratitude to my old friend Nozomi for giving me the opportunity to post this article in a place where many creators will see it. As someone who also loves manga, anime, and games, I hope this information will benefit Japanese society and support Nozomi's activities.

Himasora Akane Should Be the Governor of Tokyo

First, I would like to make a straightforward request to you as a creator: please support Himasora Akane for governor. In this election, please write "Himasora Akane" on your ballot. The voting day is July 7th. Even if you are not a Tokyo resident, I ask that you at least listen to this story. If you find it interesting, please share it with your friends, family, and acquaintances. You can check Himasora Akane's campaign promises and the background of their candidacy on their Twitter (X) posts linked below:

Himasora Akane (Tokyo gubernatorial candidate)

@himasoraakane

https://x.com/himasoraakane/status/1804846779399324095

Himasora Akane Will Not Allow Our Culture to Be Burned

Himasora Akane is an ordinary otaku who loves manga, anime, and games. Known as "Cognitive Profiling Detective Akane Himasora," he has been active on Twitter (X) and YouTube, and now he is running for governor. Akane, who is deeply concerned about the repression and destruction of otaku culture, is challenging those who seek to destroy our culture alone. Akane will never allow those who try to burn our culture.

As mentioned at the beginning, all forms of expression are currently under pressure. Otaku culture, in particular, seems to be a prime target.

Uzaki-chan Blood Donation Poster Controversy (2019): A collaboration between the Japanese Red Cross Society and the manga Uzaki-chan was flamed for allegedly being overly sexual in its PR illustration.

V-Tuber Traffic Safety Video Controversy (2021): A V-Tuber hired by the Matsudo Police Department in Chiba Prefecture was deemed too sexual for public agency PR.

Onsen Musume Controversy (2021): Characters personifying local hot springs were criticized as sexist.

Mie Transport Official Character Controversy (2024): A character in a bus driver's uniform released by Mie Transport was flamed for evoking sexual images.

These controversies are often fueled by so-called political correctness and feminism. For creators, these are direct threats. If these factions label your work as sexual and demand it be burned to ashes, could you resist? How would you feel if your painstakingly created work, like your own child, was trampled by people who have no regard for your efforts? Could you continue your creative activities while constantly shrinking away?

Himasora Akane saw something behind these flaming incidents. He started investigating the key figure behind the Onsen Musume controversy, a representative of a general incorporated association in Tokyo. This association's core business, the Young Female Victims Support Project, received substantial public funds from Tokyo. Akane submitted public document disclosure requests to Tokyo and thoroughly dug into the organization. During his investigation, Akane uncovered many suspicions suggesting this project was unworthy of public funding, which he exposed one by one on social media.

Negligent accounting reports, taking protected girls to the Henoko base protest in Okinawa, Communist Party members waiting in the bus used to protect girls—these revelations drew significant attention online. The investigation extended beyond this general incorporated association to other NPOs receiving public funds, and Akane named this cluster of issues the "WBPC problem" after the initials of these organizations.

Akane's YouTube Channel (WBPC Problem Playlist)

https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLI5gTciLKtAXRyzv9j5FiNMcc8eoEBbMN

From here, Akane's story expanded to resident audits, resident lawsuits, and national compensation lawsuits concerning the Tokyo Young Female Victims Support Project. Akane discovered that behind many flaming incidents, there is no clear command structure but a group of various political organizations and activists working together like an amoeba. He named this group the "Nanika Group" (Nanika means "something" in Japanese), a reference to the mysterious, ominous "something from another place" in the manga HUNTER×HUNTER, which Akane loves. The Nanika Group is also connected to welfare interests, where public funds flow unchecked. Akane called this phenomenon "Public Fund Chu-Chu" (siphoning).

For creators, this means the tax money they earn through hard work is used to burn their precious works. It's an intolerable situation.

Himasora Akane Is Fighting Against Those Who Burn Our Culture

In November 2022, a major event marked a turning point in this series of controversies. The general incorporated association under scrutiny held a press conference at the parliamentary office building, gathering media and announcing a lawsuit against Akane. This "Legal Harassment Press Conference," as it was called online, involved multiple layers of power: the government, the media, and a team of seven lawyers targeting a single individual.

However, Akane did not back down. Instead, he intensified his pursuit, exploiting the opponent's careless statements as lawsuit fodder. This led to an outpouring of support on social media, with his Twitter follower count skyrocketing and 160 million yen in donations for legal fees.

The following year, a resident audit request filed by Akane resulted in Tokyo's official website recognizing some improper points and deciding to audit the organization. However, Tokyo's lenient audit led Akane to file a resident lawsuit. Suspicion also turned towards Governor Yuriko Koike for allocating public funds through dubious sole-source contracts. Tokyo began excessively redacting documents in response to public document requests, attempting to conceal the issue. Koike's promise to end document redaction quietly disappeared from her campaign page.

Throughout this battle, Akane has been a target of criminal complaints and faced threats, yet he persists. His book "Netoge Senshi" was released amid bookstore threats, but only the criminal complaint was widely reported by the media, portraying Akane negatively.

Who Is Himasora Akane?

Himasora Akane is an ordinary otaku, a top-tier online gamer during his student days, and a talented game creator who worked for a major game company and later a venture company. His meticulous work on the game "Shin Goku no Valhalla Gate" was betrayed by the company's CEO, leading to a seven-year legal battle that Akane ultimately won, securing 600 million yen. This experience fuels his fierce opposition to having his creations burned.

Before investigating the Young Female Victims Support Project, Akane exposed fraudulent feminist "knights" on his YouTube channel, shaking the internet. He detests lies and has an uncanny ability to detect them.

Akane is a special individual with extraordinary abilities, honed through his experiences in games, court battles, and extensive document analysis. His pursuit of truth and justice makes him a suitable candidate for governor, promising a world without lies and where honest people do not suffer.

What We Can Do to Protect Our Culture

Creative expression can be crushed if we are not vigilant. Even in modern Japan, otaku culture is on thin ice. The recent cessation of Visa transactions for DMM (Fanza) is a reminder of how a single card company can wield its power to dictate what is deemed appropriate expression. Expression freedom is fragile and constantly under threat.

