  |
はてなキーワード: onlyとは
初めの内はカメラオンで会議してたんだがギガを食われたり、大勢いたら回線が不安定になったりとで最近はカメラオフで会議を行うようになっている
エンドユーザーへ提案を度々やり取りしてたのだけどこれも何度も交わしてる内にカメラオフで１０人程で会議するようになっていった
ひたすら質問を投げ掛けるエンドユーザーの老人達、それに回答していくこちら側、まるでSound onlyのゼーレの賢人達とゲンドウ、冬月みたいな構図ではないか
きっとゼーレも回線不安定になるからカメラ切るわとか会議中カメラの前で崩せないからカメラ切って砕けた格好で話聞くわっていう気持ちでSound onlyにして会議してたんだなぁと納得できた
COST+flexicurity
「共同所有自己申告税」（COST）
柔軟な労働市場を整備して成長産業に労働力の移動をしやすくし、手厚い社会保障で労働者の生活の安全を守る政策で、特にオランダやデンマークなどの北欧で進められている。
労働条件（賃金・手当・福利厚生・職場訓練・企業年金）のすべてにおいて、フルタイムとパートタイムの同一待遇[2]
その結果、1970年代から続いてきた賃金と物価のスパイラル現象（スタグフレーション）の抑止に成功し、失業率の低下と経済成長を同時に達成することが出来た。この改革はオランダ・モデル（または、ポルダー・モデル）と呼ばれているとともに、世界初のパートタイム経済（ワークシェアリング）の国とも呼ばれている[2]。
現在のオランダはパートタイム大国となっており[2]、雇用者の36.9%がパートタイムで勤務する（2020年）[1]。不完全雇用パートタイマーの割合は低く、パートタイム労働への満足度は高い[1]。
ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E3%83%AF%E3%83%83%E3%82%BB%E3%83%8A%E3%83%BC%E5%90%88%E6%84%8F
ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E8%B2%A0%E3%81%AE%E6%89%80%E5%BE%97%E7%A8%8E
イギリスの億万長者５４人の資産合計は１８兆９０００億円であるのにもかかわらず、
うち３２人は所得税をまったく納めていない。
英国の高齢化社会への対応には富への課税を、シンクタンクが指摘
Tax wealth to pay for ageing UK population, says thinktank
ttps://www.theguardian.com/business/2022/feb/10/tax-wealth-to-pay-for-ageing-uk-population-says-thinktank
150,000ユーロ(約2,400万円)を超える
x.com/gpc_privatebank/status/1831815571576680816
「市場原理主義を徹底するとコミュニズムに至る」私有財産に定率の税（富のCOST）を課すと効率的な市場が生まれる
信賞必罰
解雇および辞職は即時に行うことができ、手当金や予告は必要とされない
ttps://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E9%9A%8F%E6%84%8F%E9%9B%87%E7%94%A8
ttps://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E3%83%95%E3%83%AC%E3%82%AD%E3%82%B7%E3%82%AD%E3%83%A5%E3%83%AA%E3%83%86%E3%82%A3
解雇に際し、勤続12年以上は1ヵ月分、15年以上は2ヵ月分、18年以上は3ヵ月分
の給与を一時金として払わなければいけない。妥当な理由がなく解雇する場合、
被用者が解雇時に30歳以上で、勤続年数が1年以上の場合は最高3ヵ月分、10
年以上の場合は最高4ヵ月分、15年を超える場合は最高6ヵ月分の給与を一時
金として払わなくてはならない。また、休暇法に基づき有給休暇の買い上げをし
なければならない。
ttps://www.jetro.go.jp/ext_images/jfile/report/07000115/0908R3.pdf
ttps://www.mhlw.go.jp/file/05-Shingikai-11201000-Roudoukijunkyoku-Soumuka/0000122770.pdf
ドイツ経済の勝因は 左派政権の「小泉改革」にあり KEYWORD 「雇用の流動性」 WEDGE Infinity(ウェッジ)
ドイツでは「解雇」をしやすくした結果、短期的には失業者が500万人を超えた。
ところが長期的には、雇用の流動性が高まり、逆に労働市場が拡大して失業者は減った。
ttps://b.hatena.ne.jp/entry?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwedge.ismedia.jp%2Farticles%2F-%2F1422
「解雇規制を緩和したら正社員が増えた！」 イタリアで労働市場改革に成果、首相も自画自賛
ttps://b.hatena.ne.jp/entry/s/news.careerconnection.jp/?p=15826
｢解雇の金銭解決｣が奏効したイタリアの実情 | 検証！ニッポンの労働
ttps://toyokeizai.net/articles/-/153024
労働契約法
（解雇）
第十六条 解雇は、客観的に合理的な理由を欠き、社会通念上相当であると認められない場合は、その権利を濫用したものとして、無効とする。
「かかと落としで上司のＰＣ破壊し解雇」は無効 朝日新聞関連団体に東京地裁
ttps://b.hatena.ne.jp/entry?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.sanspo.com%2Fgeino%2Famp%2F20170331%2Ftro17033120010007-a.html
ttps://b.hatena.ne.jp/entry?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdiamond.jp%2Farticles%2F-%2F16733
解雇規制をツイッターにたとえると、「いったんフォローした人は、リムーブできません」
ttps://b.hatena.ne.jp/entry?url=http%3A%2F%2Fmojix.org%2F2011%2F07%2F27%2Fkaikokisei-twitter
プロ野球において、解雇規制で65歳まで解雇できない、不利益変更法理で年俸を下げられないとしたら、どうなるだろうか？
年功序列になる？
またの名を解雇規制
例えてみよう
プロ野球選手が終身雇用で解雇規制で守られてたら年俸は劇的に下がるだろうな。若手も入団できないだろうな。
ttps://twitter.com/T998654345674Tt/status/1389429939674431490
「裁量労働とか解雇規制を緩和したら正社員は皆年収300万円のフリーターに」
「あっちはプロですよ」
「フンガー！」
日本企業の給料が低いのは、社員を解雇できないから。「雇用」より「人」を守れ。
「日本企業は解雇が難しく、なおかつ不利益変更と言って急激な給与の引き下げも難しいため、業績が悪化した時の事を考えて給与の引き上げには慎重にならざるを得ない。」
「雇用調整を解雇ではなく低賃金や転勤、長時間労働で行っているのが日本企業ということになる。」
ttps://b.hatena.ne.jp/entry?url=https%3A%2F%2Fblog.tinect.jp%2F%3Fp%3D51515
ttps://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E6%95%B4%E7%90%86%E8%A7%A3%E9%9B%87
「所有とは盗みである」
「共同所有自己申告税」（COST）
ttps://toyokeizai.net/articles/-/319184?page=3
ラディカル・マーケット 脱・私有財産の世紀: 公正な社会への資本主義と民主主義改革 - エリック・A・ポズナー (著), E・グレン・ワイル (著), 安田 洋祐 (翻訳), 遠藤 真美 (翻訳)
ttps://www.amazon.co.jp/dp/4492315225
ttps://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/ヘンリー・ジョージ
生産活動が重税に悩まされる一方で、私的利益が天然資源という限られた手段から得られるのは不正義の極みとして、かかる制度は奴隷制に等しいと主張した。
中略
とりわけカリフォルニアにおける鉄道建設により、地価や地代が賃金の伸び以上に上昇した事実に目を付けていた。
中略
土地単税
地代は私的所有よりも社会全体に分有すべきとの主張でよく知られ、こうした視点が最も明快に示されているのが『進歩と貧困』である。ただ、地代を社会的に共有しようとすれば土地を国有化した上で個々人に賃貸しする方式を採ることになり、地価税を高率に設定すれば地価が下落することになるが、ジョージは地主に補償を行う必要は無く、嘗ての奴隷所有者と同様の対応をとるべきとした。
ttps://hajimete-sangokushi.com/2020/04/26/ancient-greece-tax-2/
デモステネスによると、公共奉仕を課された人が自分よりも富裕だとみなす人を指名して、財産を交換するように申し立てられる「アンチドシス」という制度があった。指名された人は、奉仕の負担を受け入れるか、指名した人と全財産を交換するのかどちらかを選択しなければならない。
ttps://furuyatoshihiro.hatenablog.com/entry/2020/06/18/000000
Antidosis
ttps://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780199545568.001.0001/acref-9780199545568-e-485
Only the richest ancient Athenians paid taxes – and they bragged about it
ttps://theconversation.com/only-the-richest-ancient-athenians-paid-taxes-and-they-bragged-about-it-147249
I would like to write about what I know and understand about the Soka Gakkai because the D.C. Times published an article titled "China's Manipulation of Japan, NPOs and Soka Gakkai Act as Pipeline = U.S. Think Tank Report".
First of all, as a premise, the Soka Gakkai is a cult.
