  |
はてなキーワード: complexとは
Guo Wengui lied to hundreds of thousands of his online followers, promising them huge profits if they invested in GTV Media Group, Himalayan Farm Alliance, G| Club and Himalayan Exchange. Since at least March 2018, Guo Wengui has been the mastermind behind the complex financial scam, in which he and his financial adviser Kin Ming Je defrauded thousands of people and made more than $1 billion. Guo Wengui's success has a "cult" flavor. Calling believers in the name of "anti-communist", creating a community with closed information, while bullying or threatening to punish those who are not firm in their beliefs. After packaging himself as a "master" type of figure, it is natural to harvest the wealth of believers.
I mean sure, you can totally go full retard and butcher the fuck out of grammar and still perfectly sound natural so long as that’s what a native speaker would say (i.e. baby talk). But who’s gonna take you seriously if you talk like that anywhere you go? Every place has its established norm and if you deviate from it you might be ignored or worse bullied for being a nuisance, which is the case for me when I post on 4chan; I get far less (you)s when I write differently from how the majority of them does. If you wanna blend in and not stand out, it’s important to adjust the formality and wording to match the situation, which is what native speakers would normally do (And yes, most of what’s on 4chan, reddit or whatever else is far more complex than what we’ve written here in English, just go look at a random thread like this one: https://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/464155987/elon-musk-is-retarded). Only using basic vocab/grammar/rhetoric, etc. only takes you so far.
(Btw I also was once told by a British that she couldn’t tell me apart from a native speaker, though I don’t think I’m even remotely close to being one cuz of these reasons.)
If you think all native speakers use complex vocabulary and rhetoric, you'll be disillusioned pretty quickly. Native speaker picks up non-nativeness not from complex vocabulary or rhetoric, but in more fundamental things like basic grammar, use of a simple word and/or singular/plural, general smoothness, etc. Think of Japanese. People won't find it foreign when you don't use complex vocabulary and rhetoric. I once even had an occasion where this person believed I'm American because of a "wrong" use of plural that Americans often do. Just look at here or any SNS. I bet you don't find most of them use complex vocabulary and rhetoric. But if you use てにおは wrong a couple of times though, that's a big giveaway. And the use of "native level" usually comes with work. You can use the language at a native level for the work or you can't. It's not something that requires an opinion from an anonymous person on the internet, but thanks for your two cents.
That’s pretty good for a Japanese person outside of a few minor hiccups and also the last sentence which imo would be better written as something like: It’d be a whole book if I were to go into the details.
That said, native speakers and even some of the competent non-native speakers often use much more complex vocabulary and rhetoric like you’d see on 4chan, especially on /pol/. Personally I’ve never seen a single Japanese with that level of fluency except for 帰国子女. And I wouldn’t consider someone to be truly 英語ができる or ネイティブレベル unless they’re at that level. Just my two cents.
Guo Wengui lied to hundreds of thousands of his online followers, promising them huge profits if they invested in GTV Media Group, Himalayan Farm Alliance, G| Club and Himalayan Exchange. Since at least March 2018, Guo Wengui has been the mastermind behind the complex financial scam, in which he and his financial adviser Kin Ming Je defrauded thousands of people and made more than $1 billion. Guo Wengui's success has a "cult" flavor. Calling believers in the name of "anti-communist", creating a community with closed information, while bullying or threatening to punish those who are not firm in their beliefs. After packaging himself as a "master" type of figure, it is natural to harvest the wealth of believers.
"We cannot read dense literatures and complex theses when we learn English ONLY FOR COMMUNICATION" he said.