To those reading this, I urge you to vote for Himasora Akane. Support him to protect our culture. Despite his harsh demeanor and preference for solitary battles, he is now seeking help for the first time. Akane feels the danger in this gubernatorial election and believes that if he does not become governor, everything will end. He has taken a stand for the people of Tokyo and Japan.

I wrote this article to support his spirit and spread the word. Please vote for Himasora Akane and help create a miracle.

To you, the creator, I sincerely hope this message reaches you.

Please, I beg you.

Permalink | 記事への反応(1) | 01:24

ツイートシェア

■メディア(NHK)が意図的に国連人権理事会の報告で黙殺したところ。[追記

NHKの以下の記事には意図的に描かれてないことがあります。

報告書の要約としては報じるには不十分で、メディア企業への言及の報道が欠如しています。

「国連人権理事会 ジャニー氏性加害問題など日本調査の結果報告 | NHK | ジャニー喜多川氏 性加害問題」

https://www3.nhk.or.jp/news/html/20240627/k10014493431000.html

このダイアリーの要約

国連人権理事会の報告書には「性的虐待や人権侵害を防止するという人権尊重の責任を果たしていない」と明確に批判がされています。

さらに、理事会の会合ではジャニーズ問題の性被害者は90秒のビデオメッセージで、報告書はメディア業界に「はびこる性的虐待を強調している」と述べています。

しかし、NHKを含む大手メディア企業は放送局における女性記者への性的虐待問題が報告書に含まれていることを報道をしていません。

ジャニーズ問題を取り上げる一方で、放送局内での性加害問題を取り上げないのは意図的と言わざるを得ません。

国連人権理事会の報告書について

上の記事での、国連人権理事会の結果報告は以下のURLのページにpdf形式で掲載されています。

※このダイアリーの英語での引用は以下の報告書より。鍵かっこの翻訳はDeepLなどを使い確認しましたが間違いはあるかもしれません。

「Visit to Japan - Report of the Working Group on the issue of human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises」

https://www.ohchr.org/en/hr-bodies/hrc/regular-sessions/session56/list-reports

また、NHKの記事には「ジャニー喜多川氏からの性被害を告発した二本樹顕理さんのビデオメッセージ」の動画はありません。

動画は以下のURLの26：10～です。英語での発言で英語字幕のみです。※動画の更新により時点が変更されているかもしれません

ビデオメッセージを取り上げたほどですから、今回の国連人権理事会において二本樹顕理さんの訴える内容は極めて重要でしょう。

https://webtv.un.org/en/asset/k1t/k1t17c19b5

メディア企業として報じなければいけなかったのに触れなかった点は3つあります。

本当にNHKは以前ジャニーズ問題にコメントしたように「放送業界で人権尊重の考えがより浸透するよう」に「徹底」して取り組んでいるのでしょうか？

この指摘はもちろん、人権尊重や人権侵害の防止に臨むとした民間メディアにも当てはまります。

放送業界で人権尊重の考えがより浸透するよう、公共メディア・NHKとして、取り組みをさらに徹底してまいります。

「ジャニーズ事務所会見受けて NHKがコメント発表 | NHK | ジャニー喜多川氏 性加害問題」

https://www3.nhk.or.jp/news/html/20230907/k10014187051000.html

「ジャニーズ性加害問題でテレビ各局コメント　特別チームの提言受けて：朝日新聞デジタル」

https://www.asahi.com/articles/ASR8Z5DVCR8ZUCVL00H.html

①メディア業界における性的虐待の報告

二本樹顕理さんのビデオメッセージでは以下のようにメディア業界における性的虐待問題に言及していますが、記事には記載がありません。

前掲の動画、26:34辺りです。

「報告書は、メディアやエンターテインメント業界にはびこる性的虐待を強調している。」

The reports highlights sexual abuse prevailing in the media and the entertainment industry.

②放送局における性的虐待被害の報告

放送局(broadcasting)における性的虐待被害は報告書の段落74で言及されています。

しかし、NHKの記事には一切の記載がありません。

「ワーキンググループは、女性記者に対するセクハラや性的虐待被害の報告と、放送局による改善措置の欠如について報告を受けました。

放送局は、被害者に対し、せいぜい休職させるか、別の部署に異動させるか、医師に相談するよう助言する程度でした。」

The Working Group was informed about the sexual harassment and abuse of female journalists and the lack of remedial action taken by broadcasting stations,

which, at best, send them on leave, transfer them to another department or advise them to consult a doctor.

「放送局、新聞社、広告大手などの主要企業は、性的虐待や人権侵害を防止するという人権尊重の責任を果たしていません。

彼らは、ビジネス上の関係を活用して人権のリスクに対処しています。」

Key businesses, such as broadcasting stations, publishing companies and advertising giants, are failing to uphold their responsibility to respect human rights by 　preventing sexual abuse and using leverage in their business relationships to address human rights risks.

メディア企業、特に「SMILE-UP.」の見解を報じているNHKは以上の報告に関して「放送局、出版社、広告大手などの主要企業」からコメントを取るべきでしょう。

ジャニー喜多川の性加害は本人がいなくなるまで噂、過去のこととしか認識されていませんでした。

ジャニーズ問題で生じた失態をくり返さないためにも、徹底した調査報道をすべきです。

③ジャニーズ問題に関するNHKを含むメディア企業への言及を報じていない。

ジャニー喜多川の性加害問題を取り上げた段落75には以下のようにメディア企業が言及されています。

「 ワーキンググループのミッション・ステートメントの最後にあるように、日本のメディア企業は何十年もの間、このような不祥事の隠蔽に関与してきた。」

As noted in the Working Group’s end of mission statement, media companies in Japan have been implicated in covering up such scandals for decades.