This is because there is a definition of a religious cult, and the reality of the Soka Gakkai falls under that definition in many ways.
You can read more about the definition of a religious cult and mind control in the book "Combating Cult Mind Control: The #1 Best-selling Guide to Protection, Rescue, and Recovery from Destructive Cults ".
The Soka Gakkai is also a collection of criminals, sick people and poor people.
In fact, the Soka Gakkai is similar to the mafia gangs in Italy and Mexico, and it has reigned as the largest criminal and anti-society organization in Japan in the name of a religious organization.
Many of its members have been brainwashed and are unable to recognize and judge themselves as normal human beings.
In the 1950s and 1980s, Soka Gakkai members were forcibly recruited to join the Soka Gakkai, and nowadays, it is estimated that about 10% of the Japanese people are members of the Gakkai (Soka Gakkai members).
In particular, the Soka Gakkai has infiltrated civil servants, specifically the police force, the fire department, and the Self-Defense Forces, and it has been revealed that 20 to 30% of the Metropolitan Police Department's employees are members of the Soka Gakkai.
There is always a certain percentage of Soka Gakkai members in elementary, middle, and high school classes, and in corporate workplaces, and therefore it is taboo to criticize the Soka Gakkai in those communities.
This is because the Gakkai members in each community monitor the words and actions of their community members in the same way as the mainland communists who have infiltrated Hong Kong, and if someone speaks out against the Soka Gakkai, they will target that person and initiate a campaign of sabotage.
The sabotage is similar to the CPC's repressive actions against human rights activists in Hong Kong, including obstructing, harassing, and following them around, an act that has been described as mass stalking.
For example, in Japan, if you make a placating statement in a school class or at work that the Soka Gakkai is a cult religious group because it meets the definition of a cult group, members of the Gakkai in the community get madly angry (depending on the degree of mind control they are receiving) or bite off their anger to deny the statement.
Then they label the person who made such a statement as "anti", and they also share information about the antis with other members of the Soka Gakkai, and begin to perceive them as "beings to be punished by Buddha", to be targets of surveillance and group attacks.
In reality, however, the definition of a religious cult was not defined for the Soka Gakkai but for dangerous religious groups such as Aum Shinrikyo and People's Temple, which were intended to prevent ordinary people from being harmed by them.
The Soka Gakkai falls under the definition of a cult because the Soka Gakkai has cult-like tendencies.
When Soka Gakkai members are pointed out to the Soka Gakkai, instead of thinking "Let's fix what's wrong with my religious group," they think of suppressing their critics (anti) and silencing them, which is a pattern of thinking and behavior of a fanatic of a religious cult, and the sarin gas attack (terrorism). I feel that the followers of Aum Shinrikyo at the time when it was founded must have had a similar pattern of thinking and behavior.
Believers in cult groups are unconsciously mind-controlled and brainwashed, so they don't think that they should change their way of thinking and behavior when criticism is pointed out to them. In this respect, their attitude is similar to that of the Chinese Communist Party towards the demands of human rights activists in Hong Kong, i.e., the fanatics of cult groups such as the Soka Gakkai are not normal human beings.
By the way, there is an organization called JCP in Japan, which is also anti-American and illegal in the United States.
It is well known that some anti-American organizations cooperate with each other in order to undermine this country by signing a pact called "Soko Kyodo Agreement" and facilitating agents of anti-Japanese and anti-American groups.
It is obvious that the JCP is an anti-American terrorist organization in nature and that the JCP is a cult-like organization when it signs an agreement with a religious cult.
From another point of view, the Soka Gakkai, to its followers, appears to be a huge organization that carries out fraudulent and criminal activities such as Ponzi schemes and network businesses. It also has elements of a black business, and believers who join the Soka Gakkai are becoming materially and mentally exhausted.
The following blog, run by Mr. Sinifié, exposes the reality of the Soka Gakkai. It contains the testimonies and experiences of many current and former Soka Gakkai members and ex-members who have left the Gakkai.
It is clear that this reality of the Soka Gakkai is far removed from the original role of religion, which is to provide individuals with peace of mind and spiritual support.
As the saying goes, "like begets friend," it is only natural for the Soka Gakkai to try to maintain a good relationship with the CPC.
However, many Chinese who have worked in Japan seem to dislike the Soka Gakkai and return to their countries.
Although the Soka Gakkai employs a different strategy than Aum Shinrikyo and has infiltrated many organizations such as corporations, police, fire departments, the Self-Defense Forces, and local government officials, the Soka Gakkai members who have infiltrated the Kasumigaseki bureaucracy and the Self-Defense Forces are considered dangerous to the U.S. because they are inherently dangerous.
Because they are essentially anti-American and may act as agents to cooperate with the CPC.
There are some findings that are common knowledge among intellectuals in the U.S. and Europe but have not been made known to the Japanese people in Japan because the media and bureaucrats have stopped them.
One of them is that the Soka Gakkai headquarters has been sending donations from Gakkai members to Noriega (former general, now imprisoned) in Panama for large-scale tax evasion and money laundering.
Noriega received a large amount of money from Daisaku Ikeda of the Soka Gakkai and invested it in his own drug business, spreading drugs on an international level.
Daisaku Ikeda of the Soka Gakkai has been investing and managing the donations collected from Gakkai members in Noriega's drug business as well as tax evasion and money laundering. At the same time, the Soka Gakkai and Daisaku Ikeda invested the donations they received from Gakkai members in Noriega's drug business as a means of tax evasion and money laundering, and returned the profits to the domestic market to help the Soka Gakkai executives line their pockets and build Soka Gakkai facilities and Soka University.
The fact that Daisaku Ikeda raised Noriega's profile in the Seikyo Shimbun during the same period must be undeniable to those Gakkai members who have subscribed to the Seikyo Shimbun.
In particular, there are many Gakkai members at the level of police organizations, the Metropolitan Police Department and prefectures, who have been causing social problems and covering up crimes committed by Gakkai members in Japan.
Well, if they are in a state of unconscious brainwashing and mind control, they may not believe the contents, and may assume a pattern of behavior such as getting angry, grumpy, or attacking the writer.
In other words, one can expect a lot of denial of facts like the followers of Aum Shinrikyo, which is easy to expect, but this (the issue of Soka Gakkai and drug business, tax evasion, and money laundering) is a fact that was revealed because Noriega was arrested and imprisoned for spreading drugs in the US. This is a fact that is well known as common knowledge in the U.S. and Europe.
The fact that the Soka Gakkai is a criminal organization is very difficult to deny.
