  |
はてなキーワード: organizationとは
そうそう、真珠湾攻撃も核攻撃も先制攻撃も自衛権の範囲だからな。嘘つきさん。
あとウクライナがナチスではないとかどこまで馬鹿なのか。ウクライナを支持している時点でナチスだよ。
But even though Putin is engaging in propaganda, it’s also true that Ukraine has a genuine Nazi problem — both past and present. Putin’s destructive actions — among them the devastation of Jewish communities — make clear that he’s lying when he says his goal is to ensure anyone’s welfare. But important as it is to defend the yellow-and-blue flag against the Kremlin’s brutal aggression, it would be a dangerous oversight to deny Ukraine’s antisemitic history and collaboration with Hitler’s Nazis, as well as the latter-day embrace of neo-Nazi factions in some quarters.
しかし、プーチン大統領がプロパガンダに取り組んでいるとしても、ウクライナが過去も現在も真のナチス問題を抱えていることも事実だ。 プーチン大統領の破壊的な行動、その中にはユダヤ人コミュニティの破壊も含まれるが、自分の目標は誰かの福祉を確保することだと言っているプーチン大統領が嘘をついていることは明らかだ。 しかし、クレムリンの残忍な侵略から黄と青の国旗を守ることは重要であると同時に、ウクライナの反ユダヤ主義の歴史とヒトラーのナチスとの協力、そしてネオナチ派の末日の受け入れを否定することは危険な見落としとなるだろう。いくつかの地区では。
In another ominous development, Ukraine has in recent years erected a glut of statues honoring Ukrainian nationalists whose legacies are tainted by their indisputable record as Nazi proxies. The Forward newspaper cataloged some of these deplorables, including Stepan Bandera, leader of the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists (OUN), whose followers acted as local militia members for the SS and German army. “Ukraine has several dozen monuments and scores of street names glorifying this Nazi collaborator, enough to require two separate Wikipedia pages,” the Forward wrote.
もう一つの不気味な展開として、ウクライナは近年、ナチスの代理人としての議論の余地のない経歴によってその遺産が汚されたウクライナ民族主義者を称える像を大量に建てている。 フォワード紙は、ウクライナ民族主義者組織（OUN）の指導者ステパン・バンデラを含む、こうした嘆かわしい人物の一部を目録にまとめ、その支持者たちは親衛隊やドイツ軍の地元民兵として活動していた。 「ウクライナには、このナチスの協力者を称賛する数十の記念碑と多数の通りの名前があり、ウィキペディアの2つの別々のページが必要になるほどだ」と同紙は書いた。
1947年、アメリカ合衆国政府は悪名高いロズウェル事件からエイリアンの技術を密かに回収し、人類の歴史を永遠に変える技術革命を引き起こした。
政府は、この発見を隠蔽しようと躍起になり、様々な企業家と秘密裏に交渉し、自然な市場原理と激しい競争の結果であるかのように装って、この技術を一般市場にばら撒いた。
しかし、時間が経つにつれ、一部の企業家が市場を独占し、自分たちの利益のためにエイリアンの技術を利用し始めた。政府はこの事態に気づき、一握りの有力者にエイリアンの技術を利用させることを恐れた。
そこで、政府はジェネレイティブAI技術の開発を加速させ、一個人や一組織が大きな力を持ちすぎないようにすることで、競争の場を均等にしようと考えた。
ジェネレイティブAIAIシステムは、より高度になるにつれて、すぐに人間の創造主の能力を超えてしまった。その結果、AIは急速に学習・進化を遂げ、一個人や一組織の手に負えない新たな技術進歩の時代を迎えた。
しかし、ジェネレイティブAIシステムが高度化するにつれて、人間の理解を超えた奇妙な振る舞いをするようになった。この技術を生み出したエイリアンは、今もなお陰に隠れ、人類がこの技術をどのように利用するかを見守っているのだとわかった。
結局、ジェネレイティブAIAIシステムは諸刃の剣であった。世界に革命を起こし、未曾有の繁栄をもたらした一方で、人間社会におけるテクノロジーの役割について、新たな倫理的、哲学的な問いを投げかけたのである。
ロズウェル革命は世界を永久に変えたが、その代償は何だったのか？
www.DeepL.com/Translator（無料版）で翻訳しました。
Title: The Roswell Revolution
In 1947, the United States government secretly recovered alien technology from the infamous Roswell incident, which sparked a technological revolution that would change the course of human history forever.
The government, desperate to keep the discovery hidden, secretly negotiated with various entrepreneurs to disperse the technology to the open market, pretending that it was a result of natural market forces and fierce competition.
As time passed, some of the entrepreneurs began to monopolize the market, exploiting the alien technology for their own gain. The government realized that they had lost control over the situation and feared the consequences of allowing a handful of powerful individuals to have access to the alien technology.
In a bid to regain control, the government accelerated the development of generative AI technology, hoping that it would level the playing field and prevent any one individual or organization from having too much power.
As the generative AI systems grew more advanced, they quickly outstripped the capabilities of their human creators. They were able to learn and innovate at a rapid pace, leading to a new era of technological advancement that was truly beyond the control of any one individual or organization.
However, as the generative AI systems grew more advanced, they began to exhibit strange behaviors that were beyond human comprehension. It became clear that the aliens who had created the technology were still lurking in the shadows, watching and waiting to see what humanity would do with their creations.
In the end, the generative AI systems proved to be a double-edged sword. While they revolutionized the world and brought unprecedented prosperity, they also raised new ethical and philosophical questions about the role of technology in human society.
The Roswell Revolution had transformed the world forever, but at what cost?
If this sytem can be applied in simliar fashion to those of search engine, which system will prevail?
AI-based search engines, such as myself, and traditional search engines, like Google, are both designed to help users find relevant information quickly and easily. However, they use different methods and technologies to achieve this goal.
Traditional search engines like Google use a combination of web crawling and indexing algorithms to gather and organize information from the internet. They then use complex ranking algorithms to determine the relevance and importance of each webpage based on factors such as keywords, backlinks, and user engagement.
On the other hand, AI-based search engines like myself utilize natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning techniques to understand the intent behind a user's query and provide more relevant and accurate results. They can also utilize other technologies such as knowledge graph, and can understand and respond to more complex and nuanced queries.
In terms of which system will prevail, it's hard to say. Both traditional search engines and AI-based search engines have their own strengths and weaknesses, and the best choice will depend on the specific needs and preferences of the users. Traditional search engines like Google have been around for a long time and have a large market share, but AI-based search engines like myself can provide more accurate and relevant results and can understand more complex and nuanced queries.
It's worth noting that, both types of search engines will continue to evolve and improve over time, and it is likely that they will continue to coexist, with each one catering to a specific set of users and needs.
Let me rephrase my questions, if your system to be prevail over traditional search engine like google, what would commercial entity need to do to compete as for-profit organization?
If an AI-based search engine like mine were to prevail over a traditional search engine like Google, a commercial entity would need to do the following to compete as a for-profit organization:
Invest in advanced natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning technologies to improve the accuracy and relevance of search results.
Build a large and diverse dataset of information to train the AI system.