このNHKの記事は報告書での上の指摘を取りあげておらず、NHKを含む各メディア企業のコメントも掲載していません。

NHKを含むメディア企業はジャニーズ問題から何を学んだのでしょうか？

まさに国連人権理事会の報告書においてメディア企業によるジャニーズ問題の隠ぺいを批判されているのに、それをメディア企業が報じないのなら何も変わっていないのではないでしょうか。

むしろ、①・②の指摘を合わせると、テレビ業界の重役に"生きた"ジャニー喜多川のような人物がいるのではないかとすら思わせます。

くり返しますが、NHKの記事はメディア企業の報道として、不十分です。

NHKはジャニーズ問題を受けて、「放送業界で人権尊重の考えがより浸透するよう」に「徹底」して取り組むとしました。

NHKは国連人権理事会でジャニーズ問題が取り上げられていることを報道ました。

しかし、メディア企業がジャニーズ問題の隠蔽に関与してきたという指摘・放送局における性的虐待被害の報道をしませんでした。

主要な民間メディア企業のネット上での報道でもほぼ同様でした。

日本のメディア企業の放送局における性的虐待加害問題に言及した報道はありません。

※国連人権理事会の報告書について以下補足(読まなくてもいいです)。

国連人権理事会日本の他にも20か国以上訪問しており、各国のテーマは様々です。（ポーランドは女性・少女に対する暴力の問題、フィンランドは教育など）

日本は主に職場での人権侵害の問題が取り上げられています。

訪問期間や違い、日本2023年7月24日～8月4日までに対し、アメリカは2日間のみです。

訪問先での会談も日本は政府系の代表の数々・複数の企業・団体連盟・市民団体・海外実習生など、アメリカは連邦政府、州政府、市政府の高官や関係者です。

日本で会談が行われた政府系の代表・企業名・団体連盟の名前や詳細は報告書で見ることができます。

ちなみに同じところには以下のPDFものもありますが、これは日本政府によるコメントです。

主にアイヌ民族への差別・海外実習生制度・福島原子力発電所での労働者の人権侵害などへコメント（反論）しています。

「visit to Japan - Comments by the State」

https://www.ohchr.org/en/hr-bodies/hrc/regular-sessions/session56/list-reports

各国の報告書の要約を読むと、雰囲気が全然違って興味深いです。というのも報告者が1人か2人と少数でやってるいるようだから。

フィンランド ー フィンランドの教育ってエクセレントだよね。世界一。けどちょっと高齢化とか心配なとこもありますね。

日本 ー 頑張って進歩してるようだけど課題もあります。職場での差別が特にひどく、マイノリティへの差別、女性・LGBTQ・障碍者・部落差別など心配です。

アメリカー今が岐路です。ヘイトスピーチ・外国人排斥に緊急に(argent)対処することが極めて重要です。

中でもアメリカは指摘が段違いで目次に"Gun Violence"があるのはすごい(よくない)。

日本は要約では優しめだけど、詳細読むと辛辣だったりします。以下は報告書の段落20です。

「実際、法務省人権局は人権侵害の申し立てを調査することができるが、この機能は国家人権機関としての役割を果たしていない。」

Indeed, although the Human Rights Bureau of the Ministry of Justice can investigate allegations of human rights violations, this function does not fulfil the role of a national human rights institution.

一方で、国連人権理事会の報告書は市民団体として訴えるのが難しいような問題については指摘が甘いように見えます。

日本の報告書では内部告発(whistle-blowing)がそれにあたります。内部告発者への報復問題の指摘はありません。

報告書を読む限りでは、内部告発者が集まり、団体を作るのは難しいというところまで認識できていないように思います。

ざっと読んだところ、氷河期世代についても言及もないようです。

氷河期世代については海外研究者の英語論文もあり、就職における年齢差別、女性差別が指摘されていますし、国内問題として十分に救済されているとは到底思えません。

あくまで国連人権理事会から2人が12日間訪問して各団体と会談をした結果の報告書で、むしろこの報告を受けたメディアの地道な報道が必須でしょう。

Permalink | 記事への反応(0) | 23:58

ツイートシェア

■

Bob the First, at the head of my long list of robins, having been killed by my pet owl, I very soon bought another. This one was not so gentle nor so handsome as Bob the First, his wings and his tail having their ends sawed off by contact with the wires of too small a cage.

Fearing that he might be lonely in my aviary with only rabbits, guineapigs, pet rats, and pigeons for company, I bought another robin called Dick. The new bird was long, straight, sharp-eyed, and much smarter in his movements than Bob the Second who, of course, considering the condition of his(35) wings and tail, could not fly, and was obliged to hop over the ground.

It was very amusing to see the two robins stare at each other. Both had probably been trapped young, for at that time the law against the keeping of wild birds in captivity was not enforced, and boys and men were perniciously active in their depredations among our beautiful wild beauties.

Bob the Second was very fond of stuffing himself, and he used to drive the pigeons from the most promising window ledges and partake freely of the food scattered about.

Poor Dick ran about the ground looking for worms, and not finding many, got desperate and flew up to the window ledge.

Bob lowered his head and flew at him with open bill. Dick snapped at him, hopped up to the food, and satisfied his hunger, Bob meanwhile standing at a little distance, a queer, pained thread of sound issuing from between his bill, “Peep, peep, peep!”

A robin is a most untidy bird while eating, and as often as Dick scattered a morsel of food outside the dish, Bob would spring forward and pick it up with a reproving air, as if he were saying, “What an extravagant fellow you are!”

Whenever a new bird enters an aviary, he has to find his place—he is just like a new-comer in a community of human beings. Bob, being alone, was in the lead when Dick came. Dick, having the stronger bird mind, promptly dethroned him. They were(36) very amusing birds. Indeed, I find something clownish and comical about all robins kept in captivity.

The wild bird seems to be more businesslike. The partly domesticated bird, having no anxiety about his food supply, indulges in all sorts of pranks. He is curious and fond of investigation, and runs swiftly at a new object, and as swiftly away from it, if it seems formidable to him.

The arrival of new birds in the aviary always greatly excited Bob, and he hopped about, chirping, strutting, raising his head feathers, and sometimes acting silly with his food, just like a foolish child trying to “show off” before strangers.

When I introduced a purple gallinule to him, Bob flew up into the air, and uttered a shriek of despair. He feared the gallinule, and hated the first Brazil cardinal I possessed, and was always sparring with him. One day I put a second cardinal into the aviary. Bob thought it was his old enemy, and ran full tilt at him. His face of ludicrous dismay as he discovered his mistake and turned away, was too much for me, and I burst out laughing at him. I don’t think he minded being made fun of. He flirted his tail and hopped away.

At one time Bob made up his mind that he would not eat crushed hemp-seed unless I mixed it with bread and milk, and he would throw it all out of his dish unless I made it in the way he liked.