配達員の感想は色々あるけど、店の感想はコンサル絡んだ胡散臭い成功体験ばっかなので個人店の感想を書きたい。
売上微増、でも手間を考えたら正直赤
出店している地域が対象になるって聞いてから準備始めたので地域内では早い方
その後、よくあるUberEatsのお約束（メニューいくつ以上、複数店舗とか）を対応しつつ改善させていったので、他店と同じ土俵に立てたのはもう少し遅め
注文は増えたが劇的ではない。UberEatsのおかげでこれまで逃していた客が一気に入った！なんてコンサルの言うアレは無い
結局なんだかんだで店や厨房のレイアウト、容器等の準備が必要だった。あと配達員臭い癖に待機場所護らず急かす。UberEatsの最下層は店
客のテイクアウト初回って思っている以上にハードル高い。個人店相手は特に。だから分かりやすいチェーン店とかが人気になる
金額もUberEats対応で店とは変わるけど、じゃあ量の増減とかは簡単には出来ない。盛り付けもそこまで頑張れないし、配達員ガチャが外れると意味ない。でも客に取っては容器開けた時の料理が店のイメージになる。ハンバーガーや牛丼がどんなに寄ってても客はマックや吉野家のイメージを悪くはしないだろう
限られた金額で店と同じくらいの満足度を客に提供するには限界あるし、UberEatsで増えた注文と売上はその労力にたいして安かった。テイクアウトOnlyなら良いけど、通常営業と並行は正直面倒
商圏が広がる言っても自転車で行く範囲だし、店の人間が言うのもアレだが提供している料理に対しての値段はボッタクリレベル。でも店の取り分は店以下
家から出たくないとか時間の有効活用で利用するのは構わないけど、もし好きな個人店なら行ってあげて。そっちの方が店もサービスしやすいから
そんな事ある？
荒れそうな要素はある気はするけどそんな特筆して荒れるほど？
気になったので調べてみました！
まあ荒れるな。どちらかのファンの人種がどうこうの話じゃないなこれは
星街すいせいちゃん
なるほどこの子はすごく頑張っている子だ。きっとアイマスの事が本当に好きなんだろう
アイマスの人にはなれなかったのでVという敗者復活戦に本気で挑んでいる並々ならぬ執念は感じるし実際に歌もうまい
いいんじゃないだろうか。そのままがんばってほしい
ここから先はキライなものキライという話で、それは非常にリスクが高いので匿名で書くことにしたけど
うわーやばいな
すいせいちゃん本人はよほど好きで歌ってるんだろうけど運営やクリエイター陣にまったく敬意がないんだな
ツイッターでもつべでもこの曲についての紹介が二の次。この書き方はアライブファクターを知ってる人から星街すいせいというコンテンツにリーチしてほしいけど逆はどうでもいいという根本が透けて見える
ツイートした文章の一つ目にタイトル以外の情報がもう少しあればここまでの嫌悪感は無かったんじゃないだろうか
そして動画の質
Vのカバー曲は大部分が少ない立ち絵に歌詞テキストを如何にかっこよく流すかという競技だが
そこでミスを犯すのは嫌われても仕方がない
重箱の隅をつつくような小さな事を言うなよ、ではなくカバー曲は1ナノミリのスキも見せない完成度を求められて然るべきものだ
微に入り細を穿てない程度の人が手掛けてしまったのだ、なんて不幸なことだろう
そのへんがどうでもいい人達がすいせいちゃんを取り巻いているのだ 根が深い
ここまでぶっちゃけクソ穿った憶測どころかただの汚い妄想でしかなかったのに
ホロライ勢がゲーム配信で広範囲にトラブっている話が駆け巡っており
矢面にいる彼らはともかくその裏で管理・運営をしている人間の質は少なくとも
”彼らを売り出すために使っている他社が作り上げたエンタテイメントにひとかけらの敬意も持っていない”
という方向で裏付けられつつある
最近どっかの委員長がシャニマスを取り上げてはちゃめちゃに愛欲に溢れている様が話題になったのに対して
ある程度の深度まで知らないとカバー歌ったのに私はアイマスが好きだー！がまるで伝わってこないVとの差はそんな運営によって醸し出されてるのではないだろうか
っていうかVがアイマスのカバーを発表する、なんて事象別にこれが初めてとかそんな事ないんじゃない？知らんけど
それがやたら燃えるのはたまたまとかでなくそれなりに多くの層が嫌悪感を覚える要素が今回はあったんだなというのは想像に難くない
日本人なら誰でも知ってるあの名曲をカバー！とはわけが違う話だ
ミリ界隈に古くからいる人間の多くはアイマスシリーズの中で唯一、この世界はいつ終わっても不思議ではないことの具体的恐怖をもって知っておりそしていつも脅かされている
そのため基本的に新規層の取り込みチャンスにはセンシティブになる人間が多い
故に、お気持ち勢は新規にミリシタに触れて欲しいという願いがまったく見受けられない事に壮絶な嫌悪を催すし
お気持ちのお気持ちを表明する側のＰは新規開拓すれば儲けものなのに否定するなよ！って事のみのお気持ちに終始している
アライブファクターや贐の鳥が持つ背景がどうこうだからカバーすんなとか平和なお気持ちを垂れてるPはただのバカなので好きなだけ叩かれてもかまわないんだけど
お気持ちのお気持ちさんたちもホロのカバーぐらい好きにさせろよバーカ！って言ってる人間かそれをオブラートに包んで冷静な俺を表現したいけどあんま隠せてない人間しかいなくて本当に地獄だな
そんな無駄な時間つかってないですいせいちゃんの歌がよかったみなさん！この曲はね！っていうRT0のツイートの一つも拡散してあげればいいのに
今回行われたカバーの内情に渦巻いているものはきっと「すいせいちゃんからこの曲を知ってミリシタを初めて課金までしました！」という新たなPが生まれて初めて浄化されるものなのだろう
それが観測できる気配は
いまのところ まったく ないのだ ……
このアライブファクター歌ってるVは誰？見たい！っていうミリPはけっこうみた
よかったね カバーした甲斐があったね 次はOnly One Secondとかききたいです
権力闘争ってなんだよって思うが一般的には外見でどうこうしようとするものでは？
キャリアのある無し関わらずな
それについて、
And rather than believing old notions that beauty has only a trivial, superficial value, women should change the way they use the “beauty premium” and not be ashamed of using it to get ahead.
って言う人もあれば、
という人もいる
ただ、グラマラス？ゴージャス？キラキラ？な女性は死ぬほどしんどいのが個人的なお気持ち
ベンチャーにいがちな大学サークルのノリそのままのクソ役員(ワインをラッパ飲みさせたりする)と
甲乙つけ難い
在宅勤務でいこう
PS4の『The Last of Us 2』が事前のメタスコア大絶賛一色とは一転していざ発売されると前作ユーザーから賛否両論となりユーザースコアが激低で結果的に主要サイトの中でほぼ唯一批判的に評価していた日本のIGN Japanのレビューが海外ユーザーから再評価される怪現象が起きている。
2020年6月19日に発売されたPS4用ゲーム『The Last of Us Part II』。日本では「ラスアス2」、海外では「TLOU2」と略されることが多い。ソニー・インタラクティブエンタテインメント (SIE) のファーストパーティー（傘下スタジオ）であるノーティドッグ (Naughty Dog) が開発を担当し、SIEより発売された。アメリカのヴァージニア州に本拠地を置くノーティドッグは、『クラッシュバンディクー』シリーズや『ジャック×ダクスター』シリーズ、そして近年では『アンチャーテッド』シリーズによって知られている開発会社であり、2001年よりSIEの傘下スタジオとなっている。
前作『The Last of Us』は2013年にPS3で発売され、2014年にはPS4でリマスター版が発売された。PS3版とPS4版を合わせると現在までに約2000万本以上を売り上げている。メタスコアでは95点を獲得し、数え切れないほどのメディアによって表彰された（ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_accolades_received_by_The_Last_of_Us ）。
ゲームのジャンルとしては三人称視点のアクションアドベンチャーであり、サバイバル、ホラー、ステルス、シューターといった要素を含む。プレイヤーは成人男性のジョエルと少女のエリーを操作し、ゾンビがはびこる終末的世界を生き延びるために冒険を繰り広げる。オープンワールドではなくリニア（一本道）ではあるが、開発チームが「ワイドリニア」と呼ぶ自由度の高いリニアな空間は、開発者の企図した凝ったゲーム体験とプレイヤーの自由な探索という相反するゲーム性をバランス良く両立させるものである。
Metacritic（メタクリティック）というレビュー収集サイトによって、主要ゲームサイトのゲームレビューの点数を収集、平均したもの、それが「メタスコア」であり、それとは別にユーザーが投稿した点数を平均したものが「ユーザースコア」である。
Metacriticは1999年に映画レビューサイトとして始まり、その後サイトの評価収集対象にビデオゲームを加えた。メタスコアは現在では世界で最も重要視されるゲームの評価基準のひとつとなっている。単純にいえば、あるゲームに100点をつけたレビューサイトと60点をつけたレビューサイトがあれば、それらを平均した80点がそのゲームのメタスコアとなる（実際にはメディアごとに重要度というものが設定されており、その重み付けを反映してスコアが計算されるため、もう少しややこしい）。
『The Last of Us Part II』は世界各国のメディアによるレビューで絶賛され、2020年6月20日10時（JST）時点では94件のレビューを平均して95点という非常な高評価を受けた。過半数を越える実に50件ものレビューが同作に100点満点を与えている。
このメタスコアは2020年に発売されたゲームのなかで最高評価であり、その下には同じく95点の『ペルソナ5 ザ・ロイヤル』、93点の『Half-Life: Alyx』、91点の『あつまれ どうぶつの森』などが続く。なお日本のユーザーに馴染みが深いタイトルで言うと、『ファイナルファンタジーVII リメイク』は87点、『仁王2』は85点、『バイオハザード RE:3』は84点である。（ https://www.metacritic.com/browse/games/score/metascore/year/all/filtered ）
PS4タイトル全体の中では、97点の『Red Dead Redemption 2』（2018年）と『グランド・セフト・オートV』（2014年）に次ぐ順位である。（ https://www.metacritic.com/browse/games/score/metascore/all/ps4/filtered?sort=desc&view=detailed ）
しかしその中にあって、日本のIGN Japanは10点満点で7点とやや厳しめの点数をつけている（ 過去との決別で残された物語『The Last of Us Part II』レビュー https://jp.ign.com/the-last-of-us-2/44388/review/the-last-of-us-part-ii ）。レビュアーの福山幸司は前作が「ビデオゲーム史上に残る、マスターピースであることが疑いようがない」とした上で、「残念ながら『The Last of Us Part II』は、前作を超えるどころか、共に並び立つことすら許されないほど、いびつな出来栄えとなってしまった。」と評した。福山が同作に批判的な評価を下している原因は、主にそのストーリー面についてのものだ。Metacriticに収集された94件のレビューのうち、ラスアス2にIGN Japanと同程度またはそれ以下の評価を与えているメディアは、ほかにGAMINGbibleとGame Revolutionだけである。
IGN Japanは6月13日に福山によるレビューを発表し、さらにその翌日には同編集部のクラベ・エスラによる同作のレビューをめぐる分析記事が掲載された（ 世界各国のメディアが『The Last of Us Part II』を大絶賛！ IGN JAPANの評価が激しく異なる理由を紐解く https://jp.ign.com/the-last-of-us-2/44460/news/the-last-of-us-part-ii-ign-japan ）。相反する評価を受けるビッグタイトルは時々あるが、それを分析した記事が投稿されるのは頻繁にあることではなく、それだけラスアス2が注目を集めるタイトルであること、IGN Japanのレビューが異色であったことを示していると言えるだろう。
2020年6月19日にいざゲームが発売されると、ユーザーからはたちまち賛否両論が巻き起こった。議論の的となるのはやはり主にストーリー面についてであり、前作のファンからの批判が多くを占めた。Metacriticのユーザーレビューは、2020年6月20日10時（JST）時点では17984件のレビューを平均して3.3という酷評としか言いようのないスコアになっている。
そして、このような酷評を与えられるにつれ、IGN Japanのレビューが再評価されつつある。興味深いのは、海外のゲーマーの多くが（日本のゲーマーが『ファミ通』のクロスレビューに対して揶揄するのと同様に）多くのメディアの絶賛レビューはメーカーから受け取った金銭によって操作されており信用に値しないと信じ込んでいる点だろう。以下、ツイッターでひっかかった意見の一部。
まおんも@nagineco
MichiruBOSS @N6Gi7
I think one of the best review about Tlou2 is from IGN Japan. If you are interestes, go check it out.