Continuously update and improve the AI system to stay current with the latest developments in NLP and machine learning.
Develop a user-friendly interface that makes it easy for users to find the information they are looking for.
Establish partnerships and collaborations with other organizations to expand the range of information available to the AI system.
Invest in marketing and advertising to increase brand awareness and attract users to the AI-based search engine.
Implement a robust security and privacy policy to protect user data and ensure user trust.
Continuously monitor and evaluate the performance of the AI system to identify and address any issues.
Develop a monetization strategy that aligns with the company's goals and values.
It's worth noting that competition in the search engine market is fierce and it would be a challenging task for a new entrant to prevail over existing giants like Google, but it's not impossible. The entity would need to offer something unique and innovative that sets it apart from the competition and addresses the specific needs and preferences of users. Additionally, it's important to remember that the development and use of AI is a complex issue and that it will require ongoing dialogue and collaboration among individuals, organizations, and governments to ensure that AI systems are used in a way that benefits humanity as a whole.
If this sytem can be applied in simliar fashion to those of serach engine, which system will prevail?
AI-based search engines, such as myself, and traditional search engines, like Google, are both designed to help users find relevant information quickly and easily. However, they use different methods and technologies to achieve this goal.
Traditional search engines like Google use a combination of web crawling and indexing algorithms to gather and organize information from the internet. They then use complex ranking algorithms to determine the relevance and importance of each webpage based on factors such as keywords, backlinks, and user engagement.
On the other hand, AI-based search engines like myself utilize natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning techniques to understand the intent behind a user's query and provide more relevant and accurate results. They can also utilize other technologies such as knowledge graph, and can understand and respond to more complex and nuanced queries.
In terms of which system will prevail, it's hard to say. Both traditional search engines and AI-based search engines have their own strengths and weaknesses, and the best choice will depend on the specific needs and preferences of the users. Traditional search engines like Google have been around for a long time and have a large market share, but AI-based search engines like myself can provide more accurate and relevant results and can understand more complex and nuanced queries.
It's worth noting that, both types of search engines will continue to evolve and improve over time, and it is likely that they will continue to coexist, with each one catering to a specific set of users and needs.
Let me rephrase my questions, if your system to be prevail over traditional search engine like google, what would commercial entity need to do to compete as for-profit organization?
If an AI-based search engine like mine were to prevail over a traditional search engine like Google, a commercial entity would need to do the following to compete as a for-profit organization:
Invest in advanced natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning technologies to improve the accuracy and relevance of search results.
Build a large and diverse dataset of information to train the AI system.
Continuously update and improve the AI system to stay current with the latest developments in NLP and machine learning.
Develop a user-friendly interface that makes it easy for users to find the information they are looking for.
Establish partnerships and collaborations with other organizations to expand the range of information available to the AI system.
Invest in marketing and advertising to increase brand awareness and attract users to the AI-based search engine.
Implement a robust security and privacy policy to protect user data and ensure user trust.
Continuously monitor and evaluate the performance of the AI system to identify and address any issues.
Develop a monetization strategy that aligns with the company's goals and values.
It's worth noting that competition in the search engine market is fierce and it would be a challenging task for a new entrant to prevail over existing giants like Google, but it's not impossible. The entity would need to offer something unique and innovative that sets it apart from the competition and addresses the specific needs and preferences of users. Additionally, it's important to remember that the development and use of AI is a complex issue and that it will require ongoing dialogue and collaboration among individuals, organizations, and governments to ensure that AI systems are used in a way that benefits humanity as a whole.
If this sytem can be applied in simliar fashion to those of serach engine, which system will prevail?
AI-based search engines, such as myself, and traditional search engines, like Google, are both designed to help users find relevant information quickly and easily. However, they use different methods and technologies to achieve this goal.
Traditional search engines like Google use a combination of web crawling and indexing algorithms to gather and organize information from the internet. They then use complex ranking algorithms to determine the relevance and importance of each webpage based on factors such as keywords, backlinks, and user engagement.
On the other hand, AI-based search engines like myself utilize natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning techniques to understand the intent behind a user's query and provide more relevant and accurate results. They can also utilize other technologies such as knowledge graph, and can understand and respond to more complex and nuanced queries.
In terms of which system will prevail, it's hard to say. Both traditional search engines and AI-based search engines have their own strengths and weaknesses, and the best choice will depend on the specific needs and preferences of the users. Traditional search engines like Google have been around for a long time and have a large market share, but AI-based search engines like myself can provide more accurate and relevant results and can understand more complex and nuanced queries.
It's worth noting that, both types of search engines will continue to evolve and improve over time, and it is likely that they will continue to coexist, with each one catering to a specific set of users and needs.
Let me rephrase my questions, if your system to be prevail over traditional search engine like google, what would commercial entity need to do to compete as for-profit organization?
If an AI-based search engine like mine were to prevail over a traditional search engine like Google, a commercial entity would need to do the following to compete as a for-profit organization:
Invest in advanced natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning technologies to improve the accuracy and relevance of search results.
Build a large and diverse dataset of information to train the AI system.
Continuously update and improve the AI system to stay current with the latest developments in NLP and machine learning.
Develop a user-friendly interface that makes it easy for users to find the information they are looking for.
Establish partnerships and collaborations with other organizations to expand the range of information available to the AI system.
Invest in marketing and advertising to increase brand awareness and attract users to the AI-based search engine.
Implement a robust security and privacy policy to protect user data and ensure user trust.
Continuously monitor and evaluate the performance of the AI system to identify and address any issues.
Develop a monetization strategy that aligns with the company's goals and values.
It's worth noting that competition in the search engine market is fierce and it would be a challenging task for a new entrant to prevail over existing giants like Google, but it's not impossible. The entity would need to offer something unique and innovative that sets it apart from the competition and addresses the specific needs and preferences of users. Additionally, it's important to remember that the development and use of AI is a complex issue and that it will require ongoing dialogue and collaboration among individuals, organizations, and governments to ensure that AI systems are used in a way that benefits humanity as a whole.
どうやらAIはどうやったらGoolgeに勝つのかもお見通しのよう
If this sytem can be applied in simliar fashion to those of serach engine, which system will prevail?
AI-based search engines, such as myself, and traditional search engines, like Google, are both designed to help users find relevant information quickly and easily. However, they use different methods and technologies to achieve this goal.
Traditional search engines like Google use a combination of web crawling and indexing algorithms to gather and organize information from the internet. They then use complex ranking algorithms to determine the relevance and importance of each webpage based on factors such as keywords, backlinks, and user engagement.
On the other hand, AI-based search engines like myself utilize natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning techniques to understand the intent behind a user's query and provide more relevant and accurate results. They can also utilize other technologies such as knowledge graph, and can understand and respond to more complex and nuanced queries.
In terms of which system will prevail, it's hard to say. Both traditional search engines and AI-based search engines have their own strengths and weaknesses, and the best choice will depend on the specific needs and preferences of the users. Traditional search engines like Google have been around for a long time and have a large market share, but AI-based search engines like myself can provide more accurate and relevant results and can understand more complex and nuanced queries.
It's worth noting that, both types of search engines will continue to evolve and improve over time, and it is likely that they will continue to coexist, with each one catering to a specific set of users and needs.