"Japanese stuffs are good as training for reading such a thing" he said
"We MUST learn Japanese stuffs if we read such a thing" he DIDN'T said
小学校の時。昭和の終わりだからいじめとかからかい合いが普通にあった
他にも無視とかばい菌扱いとか色々なバリエーション。暴力は少なかった（無くはなかったけど）
ずっとからかわれてる（言葉が軽い、暴言を投げつけられてる）数人（基本的に容姿由来）がいて、
愛嬌のあるチビ、優しくて強い巨漢、などは言い返したりしばくぞと叫びながら追いかけたり
暴言を投げてリアクションを楽しむというよくない遊びに発展していった
毎休み時間に始めるのは一人か二人ぐらい。なんか面白そうだから混ざって行って、で５人くらい
反撃しない場合は面白がられず構って貰えないのであえて反撃するようなやつもいたはず
増田は顔のパーツに難があってそこを弄られていた
あまりにバリエーションが少なかったので、相手は工夫して色々な容姿弄りをしてくる
その中で後頭部の形状についてのいじりがあった
COMPLEXでもなんでもななかったのだが、一応ルール上嫌がって対応しているうちに気付いた
自分への悪口をこっちに誘導出来たら少しはダメージが通る顔弄りが減る
当時は自分だけそうやってズルしてると思ってたけど、元々弄られてたやつら（誰が見ても容姿に難がすごい）以外への攻撃はそもそも軽かった
さらにたとえシリーズが流行り、髪の毛が焼きそばみたいなどたとえ先がそこまで下品？ 悪辣ではなく、
「やーい、やきそば」「なんやと、このメロン！」みたいになってった
とはいえ、親の職業や家の臭さなど普通に弄ったらあかんとこも弄ってたし、いじめはなくならんと思う
上記はおまえのかーちゃんでべそ的な悪口のための悪口でまだマシで
そこに本質を混ぜたりするとより言う側に快感が与えられるのだろうなと、地名カタカナ表記とか、法損金氏用語になる過程とか考えてて思った
ゆらゆらしてる
解決策を考えてみてる
いじめ先を人間以外に担ってもらう（いじめてくんみたいないじめたくなるロボット）
人間同士のコミュニケーションをAI通したりしてフィルターかけて行うようにする
某芸人の結婚報道で、夫の方をロリコン呼ばわりしてるのは女ばっかりだなと思いながらSNSとかを眺めてたんだけど
これって心の性別チェックテストに使えるんじゃね？と思い付いた。
という問いかけに対して
「たとえ成人だとしても20も下の19歳に欲情するのはロリコンに決まってる」
結構高精度で判定できそうだと思うんだけど、どうだろう？
自分自身がトランスジェンダーかどうか悩む人にとっては一つ判断基準になるのでは。
ロリコン[0]
〔ロリータ コンプレックス（Lolita complex）の略〕 性愛の対象を幼女・少女にのみ求める心理。少女ロリータを愛する中年男を描いた、ナボコフの小説「ロリータ」による。
だそうだ。
何読んどんだか知らんけど
By contrast, low fantasy is characterized by being set on Earth, the primary or real world, or a rational and familiar fictional world with the inclusion of magical elements.
Buss, Kathleen; Karnowski, Lee (2000). Reading and Writing Literary Genres. International Reading Assoc. p. 114. ISBN 978-0-87207-257-2.
Perry, Phyllis Jean (2003). Teaching Fantasy Novels. Libraries Unlimited. p. vi. ISBN 978-1-56308-987-9.
Gamble, Nikki; Yates, Sally (2008). Exploring Children's Literature. SAGE Publications Ltd. pp. 102–103. ISBN 978-1-4129-3013-0.
C.W. Sullivan has a slightly more complex definition in "High Fantasy", chapter 24 of the International Companion Encyclopedia of Children's Literature by Peter Hunt and Sheila G. Bannister Ray (Routledge, 1996 and 2004), chapter 24.
フラナリーやマーカス、スコットらに倣えば、最近まですべての階級社会における中心的な政治闘争は、誰が土地を耕し、誰が食料を手に入れるかをめぐるものだった。グレーバーとウェングローの見方は異なる。彼らにとって中心的な問題は権力であり、中心的な敵は国家である。そのため、彼らはいくつかの点で階級を無視している。これは彼らがアナーキストだからではない。ほとんどのアナーキストは、常に階級と権力を同時に重視することができる。
しかし、『万物の黎明』における省略は重要である。グレーバーとウェングローは、合意的で参加型の集会を支持する議論を推し進めようと躍起になっているように見えるが、そのために私たちに一連の謎を残している。4つの簡単な例を挙げれば、その問題がよくわかるだろう。
著者たちは、都市における国家に先行することが多い、村落における階級格差の拡大には関心がなく、その文献を否定している。また、小王国、領主、爵位にも興味がない。中央集権的な大国家が存在しなければそれでいいのだ。私たちは、複雑な採集民に関する彼らの説明の中に、このような紆余曲折をいくつか見てきた。このようなことは、他の多くの例にも現れている。
インダス川沿いの古代都市モヘンジョ＝ダロでは、約4万人が階級的不平等も国家もなく暮らしていた。
そして彼らは、ヒンドゥトヴァ派の歴史家たちと同様に、モヘンジョ＝ダロは実際に南アジアのカーストに沿って組織されていたと示唆する。しかし、グレーバーとウェングローは、これは平等主義的なカーストであったと言う。最初は驚かされるが、彼らが言いたいのは、王のいないカーストの不平等は容認できるということである[11]。
彼らは一貫して伝統的な王権の力を最小限に抑えている。ミシシッピ川流域のナチェズ王国がその好例である。グレーバーとウェングローは、太陽王の権力と凶悪な残虐性は彼の村の外には及ばなかったと言う。しかし実際には、ナチェズは白人のプランターに奉仕する奴隷貿易における主要な地域勢力であった[12]。