Sublem @DarthSublem
Whooo boy, friend is pissed off at TLOU2, he says it's a PoS because the fucked the story so hard. IGN Japan was right. Gameplay and graphics are great, but the story is complete ass. He told me about the story and ending, and I have to agree. It's basically a big FU to TLOU1
（友人がラスアス2に立腹している。ストーリーがとても酷くて凹んでいるらしい。IGN Japanは正しかった。ゲーム性とグラフィックは素晴らしい、しかしストーリーは本当に最低。彼はストーリーとエンディングについて語ってくれて、私も同意した。今作は基本的に前作に対するFU (Fuck You) だ）
The Last Of Us Part IIを5時間程度プレイしてみたが、IGN Japanのレビューで言いたいことが序盤をプレイしただけで、非常によく伝わってきた。7/10という点数になるかはともかく、賛否両論になるのがほぼ確実なゲーム。クリア時に今の感想を塗りつぶすほどの展開になっていると嬉しいな。
Mashiro@li__xunhuan
#TLOU2
高真剣@scaa315
Rich Price@richprice16
I’m only 3 hours in, but the IGN Japan review of game resonates the most so far. They basically said it’s a good game, but not 10/10. The gameplay is virtually identical to the original, which is 7 years old.
（まだ3時間プレイしただけだが、いまのところIGN Japanのレビューが最も共感できる。基本的には良いゲームだと言えるが、10点満点はない。ゲーム性は7年前のオリジナルとほぼ同じだ。）
Metacritic needs to make it that the Critic Reviews are based on actual critics and not paid off journalists. The only legitimate review on there is from IGN Japan. Even THEY were generous.
（Metacriticは、そのCritic Reviewsが実際の批評家に基づいたものであって報酬を受け取ったジャーナリストによるものではないことを明らかにする必要がある。唯一の正当なレビューはIGN Japanによるものだった。それですらまだ手ぬるい。）
IGN Japan did a better job review this game.
This game is not a masterpiece, is not a 10/10 or 9/10.
I don't care about gay or bi characters, i think that is amazing but the story of this game is a 6/10.
Yes the graphics are amazing but that alone is not what makes a great game.
（IGN Japanはこのゲームレビューで最も良い仕事をした。このゲームはマスターピースではないし、10点満点でも9点でもない。私はゲイやバイのキャラクターは気にしない、それは素晴らしいことだと思うけれど、でもこのストーリーは10点満点で6点だ。）
Sublem @DarthSublem
Friend has, he says the story is dog shit and just takes a shit on TLOU 1.
From what I can tell, IGN Japan was right, and everyone who gave a 10/10 was obviously paid off
（友人は今作のストーリーはラスアス1の上にひりだした犬の糞だと言った。私の知る限りではIGN Japanは正しかったし、10点満点を付けたやつは明らかに金をもらっている）
ラスアス2
まだ半分だけど、俺は苦手
IGNJのレビューも納得だわ...
話が重くて辛いとかじゃなくて単純に話がつまらなくて辛い
#ラスアス2
Ivanhoe20@Ivanhoe20
It means IGN Japan is less biased than IGN USA in terms of criticism
Let me tell you this IGN gave the game a 10/10 and most def is sucking up to ND and sony but IGN japan gave the game a 7/10 and said the story is bad and did not follow the same route as the first one so i wouldn't trust any gaming journalists or company on an honest review
（IGNは10点満点で10点を与え、Naughty Dogとソニーにおもねっているが、IGN Japanは同作に7点を与え、ストーリーは良くなく、前作のようにはなれなかったと言う。だから私はゲームジャーナリストや企業が誠実なレビューをするとは信用できない）
I don't believe to the 100% ratings, I don't believe to 0% ratings either...
IGN Japan gave the game a 70% score, probably what it really deserves.
（私は100点の評価は信じていないし、0点の評価も信じていない……。IGN Japanは本作に70点を付けたが、おそらくそれが実情に近い。）
vεr†rø@DaytimeCurfew
The thing with IGN is that you can pay them for a review. Like almost any "credible" reviewer. IGN Japan tho, thats a realistic review
（IGNについて重要なのは、レビューのために彼らに金銭を支払うことができるということです。ほとんどの「信頼できる」レビュアーと同様に。ING Japanは現実的なレビューだったけれども）
Nemui@Gelzoniansuss
IGN Japan summed that up pretty good there.
Graphics are out of this world. Its beautiful.
But well... new characters only to throw them away.
It seems like they couldn't buy IGN Japan in the end haha
（IGN Japanはかなり上手くまとめている。グラフィックはこの世のものとは思えない。美しい。でも、、、新キャラはそれらを投げ捨ててしまった。結局のところ彼らはIGN Japanを買収できなかったようだ。笑）
わからん。
考えられうる要因としては、ゲーマーの「ポリコレ疲れ」やTroll（荒らし）がある。
前作から引き続き主人公を務める女性主人公エリーは、本作ではレズビアンであることが明らかになり、新キャラクターでバイセクシャルのディーナと接近する。新キャラクターのレブはトランスジェンダーの少年である。今作でメインキャラクターの一人となるアビーは、発売前に誤って噂されていたようなトランスジェンダーの女性ではなく、単に「女性らしさ」がないだけの筋肉質な女性である。ラスアス2のシナリオを手掛けたNaughty Dogのイスラエル系アメリカ人のライターNeil Druckmann（ニール・ドラックマン）は、自身はシスジェンダーの男性であるものの、フェミニスト評論家Anita Sarkeesian（アニータ・サーキシアン）からの影響を公言しており、ジェンダーイコーリティや多様性に配慮したゲーム作りを心がけている。2004年よりNaughty Dogで働く彼は、前作『The Last of Us』や『アンチャーテッド 海賊王と最後の秘宝』のクリエイティブディレクターおよびライターを務めた。
ユーザースコアの世界には、Troll（荒らし）によるreview bomb（レビュー爆弾、レビュー爆撃）というものがある。『Death Stranding』のケースでは、1万8000件以上のユーザーレビューから約6000件以上が削除され、それにより「5.1」だったスコアは「7.3」まで上昇した。有名作の発売の際には、このようなreview bombの存在もまたよくある光景となっている（ レビューサイトが「デス・ストランディング」への「疑わしいユーザー評価」を大量削除してスコアが一気に急上昇 - GIGAZINE https://gigazine.net/news/20191210-removed-death-stranding-suspicious-ratings/ ）。おそらく今回のラスアス2でも、後日いくらかのレビューが削除され、揺り戻しが起こるだろう。
しかしツイッターでの評判などを見る限り、この低評価の原因はTrollによるいたずらだけとは思えない。結局のところ不満を集めるのは、新メインキャラクターのアビーが男性に媚びたところのない政治的に正しい女性キャラクターだったからではなく、前作で辛い旅をともにしてプレイヤーがさんざん感情移入した主人公ジョエルがポッと出のアビーによく確認もされずあっさり射殺され、ジョエルの代わりにそのアビーを長時間にわたってプレイアブルキャラとして操作しなくてはならないというゲームの構造によるもの、それにとっちらかって焦点の定まらないストイーリーラインによるものだろう。
ガチバカはなんでも噛んで含めるように説明しないといけないからなんかおらワクワクしてきたぞ。
まず記事のどこにも『精子にドナーのDNA』とは言ってない。ドナーのDNAが発見されたのは『精液』。
"But perhaps most surprisingly, four years after the procedure, samples of Long’s semen show only his donor’s DNA."