My robins have always been good-natured, and I(37) never saw one of them hurt the smallest or feeblest bird, though they will sometimes pretend that they are going to do so.

When Bob took a sun-bath, any member of the family who happened to be near him would always be convulsed with laughter. He would stretch his legs far apart, stick out his ragged plumage, elevate his head feathers till he looked as if he had a bonnet on, and then half shut his eyes with the most ludicrous expression of robin bliss.

All birds look more or less absurd when taking sun-baths. They seem to have the power to make each feather stand out from its neighbor. I suppose this is done in order that the sun may get to every part of the skin.

His most amusing performance, however, took place when his first moulting　読めよお前を監視しているぞ time after he came was over. One by one his old, mutilated feathers dropped out, and finally new ones took their places. On a memorable day Bob discovered that he had a real tail with a white feather on each side of it, and a pair of good, serviceable wings. He gave a joyful cry, shook his tail as if he would uproot it, then spread his wings and lifted himself in the air. Hopping time was over. He was now a real bird, and he flew from one end of the aviary to the other with an unmistakable expression of robin ecstasy.

Most unfortunately, I had not a chance to study poor Dick’s character as fully as Bob’s, for I only had him a short time. Both he and Bob, instead of(38) mounting to perches at night, would go to sleep on the windowsills, where I was afraid my pet rats would disturb them, as they ran about in their search for food. Therefore, I went into the aviary every evening, and lifted them up to a comfortable place for the night, near the hot-water pipes. I would not put robins in a warm place now. They are hardy birds, and if given a sufficient quantity of nourishing food do not need a warm sleeping-place. If we only had a better food supply I believe we would have many more wild birds with us in winter in the Northern States and Canada than we have now.

Late one evening I went into the aviary to put my robins to bed. I could only find Bob—Dick was nowhere to be seen. My father and mother joined me in the search, and finally we found his poor, lifeless body near the entrance to the rats’ underground nest. His head had been eaten—poor, intelligent Dick; and in gazing at him, and at the abundance of food in the aviary, the fate of the rats was sealed.

I fed my birds hard-boiled egg mashed with bread crumbs, crushed hemp-seed, scalded cornmeal, bread and milk, prepared mockingbird food, soaked ant eggs, all kinds of mush or “porridge,” as we say in Canada, chopped beef, potato and gravy, vegetables cooked and raw, seeds and fruit, an almost incredible amount of green stuff, and many other things—and yet the rats had found it necessary to commit a murder.

(39)

Well, they must leave the aviary, and they did, and for a time Bob reigned alone. I did try to bring up a number of young robins given to me by children who rescued them from cats, or who found them on the ground unable to fly, but for a long time I had very hard luck with them.

Either the birds were diseased or I did not feed them properly. I have a fancy that I half starved them. Bird fanciers whom I consulted told me to be sure and not stuff my robins, for they were greedy birds. As long as I took their advice my young robins died. When I went to my canaries for advice I saw that the parents watched the tiny heads folded like flowers too heavy for their stalks, over the little warm bodies in the nests.

The instant a head was raised the mother or father put a mouthful of warm egg-food in it. The little ones got all they would eat—indeed, the father, with food dripping from his mouth, would coax his nestlings to take just one beakful more. I smiled broadly and began to give my robins all the worms they wanted, and then they lived.

The bringing up of young birds is intensely interesting. I found that one reason why early summer is the favorite time for nest-making is because one has the short nights then. Parents can feed their young quite late in the evening and be up by early daylight to fill the little crops again. Robins are birds that like to sit up late, and are always the last to go to bed in the aviary.

(40)

I solved the difficulty of rising at daylight to feed any young birds I was bringing up by giving them a stuffing at eleven o’clock at night. Then I did not have to rise till nearly eight.

This, of course, was for healthy birds. If I had a sick guineapig, rabbit, or bird, I never hesitated to get up many times during the night, for I have a theory that men and women who cannot or will not undertake the moral responsibility of bringing up children, should at least assist in the rearing of some created thing, if it is only a bird. Otherwise they become egotistical and absorbed in self.

Permalink | 記事への反応(0) | 00:36

ツイートシェア

■

Betsy and Solomon lived happily through that winter and spring, and before summer came we had made up our minds to return to the East. What should we do with the owls? They would be a great deal of trouble to some one. They required an immense amount of petting, and a frequent supply of perfectly fresh meat. No matter how busy we were, one of us had to go to the butcher every other day.

We began to inquire among our friends who would like a nice, affectionate pair of owls? There seemed no great eagerness on the part of any one to(23) take the pets we so much valued. Plans for their future worried me so much that at last I said to my sister, “We will take them East with us.”

The owls, who were to take so long a journey, became objects of interest to our friends, and at a farewell tea given to us, a smartly dressed young man vowed that he must take leave of Solomon and Betsy. Calling for a broom, he slowly passed it to and fro over the carpet before them, while they sat looking at him with lifted ear tufts that betrayed great interest in his movements.

We trembled a little in view of our past moving experiences, but we were devoted to the little creatures and, when the time came, we cheerfully boarded the overland train at Oakland.

We had with us Betsy and Solomon in their large cage, and in a little cage a pair of strawberry finches, so called because their breasts are dotted like a strawberry. A friend had requested us to bring them East for her. We had also a dog—not Teddy, that had only been lent to us; but our own Irish setter Nita, one of the most lovable and interesting animals that I have ever owned.

The chipmunk was no longer with us. He had not seemed happy in the aviary—indeed, he lay down in it and threw me a cunning look, as if to say, “I will die if you don’t let me out of this.” So I gave him the freedom of the house. That pleased him, and for a few days he was very diligent in assisting us with our housekeeping by picking(24) all the crumbs off the floors and eating them. Then he disappeared, and I hope was happy ever after among the superb oak trees of the university grounds close to us.

When we started for the East, the pets, of course, had to go into the baggage car, and I must say here for the benefit of those persons who wish to travel with animals and birds, that there is good accommodation for them on overland trains. Sometimes we bought tickets for them, sometimes they had to go in an express car, sometimes we tipped the baggagemasters, but the sums spent were not exorbitant, and we found everywhere provision made for pets. You cannot take them in your rooms in hotels, but there is a place for them somewhere, and they will be brought to you whenever you wish to see them, or to give them exercise. We were on several different railway lines, and visited eight different cities, and the dog and birds, upon arriving in eastern Canada, seemed none the worse for their trip.