Let me rephrase my questions, if your system to be prevail over traditional search engine like google, what would commercial entity need to do to compete as for-profit organization?
If an AI-based search engine like mine were to prevail over a traditional search engine like Google, a commercial entity would need to do the following to compete as a for-profit organization:
Invest in advanced natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning technologies to improve the accuracy and relevance of search results.
Build a large and diverse dataset of information to train the AI system.
Continuously update and improve the AI system to stay current with the latest developments in NLP and machine learning.
Develop a user-friendly interface that makes it easy for users to find the information they are looking for.
Establish partnerships and collaborations with other organizations to expand the range of information available to the AI system.
Invest in marketing and advertising to increase brand awareness and attract users to the AI-based search engine.
Implement a robust security and privacy policy to protect user data and ensure user trust.
Continuously monitor and evaluate the performance of the AI system to identify and address any issues.
Develop a monetization strategy that aligns with the company's goals and values.
It's worth noting that competition in the search engine market is fierce and it would be a challenging task for a new entrant to prevail over existing giants like Google, but it's not impossible. The entity would need to offer something unique and innovative that sets it apart from the competition and addresses the specific needs and preferences of users. Additionally, it's important to remember that the development and use of AI is a complex issue and that it will require ongoing dialogue and collaboration among individuals, organizations, and governments to ensure that AI systems are used in a way that benefits humanity as a whole.
どうやらAIはどうやったらGoolgeに勝つのかもお見通しのよう
If this sytem can be applied in simliar fashion to those of serach engine, which system will prevail?
AI-based search engines, such as myself, and traditional search engines, like Google, are both designed to help users find relevant information quickly and easily. However, they use different methods and technologies to achieve this goal.
Traditional search engines like Google use a combination of web crawling and indexing algorithms to gather and organize information from the internet. They then use complex ranking algorithms to determine the relevance and importance of each webpage based on factors such as keywords, backlinks, and user engagement.
On the other hand, AI-based search engines like myself utilize natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning techniques to understand the intent behind a user's query and provide more relevant and accurate results. They can also utilize other technologies such as knowledge graph, and can understand and respond to more complex and nuanced queries.
In terms of which system will prevail, it's hard to say. Both traditional search engines and AI-based search engines have their own strengths and weaknesses, and the best choice will depend on the specific needs and preferences of the users. Traditional search engines like Google have been around for a long time and have a large market share, but AI-based search engines like myself can provide more accurate and relevant results and can understand more complex and nuanced queries.
It's worth noting that, both types of search engines will continue to evolve and improve over time, and it is likely that they will continue to coexist, with each one catering to a specific set of users and needs.
Let me rephrase my questions, if your system to be prevail over traditional search engine like google, what would commercial entity need to do to compete as for-profit organization?
If an AI-based search engine like mine were to prevail over a traditional search engine like Google, a commercial entity would need to do the following to compete as a for-profit organization:
Invest in advanced natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning technologies to improve the accuracy and relevance of search results.
Build a large and diverse dataset of information to train the AI system.
Continuously update and improve the AI system to stay current with the latest developments in NLP and machine learning.
Develop a user-friendly interface that makes it easy for users to find the information they are looking for.
Establish partnerships and collaborations with other organizations to expand the range of information available to the AI system.
Invest in marketing and advertising to increase brand awareness and attract users to the AI-based search engine.
Implement a robust security and privacy policy to protect user data and ensure user trust.
Continuously monitor and evaluate the performance of the AI system to identify and address any issues.
Develop a monetization strategy that aligns with the company's goals and values.
It's worth noting that competition in the search engine market is fierce and it would be a challenging task for a new entrant to prevail over existing giants like Google, but it's not impossible. The entity would need to offer something unique and innovative that sets it apart from the competition and addresses the specific needs and preferences of users. Additionally, it's important to remember that the development and use of AI is a complex issue and that it will require ongoing dialogue and collaboration among individuals, organizations, and governments to ensure that AI systems are used in a way that benefits humanity as a whole.
アフロのお母さん
She is a co-founder of the political fundraising organization Mind the Gap, which advocates for progressive political candidates and funds get-out-the-vote groups.[5][6]
ちなみに、Gmail前提の話。
GASでGmailのonCreateDraft的なトリガーとかイベントがあれば楽だったんだけど、無かった。○uck!!
Googleコンタクトで敬称を設定できるんだけど、スマート作成とかスマートリプライとかで候補に出てくるかっていうと出てきたり出てこなかったりする。○uck!!
テンプレートで変数埋め込みとかもできないみたい。○uck!!厳密にはできるんだけど、結構workaroundな感じですぐ使えなくなりそうだし他人にお勧めできない。
てかそもそも、こんなことのためにわざわざGAS使うのがおかしい。
ここまでで1時間くらい使った。まあ勉強にはなったけどそんな回り道をした俺に○uck!!
とりあえず、あなたはコピペしてるってことなんで、それ前提でちょっとした効率化を考えてみた。
下準備が面倒だけど。
まず、Googleコンタクトで敬称・会社・役職などを設定する。
連絡先がたくさんあるなら、CSVでエクスポートしてExcelかスプシで開いて、「Name Suffix」（敬称）「Organization 1 - Name」（会社）「Organization 1 - Title」（役職）の列を一括変更してインポートするのが楽。ちなみに「Name Prefix」はSirとかMr.とか入れるところ。