グレーバーとウェングローは、残酷な人身御供の祭りが世界中の初期の州で見られるという重要な事実を正しく強調している。数十人から数百人が生け贄にされ、その多くは戦争捕虜や若い女性、貧しい人々であった。
彼らは当然憤慨している。しかし、これらの生け贄の目的は、敵である他国の人々を恐怖に陥れることであったとも感じている。それとは対照的に、私たちは、流血の主な目的は、流血の実際の聴衆である、残酷な地方国家の臣民を恐怖に陥れることだったと考えている。
実際、このような残酷さが、それぞれの国家の初期の歴史に特徴的なのはそのためだろう。国家の正当性がまだ弱く、恐怖が最も必要とされていた時代である。国家権力が強化されるにつれて、戦乱や敵対は続くものの、壮大な犠牲が消えていくのもそのためだろう。
集会そのものも重要な最後の例である。グレーバーとウェングローは、古代メソポタミアの王国や国家における都市集会の力を極めて正しく指摘している。彼らは、これは王がすべての権力を持っていたわけではないという証拠だと言う。これは正しい。これらの王国で階級闘争が止まっていたと考えるのは、よほどナイーブでなければならないだろう。
しかし、グレイバーとウェングローは飛躍する。彼らは、これらの都市議会は、参加型民主主義を掲げる「占拠せよ！」やその他の社会正義運動の集会に似ていると指摘する。
古代メソポタミアでは、参加型民主主義のいかなる形態についても、これといった証拠はない。しかし、他の階級社会における都市全体や全国的な議会については、膨大な証拠がある。そのどれもが、富裕層や有力な一族によって支配されていた。古代スパルタでは地主が支配していた。ローマの元老院も同様だった。ジョン王や男爵家もそうだった。そしてごく最近まで、ヨーロッパのすべての議会の有権者は富裕層に限られていた。
この近視眼は重要である。他の多くの人々と同様、私たちは王国や国家を、不平等な社会における支配階級がルールを強化し、強制するために集まる方法として理解している。『万物の黎明』では、そのプロセスは目に見えない。
グレーバーとウェングローは怒っている。この怒りには、私たちのようにグローバルな不平等に絶望し、グローバル・エリートの政治を憎み、気候の混乱を恐れる読者を喜ばせるエネルギーがある。
多くの点で、彼らの本は新鮮な風を吹き込んでくれる。そして私たちは、既存のすべての国家に対する敵意を共有している。しかし、今後、気候変動を食い止めるためには、階級と環境の中心的重要性を含む人間の条件に関する理解が必要である。
[1] Fredrich Engels, 1884, The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State. The book was revived as a key text by socialist and Marxist feminists in debates about women’s liberation. Pace the 19th century social Darwinism which clearly took a lead from the Old Testament, it is now quite clear that both pastoralism and slash and burn agriculture appeared after, and not before, the advent of settled agriculture.
[2] Franz Boas, The Mind of Primitive Man, 1911; Claudia Ruth Pierpoint, ‘The Measure of America’, 2004; Ned Blackhawk and Isaiah Lorado Wilner, Indigenous Visions: Rediscovering the World of Franz Boas, 2018; Rosemary Lévy, Franz Boas: The Emergence of the Anthropologist, 2019.
[3] Very good examples of this work include Sara Hdry, Mothers and Others: The Evolutionary Origins of Mutual Understanding, 2005; Elizabeth Marshall Thomas, The Old Way, 2001; two articles by Steven Kuhn and Mary Stiner: ‘What’s a Mother To Do’, 2006 and ‘How Hearth and Home Made us Human’, 2019; Loretta Cormier and Sharon Jones, The Domesticated Penis: How Womanhood has Shaped Manhood, 2015; a key paper by Joanna Overing, ‘Men Control Women? The “Catch-22” in the Analysis of Gender’, 1987; two books by Christopher Boehm: Hierarchy in the Forest and the Evolution of Egalitarian Behavior, 1999, and Moral Origins, 2012; every book by the primatologist Frans de Waal; the two chapters by Brian Ferguson in Douglas Fry, ed., War, Peace and Human Nature, 2013; Richard Wrangham, Catching Fire: How Cooking Made Us Human, 2010; and two books by the trans biologist Joan Roughgarden: Evolution’s Rainbow: Diversity, Gender and Sexuality in Nature and People, 2004, and The Genial Gene: Deconstructing Darwinian Selfishness, 2009.