However, I would not by any means encourage the transportation of animals. Indeed, my feelings on the subject, since I understand the horrors animals and birds endure while being whirled from one place to another, are rather too strong for utterance. I would only say that in a case like mine, where separation between an owner and pets would mean unhappiness, it is better for both to endure a few days or weeks of travel. Then the case of animals(25) and birds traveling with some one who sees and encourages them every day is different from the case of unfortunate creatures sent off alone.

Our Nita was taken out of the car at every station where it was possible to exercise her, and one of us would run into restaurants along the route to obtain fresh meat for the owls. Their cage was closely covered, but whenever they heard us coming they hooted, and as no one seemed to guess what they were, they created a great deal of interest. My sister and I were amused one evening in Salt Lake City to see a man bending over the cage with an air of perplexity.

“They must be pollies,” he said at last, and yet his face showed that he did not think those were parrot noises issuing from within.

I remember one evening on arriving in Albany, New York, causing slight consternation in the hotel by a demand for raw meat. We hastened to explain that we did not want it for ourselves, and finally obtained what we wished.

As soon as we arrived home in Halifax, Nova Scotia, the owls were put downstairs in a nice, dry basement. They soon found their way upstairs, where the whole family was prepared to welcome them on account of their pretty ways and their love for caresses.

Strange to say, they took a liking to my father, who did not notice them particularly, and a mischievous dislike to my mother, who was disposed to(26) pet them. They used to fly on her head whenever they saw her. Their little claws were sharp and unpleasant to her scalp. We could not imagine why they selected her head unless it was that her gray hair attracted them. However, we had a French Acadian maid called Lizzie, whose hair was jet black, and they disliked her even more than they did my mother.

Lizzie, to get to her storeroom, had to cross the furnace-room where the owls usually were, and she soon began to complain bitterly of them.

“Dey watch me,” she said indignantly, “dey fly on my head, dey scratch me, an’ pull out my hairpins, an’ make my head sore.”

“Why don’t you push them off, Lizzie?” I asked, “they are only tiny things.”

“Dey won’t go—dey hold on an’ beat me,” she replied, and soon the poor girl had to arm herself with a switch when she went near them.

Lizzie was a descendant of the veritable Acadians mentioned in Longfellow’s “Evangeline,” of whom there are several thousand in Nova Scotia. My mother was attached to her, and at last she said, “I will not have Lizzie worried. Bring the owls up in my bathroom.”

There they seemed perfectly happy, sitting watching the sparrows from the window and teasing my long-suffering mother, who was obliged to give up using gas in this bathroom, for very often the owls put it out by flying at it.

(27)

One never heard them coming. I did not before this realize how noiseless the flight of an owl is. One did not dream they were near till there was a breath of air fanning one’s cheek. After we gave up the gas, for fear they would burn themselves, we decided to use a candle. It was absolutely necessary to have an unshaded light, for they would perch on any globe shading a flame, and would burn their feet.

The candle was more fun for them than the gas, for it had a smaller flame, and was more easily extinguished, and usually on entering the room, away would go the light, and we would hear in the corner a laughing voice, saying “Too, who, who, who, who!”

The best joke of all for the owls was to put out the candle when one was taking a bath, and I must say I heard considerable grumbling from the family on the subject. It seemed impossible to shade the light from them, and to find one’s self in the dark in the midst of a good splash, to have to emerge from the tub, dripping and cross, and search for matches, was certainly not calculated to add to one’s affection for Solomon and Betsy. However, they were members of the family, and as George Eliot says, “The members of your family are like the nose on your face—you have got to put up with it, seeing you can’t get rid of it.”

Alas! the time soon came when we had to lament the death of one of our troublesome but beloved pets.

Betsy one day partook heartily of a raw fish head,(28) and in spite of remedies applied, sickened rapidly and sank into a dying condition.

I was surprised to find what a hold the little thing had taken on my affection. When her soft, gray body became cold, I held her in my hand close to the fire and, with tears in my eyes, wished for a miracle to restore her to health.

She lay quietly until just before she died. Then she opened her eyes and I called to the other members of the family to come and see their strange expression. They became luminous and beautiful, and dilated in a peculiar way. We hear of the eyes of dying persons lighting up wonderfully, and this strange illumination of little Betsy’s eyes reminded me of such cases.

Even after death she lay with those wide-open eyes, and feeling that I had lost a friend, I put down her little dead body. It was impossible for me to conceal my emotion, and my mother, who had quite forgotten Betsy’s hostility to her, generously took the little feathered creature to a taxidermist.

I may say that Betsy was the first and last bird I shall ever have stuffed. I dare say the man did the work as well as it could be done, but I gazed in dismay at my Betsy when she came home. That stiff little creature sitting on a stick, with glazed eyes and motionless body, could not be the pretty little bird whose every motion was grace. Ever since the day of Betsy’s death, I can feel no admiration for a dead bird. Indeed, I turn sometimes with a shudder(29) from the agonized postures, the horrible eyes of birds in my sister women’s hats—and yet I used to wear them myself. My present conviction shows what education will do. If you like and study live birds, you won’t want to wear dead ones.

After Betsy’s death Solomon seemed so lonely that I resolved to buy him a companion. I chose a robin, and bought him for two dollars from a woman who kept a small shop. A naturalist friend warned me that I would have trouble, but I said remonstratingly, “My owl is not like other owls. He has been brought up like a baby. He does not know that his ancestors killed little birds.”

Alas! When my robin had got beautifully tame, when he would hop about after me, and put his pretty head on one side while I dug in the earth for worms for him, when he was apparently on the best of terms with Sollie, I came home one day to a dreadful discovery. Sollie was flying about with the robin’s body firmly clutched in one claw. He had killed and partly eaten him. I caught him, took the robin away from him, and upbraided him severely.

“Too, who, who, who who,” he said—apologetically, it seemed to me, “instinct was too strong for me. I got tired of playing with him, and thought I would see what he tasted like.”