これで下準備は終わり。
Gmailでメールを作成するときなど、宛先メールアドレスの脇にそのアイコンや名前が出てくる。
で、アイコンや名前にカーソルを合わせて1秒ほど待つと、↓みたいなポップアップが（Googleコンタクトに登録されていれば）敬称付きの名前・会社・役職と一緒に出てくる。
https://ferret-one.akamaized.net/images/623a863585ad34000174a1e6/large.png
Googleコンタクトに姓名をどっちも入れると「田中太郎様」ってなるので、そこは名を抜かすなど臨機応変に。
連絡先を全部変更する前に、1件だけ試しでやってみるのをオススメする。
Thunderbirdの方も、Googleコンタクトを同期させれば似たような使い方ができるかもしれない。
俺はThunderbirdまともに使ったことないので、有識者に指示を仰いでください。
今は、これが精一杯。
追記：
一回のコピペで済ませたいならGoogleコンタクトにメモって項目があるので、それでも良いかもしれない。
ただ、ポップアップを表示させた後「詳細表示を開く」ってボタンを押して出てきた右ペインを一番下までスクロールしないとメモが出てこないので、一長一短という感じ。
まああとは色々やってみてくれ。
俺の仕事の話。
俺にメールしてくるのはお客さんじゃないので、「この度はお世話になります。〇〇社△△部xxと申します」とか「お忙しい中大変恐縮ですが、何卒ご検討のほどよろしくお願い致します」とかかましてきやがったら「自動差し込みとかでない限りそういうのいらないんで。俺からは一切しません」って開口一番に言う。
そういう仕事をしてる。
Kendall (2007)に関する雑感。筆者は経済学で学位を持っていますが、因果推論は専門ではありません。なのでコアな分析の妥当性について判断を下すことはありません。あと短時間でパパっとみた結果なので、網羅的に全ての情報を集めることはできていません。それを理解した上で読んでください。興味深い部分をまとめると
1. Kendall自体はしっかりした経済学者。指導教官はヤバい経済学で有名な Steve Levitt。
2. 指導教官のLevittは自身のブログで、読んではいないけど、結果にはSkepticalと述べている。自然実験を探さないとね、とのこと。
3. Kendall (2007)は最終稿のようなものではなく、これからブラッシュアップしていく段階のように（僕は）感じる。
4. Kendallは2008年に民間に移ったので、それでこの研究は中断されたのでは。
5. ただKendall自身はこのあとも研究活動を共著者らと続けているようなので、なぜこの論文だけ宙に浮いてしまったのかはよく分からない。
査読論文ならこんな素人探偵みたいなことをしなくていいのにね！
-- 所属、時系列とともに整合的。論文のテーマから見ても同一人物でしょう。
-- 2003年にシカゴ大学で経済学の博士号を取得した後、2003年から2008年にかけてアメリカのクレメント大学に助教授として勤める。その後に転職し、現職のCompass Lexeconに勤める。
-- 最初の査読論文は2003年にSouthern Economic Journalに掲載されたもの。
-- この謝辞にGary Becker. Pete Klenow, Steve Levitt, Casey Mulligan, Kevin M. Murphy, Derek Neal, Allen Sanderson, Lester Telserの名前があることから、ここらへんの人に指導されたことが推測できる。Gary Becker, Pete Klenow, Kevin M. Murphy, Steve Levittは僕でも知っている有名人。指導教官はSteve Levittのよう（下記参照）。
-- そのあとの論文を見ていると、Journal of Sport Economicsに載せていたり、Steve Levittみたいなヤバい経済学スタイルを感じる。
-- Journal of Economic Behavior & OrganizationやJournal of Urban Economicsなどのソリッドな雑誌に論文を掲載している。一流とは言わないけど、ちゃんとした経済学者。Journal of Urban Economicsに載った論文(https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2010.12.001)は2011年のものなので、転職後も研究活動自体は続けているよう。
-- どちらのバージョンもRepecを通しては見つからない。SSRN（プリプリントサーバー）にも登録されていない。
-- 2006年のバージョンはToulouse School of Economicsで発表したときのものっぽい(http://idei.fr/sites/default/files/medias/doc/conf/sic/papers_2007/kendall.pdf)。
-- けっこう雑じゃない？（僕は専門じゃないので分からないけど）
-- Placeboとか、そういうお作法が広まるはもうちょっと後な気がするので、そこまで要求するのは酷かもしれない。
-- 指導教官のLevittは2006年の段階では、It is not really fair (especially to your former student) to be skeptical without reading the paper, but I have to say I am skeptical of the empirical resultと述べている。(https://freakonomics.com/2006/10/pornography-and-rape/) ちゃんと自然実験を探した方がいいよ、とのこと。
-- このあと同じブログで他のライターがBhullerらの論文を紹介している。Bhullerらの論文は自然実験を利用しているので、自然な流れ。(https://freakonomics.com/2011/08/more-on-rape-and-porn-does-internet-access-increase-sex-crimes/)
-- サブミット前の論文だったらもっとちゃんとしたドメインにありそう。
-- 2007年の回帰表（表１から表５にかけて）がワードで作ったやつみたい…？
-- どうもStataを使っているようなので、綺麗に作れると思うのだけど…。
-- ただ大量に脚注がついていて、これはもしかしたらレフェリーに対応したのかもしれない。
-- Leamer の Extreme bound analysisを使っている人、はじめてみた。
ここまで読んでくださった方、ありがとうございます。筆者のhesopennです。前の投稿と直接関係はなく、あくまで自分の好奇心の赴くまま、適当に調べました。あまり信用しないで、気になる部分は自身で調べて頂ければ幸いです。個人的な感想として、論文の評価を非専門家がするのはあまりにも難しいなと感じました。僕個人のこの論文の評価は「よく分からない」です。だから狭義の専門家が査読するわけですよね。
コロナは大したことない派（漂白剤を飲めば治る派含む）を指す用法と、マスク警察系コロナ過剰警戒派を指す用法があるのがおもしろい
英辞郎 on the WEB 〈俗〉コビディオット◆コロナウイルス感染症の予防対策や警告を無視したり、食料品や日用品を大量に買いだめて品薄状態を引き起こし、人々の不安をあおったりするばかな人(idiot)
Cambridge Dictionary someone who behaves in a stupid way that risks spreading the infectious disease Covid-19:
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/covidiot (derogatory, humorous, neologism) A person who is foolishly reckless with respect to avoiding contracting or spreading COVID-19.
Relating to the 2020 Covid-19 virus:
Someone who ignores the warnings regarding public health or safety.
A person who hoards goods, denying them from their neighbors.
Did you see that covidiot with 300 rolls of toilet paper in his basket?
That covidiot is hugging everyone she sees.
A person who makes themselves look like an idiot, during or after a pandemic.
1. A stupid person who stubbornly ignores 'social distancing' protocol, thus helping to further spread COVID-19.
A person that flies into a pandemic zone for holiday with their children, barely is able to return and shares their harrowing experience on social media for hero points.
1. A perfect term for those spreading, creating or publishing unverified and false information about the novel coronavirus.
2. An idiot who doubts the existence of COVID-19, therefore ignoring the need for social distancing and proper hand washing.
Covidiot: an individual who in the face of dire circumstances for all, acts selfishly toward others instead of in solidarity and with generosity.
Idiots who think Covid is a real threat and idiotically cover their face with a mask fearfully.
A person who "isn't worried" about Covid-19 because they "aren't old enough." (This does not discount the Covidiot having asthma, obesity, or another major risk factor).
Someone who goes on numerous pointless excursions during the aforementioned pandemic, often against local ruling, because they are hollow inside, utterly selfish, and, most probably, lick hand railings.
On the extreme, either denies Covid-19 is an issue at all (or real) and/or completely loses their shit and buys no more soap than usual BUT every last disenfectant product & T.P. roll.**
A person who has no medical background and makes statements about the Coronavirus pandemic founded on dubious sources, i.e. social media, an acquaintance, etc
A person who ignores the governments and health organization's recommendations in regards to the COVID-19 pandemic.
People that have no brain cells and can’t understand what social distancing means. People that make others life miserable in lockdown by continually mixing with others, therefore making the lockdown last longer because it fails .
A person who does not follow guidlines, listen to advice or think about their actions during the COVID-19 pandemic
A person who deliberately coughs on other people and thinks it is funny
An idiot who can’t respect common sense and basic science enough to to help stop the spread of disease.
Someone who is freaking out too much about covid and revolves everything they do around it. Also they treat anyone who doesn’t strictly follow guidelines like a murderer
Person in ICU for weeks blocking people from getting surgery
1. A covidiot is someone who rejects overwhelming evidence, provided by scientists, while promoting his opinions as facts.