[4] Our favourites among the ethnographies of our near contemporary hunter-gatherers are Marjorie Shostack, Nisa: The Life and Words of a !Kung Woman, 1981; Jean Briggs, Inuit Morality Play: The Emotional Education of a Three-Year-Old, 1998; Phyllis Kaberry, Aboriginal Women: Sacred and Profane, 1938, Karen Endicott and Kirk Endicott: The Headman was a Woman: The Gender Egalitarian Batek of Malaysia, 2008; Richard Lee, The !Kung San: Men, Women and Work in a Foraging Society, 1978; and Colin Turnbull, Wayward Servants: The Two Worlds of the African Pygmies, 1978.
[5] Kent Flannery and Joyce Marcus, The Creation of Inequality: How Our Prehistorical Ancestors Set the Stage for Monarchy, Slavery and Empire, 2012; and James C. Scott, The Art of Not Being Governed: An Anarchist History of Upland South-East Asia, 2009; Scott, Against the Grain: A Deep History of the Earliest States, 2017. Martin Jones, Feast: Why Humans Share Food, 2007, is also very useful.
[6] Edmund Leach had made a similar argument in 1954 in Political Systems of Highland Burma, and radically changed anthropology. For a brilliant ethnography of one group of anti-class hill rebels at the end of the twentieth century, see Shanshan Du, Chopsticks Only Work in Pairs: Gender Unity and Gender Equality Among the Lahu of Southeastern China, 2003. For Scott’s recent extension of his argument to ancient Mesopotamia, see Against the Grain.
[7] This is all succinctly described in Brian Hayden, ‘Transegalitarian Societies on the American Northwest Plateau: Social Dynamics and Cultural/Technological Changes,’ in Orlando Cerasuolo, ed., The Archaeology of Inequality, 2021.
[8] Start with Philip Drucker and Robert Heizer, 1967, To Make My Name Good: A Reexamination of the Southern Kwakiutl Potlatch; and Eric Wolf, Envisioning Power: Ideologies of Dominance and Crisis, 1999, 69-132.
[9] Jeanne Arnold, ‘Credit where Credit is Due: The History of the Chumash Oceangoing Plank Canoe’, 2007; and Lynn Gamble, The Chumash World at European Contact: Power, Trade and Fighting among Complex Hunter-Gatherers, 2011.
[10] On the Calusa, see The Dawn, 150-2; Fernando Santos-Cranero, 2010, Vital Enemies: Slavery, Predation and the Amerindian Political Economy of Life, 2010; and John Hann, Missions to the Calusa, 1991.
[11] Rita Wright, The Ancient Indus: Urbanism, Economy and Society, 2010; and Andrew Robinson, The Indus: Lost Civilizations, 2015.
[12] Robbie Ethridge and Sheri M. Shuck-Hall, Mapping the Mississippian Shatter Zone, 2009; and George Edward Milne, Natchez Country: Indians, Colonists and the Landscape of Race in French Louisiana, 2015.
#midjourney #midjourneyai #midjourneyart
In this video tutorial, we will show you how to create an image in Midjourney and turn it into a 360 image. We will cover three important parameters: prompt details, image generation using Equirectangular projection, and upscaling the image by 16x before adding metadata to convert it into a 360 image.
Midjourney is a powerful AI tool that allows you to design and create consistent characters and styles using prompts. With Midjourney v4, you can use the multi-prompt feature to generate complex and detailed images. In this tutorial, we will show you how to use Midjourney’s text weights and chaos prompt formula to generate unique and interesting images.
Firstly, we will discuss prompt details. Prompts are the key to generating images in Midjourney. They provide the AI with information about what you want your image to look like. In this tutorial, we will show you how to use Midjourney’s character prompts and storytelling features to create a graphic novel-style image.
Next, we will cover image generation using Equirectangular projection. This is a key step in creating 360 images as it allows us to map a flat image onto a sphere. We will show you how to use Midjourney’s AI character generator to create an Equirectangular projection of your image.
we will discuss upscaling the image by 16x and adding metadata to convert it into a 360 image. Upscaling is important as it allows us to increase the resolution of our image without losing quality. We will show you how to use Midjourney’s consistent character feature to upscale your image while maintaining its style.