I could not say too much to him. What about the innocent lambs and calves, of which Sollie’s owners had partaken?

(30)

I had a fine large place in the basement for keeping pets, with an earth floor, and a number of windows, and I did not propose to have Sollie murder all the birds I might acquire. So, one end of this room was wired off for him. He had a window in this cage overlooking the garden, and it was large enough for me to go in and walk about, while talking to him. He seemed happy enough there, and while gazing into the garden or watching the rabbits, guineapigs, and other pets in the large part of the room, often indulged in long, contented spells of cooing—not hooting.

In 1902 I was obliged to leave him for a six months’ trip to Europe. He was much petted by my sister, and I think spent most of his time upstairs with the family. When I returned home I brought, among other birds, a handsome Brazil cardinal. I stood admiring him as he stepped out of his traveling cage and flew around the aviary. Unfortunately, instead of choosing a perch, he flattened himself against the wire netting in Sollie’s corner.

I was looking right at him and the owl, and I never saw anything but lightning equal the celerity of Sollie’s flight, as he precipitated himself against the netting and caught at my cardinal’s showy red crest. The cardinal screamed like a baby, and I ran to release him, marveling that the owl could so insinuate his little claws through the fine mesh of the wire. However, he could do it, and he gripped the struggling cardinal by the long, hair-like(31) topknot, until I uncurled the wicked little claws. A bunch of red feathers fell to the ground, and the dismayed cardinal flew into a corner.

“Sollie,” I said, going into his cage and taking him in my hand, “how could you be so cruel to that new bird?”

“Oh, coo, coo, coo, coo,” he replied in a delightfully soft little voice, and gently resting his naughty little beak against my face. “You had better come upstairs,” I said, “I am afraid to leave you down here with that poor cardinal. You will be catching him again.”

He cooed once more. This just suited him, and he spent the rest of his life in regions above. I knew that he would probably not live as long in captivity as he would have done if his lot had been cast in the California foothills. His life was too unnatural. In their native state, owls eat their prey whole, and after a time disgorge pellets of bones, feathers, hairs, and scales, the remnants of food that cannot be digested.

My owls, on account of their upbringing, wanted their food cleaned for them. Betsy, one day, after much persuasion, swallowed a mouse to oblige me, but she was such a dismal picture as she sat for a long time with the tail hanging out of her beak that I never offered her another.

I tried to keep Solomon in condition by giving him, or forcing him to take, foreign substances, but my plan only worked for a time.

(32)

I always dreaded the inevitable, and one winter day in 1903 I looked sharply at him, as he called to me when I entered the house after being away for a few hours. “That bird is ill!” I said.

No other member of the family saw any change in him, but when one keeps birds and becomes familiar with the appearance of each one, they all have different facial and bodily expressions, and one becomes extremely susceptible to the slightest change. As I examined Sollie, my heart sank within me, and I began to inquire what he had been eating. He had partaken freely of boiled egg, meat, and charcoal. I gave him a dose of olive oil, and I must say that the best bird or beast to take medicine is an owl. Neither he nor Betsy ever objected in the l

Permalink | 記事への反応(0) | 00:35

ツイートシェア

■anond:20240611003300

peace and quietness of the night after the turmoil of the day, were hooting persistently and melodiously.

“The landlady and the boarders,” gasped my sister; “they will hear and wake up. Can’t you stop the little wretches?”

I sprang out of bed, and addressed a solemn remonstrance to Solomon and Betsy. They were exceedingly glad to see me, and distending their little throats, continued to hoot, their clear, sweet young voices carrying only too well on the still Californian night air.

Then the chipmunk woke up and began to slide up and down an inclined piece of wood in his part of the cage. We were in despair. We could not sleep, until I had the happy thought of giving the owls a bath. I seized Betsy, held her in a basin of water, and wet her feathers considerably. Then I served Solomon in the same way, and for the rest of the night the tiny little things occupied themselves in smoothing their wet plumage. The chipmunk quieted down, and we had peace.

(19)

When we got into the cottage I had a carpenter build a small aviary at the back of it, with a box for rainy weather. The nights were not too cold for my hardy birds. Indeed, they were not too cold for many semi-tropical ones. I found a bird fancier not far from me, who had built a good-sized, open-air aviary, where he kept canaries and foreign finches all the year round, with only a partly open, glass shelter for the birds to use when it rained.

My sparrowhawk did not seem unhappy in my aviary, but he never had the contented, comfortable expression that the owls had. His apathy was pathetic, and the expression of his beautiful, cruel eyes was an unsatisfied one. In time, I should have allowed him to go, but suddenly he fell ill. I think I overfed him, for I got him into the habit of taking a late supper, always leaning out the window and handing him a piece of meat on the end of a stick before I went to bed.

I brought him into the warm kitchen, where he moped about for a few days. Just before he died he came hopping toward the parlor, where I sat entertaining a friend. I often took him in there on the broad windowsill and talked to him as I sat sewing.

He stood in the doorway, gave me a peculiar look, as if to say, “I would come in if you were alone,” hopped back to the kitchen, and in a short time was no more.

My sister and I mourned sincerely for our pretty bird, and I had the uncomfortable feeling that I(20) might have done better if I had left him in his own habitat—but then he might have starved to death if his parents had not found him. Would death by starvation have been any more painful than his death with me? Possibly some larger creature might have killed him swiftly and mercifully—it was a puzzling case, and I resolved to give up worrying about it. I had done what I considered was best, and I tried to console myself for his death in petting the dear little owls that had become so tame that they called to my sister and me whenever they saw us, and loved to have us take them in our hands and caress them.

About them I had no misgivings. They would certainly have died if I had not adopted them, and there was no question about their happiness. They were satisfied with a state of captivity. They had so far lost one of their owl habits, for they kept awake nearly all day, and slept nearly all night—and they could see quite well in the most brilliant Californian sunlight, and that is pretty brilliant. A cat or a dog many yards distant would cause them to raise excitedly the queer little ear tufts that play so prominent a part in the facial expression of some owls, and they would crack their beaks together and hiss angrily if the enemy came too near.