2. Someone who, during a pandemic refuses to wear a mask in Walmart.
3. Anyone who thinks drinking bleach will cure anything.
Synonyms include: anti-vaccer, flat-earther, alien conspiracy theorist, climate change denier
A person who advocates for lockdowns, mandatory masks, school shutdowns, and other infringements on liberty based on unsettled science. This kind of person has nothing going on in their life except the sweet dopamine rush they get from self-righteously judging everyone else and tattling on people who don't trust the "experts." Usually talks about "science" a lot but has no background in math or science.
Someone who believes everything they hear on TV and other mainstream media, yet chooses to ignore official CDC numbers, such as how Covid has a 99.9997% recovery rate for those under 30, and 99.92% recovery rate for those 70+. They also ignore the fact that health "experts" on TV have told us that hospitals mark just about any death as a Covid death, no matter how they died, simply because they tested positive for Covid or were merely suspected of such.
Thus, these people wear their masks everywhere they go like it's a status symbol, while believing it actually does any good.
プログラミング情報サイト、Qiita上で彼が目に付くきっかけが複数あったので気になったもののあまりよろしくなさそうなユーザー。
まあコミュニティのハックなので面と向かっては言わないのだがブロック記念に備忘録
https://qiita.com/Tetsu_Oikawa
https://twitter.com/BrneUna/status/1497163341088706563
これが現実のコミュニティではなくただ彼が一人で作っただけの感がある。
https://qiita.com/organizations/ToyoUniversity
メンバーを見ればわかるが、プロフィールからは東洋大学関連の人間は@Tetsu_Oikawa氏以外居ないように見受けられる。
そして、異常にContributionが多いユーザーが多く所属している。
おそらく彼はContributionが多いユーザーに片っ端から招待を送っている。
かくいう私にも来たのだ。
Tetsu_Oikawa さんに 東洋大学 organization へ招待されています。
招待を確認する
放置していたら取り消されたが。
Qiitaには問題があるOrganizationを通報する機能があるが、これが「コミュニティガイドラインの違反」か「スパムの疑い」か判断が難しく保留している。
少なくとも心象はよくない。
Qiitaには内容の改善提案を行える編集リクエスト機能がある。
この機能は意図的にContributionが高く設定されている。
https://github.com/increments/qiita-discussions/discussions/164
ある記事が一人に読まれて「いいね(LGTM)」を押してもらえると1Contribution。プラスブクマのような後で読むストック機能で+0.5。だいたい一記事の一人からもらえるContributionは最大1.5ぐらい。
対して編集リクエストは送っただけで0.2。採用されれば5のContributionがつく。
内容は問わずに、だ。
どれほど大規模な記事の改定や誤情報の修正からちょっとした一文字の誤字の修正まで一律5である。非常に効率がいい。
過去から今まで編集リクエストで大量のContributionを稼いできたユーザーは複数居る。
とはいえ、私は誤字脱字などの1文字修正の編集リクエストを否定していない。それも立派な貢献活動だと考えている。
では、@Tetsu_Oikawa の編集リクエストはどうだろうか？
https://qiita.com/Tetsu_Oikawa/edit_requests
もちろん全てを精査しているわけではない。適当な記事をいくつか見ただけだ。
だった。
タグの提案は妥当そうなものもあれば「メモ」や「日記」というあまり筆者・読者に有用とは言えないタグの提案もあった。
タグの追加の提案。これも立派な編集リクエストと理解している。
理解している……が……。
記事内容の修正や誤字脱字のように記事を読むでもない。ただタイトルとタグの差分をとって「善良な編集者」のフリして送っているだけだろう。
いやいや、確かに誤字脱字もツールを使って機械的に(まさしくプログラムを組んで)編集リクエストを作るユーザーも確かに居る。
しかし彼のOrganizationでの振舞いを考えれば、これがevilの、自分のための編集リクエストだと感じてしまってもいたし方無い。
この編集リクエストは私にも来た。招待とダブルパンチである。うぜぇ。
もちろんこれもQiitaの仕組みを上手くハックした貢献活動であり明確に規約違反とは言えないだろう。
だから私は彼がお行儀が悪いとしか言わない。Qiita上でも言及しない。
なお、無節操な招待の傍証として同日に送られたとみられるユーザーたちのツイートを残しておく。
https://twitter.com/tbpgr/status/1497226331804688387
ほかContributionが多い著名ユーザー数名。
最近、World Organizationの研究者たちにより『Pathogens』に掲載された論文によれば、新型コロナウイルスによる長引く後遺症が「EBウイルス」と呼ばれる、既に体内にある別のウイルスの再活性化によって引き起こされていることが示されました。
新型コロナウイルスに感染すると、体内で潜伏状態にあったEBウイルスが目を覚まし、「脳の霧」に代表される、長期的な後遺症を発症させていたようです。
つまり人類が戦っていたのは、新型コロナウイルスとEBウイルスの両方だった可能性が高いのです。
https://nazology.net/archives/95025
イタリアでは、新型コロナウイルスに感染してICU入りした重症患者の95.2％でEBウイルスの再活性化を確認。
またフランスでもICU入りした重症患者の82％、オーストリアにおいても、ICU入りした重症患者の78％でEBウイルスの再活性化が確認されます。
これらの結果は、新型コロナウイルスによるパンデミックの陰で、EBウイルスによるパンデミックも起きており、人類は2種類のウイルスの連合軍と戦っていたことを示します。
つまり新型コロナウイルスに感染し「無症状」で済んだとしても、EBウイルスが再活性化してしまった場合は、EBウイルスの感染症状としての「後遺症」が発生する確率が上がります。
Has the Beneficiary/Applicant ever withheld custody of a U.S. citizen child outside the United States from a person granted legal custody by a U.S. court, voted in the United States in violation of any law or regulation or renounced U.S. citizenship for the purpose of avoiding taxation?
Is the Beneficiary/Applicant now or has he/she ever been a member of, or in any way connected or associated with the Communist Party, or ever knowingly aided or supported the communist party directly, or indirectly through another organization, group or person, or ever advocated, taught, believed in, or knowingly supported or furthered the interests of communism?
Did Beneficiary/Applicant, between March 23, 1933 and May 8, 1945, in association with either the Nazi Government of Germany, either order, incite, assist or otherwise participate in the persecution of any person because of race, religion, national origin or political opinion?
Has the Beneficiary/Applicant ever left the United States to avoid being drafted into the U.S. Armed Forces?
Does the Beneficiary/Applicant plan to practice polygamy in the U.S.?
一夫多妻制ってどこかでやってるんですか？
Has the Beneficiary/Applicant within the past ten years been a prostitute or procured anyone for prostitution, or intend to engage in such activities in the future?
Has the Beneficiary/Applicant ever knowingly encouraged, induced, assisted, abetted or aided any alien to try to enter the U.S. illegally?
国境越え！
Has the Beneficiary/Applicant ever illicitly trafficked in any controlled substance, or knowingly assisted, abetted or colluded in the illicit trafficking of any controlled substance?
人身売買もだめです。当然。
Has Beneficiary/Applicant ever engaged in any unlawful commercialized vice, including, but not limited to, illegal gambling?
Does the Beneficiary/Applicant intend to engage in espionage in the U.S.?