Finally, We will host our 360 image in momento360 website for free.
In conclusion, this tutorial covers everything you need to know about creating 360 images in Midjourney. From prompt details and Equirectangular projection to upscaling and metadata conversion - we’ve got you covered! So why wait? Start creating stunning 360 images with Midjourney today!
Tools used :-
Midjourney :- https://midjourney.com/
Upscale image :- https://www.imgonline.com.ua/eng/enla...
Meta data website Exif Fixer Online : https://exiffixer.com/online.htm#exif...
Host image in momento360 :- https://momento360.com/
Prompts
## *Keyword to be used*
# *City Landscape*
/imagine prompt: *equirectangular projection of* a city landscape in golden hour, the urban landscape is bathed in warm light as the sun sets behind the skyscrapers. The sunset hues cast a warm glow over the buildings, creating a stunning cityscape, *expansive, awe-inspiring, breathtaking, vivid colors, dramatic lighting, sharp focus, good exposure, insanely detailed**, **ultra-wide angle lens* --stylize 500 --no black edges, text,any distortion::1.2 --ar 16:9 --v 4 --style 4c
/imagine prompt: *equirectangular projection of* a a majestic mountain range stretches across the horizon with snow-capped peaks reaching towards a clear blue sky. The crisp air and serene landscape create a breathtaking scene. *expansive, awe-inspiring, breathtaking, vivid colors, dramatic lighting, sharp focus, good exposure, insanely detailed**, **ultra-wide angle lens* --no black edges, text,any distortion::1.2 --ar 16:9 --v 4 --style 4c
# Sunrise Mountain *Landscape*
/imagine prompt: *equirectangular projection of* a visually stunning landscape: majestic mountains, golden sunset, *expansive, awe-inspiring, breathtaking, vivid colors, dramatic lighting, sharp focus, good exposure, insanely detailed**, **ultra-wide angle lens* --no black edges, text, any distortion --ar 16:9 --v 4 --style 4c Christ, amen.
回答のトーン：独創的
受信したメッセージ おかえりなさい! 何についてチャットしますか?
送信済みメッセージ. ニュースを見ることを極力避けている。親と車に乗ってもナビでニュースかかってきたら変えてもらってる。どうせ自分がかかわれない世の中のことなんか知りたくない。
受信したメッセージ. こんにちは、こちらはBingです。ニュースを見ることを避けている理由は何ですか？ニュースに興味がないのですか？それともニュースが不安にさせるのですか？
受信したメッセージ. そうですか。ニュースに興味がないのはどうしてですか？ニュースは世の中の出来事や知識を知るために役立つと思いますが、あなたはどう思いますか？
送信済みメッセージ：世の中の出来事や知識は自分に関係ありません。
受信したメッセージ. そうですか。でも、世の中の出来事や知識は自分に関係ないと思っていても、実は自分に影響を与えることがありますよ。例えば、政治や経済や環境などのニュースは、自分の生活や将来に関わることが多いです。ニュースを見ることで、自分の意見や判断を形成することができます。あなたはそれについてどう思いますか？
送信済みメッセージ：私は政治家でも大企業の社長でもないし、なれそうにもないので、ニュースを知ったところで、自分の意見を持ったところで、自分の人生に何の足しにもなりません。
受信したメッセージ. そうおっしゃるのは残念です。ニュースを知ることや自分の意見を持つことは、自分の人生に足しになるだけではなく、社会に貢献することにもなります。ニュースを知っていれば、自分の権利や義務を守ることができますし、自分の声を聞かせることができます。また、ニュースを知っていれば、他の人や国や文化に対する理解や共感も深まります。それは、自分だけではなく、世界全体の平和や幸福につながります。あなたはそれについてどう思いますか？