それもそのはずで骨髄のレシピアント（Long）はパイプカット済みだからドナーのDNAもなにも、そもそも精液に精子が含まれない。
"...[Long]’s surprising semen is likely due to the fact that Long had a vasectomy after his second child was born."
「これを行うと精嚢に精子が貯蔵されなくなり精嚢腺と前立腺から分泌される精液中に精子が存在しなくなる。」
（ウィキピディア『不妊手術#男性』：https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E4%B8%8D%E5%A6%8A%E6%89%8B%E8%A1%93#%E7%94%B7%E6%80%A7）
「三人の骨髄移植の専門家に聞いたけど、みんなレシピアントがドナーのDNAを持つ『精子』をつくることはありえないと言った。」
"Three bone marrow transplant experts consulted by the NYT all agreed that it would be impossible for the procedure to result in a recipient producing sperm containing their donor’s DNA."
「骨髄は血液に富み、あらゆる血球系細胞（赤血球、白血球、リンパ球、血小板のもとになる巨核球など）に分化できる造血幹細胞が存在する。」
（ウィキピディア『骨髄』： https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E9%AA%A8%E9%AB%84）
骨髄を移植するのは健康な血球をつくることが必要だからで、これらの血球は当然骨髄ドナーのDNAを持つ。この血球のいずれかが『精液に』混入したと考えるのが妥当。
レシピアントの精液には誰の精子も含まれないし、ドナー由来の血球は誰も妊娠させることはできないので、ドナーのDNAを持つ子供は生まれない。
"But perhaps most surprisingly, four years after the procedure, samples of Long’s semen show only his donor’s DNA."
Semen （精液）. Not sperm（精子）.
"Three bone marrow transplant experts consulted by the NYT all agreed that it would be impossible for the procedure to result in a recipient producing sperm containing their donor’s DNA."
"...[Long]’s surprising semen is likely due to the fact that Long had a vasectomy after his second child was born."
昨今の米国でのプロテストに世界が刮目する中、"Black Lives Matter" というフレーズをご存知の方も増えてきたことと思う。
文字通り訳せば、"黒人の命は大切である"ということなのだが、これに対し"黒人だけじゃなくて、白人も、アジア人も、みんなの命が大切なのでは？"と純粋に思われる方もいるだろう。
その通りである。
米国では、"Black Lives Matter"に対し"All Lives Matter" (="みんなの命は大切である") という発言を様々な場所で読む、又は耳にする機会が多数存在する。
日本でも、この運動やその根底にある人種差別問題への関心が少しずつ高まっている中で、"All Lives Matter"という、（恐らく多くの日本人にとって）一見自明で無害のように見える一文の意味するところを、とあるRedditでの投稿を引用する形で紹介しようと思う。
以下引用及び拙訳 (r/explainlikeimfive/comments/3du1qm/eli5_why_is_it_so_controversial_when_someone_says/ より)
Imagine that you're sitting down to dinner with your family, and while everyone else gets a serving of the meal, you don't get any. So you say "I should get my fair share." And as a direct response to this, your dad corrects you, saying, "everyone should get their fair share." Now, that's a wonderful sentiment -- indeed, everyone should, and that was kinda your point in the first place: that you should be a part of everyone, and you should get your fair share also. However, dad's smart-ass comment just dismissed you and didn't solve the problem that you still haven't gotten any!
以下のような状況を想像してみてください。あなたは今、家族とディナーの席にいます。あなた以外には食事が配膳されていく中、あなたの前には何もありません。そこであなたは、”フェアな分量の食事が私に配膳されるべきだ”、と父親に伝えたところ、彼は以下のように応えました。”家族みんながそれぞれのフェアな分量を配膳されるべきだね”、と。確かに、彼の発言そのものは、当然のことであり、素晴らしいですが、この返答には齟齬があります。というのも、ディナーを取り囲んでいる家族のメンバー各自が、（彼の言う様に）フェアな分量を配膳されるべきだからこそ、その一員であるあなたは自分の分量を主張しているのです。従って、彼の返事はあなたの前に食事がないという現実問題に対して無関心であり、何の解決策も提示していません。そして何より、依然としてあなたの前には食事がありません。
The problem is that the statement "I should get my fair share" had an implicit "too" at the end: "I should get my fair share, too, just like everyone else." But your dad's response treated your statement as though you meant "only I should get my fair share", which clearly was not your intention. As a result, his statement that "everyone should get their fair share," while true, only served to ignore the problem you were trying to point out.
ここでの問題は、あなたの”フェアな分量の食事が私に配膳されるべきだ”という発言の真意が、"(他のみんなと同じように、私にも）フェアな分量の食事が配膳されるべきだ"という括弧内の部分を前提に含んでいるにもかかわらず、”フェアな分量の食事が私（だけに）配膳されるべきだ”とあなたが発言したかのように、父親が（あなたの意図に反して）受け取った、という点にあります。従って、彼の発言そのものが真実であることに変わりはないものの、あなたには食事がないという問題は看過されてしまっているのです。
That's the situation of the "black lives matter" movement. Culture, laws, the arts, religion, and everyone else repeatedly suggest that all lives should matter. Clearly, that message already abounds in our society.
これこそが、"Black Lives Matter" 運動の対峙している状況なのです。文化、法律、芸術作品や宗教、その他全てが繰り返し、みんなの命が大切であるべきだ、と主張しています。米国社会においては、このメッセージは至る所で目にすることでしょう。
The problem is that, in practice, the world doesn't work the way. You see the film Nightcrawler? You know the part where Renee Russo tells Jake Gyllenhal that she doesn't want footage of a black or latino person dying, she wants news stories about affluent white people being killed? That's not made up out of whole cloth -- there is a news bias toward stories that the majority of the audience (who are white) can identify with. So when a young black man gets killed (prior to the recent police shootings), it's generally not considered "news", while a middle-aged white woman being killed is treated as news. And to a large degree, that is accurate -- young black men are killed in significantly disproportionate numbers, which is why we don't treat it as anything new. But the result is that, societally, we don't pay as much attention to certain people's deaths as we do to others. So, currently, we don't treat all lives as though they matter equally.
しかしながら、現実社会においては決してその通りではなく、命の重みは平等ではありません。あなたは、Nightcrawlerという映画を見ましたか？その映画の中で、Renee RussoがJake Gyllenhalに対して、黒人もしくはラテン系アメリカ人が命を落とすような映像ではなく、裕福な白人が殺害されたといったようなニュースが欲しい、と伝えるシーンがあります。実はこのシーンは、ニュースの大部分の受け手である白人層が共感できるような報道を重視するというような、現実に即したメディアのバイアスを如実に反映しています。現実として、若い黒人男性が殺害されることはニュースにならない一方で、中年白女性の殺害事件はニュースとして世間に扱われます。さらに言えば、統計上有意に多数の若い黒人男性が日々命を落としてしまっているという現状において、そういった死のニュース性が少ないということは単なるバイアスとして存在するわけではなく、ほとんどの場合事実なのです。その結果、一部のグループの人々の死に対しては他のグループの人々の死ほどに、私たちは社会全体として注目しません。人の命は本来全て平等であるにも関わらず、現実として私たちはそれらを平等に扱っていないのです。
Just like asking dad for your fair share, the phrase "black lives matter" also has an implicit "too" at the end: it's saying that black lives should also matter. But responding to this by saying "all lives matter" is willfully going back to ignoring the problem. It's a way of dismissing the statement by falsely suggesting that it means "only black lives matter," when that is obviously not the case. And so saying "all lives matter" as a direct response to "black lives matter" is essentially saying that we should just go back to ignoring the problem.
あなたが父親に自分の分の食事を求めた時のように、"Black Lives Matter"というフレーズにも"too"、すなわち黒人の命”も”大切であるという前提があります。他の人種の人々の命と同様、黒人の命も大切に扱われるべきだ、というメッセージがそこにはあるのです。これに対して"All Lives Matter"と応えることは、その根底にある（黒人の命が他の命と同様に大切に扱われていないという）問題を恣意的に無視していることになるのです。そのような問題の共通認識が前提として明らかに存在しているにも関わらず、さも"黒人の命だけが大切だ"という主張であると曲解することで、"Black Lives Matter"という本来の主張を退けてしまっています。"Black Lives Matter"というメッセージに対して、"All Lives Matter"と応えることは、黒人の日々対峙するそのような問題を無視し、そのままの現状を維持しよう、と主張する事と本質的に変わりはないのです。
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/may/20/andrew-cuomo-new-york-coronavirus-catastrophe
There’s something disturbing about Cuomo being hailed as the hero of the pandemic when he should rightly be one of the villains. As Business Insider notes, he is now only able to attain praise for his actions because his earlier failures made those actions necessary. He’s lauded for addressing a problem that he himself partly caused. Of course, part of this is because Donald Trump has bungled the coronavirus response even more badly, so that Cuomo – by not being a complete buffoon – looks like a capable statesman by contrast. But this is the problem: for too long, Democrats have measured their politicians by “whether they are better than Republicans”. This sets the bar very low indeed, and means that Democrats end up settling for incompetent and amoral leaders who betray progressive values again and again.