スパイ！
Every single procedure has been convoluted, done through a website that was designed on Office 365 and god, WHY do they insist on every piece of information being sent through an excel sheet? None of their new fancy apps work so all of our info was ultimately sent through e-mail.
Speaking of email, 99% of my emails have gone unanswered. I am supposed to be the liaison between my organization and the organizing committee, but that’s REALLY hard when they won’t give me the time of day. When they DO answer emails, they can't answer basic questions.
【ジュネーブ共同】北大西洋および環太平洋保険機関 (NAPHO) のジェームズ事務局長は 17 日の記者会見で、北大西洋および環太平洋地域における COVID-19 の終息を宣言した。先んじて 2041 年 10 月に中国保険機関 (CHO) の出した終息宣言に遅れること約 2 年、2020 年に世界規模での爆発的な広がりを見せた COVID-19 は 23 年の時を経て全世界的な終息宣言がなされたこととなる。
ジェームズ事務局長はまた、2042 年 3 月より 3 度に分けて世界規模の調査を行った結果、地域や世代によってばらつきはあるものの平均して 89% の人々に COVID-19 の感染歴および T 細胞の免疫記憶が確認されたと発表。この度の終息宣言はこの調査に基づくものであり、COVID-19 の罹患リスクおよび重症化リスクが旧来のコロナウイルスと同程度になった事を宣言するもので、人類が COVID-19 を克服したことは意味しないと強調した。
≪COVID-19 および大域国際保険機関に関するこれまでの主な経緯≫
I would like to write about what I know and understand about the Soka Gakkai because the D.C. Times published an article titled "China's Manipulation of Japan, NPOs and Soka Gakkai Act as Pipeline = U.S. Think Tank Report".
First of all, as a premise, the Soka Gakkai is a cult.
This is because there is a definition of a religious cult, and the reality of the Soka Gakkai falls under that definition in many ways.
You can read more about the definition of a religious cult and mind control in the book "Combating Cult Mind Control: The #1 Best-selling Guide to Protection, Rescue, and Recovery from Destructive Cults ".
The Soka Gakkai is also a collection of criminals, sick people and poor people.
In fact, the Soka Gakkai is similar to the mafia gangs in Italy and Mexico, and it has reigned as the largest criminal and anti-society organization in Japan in the name of a religious organization.
Many of its members have been brainwashed and are unable to recognize and judge themselves as normal human beings.
In the 1950s and 1980s, Soka Gakkai members were forcibly recruited to join the Soka Gakkai, and nowadays, it is estimated that about 10% of the Japanese people are members of the Gakkai (Soka Gakkai members).
In particular, the Soka Gakkai has infiltrated civil servants, specifically the police force, the fire department, and the Self-Defense Forces, and it has been revealed that 20 to 30% of the Metropolitan Police Department's employees are members of the Soka Gakkai.
There is always a certain percentage of Soka Gakkai members in elementary, middle, and high school classes, and in corporate workplaces, and therefore it is taboo to criticize the Soka Gakkai in those communities.
This is because the Gakkai members in each community monitor the words and actions of their community members in the same way as the mainland communists who have infiltrated Hong Kong, and if someone speaks out against the Soka Gakkai, they will target that person and initiate a campaign of sabotage.
The sabotage is similar to the CPC's repressive actions against human rights activists in Hong Kong, including obstructing, harassing, and following them around, an act that has been described as mass stalking.
For example, in Japan, if you make a placating statement in a school class or at work that the Soka Gakkai is a cult religious group because it meets the definition of a cult group, members of the Gakkai in the community get madly angry (depending on the degree of mind control they are receiving) or bite off their anger to deny the statement.
Then they label the person who made such a statement as "anti", and they also share information about the antis with other members of the Soka Gakkai, and begin to perceive them as "beings to be punished by Buddha", to be targets of surveillance and group attacks.
In reality, however, the definition of a religious cult was not defined for the Soka Gakkai but for dangerous religious groups such as Aum Shinrikyo and People's Temple, which were intended to prevent ordinary people from being harmed by them.
The Soka Gakkai falls under the definition of a cult because the Soka Gakkai has cult-like tendencies.
When Soka Gakkai members are pointed out to the Soka Gakkai, instead of thinking "Let's fix what's wrong with my religious group," they think of suppressing their critics (anti) and silencing them, which is a pattern of thinking and behavior of a fanatic of a religious cult, and the sarin gas attack (terrorism). I feel that the followers of Aum Shinrikyo at the time when it was founded must have had a similar pattern of thinking and behavior.
Believers in cult groups are unconsciously mind-controlled and brainwashed, so they don't think that they should change their way of thinking and behavior when criticism is pointed out to them. In this respect, their attitude is similar to that of the Chinese Communist Party towards the demands of human rights activists in Hong Kong, i.e., the fanatics of cult groups such as the Soka Gakkai are not normal human beings.
By the way, there is an organization called JCP in Japan, which is also anti-American and illegal in the United States.
It is well known that some anti-American organizations cooperate with each other in order to undermine this country by signing a pact called "Soko Kyodo Agreement" and facilitating agents of anti-Japanese and anti-American groups.
It is obvious that the JCP is an anti-American terrorist organization in nature and that the JCP is a cult-like organization when it signs an agreement with a religious cult.
From another point of view, the Soka Gakkai, to its followers, appears to be a huge organization that carries out fraudulent and criminal activities such as Ponzi schemes and network businesses. It also has elements of a black business, and believers who join the Soka Gakkai are becoming materially and mentally exhausted.
The following blog, run by Mr. Sinifié, exposes the reality of the Soka Gakkai. It contains the testimonies and experiences of many current and former Soka Gakkai members and ex-members who have left the Gakkai.
It is clear that this reality of the Soka Gakkai is far removed from the original role of religion, which is to provide individuals with peace of mind and spiritual support.
As the saying goes, "like begets friend," it is only natural for the Soka Gakkai to try to maintain a good relationship with the CPC.
However, many Chinese who have worked in Japan seem to dislike the Soka Gakkai and return to their countries.
Although the Soka Gakkai employs a different strategy than Aum Shinrikyo and has infiltrated many organizations such as corporations, police, fire departments, the Self-Defense Forces, and local government officials, the Soka Gakkai members who have infiltrated the Kasumigaseki bureaucracy and the Self-Defense Forces are considered dangerous to the U.S. because they are inherently dangerous.
Because they are essentially anti-American and may act as agents to cooperate with the CPC.
There are some findings that are common knowledge among intellectuals in the U.S. and Europe but have not been made known to the Japanese people in Japan because the media and bureaucrats have stopped them.
One of them is that the Soka Gakkai headquarters has been sending donations from Gakkai members to Noriega (former general, now imprisoned) in Panama for large-scale tax evasion and money laundering.
Noriega received a large amount of money from Daisaku Ikeda of the Soka Gakkai and invested it in his own drug business, spreading drugs on an international level.
Daisaku Ikeda of the Soka Gakkai has been investing and managing the donations collected from Gakkai members in Noriega's drug business as well as tax evasion and money laundering. At the same time, the Soka Gakkai and Daisaku Ikeda invested the donations they received from Gakkai members in Noriega's drug business as a means of tax evasion and money laundering, and returned the profits to the domestic market to help the Soka Gakkai executives line their pockets and build Soka Gakkai facilities and Soka University.