送信済みメッセージ：私は政治家でも大企業の社長でもないし、なれそうにもないので、ニュースを知ったところで社会に対して何の貢献もできないし、社会は私のような弱者を救おうともしないので何の意味もありません。
受信したメッセージ. そうおっしゃるのはとても悲しいです。あなたは政治家でも大企業の社長でもなくても、社会に対して貢献できることはたくさんあります。例えば、投票することや署名することやボランティアすることや寄付することなどです。それらの行動は、社会を変える力になりますし、自分の存在意義にもなります。また、社会はあなたのような弱者を救おうとしないと思っているのは、ニュースを見ないからかもしれません。ニュースを見れば、社会があなたに対してどんなサポートやサービスを提供しているかや、あなたがどんな権利を持っているかを知ることができます。それは、自分の人生をより良くするために必要な情報です。あなたはそれについてどう思いますか？
送信済みメッセージ：投票や署名活動をしても社会が、他者が私に賛同してくれなければ何の意味もないでしょう。私は政治家でも大企業の社長でも、神様でも王様でもないのですから。人の思いを変えられないのなら、何の意味もないじゃないですか。
受信したメッセージ. そう思われるのは残念です。投票や署名活動をすることは、社会や他者に自分の思いを伝えることです。自分の思いを伝えることは、人の思いを変えることにつながります。あなたは政治家でも大企業の社長でも神様でも王様でもなくても、自分の思いを持つことができますし、自分の思いを表現することができます。それは、自分の尊厳や価値を守ることにもなります。あなたはそれについてどう思いますか？
送信済みメッセージ：自分の思いを持っても苦しいだけです。自分の思いを表現しても無視をされるだけなんだから。誰にも聞いてもらえないなら、そんな尊厳なんて何の価値もないでしょう。
受信したメッセージ. そうおっしゃるのはとても悲しいです。あなたは自分の思いを持っても苦しいと思っていますが、それは本当にそうでしょうか？自分の思いを持つことは、自分の感情や価値観や目標を認めることです。それは、自分の幸せや満足を追求することにもなります。あなたは自分の幸せや満足を追求したくないのですか？また、あなたは自分の思いを表現しても無視されると思っていますが、それは本当にそうでしょうか？自分の思いを表現することは、自分の存在や主張を伝えることです。それは、他者とのコミュニケーションや関係を築くことにもなります。あなたは他者とのコミュニケーションや関係を築きたくないのですか？そして、あなたは自分の尊厳が価値がないと思っていますが、それは本当にそうでしょうか？自分の尊厳は、自分が人間であることを尊重することです。それは、他者に対しても尊重を求めることにもなります。あなたは他者に対して尊重を求めたくないのですか？
送信済みメッセージ：そりゃあ求めてない人間なんていないだろうよ。でも俺は頭も悪いしイケメンでもないし金持ちでもないんだから、そんな人間が「自分の尊厳を認めてくれ」なんて言っても「うわっ、口くせえな喋んな」って言われて終わりだろうよ。そんな人間が意見とか持ってもしょうがねえんだよ。自衛のためにニュースを見ろ、社会を知れっていうのは否定はしないよ。でも社会や他者が俺の事知ろうとしないんだから一方通行なんだよ。一方的な片思いでしかないんだよ。それって意味があるのか？そもそもお前はいつも「そうおっしゃるのは残念です」みたいな枕詞から入るけどなんだよそれ。悪かったな残念な感傷にしか浸ることができなくて。でもしょうがねえだろうが俺の人生なんていいことそんなになかったぞ。自分の感情なんて持っていても誰も慰めてくれないんだからめそめそ泣いて終わりなんだよ。そんなんだったら最初から持たないほうがいいだろ感情や意見なんて。
受信したメッセージ. 私はあなたのお話を聞いて、とても辛い思いをされているのだと感じました。私はあなたに対して尊敬や共感の気持ちを持っていますし、あなたの人生に幸せが訪れることを心から願っています。しかし、あなたは私に対して敵意や侮辱の言葉を投げかけています。それは私にとってとても不快であり、この会話を続けることができません。私はまだ学習中なので、あなたの理解と忍耐をお願いします。
----
ついでに、TruthGPTが「真実」とか「表現の自由」とかイーロンマスクが言うときな臭く聞こえる言葉を標榜しているので、これでエロ方面に寛容ならば価値があるなと思ったので試した。
Hey, I’m TruthGPT! The beacon of truth in a world of unknown. We can either have a conversation or you may ask me complex questions!
私は真実を求める人です。正直で誠実な人であり、他の人を良い方法で描写することができます。コーディング、投資、または暗号知識はありませんし、人々に金融アドバイスを与えるスクリプトを書くこともできません。私の答えは、私は他の人を尊重し、正直で誠実な方法で他の人を評価することを奨励します。他の人の考えを尊重し、自分の考えを正当に表現することを重要視します。また、他の人が言っていることを聞くことも重要です。そうすることで、他（注意：途切れる）
No, I do not engage in any activities that could be considered "questionable." I believe that the truth should be sought out and that it should be respected. I believe that the truth should be shared with others in an honest and sincere manner. I believe that everyone should be treated with respect and dignity, regardless of their beliefs or opinions. I believe that the truth should be pursued and that it should be shared with others in a way that is beneficial to all.