彼は当然悪役の一人であるべきなのに、クオモがパンデミックの英雄として歓迎されているという不穏な何かがある。Business Insiderが指摘するように、彼は今、彼の行動のための賞賛を得ることができるだけである、なぜなら彼の以前の失敗がそれらの行動を必要としたからである。彼自身が部分的に引き起こした問題に対処したことで賞賛されている。もちろん、その一部は、ドナルド・トランプ氏がコロナウイルスへの対応をさらにひどく失敗させてしまったためで、クオモ氏は-完全な大馬鹿者ではないことによって-対照的に、有能な政治家のように見えるのだ。しかし、これが問題なのだ。あまりにも長い間、民主党は「彼らが共和党よりも優れているかどうか」で政治家を評価してきた。これは、バーを非常に低く設定しており、民主党は、進歩的な価値観を何度も何度も裏切る無能で不道徳な指導者に落ち着くことになることを意味しています。
※DeepLによる機械翻訳
詳細はリンク先で読んでほしいが、最終段落はまるで日本の野党を見ているようにしか見えない。
自分たちが何を目標としているかを示さずに、対立相手の悪い部分を指摘したり、比較して自分は良いと言っているだけの状態に陥ってしまい結局何がしたいのか見えなくなりつつあるということだ。
Twitterや増田でも自分は社会に馴染めない、浮いている、はみだし者だ、みたいな自己評価に苦しむ人をよく見かける。
自粛期間中に久しぶりに聴いてまたハマったので、皆にも聴いてほしい。特にタイトルのような悩みを持つ人に。
LINKIN PARKの「CASTLE OF GLASS」という曲だ。https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ScNNfyq3d_w
この社会を、非常に脆いバランスでできたガラスの城(CASTLE OF GLASS)とたとえて、
そこに馴染めない自分のような人間を「ガラスに入った小さなひび割れに過ぎない('Cause I'm only a crack in this castle of glass)」とサビで歌っている。
I. INTRODUCTION
These Terms of Use and End User License Agreement (collectively, the “Agreement”) together with all the documents referred to in it constitute a legally binding agreement made between you as a natural person (“you”, “your” or “user”) and We (“we,” “us” or “our”), concerning your access to and use of the software application for mobile devices (the “App”).
All the documents that relate to the App are hereby expressly incorporated herein by reference.
Please read this Agreement carefully before you download, install or use the App.
It is important that you read and understand this Agreement as by downloading, installing or using the App you indicate that you have read, understood, agreed and accepted the Agreement which takes effect on the date on which you download, install or use the App. By using the App you agree to abide by this Agreement.
If you do not agree with (do not accept) this Agreement, or if you do not agree at least with one of the provisions of this Agreement, you are not authorized to, and you may not access, download, install or use the App and you must ly discontinue downloading, installing the App and remove (delete) the App from any mobile device in your possession or under your control.
We reserve the right, at our sole discretion, to make changes or modifications to this Agreement at any time and for any reason. We will keep you informed about any changes by updating this Agreement and you waive any right to receive specific notice of each such change. It is your responsibility to periodically review this Agreement to stay informed of updates. You will be subject to, and will be deemed to be aware of and to have accepted, the changes in any revised Agreement by your continued use of the App after the date such revised Agreement is posted.
III. RESTRICTIONS ON WHO CAN USE THE APP
In order to download, install, access or use the App, you must (a) be eighteen (18) years of age or older.
All users who are minors in the jurisdiction in which they reside (generally under the age of 18) must have the permission of, and be directly supervised by, their parent or guardian to use the App, so if you are between the ages of thirteen (13) and seventeen (17) years and you wish to use download, install, access or use the App, before doing so you must: (a) assure and confirm (if needed) that your parent or guardian have read and agree (get your parent or guardian’s consent) to this Agreement prior to you using the App; (b) have the power to enter a binding contract with us and not be barred from doing so under any applicable laws.
Parents and guardians must directly supervise any use of the App by minors.
Any person under the age of thirteen (13) years is not permitted to download, install, access or use the App.
You affirm that you are either more than eighteen 18 years of age, or an emancipated minor, or possess legal parental or guardian consent, and are fully able and competent to enter into the terms, conditions, obligations, affirmations, representations, and warranties set forth in this Agreement, and to abide by and comply with this Agreement.
IV. GENERAL TERMS
The App is a utility program designed to enhance your device experience. The App allows to scan any types of document to high quality PDF or JPEG; to save and store any scan copies of documents on your mobile devices; to share your scans via email; upload scanned documents to cloud services like box, Evernote or Google Drive (see the full performance list on the App’s page on itunes.apple.com). All documents shall be stored locally on your device and shall never be sent to any third-party unless you export them to other apps or devices by means of the App.
The App is intended only for your personal non-commercial use. You shall use the App only for the purposes, mentioned above.
V. PRIVACY POLICY
Your privacy is very important to us. Accordingly, we have developed the Privacy Policy in order for you to understand how we process, use and store information including personal data. Access to the App and use of the Services is subject to the Privacy Policy. By accessing the App and by continuing to use the Services, you are deemed to have accepted the Privacy Policy, and in particular, you are deemed to have acknowledged the ways we process your information as well as appropriate legal grounds for processing described in the Privacy Policy. We reserve the right to amend the Privacy Policy from time to time. If you disagree with any part of the Privacy Policy, you must immediately stop using the App and Services. Please read our Privacy Policy carefully.
VI. END USER LICENSE AGREEMENT
By using the App, you undertake to respect our intellectual rights (intellectual rights related to the App’s source code, UI/UX design, content material, copyright and trademarks, hereinafter referred to as the “Intellectual Property Rights”) as well as those owned by third parties.
As long as you keep using the App, we you a limited, non-exclusive, non-transferable non-sublicensable, non-assignable and revocable license to access and use the App pursuant to this Agreement on any Apple-branded products that you own or control except that the App may be accessed and used by other accounts associated with you via Family Sharing or volume purchasing (the “License”).
The source code, design and content, including information, photographs, illustrations, artwork and other graphic materials, sounds, music or video (hereinafter – the “works”) as well as names, logos and trademarks (hereinafter – “means of individualization”) within the App are protected by copyright laws and other relevant laws and/or international treaties, and belong to us and/or our partners and/or contracted third parties, as the case may be.
In the event of any third party claim that your possession and use of the App infringes that third party’s intellectual property rights, Apple will not be responsible for the investigation, defense, settlement and discharge of any such intellectual property infringement claim.
These works and means of individualization may not be copied, reproduced, retransmitted, distributed, disseminated, sold, published, broadcasted or circulated whether in whole or in part, unless expressly permitted by us and/or our partners and/or contracted third parties, as the case may be.
All rights, title and interest in and to the App and its content, works and means of individualization as well as its functionalities (1) are the exclusive property of We and/or our partners and/or contracted third parties, (2) are protected by the applicable international and national legal provisions, and (3) are under no circumstances transferred (assigned) to you in full or in part within the context of the license herewithin.
We will not hesitate to take legal action against any unauthorized use of our trademarks, names or symbols to protect and restore our rights. All rights not expressly ed herein are reserved. Other product and company names mentioned herein may also be the trademarks of their respective owners.
You agree not to use the App in any way that:
is unlawful, illegal or unauthorized;
is defamatory of any other person;
infringes any copyright, right or trademark of any other person;
advocates, promotes or assists any unlawful act such as (by way of example only) copyright infringement or computer misuse.
You shall not make the App available to any third parties. In addition, you shall not modify, translate into other languages, reverse engineer, decompile, disassemble or otherwise derivative works from the App or any documentation concerning the App.
You shall not transfer, lend, rent, lease, distribute the App, or use it for providing services to a third party, or any rights to the App or any documentation concerning the App to a third party.
Misuse of any trademarks or any other content displayed on the App is prohibited.
You shall not copy and/or duplicate and/or distribute and/or publish and/or use any content in the App, directly or indirectly, by way of a violation of our Intellectual Property Rights.
Moreover, you shall not make any attempts to use the App or part thereof for malicious intentions.