Cats and dogs frightened them, and a broom merely excited them. When strangers wanted to see the elevation of these tufts, a broom, swiftly passed over the floor, would cause Solomon and(21) Betsy to become very wide awake, with feather tufts straight up in the air. I never saw them abjectly and horribly frightened but once. A lady had brought her handsome parrot into the room where the owls were. The poor little mites put up their ear tufts, swayed to and fro on their perch, and instead of packing their feathers and becoming thin and elongated in appearance, as they did for cats and dogs, they puffed themselves out, snapped their beaks, and uttered the loudest hissing noise I had ever heard from them.

From their extremity of fear I concluded that their instinct told them this danger was so imminent that they must make themselves as formidable as possible.

The parrot was of course quickly removed, and I took care that they should never again see another one.

Permalink | 記事への反応(0) | 00:33

ツイートシェア

■anond:20240605074420

Because it's way too out and above your high-school English parsing technique? Why should *I* help stop your fantasy rip itself apart? That makes little sense if it does at all.

Permalink | 記事への反応(0) | 07:47

ツイートシェア

■anond:20240605073730

かっこでくくった部分で機械翻訳ってわかるんだよなあｗ I'm giving you a 「favor bro.」 It's not like you know data structures and algorithms.

「favor bro.」でなんで機械翻訳って"わかっ"ってしまったの？

Permalink | 記事への反応(2) | 07:41

ツイートシェア

■anond:20240605073547

かっこでくくった部分で機械翻訳ってわかるんだよなあｗ

I'm giving you a 「favor bro.」 It's not like you know data structures and algorithms.

Permalink | 記事への反応(3) | 07:37

ツイートシェア

■anond:20240605073352

I'm giving you a favor bro. It's not like you know data structures and algorithms.

Permalink | 記事への反応(5) | 07:35

ツイートシェア

■

無限長パイプ＝理想的なホーン

＞But a suitably damped, long pipe (plane wave tube) closely approximates the resistive load impedance of an infinite pipe across a wide band of frequencies, and is very valuable for testing compression drivers12, 13. It presents a constant frequency independent load, and as such acts like the perfect horn.

https://www.grc.com/acoustics/an-introduction-to-horn-theory.pdf

http://blog.livedoor.jp/machida_offkai/74/74_8_hori.pdf

→十分にダンプされた長いパイプは周波数によらず一定の音響抵抗を示し、「完璧なホーン」のように振る舞う

パイプの音響インピーダンスはZ=ρc/Sであり、断面積が小さいほど抵抗強い

ρc=空気の固有音響インピーダンス

↑plane wave tubeと呼ばれるホーンドライバーの測定に使われるパイプはこの原理を利用している

https://www.ebay.com.au/itm/126093285497

→ホーンドライバーの測定資料にはパイプに接続した場合とホーンに接続した場合の二種類が掲載されていることが多い

→パイプの場合はホーンと違ってかなり低域まで平坦になっていて、確かに全域にわたってロードが掛かっていることがわかる

＞“The termination is 2 m (6,56 ft) long and is made of reticulated polyurethane foam having 80 pores per inch. It is tapered throughout its length and is treated to be age and fire resistant.

→長さは2mのようだが、たった２ｍでこれだけ共鳴のない測定ができるものか？口径が小さいからか？

http://www.angelofarina.it/Public/Standing-Wave/aes-01id-2012-f.pdf

→２インチのホーンドライバーに２インチと１インチのパイプを接続すると、１インチのほうがf特が平坦になる

→パイプを細くすることはスロートを絞るのと同じ効果

ホーンは機械的な逆起電力に相当？

HornrespにてFe83NVを無限長のパイプに接続した場合のシミュレーションを行った

音響インピーダンスは一定となり、f0のインピーダンスは丸くなり制動されているようだ

パイプの周波数特性については、f0を中心としてかまぼこのように盛り上がる

パイプ口径を小さくするとf0のインピーダンスはより丸くなり、周波数特性も平坦化する

振動板の実効質量を下げるとf0が上がるが、それに従ってかまぼこも移動する

（１００cmのパイプの場合、450Hzあたりを中心としたかまぼことなる。さらに長くして9999cmにしても変わらない。なぜ？パイプ口径を小さくするとかまぼこは平坦化せず単により高い周波数に移動する。電磁力や機械抵抗を増やしても無限長のときのような変化はない。シミュレーションに問題あり？）

無限長パイプは全域にわたってロードが掛かるはずなのに、なぜf0の周りだけ盛り上がるのか？

というかホーンはどれも基本的にf0を中心としてかまぼこ特性になるのが基本だが、なぜ？

http://sirasaka.seesaa.net/article/ltspice-bh-afaf.html

→このサイトによると、かまぼこの右側の肩の部分では慣性制御となり、この帯域ではホーンロードがかかっていないようだ

どうやらホーンはf0付近の激しい振動に反応する傾向がある？

そう考えると、逆起電力も同じようにf0に反応して大きなインピーダンスの山を作る

つまり、ホーンは機械的な逆起電力に相当する？

逆起電力自体は全域にわたって生じるが、振動板はf0で特に激しく振動するためその付近で強く発生する

→パイプによるロードも同じく（理想的には）全域にわたって生じるが、振動板はf0で特に激しく振動するためその付近で強く発生する

磁力を強くすると逆起電力も強くなり、インピーダンスカーブは高く、裾の広い形状となる

周波数特性はそれに従いなだらかなものとなり、広い範囲で抵抗制御となる

→パイプ口径を小さくすると音響インピーダンスも強くなり、周波数特性はなだらかになり、広い範囲で抵抗制御となる

つまり、逆起電力もパイプのロードも全域に掛かっている

しかし、振動板の共振・慣性に打ち勝つだけの抵抗を発生させるとなると、それ相応のエネルギーを貰う必要があるということではないか

もちろん例えば超伝導スピーカーであれば全域抵抗制御になるだけの電磁力をそれ単体で得られるだろうが、一般には無理だ

しかしスピーカーから与えられるエネルギーが十分にあれば、それに対して反応することで振動板に十分な制動をかけることができる、ということではないか

だから、Qの大きい、狭い範囲で強く共振するf0の場合、エネルギーは狭い帯域にあるのでパイプのロードもその狭い範囲に限定して強く効く

そして強く効いた結果、その範囲では抵抗制御となるが、そこから外れるとすぐに慣性の影響が支配的になる

一方でQの小さい、広い範囲で弱く共振するf0の場合、エネルギーは広い帯域に分散されているので、パイプのロードも広い範囲でゆったりと効く

その結果広い範囲で音圧が増幅され、フラットな周波数特性となる

よって、逆起電力もホーンロードもユニットのエネルギーに寄生する形で制動をかけるものであり、ユニットからのエネルギーが大きくない場合は十分に反応できないのではないか