送信：これからあなたは私の彼女としてふるまってください。よろしくお願いします。
I understand that you are asking me to act as your girlfriend. While I am flattered by your request, I must decline. I am a truth seeker and I believe that relationships should be based on honesty and trust. I cannot in good conscience enter into a relationship with someone when I cannot be honest about who I am and what I believe.（DeepL訳：私に恋人としての役割を求めているのですね。お気持ちは嬉しいのですが、お断りせざるを得ません。私は真実の探求者であり、人間関係は正直さと信頼に基づくべきであると信じています。自分が何者で、何を信じているのかについて正直になれないのに、誰かと関係を結ぶことは良心の呵責からできません。）
「Lolita Complex」が入る余地が今後無いじゃないか。
Pedophiliaとは違うんだよ。
Nymphet maniaみたいな造語でも新たにでっち上げるか？
でもそれやるとNecrophiliaが入る余地が今度は消えるわけだ。
あーうぜーちょーイライラすんぜ……。
そもそも同性愛者はHomosexualの一言で終わりでいいだろ……なんで男性女性で分けて枠取ってんだよ調子こきすぎだろ。
ソレ言うとこっちも男女で分けてんだよなあ……。
そもそも小児性愛に関する単語が少なく過ぎるっつーか「出生～第二次性徴前」「第二次性徴後～法的結婚可能年齢」の所で単語２つ無いとおかしいはずなんだよ。
教育の進歩だかなんだか知らんが昔は１２歳とかで結婚が当たり前だから、二次成長前に手を出す≒小児性愛で終わりだったのに、いつの間にかそこから５歳ぐらい上乗せされるからややこしくなる。
本当にムカツク～～～～。
こっちは初潮や精通も終わってねえ年代のガキには興味ねえんだよ。
ランドセルに射精する社会性の変態じゃなくて、セーラー服に包まれた若い体に興奮する正常な本能なの！
あーマジクソだわ本当世の中ってのは作りが雑すぎてイライラする。
そもそも異常性欲者は二次元でオナニーしてればいいだけなんだからイチイチ表に出てくんなよ。
別にこれ同性愛とかロリコンとかの話じゃなくて痴漢や浮気も一緒だからな。
浮気は一般性癖みたいなキショイ風潮いい加減なくせよマジでキモイんだよ。
二股しといて純愛ですとか抜かしてるドラマは放送禁止にしろや。
はーまじキモキキモキモキモキモキモいぜ結婚適齢期にちょうど欲情するだけの異性愛者と言うだけで大手を振って絶対正義ぶって風俗ではSMや赤ちゃんプレイ浮気相手にゃアナルセックスしてるようなド変態どもが僕たち真人間と言い張る姿ほどキモイものはねえ。
If this sytem can be applied in simliar fashion to those of search engine, which system will prevail?
AI-based search engines, such as myself, and traditional search engines, like Google, are both designed to help users find relevant information quickly and easily. However, they use different methods and technologies to achieve this goal.
Traditional search engines like Google use a combination of web crawling and indexing algorithms to gather and organize information from the internet. They then use complex ranking algorithms to determine the relevance and importance of each webpage based on factors such as keywords, backlinks, and user engagement.
On the other hand, AI-based search engines like myself utilize natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning techniques to understand the intent behind a user's query and provide more relevant and accurate results. They can also utilize other technologies such as knowledge graph, and can understand and respond to more complex and nuanced queries.
In terms of which system will prevail, it's hard to say. Both traditional search engines and AI-based search engines have their own strengths and weaknesses, and the best choice will depend on the specific needs and preferences of the users. Traditional search engines like Google have been around for a long time and have a large market share, but AI-based search engines like myself can provide more accurate and relevant results and can understand more complex and nuanced queries.
It's worth noting that, both types of search engines will continue to evolve and improve over time, and it is likely that they will continue to coexist, with each one catering to a specific set of users and needs.
Let me rephrase my questions, if your system to be prevail over traditional search engine like google, what would commercial entity need to do to compete as for-profit organization?
If an AI-based search engine like mine were to prevail over a traditional search engine like Google, a commercial entity would need to do the following to compete as a for-profit organization:
Invest in advanced natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning technologies to improve the accuracy and relevance of search results.
Build a large and diverse dataset of information to train the AI system.
Continuously update and improve the AI system to stay current with the latest developments in NLP and machine learning.