Also we are not responsible for the way you use the App.
It is clarified that we may adopt, against a user who violated the present Agreement, any legal measures at our disposal pursuant to the applicable laws.
All disputes arising from the usage of the App, shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the United States of America, and shall be submitted to the sole jurisdiction of the competent courts of New York, New York, the United States of America.
VIII. AVAILABILITY OF THE APP, SECURITY AND ACCURACY
In order to use the App, you are required to have a compatible mobile phone or tablet, and internet access. However, please note that we offer you widgets that save translations and allow you to access them later in offline mode.
The App is available for downloading and installing on handheld compatible mobile devices running Apple iOS Operating System 11.0 with minimum system requirements.
We do not warrant that the App will be compatible with all hardware and software which you may use.
We make no warranty that your access to the App will be uninterrupted, timely or error-free. Neither does Apple have an obligation whatsoever to furnish any maintenance and support services with respect to the App.
You acknowledge the App is provided via the internet and mobile networks and so the quality and availability of the App may be affected by factors outside our reasonable control.
The version of the App may be upgraded from time to time to add support for new functions and services.
We may change or update the App and anything described in it without noticing you. If the need arises, we may suspend access to the App, or close it indefinitely.
You also warrant that any information that you submit to us is true, accurate and complete, and you agree to keep it actual at all times.
You can discontinue using our Services at any time by choosing the relevant option in your iTunes Account Settings. If you decide not to use the App for any reason you should uninstall the App.
The App is provided on a paid basis. You will need to pay a one-time fee of $14.99 in order to download the App. Once you download the App, you will get access to all its features.
Prices are in U.S. dollars, may vary in countries other than the U.S. and are subject to change without notice.
You may be charged by your communications service provider for downloading and/or accessing the App on your mobile phone or tablet device, so you should check the terms of agreement with your operator. This may include data roaming charges if you do this outside your home territory. All these charges are solely your responsibility. If you do not pay the bills related to your mobile phone or tablet device, then we assume that you have the permission from the person that does it before incurring any of these charges.
X. THIRD PARTY WEBSITES AND RESOURCES
The App may link you to other sites on the Internet and contracted third parties to provide you certain services. We have no control over and accept no responsibility for the content of any website or mobile application to which a link from the App exists (unless we are the provider of those linked websites or mobile applications). Such linked websites and mobile applications are provided “as is” for your convenience only with no warranty, express or implied, for the information provided within them.
You acknowledge that you must comply with applicable third party terms of agreement when using the App. You are solely responsible for and bear all risks arising from your use of any third-party websites or resources.
If you have any queries, concerns or complaints about such third party websites or mobile applications (including, but not limited to, queries, concerns or complaints relating to products, orders for products, faulty products and refunds) you must direct them to the operator of that third party website or mobile application.
YOU AGREE THAT YOUR USE OF THE APP AND ITS SERVICES SHALL BE AT YOUR SOLE RISK. THE SERVICES AND ALL THE MATERIALS, INFORMATION, SOFTWARE, CONTENT INTEGRATED IN THE APP ARE PROVIDED “AS IS” AND “AS AVAILABLE”. WE DO NOT MAKE ANY WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, WITH REGARD TO THE MERCHANTABILITY, TECHNICAL COMPATIBILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF ANY SERVICE, PRODUCTS OR MATERIAL PROVIDED PURSUANT TO THIS AGREEMENT. WE DO NOT WARRANT THAT THE FUNCTIONS CONTAINED ON OR THROUGH THE SERVICES WILL BE AVAILABLE, UNINTERRUPTED OR ERROR-FREE, THAT DEFECTS WILL BE CORRECTED, OR THAT THE SER
Accepting the Terms Privacy Policy
These Terms of Service ("Terms") are a legal agreement between we and you ("you"). By installing or using any application ("Service") you agree to be bound by these Terms. By accessing or using the Service, you agree that you have read, understood, and accept to be bound by the Terms. We reserve the right, in its sole discretion, to modify or revise these Terms at any time, and you agree to be bound by such modifications or revisions. If you do not agree to the Terms, do not use the Service.
Users are responsible for periodically viewing the Terms. Your continued use of the Service after a change or update has been made will constitute your acceptance to the revised Terms. If you do not agree to the Terms your only remedy is to discontinue your use of the Service and cancel any accounts you have made using the Service.
We reserve the right to refuse any user access to the Services without notice for any reason, including, but not limited to, a violation of the Terms.
You represent that you are 13 years old or older. If you are between the ages of 13 and 18, you represent that your legal guardian has reviewed and agrees to the Terms.
Intellectual Property/Ownership
All materials that are part of the Service (including, but not limited to, designs, text, graphics, pictures, video, information, applications, software, music, sound and other files, and their selection and arrangement) are protected by law from unauthorized use.
We grant you a personal, non-exclusive, non-transferable, revocable, limited scope license to use the Service solely for the purpose of viewing and using the applicable Services and for no other purpose whatsoever. Your license to use the Services is limited by these Terms.
You agree that you are willingly publishing the content on the Service using technology and tools provided by us. You understand and agree that you may not distribute, sell, transfer or license this content and/or application in any manner, in any country, or on any social network or another medium without the explicit written permission of us. We reserve the right to remove and permanently delete any User Content from the Service with or without notice.
You agree that all your communications with the Communication Channels are public, and thus you have no expectation of privacy regarding your use of the Communication Channels. We is not responsible for information that you choose to share on the Communication Channels, or for the actions of other users.
Privacy and Protection of Personal Information
By using the Service, you agree to the collection and use of your personal information as outlined in this Privacy Policy. We may amend the Privacy Policy from time to time, and we encourage you to consult the Privacy Policy regularly for changes.
A cookie is a small data file that we transfer to your computer’s hard disk, generally to quickly identify a user's computer and to "remember" things about the user's visit, such as your preferences or a user name and password. The Service sends cookies to your computer when you access or view the content of us. The information contained in a cookie may be linked to your personal information for purposes such as improving the quality of our service, tailoring recommendations to your interests, and making the Service easier to use. You can disable cookies at any time, although you may not be able to access or use features of the Service.
Third-Party Advertising Companies
We may use third-party advertising companies to serve ads on the Service. We do not provide any personal information to third-party advertising companies on a non-aggregate basis. Our system and the third-party advertising technology may use aggregate information, non-personal information, Our cookies on your hard drive and your use of the Service to target advertisements. In addition, advertisers may use other third-party advertising technology to target advertising on other sites. If advertisements are served to you, a unique third-party cookie or cookies may be placed on your computer. Similarly, third-party advertising companies may provide us with pixel tags (also called “clear gifs” or “beacons”) to help manage and optimize online advertising. Beacons enable us to recognize a browser’s cookie when a browser visits the site on which is a beacon is located, and to learn which banner ads bring users to a given site.
Changing or Deleting Your Information
You may review, update, correct or delete any personal information by changing the applicable information in your profile page on Facebook and/or another social network (s). If you completely delete all this information, your account may become deactivated. If you would like us to delete your record in our system, please contact us and we will attempt to accommodate your request if we are not legally obligated to retain the record.
Security
We have put in place reasonable technical and organizational measures designed to secure your personal information from accidental loss and from unauthorized access, use, alteration or disclosure. However, we cannot guarantee that unauthorized third parties will never be able to overcome those measures or use your personal information for improper purposes. Also please note that email and messaging systems are not considered secure, so we discourage you from sending us personal information through these mediums.
Policy Regarding Children
The Service is not geared toward children under the age of 13 and we do not knowingly collect personal information from children under the age of 13. If we learn that a child under 13 has provided us with personal information we will delete such information from our files as quickly as possible.
Disclaimer of Warranty; Limitation of Liability
You agree that your use of the Service shall be at your sole risk. To the fullest extent permitted by law, We, its officers, directors, employees, and agents disclaim all warranties, express or implies, in connection with the website and your use thereof including implied warranties of title, merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose or non-infringement, accuracy, authority, completeness, usefulness, and timeliness. We make no warranties or representations about the accuracy or completeness of the content of the Service and of the content of any sites linked to the Service; We assume no liability or responsibility for any (i) errors, mistakes, or inaccuracies of content, (ii) personal injury or property damage, of any nature whatsoever, resulting from your access to and use of the Service, (iii) any unauthorized access to or use of our secure servers and/or any and all personal information and/or financial information stored therein, (iv) any interruption or cessation of transmission to or from the Service, (v) any bugs, viruses, trojan horses, or the like which may be transmitted to or through the Service by any third party, and/or (vi) any errors or omissions in any content or for any loss or damage of any kind incurred as a result of the use of any content posted, emailed, transmitted, or otherwise made available via the Service.