The fact that Daisaku Ikeda raised Noriega's profile in the Seikyo Shimbun during the same period must be undeniable to those Gakkai members who have subscribed to the Seikyo Shimbun.
In particular, there are many Gakkai members at the level of police organizations, the Metropolitan Police Department and prefectures, who have been causing social problems and covering up crimes committed by Gakkai members in Japan.
Well, if they are in a state of unconscious brainwashing and mind control, they may not believe the contents, and may assume a pattern of behavior such as getting angry, grumpy, or attacking the writer.
In other words, one can expect a lot of denial of facts like the followers of Aum Shinrikyo, which is easy to expect, but this (the issue of Soka Gakkai and drug business, tax evasion, and money laundering) is a fact that was revealed because Noriega was arrested and imprisoned for spreading drugs in the US. This is a fact that is well known as common knowledge in the U.S. and Europe.
The fact that the Soka Gakkai is a criminal organization is very difficult to deny.
元増田( 結局、生き物ってなんなんだろうな )にも一例を貼ったが
Self-Organization（自己組織化）
We("developer") provides this app to users("you").
While providing our services, we recognize the importance of your privacy and carry out our activities in line with the applicable data protection regulation including the EU General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”) and other related laws.
This Privacy Policy aims to specify how we collect, use and disclose your personal data to provide you with the best level of our service.
We collect and process your personal data such as:
identity information including your Instagram username, Instagram full name, user ID, gender,
contact information including your phone number and e-mail address,
online identifiers including Identifier for Vendors (IDFV), Identifier for Advertisers (IDFA) and IP address,
visual information including your photo,
customer transaction information including your purchase history, payment details, subscription ID, transaction ID, subscription start and end date, receipt of subscription, version of Follower Check +,
behavioural information including your usage activity, language preference, how much time you have spent and your last active time in the Follower Check +,
marketing information including your push notification device token, information about the campaign (advertisement, Instagram phenomenon etc.) you come from, the ads you see in Follower Check +.
Collection Method of Your Personal Data
We collect your personal data in a number of ways, including:
directly from you via e-mail, telephone, mobile application, SMS, printed form and/or other electronic devices.
from publicly available sources of information,
from our own records of how you use Follower Check + services.
We collect, hold, use and disclose your personal data for the purposes including to:
provide you with a better and more personalized level of service,
review your requests, suggestions and complaints regarding our service,
fulfil contractual obligations to you and anyone involved in the process,
monitor metrics such as total number of visitors, traffic and demographic patterns,
show you ads that are more tailored to your interests.
identify and resolve errors, problems or bugs in our products and services,
meet legal and regulatory requirements including compliance with applicable law, respond to requests from public and government authorities, including authorities outside your country of residence and to meet national security or law enforcement requirements.
We collect and process your personal data on the following bases under the GDPR:
to comply with our contractual obligation (for example, providing you with our service),
to comply with our legal obligations,
because of our company’s legitimate interests which include the provision of our mobile application and/or relevant services, provided always that our legitimate interests are not outweighed by any prejudice or harm your rights and freedoms,
to establish, exercise or defend our legal claims before the courts, arbitrations, authorized data protection authorities or similar legal proceedings,
because you have explicitly given us your consent to process your personal data in that manner.
We will only provide you with marketing related information after you have, where legally required to do so, opted in to receive those communications and having provided the opportunity for you to opt out at any time.
Disclosure of Your Personal Data
We disclose your personal data
with our employees, other Follower Check + users, company executives, representatives, suppliers, service providers, business partners and solution partners for the purposes specified in Section 3,
with government and regulatory authorities and other organizations to meet legal and regulatory requirements, or to protect or defend our rights or property in accordance with applicable laws.
For the compliance with the GDPR, we ensure that our suppliers and business or solution partners whether they are located outside the EEA or not, takes appropriate technical and organizational security measures in accordance with applicable data protection laws and use it solely for the purposes specified by us.
Your Rights
If you are from the European Economic Area or in certain countries, you are also entitled (with some exceptions and restrictions) to:
Access: You have the right to request information about how we process your personal data and to obtain a copy of that personal data.
Rectification: You have the right to request the rectification of inaccurate personal data about you and for any incomplete personal information about you to be completed.
Objection: You have the right to object to the processing of your personal information, which is based on our legitimate interests (as described above).
Deletion: You can delete your account by using the corresponding functionality directly on the service.
Automated decision-making: You have the right to object a decision made about you that is based solely on automated processing if that decision produces legal or similarly significant effects concerning you.
Restriction: You have the right to ask us to restrict our processing of your personal data, so that we no longer process that personal data until the restriction is lifted.
Portability: You have the right to receive your personal data, which you have provided to us, in a structured, commonly used and machine-readable format and to have that personal data transmitted to another organization in certain circumstances.
Complaint: You have a right to lodge a complaint with the authorized data protection authority if you have concerns about how we process your personal data. The data protection authority you can lodge a complaint with notably may be that of your habitual residence, where you work or where we are established.
You may, at any time, exercise any of the above rights, by contacting us via info@followcheckx.com together with a proof of your identity, i.e. a copy of your ID card, or passport, or any other valid identifying document.
In some cases, we may not be able to give you access to your personal data that we hold, if making such a disclosure would breach our legal obligations to our other customers or if prevented by any applicable law or regulation.
If you have provided your consent to the collection, processing and transfer of your personal data, you have the right to fully or partly withdraw your consent. To withdraw your consent please follow the opt-out links on any marketing message sent to you or contact us via info@followcheckx.com.
Once we have received notification that you have withdrawn your consent, we will no longer process your information for the purpose(s) to which you originally consented unless there are compelling legitimate grounds for further processing which override your interests, rights and freedoms or for the establishment, exercise or defence of legal claims.
Collection of Children’s Personal Data
We attach great importance of protecting children’s privacy. Therefore, we make an effort to not collect personal data of any children under the age of 13. If you have any concerns about your child’s privacy with respect to our services, or if you believe that your child may have provided his/her personal data to us, please contact us using the details provided below. We ensure to delete such personal data from our records immediately.
Security of Your Personal Data
We take appropriate and reasonable technical and organizational measures to protect your personal data from loss, misuse, unauthorized access, disclosure, alteration, and destruction, taking into account the risks involved in the processing and the nature of the personal data.
Retention of Your Personal Data
We will only retain your personal data for as long as necessary to fulfil our collection purposes, including for the purposes of satisfying any legal, accounting, or reporting requirements, and where required for our company to provide services, until the end of the relevant retention period.
To determine the appropriate retention period for personal data, we consider the amount, nature, and sensitivity of the personal data, the potential risk of harm from unauthorized use or disclosure of your personal data, the purposes for which we process your personal data and whether we can achieve those purposes through other means, and the applicable legal requirements. Upon expiry of the applicable retention period, we will securely delete, destroy or anonymize your personal data in accordance with applicable laws and regulations.
Links to Third Party Sites
Our mobile application includes links to other websites or apps whose privacy practices may differ from those of our companies. If you submit personal information to any of those sites, your information is governed by their Privacy Policies. We encourage you to carefully read the Privacy Policy of any website or app you visit.