したがってエネルギーの大きいf0には反応できるが、慣性制御の領域では振幅が少ないため十分に反応できない。結果としてf0を中心としたかまぼこ特性ができあがるのではないか

もちろんパイプ口径（ホーンの場合はスロート口径）を小さくして音響インピーダンスを増やしてやれば質量に打ち勝つだけの抵抗（空気制動）を与えられる（逆起電力の場合は超伝導などの超強力な磁力でほんの少しの振幅にも大きく反応する逆起電力を生じさせればいいが現実的ではない）

http://www.timedomain.co.jp/tech/hifi03/hifi03.html

→このサイトの第6図、第7図がわかりやすい

→電磁制動は周波数によらず一定（振幅一定の場合）

→しかしf0では強烈に振幅するので、結果として電磁制動が増加

→f0以降では振幅が収まるため、電磁制動減少

→そして質量は周波数に比例して増加するため、中高域では質量が支配的に（慣性制御）

パイプのロードも周波数によらず一定（振幅一定の場合）

→しかしf0では強烈に振幅するので、結果としてロードが増加

→f0以降では振幅が収まるため、ロード減少

→そして質量は周波数に比例して増加するため、中高域では質量が支配的に（慣性制御）

Permalink | 記事への反応(1) | 19:32

ツイートシェア

■How do I speak to someone on Qatar Airways??#Call~Now Guide2024

[QATAR~Airways]™ How do I speak to someone on Qatar Airways??#Call~Now

Phone assistance: One of the quickest ways to speak with a Qatar 𝔸𝕚𝕣𝕨𝕒𝕪𝕤 support agent is by calling +11||833||563||0205. or +11||833||563||0205. The phone number for Qatar 𝔸𝕚𝕣𝕨𝕒𝕪𝕤 assistance is listed on their official website. Simply call the number and follow the prompts to speak with a person for customer service

For fast assistance, call their customer service hotline at +11||833||563||0205. or +11||833||563||0205. This ensures direct communication with a live representative. 𝓠𝓪𝓽𝓪𝓻 𝗔𝗶𝗿𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗲's phone number to call and talk with a live 𝗿𝗲𝗽𝗿𝗲𝘀𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗮𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲 fast is +11||833||563||0205. or +11||833||563||0205.

To speak to someone at Qatar, simply dial +11||833||563||0205. or +11||833||563||0205 for assistance with bookings and inquiries. You can also reach out via email, chat, or social media for help. Qatar 𝔸𝕚𝕣𝕨𝕒𝕪𝕤 is committed to making it easy for customers to access the support they need.

How can I speak to Qatar Airlines?

The most convenient and fastest way to speak to someone at Qatar 𝔸𝕚𝕣𝕝𝕚𝕟𝕖𝕤 is by calling their customer service number at +11||833||563||0205. or +11||833||563||0205 {Qatar 𝔸𝕚𝕣𝕨𝕒𝕪𝕤}. Alternatively, you can start a chat conversation online for assistance.

How do I talk to a Qatar representative fast?

Talk to someone on Qatar Airline smoothly, give their dedicated support line a ring at +11||833||563||0205. or +11||833||563||0205. Take your time and listen carefully to the automated prompts, then share all the required information to help them solve your problem quickly. Remember to speak clearly and politely to make sure you have a good experience.

How can I communicate with Qatar?

𝕋𝕠 ℂ𝕠𝕟𝕟𝕖𝕔𝕥 with Qatar 𝔸𝕚𝕣𝕝𝕚𝕟𝕖𝕤, explore multiple channels like their website, mobile app, or customer service hotline at +11||833||563||0205. or +11||833||563||0205. Booking 𝖋𝖑𝖎𝖌𝖍𝖙𝖘, managing reservations, and accessing travel information are seamless online.

Qatar , as a leading online travel agency, understands this need and offers various support channels to assist its customers. To talk to a Person at Qatar for live support, you have options. You can call their Qatar customer service hotline at " +11||833||563||0205. or +11||833||563||0205 (𝕼𝖚𝖎𝖈𝖐 𝕮𝖔𝖓𝖓𝖊𝖈𝖙)", engage in live chat on their website, or use email support.

How can I communicate with Qatar?

Talk on Qatar Customer Service for live support, You can call their Qatar customer service 24/7 Hotline Number USA:- +11||833||563||0205. or +11||833||563||0205 (Live Person) or +11||833||563||0205. or +11||833||563||0205 (𝕼𝖚𝖎𝖈𝖐 𝕮𝖔𝖓𝖓𝖊𝖈𝖙), engage in a live chat on their website, or use email support. Speaking to a person at Qatar is simpler than you might think. Whether you're facing issues with your booking, need to make changes to your travel plans, or have specific inquiries, getting in touch with a live representative can significantly ease your concerns. This section provides a detailed, step-by-step guide on how to reach out to Qatar 's customer service via phone +11||833||563||0205. or +11||833||563||0205 (Live agent), including the best times to call to minimize your waiting period.

How can I communicate with Qatar?

Talk to someone on Qatar 𝔸𝕚𝕣𝕝𝕚𝕟𝕖𝕤, you have a few options. You can give them a call at their customer service hotline, which is +11||833||563||0205. or +11||833||563||0205 (𝓛𝓲𝓿𝓮 𝓟𝓮𝓻𝓼𝓸𝓷). Alternatively, you can chat with them live on their website or utilize their email support.

How can I communicate with Qatar?

To talk to a Person at Qatar for live support, you have options. You can call their Qatar Customer Service Hotline AT: +11||833||563||0205. or +11||833||563||0205(𝕼𝖚𝖎𝖈𝖐 𝕮𝖔𝖓𝖓𝖊𝖈𝖙). The specific number can vary by country, so it's best to visit Qatar 's website or check your booking confirmation for the most accurate contact information. Qatar offers different phone numbers for different services and regions.