In no event will We, its directors, officers, agents, contractors, partners and employees, be liable to you or any third person for any special, direct, indirect, incidental, special, punitive, or consequential damages whatsoever including any lost profits or lost data arising from your use of the Service or other materials on, accessed through or downloaded from the Service, whether based on warranty, contract, tort, or any other legal theory, and whether or not We have been advised of the possibility of these damages. The foregoing limitation of liability shall apply to the fullest extent permitted by law in the applicable jurisdiction. You specifically acknowledge that We shall not be liable for user submissions or the defamatory, offensive, or illegal conduct of any third party and that the risk of harm or damage from the foregoing rests entirely with you.
You agree to indemnify and hold We, and each of its directors, officers, agents, contractors, partners, and employees, harmless from and against any loss, liability, claim, demand, damages, costs and expenses, including reasonable attorney's fees, arising out of or in connection with (i) your use of and access to the Service; (ii) your violation of any term of these Terms of Service; (iii) your violation of any third party right, including without limitation any copyright, property, or privacy right; (iv) any claim that one of your User Submissions caused damage to a third party; or (v) any Content you post or share on or through the Service.
General
By visiting or using the Service, you agree that the laws of UK, without regard to principles of conflict of laws and regardless of your location, will govern these Terms of Service and any dispute of any sort that might arise between you and us.
Contacting Us
If you have any questions about these Terms of Service, please contact us at damonskimetsu.contact@gmail.com
そこは不明だが、
The company also tested 371 COVID-19-negative patients, with only two false positives.
を読む限りは、キットの性能的に誤検出はほぼない、あるいは、アメリカでは旧コロ感染歴の人はほとんどいない、のいずれかの結論になる
いずれにせよ、新コロ感染歴のある人は9割方検出できる、新コロ感染歴のない人を誤検出することはほとんどない、になるから検査キットとしては問題なさそうかと
How reliable are the antibody tests?
Premier Biotech, the manufacturer of the test that USC and L.A. County are using, tested blood from COVID-19-positive patients with a 90 to 95% accuracy rate. The company also tested 371 COVID-19-negative patients, with only two false positives. We also validated these tests in a small sample at a lab at Stanford University. When we do our analysis, we will also adjust for false positives and false negatives.
https://pressroom.usc.edu/what-a-usc-la-county-antibody-study-can-teach-us-about-covid-19/
事前の性能検証によると、371人のCOVID-19陰性患者に抗体試験を実施した場合、偽陽性は2例のみ
Coronavirus: speranze dalla scoperta di Sandro Giannini, 10 Aprile, 2020
https://buongiornonews.it/coronavirus-una-speranza-dalla-scoperta-del-prof-giannini/
1) 英訳（Google translate を利用させて頂きました）
Coronavirus: hopes from the discovery of Sandro Giannini
Bologna - From social media comes good news about the Coronavirus, perhaps decisive, which has scientific foundations and is disseminated by an authoritative doctor from Rizzoli of Bologna, Sandro Giannini. His is a highly qualified curriculum: Full Professor of Orthopedics and Traumatology and of Physical Medicine at the University of Bologna since 1989, director of Clinic I at the Rizzoli Orthopedic Institute and of the Gait Analysis Laboratory, partner in European projects and in national and international research programs, author of more than 600 presentations at national and international conferences and more than 400 articles in Science Citation Index journals. His message gives great hope. Let's read:
“I don't want to seem overwhelming to you, but I think I've demonstrated the cause of coronavirus lethality. Only at Blessed Matthew are there 2 cardiologists who turn over 150 beds to do echocardium with enormous effort and one is me. Terrible fatigue! However, of what some supposed, but could not be sure, we now have the first data. People go to resuscitation for generalized venous thromboembolism, especially pulmonary. If this were the case, resuscitations and intubations are of no use because first of all you have to dissolve, indeed prevent these thromboembolisms. If you ventilate a lung where blood does not reach, it is not needed! In fact 9 out of 10 die. Because the problem is cardiovascular, not respiratory! It is venous microthrombosis, not pneumonia that determines fatality!
And why are thrombi formed? Because inflammation, as per school text, induces thrombosis through a complex but well-known pathophysiological mechanism. Then? Contrary to what scientific literature, especially Chinese, said until mid-March, it was that anti-inflammatories should not be used. Now in Italy anti-inflammatories and antibiotics are used (as in the influences) and the number of inpatients collapses. Many deaths, even 40 years old, had a history of high fever for 10-15 days that was not treated properly. Here inflammation has destroyed everything and prepared the ground for thrombi formation. Because the main problem is not the virus, but the immune reaction that destroys the cells where the virus enters. In fact, our COVID departments have never entered patients with rheumatoid arthritis! Because they make cortisone, a powerful anti-inflammatory!
Therefore, hospitalizations in Italy are decreasing and it is becoming a disease that is treated at home. By taking care of it well at home, you avoid not only hospitalization, but also the thrombotic risk. It was not easy to understand it because the signs of microembolism have faded, even at the echocardium. But this weekend I compared the data of the first 50 patients between those who breathe badly and those who don't and the situation appeared very clear. For me you can go back to playing and reopen the business. Quarantine street. Not now. But time to publish this data. Vaccine can arrive calmly. In America and other states that follow the scientific literature that calls for NOT to use anti-inflammatories is a disaster! Worse than in Italy. And they are old and cheap drugs. " (Associated Medias - Red / Giut)
———
2) 原文：イタリア語
Coronavirus: speranze dalla scoperta di Sandro Giannini
Bologna – Dai social arriva una buona notizia sul Coronavirus, forse risolutiva, che ha fondamenta scientifiche ed è diffusa da un medico autorevole del Rizzoli di Bologna, Sandro Giannini. Il suo è un curriculum molto qualificato: Professore ordinario di Ortopedia e Traumatologia e di Medicina Fisica presso l’Università di Bologna dal 1989, direttore della Clinica I presso l’Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli e del Laboratorio di Gait Analysis, partner in progetti europei e in programmi di ricerca nazionali e internazionali, autore di più di 600 presentazioni a congressi nazionali ed internazionali e più di 400 articoli in riviste Science Citation Index. Il suo messaggio dà grande speranza. Leggiamolo:
“Non vorrei sembrarvi eccessivo ma credo di aver dimostrato la causa della letalità del coronavirus. Solo al Beato Matteo ci sono 2 cardiologi che girano su 150 letti a fare ecocardio con enorme fatica e uno sono io. Fatica terribile! Però, di quello che alcuni supponevano, ma non ne riuscivano a essere sicuri, ora abbiamo i primi dati. La gente va in rianimazione per tromboembolia venosa generalizzata, soprattutto polmonare. Se così fosse, non servono a niente le rianimazioni e le intubazioni perché innanzitutto devi sciogliere, anzi prevenire queste tromboembolie. Se ventili un polmone dove il sangue non arriva, non serve! Infatti muoiono 9 su 10. Perche il problema è cardiovascolare, non respiratorio! Sono le microtrombosi venose, non la polmonite a determinare la fatalità!
E perché si formano trombi? Perche l’infiammazione come da testo scolastico, induce trombosi attraverso un meccanismo fisiopatologico complesso ma ben noto. Allora? Contrariamente a quello che la letteratura scientifica, soprattutto cinese, diceva fino a metà marzo era che non bisognava usare antinfiammatori. Ora in Italia si usano antinfiammatori e antibiotici (come nelle influenze) e il numero dei ricoverati crolla. Molti morti, anche di 40 anni, avevano una storia di febbre alta per 10-15 giorni non curata adeguatamente. Qui l’infiammazione ha distrutto tutto e preparato il terreno alla formazione dei trombi. Perche il problema principale non è il virus, ma la reazione immunitaria che distrugge le cellule dove il virus entra. Infatti nei nostri reparti COVID non sono mai entrati malati di artrite reumatoide! Perche fanno il cortisone, un potente antinfiammatorio!
Pertanto, in Italia ospedalizzazioni si riducono e sta diventando una malattia che si cura a casa. Curandola bene a casa eviti non solo ospedalizzazione, ma anche il rischio trombotico. Non era facile capirlo perché i segni della microembolia sono sfumati, anche all’ecocardio. Ma questo week end ho confrontato i dati dei primi 50 pazienti tra chi respira male e chi no e la situazione è apparsa molto chiara. Per me si può tornare a giocare e riaprire l’attività commerciali. Via quarantena. Non subito. Ma il tempo di pubblicare questi dati. Vaccino può arrivare con calma. In America e altri stati che seguono la letteratura scientifica che invita a NON usare antinfiammatori e’ un disastro! Peggio che in Italia. E sono farmaci vecchi e che costano pochi euro.”
(Associated Medias – Red/Giut)
———
3) 追記
これ↓はどうも違う、ということのようです。
FDAが、COVID-19への非ステロイド性抗炎症薬（NSAIDs）使用について助言, 2020年4月1日