Changes to our Privacy Policy
We reserve the right to update and change this Policy from time to time in order to reflect any changes to the way in which we process your personal data or changing legal requirements. Any changes we may make to our Policy in the future will be posted on this page and, where appropriate, notified to you by e-mail or push notification. Please check back frequently to see any updates or changes to our Policy.
Contact us
If you have any questions or concerns about our privacy practices or would like to exercise any of the rights mentioned in this Privacy Policy, please contact us via info@followcheckx.com. You may also contact us by postal at our address stated above.
We("developer") provides this app to users("you").
While providing our services, we recognize the importance of your privacy and carry out our activities in line with the applicable data protection regulation including the EU General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”) and other related laws.
This Privacy Policy aims to specify how we collect, use and disclose your personal data to provide you with the best level of our service.
We collect and process your personal data such as:
identity information including your Instagram username, Instagram full name, user ID, gender,
contact information including your phone number and e-mail address,
online identifiers including Identifier for Vendors (IDFV), Identifier for Advertisers (IDFA) and IP address,
visual information including your photo,
customer transaction information including your purchase history, payment details, subscription ID, transaction ID, subscription start and end date, receipt of subscription, version of Follower Check +,
behavioural information including your usage activity, language preference, how much time you have spent and your last active time in the Follower Check +,
marketing information including your push notification device token, information about the campaign (advertisement, Instagram phenomenon etc.) you come from, the ads you see in Follower Check +.
Collection Method of Your Personal Data
We collect your personal data in a number of ways, including:
directly from you via e-mail, telephone, mobile application, SMS, printed form and/or other electronic devices.
from publicly available sources of information,
from our own records of how you use Follower Check + services.
We collect, hold, use and disclose your personal data for the purposes including to:
provide you with a better and more personalized level of service,
review your requests, suggestions and complaints regarding our service,
fulfil contractual obligations to you and anyone involved in the process,
monitor metrics such as total number of visitors, traffic and demographic patterns,
show you ads that are more tailored to your interests.
identify and resolve errors, problems or bugs in our products and services,
meet legal and regulatory requirements including compliance with applicable law, respond to requests from public and government authorities, including authorities outside your country of residence and to meet national security or law enforcement requirements.
We collect and process your personal data on the following bases under the GDPR:
to comply with our contractual obligation (for example, providing you with our service),
to comply with our legal obligations,
because of our company’s legitimate interests which include the provision of our mobile application and/or relevant services, provided always that our legitimate interests are not outweighed by any prejudice or harm your rights and freedoms,
to establish, exercise or defend our legal claims before the courts, arbitrations, authorized data protection authorities or similar legal proceedings,
because you have explicitly given us your consent to process your personal data in that manner.
We will only provide you with marketing related information after you have, where legally required to do so, opted in to receive those communications and having provided the opportunity for you to opt out at any time.
Disclosure of Your Personal Data
We disclose your personal data
with our employees, other Follower Check + users, company executives, representatives, suppliers, service providers, business partners and solution partners for the purposes specified in Section 3,
with government and regulatory authorities and other organizations to meet legal and regulatory requirements, or to protect or defend our rights or property in accordance with applicable laws.
For the compliance with the GDPR, we ensure that our suppliers and business or solution partners whether they are located outside the EEA or not, takes appropriate technical and organizational security measures in accordance with applicable data protection laws and use it solely for the purposes specified by us.
Your Rights
If you are from the European Economic Area or in certain countries, you are also entitled (with some exceptions and restrictions) to:
Access: You have the right to request information about how we process your personal data and to obtain a copy of that personal data.
Rectification: You have the right to request the rectification of inaccurate personal data about you and for any incomplete personal information about you to be completed.
Objection: You have the right to object to the processing of your personal information, which is based on our legitimate interests (as described above).
Deletion: You can delete your account by using the corresponding functionality directly on the service.
Automated decision-making: You have the right to object a decision made about you that is based solely on automated processing if that decision produces legal or similarly significant effects concerning you.
Restriction: You have the right to ask us to restrict our processing of your personal data, so that we no longer process that personal data until the restriction is lifted.
Portability: You have the right to receive your personal data, which you have provided to us, in a structured, commonly used and machine-readable format and to have that personal data transmitted to another organization in certain circumstances.
Complaint: You have a right to lodge a complaint with the authorized data protection authority if you have concerns about how we process your personal data. The data protection authority you can lodge a complaint with notably may be that of your habitual residence, where you work or where we are established.
You may, at any time, exercise any of the above rights, by contacting us via info@followcheckx.com together with a proof of your identity, i.e. a copy of your ID card, or passport, or any other valid identifying document.
In some cases, we may not be able to give you access to your personal data that we hold, if making such a disclosure would breach our legal obligations to our other customers or if prevented by any applicable law or regulation.
If you have provided your consent to the collection, processing and transfer of your personal data, you have the right to fully or partly withdraw your consent. To withdraw your consent please follow the opt-out links on any marketing message sent to you or contact us via info@followcheckx.com.
Once we have received notification that you have withdrawn your consent, we will no longer process your information for the purpose(s) to which you originally consented unless there are compelling legitimate grounds for further processing which override your interests, rights and freedoms or for the establishment, exercise or defence of legal claims.
Collection of Children’s Personal Data
We attach great importance of protecting children’s privacy. Therefore, we make an effort to not collect personal data of any children under the age of 13. If you have any concerns about your child’s privacy with respect to our services, or if you believe that your child may have provided his/her personal data to us, please contact us using the details provided below. We ensure to delete such personal data from our records immediately.
Security of Your Personal Data
We take appropriate and reasonable technical and organizational measures to protect your personal data from loss, misuse, unauthorized access, disclosure, alteration, and destruction, taking into account the risks involved in the processing and the nature of the personal data.
Retention of Your Personal Data
We will only retain your personal data for as long as necessary to fulfil our collection purposes, including for the purposes of satisfying any legal, accounting, or reporting requirements, and where required for our company to provide services, until the end of the relevant retention period.
To determine the appropriate retention period for personal data, we consider the amount, nature, and sensitivity of the personal data, the potential risk of harm from unauthorized use or disclosure of your personal data, the purposes for which we process your personal data and whether we can achieve those purposes through other means, and the applicable legal requirements. Upon expiry of the applicable retention period, we will securely delete, destroy or anonymize your personal data in accordance with applicable laws and regulations.
Links to Third Party Sites
Our mobile application includes links to other websites or apps whose privacy practices may differ from those of our companies. If you submit personal information to any of those sites, your information is governed by their Privacy Policies. We encourage you to carefully read the Privacy Policy of any website or app you visit.
Changes to our Privacy Policy
We reserve the right to update and change this Policy from time to time in order to reflect any changes to the way in which we process your personal data or changing legal requirements. Any changes we may make to our Policy in the future will be posted on this page and, where appropriate, notified to you by e-mail or push notification. Please check back frequently to see any updates or changes to our Policy.
Contact us
If you have any questions or concerns about our privacy practices or would like to exercise any of the rights mentioned in this Privacy Policy, please contact us via info@followcheckx.com. You may also contact us by postal at our address stated above.