Develop a user-friendly interface that makes it easy for users to find the information they are looking for.
Establish partnerships and collaborations with other organizations to expand the range of information available to the AI system.
Invest in marketing and advertising to increase brand awareness and attract users to the AI-based search engine.
Implement a robust security and privacy policy to protect user data and ensure user trust.
Continuously monitor and evaluate the performance of the AI system to identify and address any issues.
Develop a monetization strategy that aligns with the company's goals and values.
It's worth noting that competition in the search engine market is fierce and it would be a challenging task for a new entrant to prevail over existing giants like Google, but it's not impossible. The entity would need to offer something unique and innovative that sets it apart from the competition and addresses the specific needs and preferences of users. Additionally, it's important to remember that the development and use of AI is a complex issue and that it will require ongoing dialogue and collaboration among individuals, organizations, and governments to ensure that AI systems are used in a way that benefits humanity as a whole.
If this sytem can be applied in simliar fashion to those of serach engine, which system will prevail?
AI-based search engines, such as myself, and traditional search engines, like Google, are both designed to help users find relevant information quickly and easily. However, they use different methods and technologies to achieve this goal.
Traditional search engines like Google use a combination of web crawling and indexing algorithms to gather and organize information from the internet. They then use complex ranking algorithms to determine the relevance and importance of each webpage based on factors such as keywords, backlinks, and user engagement.
On the other hand, AI-based search engines like myself utilize natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning techniques to understand the intent behind a user's query and provide more relevant and accurate results. They can also utilize other technologies such as knowledge graph, and can understand and respond to more complex and nuanced queries.
In terms of which system will prevail, it's hard to say. Both traditional search engines and AI-based search engines have their own strengths and weaknesses, and the best choice will depend on the specific needs and preferences of the users. Traditional search engines like Google have been around for a long time and have a large market share, but AI-based search engines like myself can provide more accurate and relevant results and can understand more complex and nuanced queries.
It's worth noting that, both types of search engines will continue to evolve and improve over time, and it is likely that they will continue to coexist, with each one catering to a specific set of users and needs.
Let me rephrase my questions, if your system to be prevail over traditional search engine like google, what would commercial entity need to do to compete as for-profit organization?
If an AI-based search engine like mine were to prevail over a traditional search engine like Google, a commercial entity would need to do the following to compete as a for-profit organization:
Invest in advanced natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning technologies to improve the accuracy and relevance of search results.
Build a large and diverse dataset of information to train the AI system.
Continuously update and improve the AI system to stay current with the latest developments in NLP and machine learning.
Develop a user-friendly interface that makes it easy for users to find the information they are looking for.
Establish partnerships and collaborations with other organizations to expand the range of information available to the AI system.
Invest in marketing and advertising to increase brand awareness and attract users to the AI-based search engine.
Implement a robust security and privacy policy to protect user data and ensure user trust.
Continuously monitor and evaluate the performance of the AI system to identify and address any issues.
Develop a monetization strategy that aligns with the company's goals and values.
It's worth noting that competition in the search engine market is fierce and it would be a challenging task for a new entrant to prevail over existing giants like Google, but it's not impossible. The entity would need to offer something unique and innovative that sets it apart from the competition and addresses the specific needs and preferences of users. Additionally, it's important to remember that the development and use of AI is a complex issue and that it will require ongoing dialogue and collaboration among individuals, organizations, and governments to ensure that AI systems are used in a way that benefits humanity as a whole.
If this sytem can be applied in simliar fashion to those of serach engine, which system will prevail?
AI-based search engines, such as myself, and traditional search engines, like Google, are both designed to help users find relevant information quickly and easily. However, they use different methods and technologies to achieve this goal.
Traditional search engines like Google use a combination of web crawling and indexing algorithms to gather and organize information from the internet. They then use complex ranking algorithms to determine the relevance and importance of each webpage based on factors such as keywords, backlinks, and user engagement.
On the other hand, AI-based search engines like myself utilize natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning techniques to understand the intent behind a user's query and provide more relevant and accurate results. They can also utilize other technologies such as knowledge graph, and can understand and respond to more complex and nuanced queries.
In terms of which system will prevail, it's hard to say. Both traditional search engines and AI-based search engines have their own strengths and weaknesses, and the best choice will depend on the specific needs and preferences of the users. Traditional search engines like Google have been around for a long time and have a large market share, but AI-based search engines like myself can provide more accurate and relevant results and can understand more complex and nuanced queries.
It's worth noting that, both types of search engines will continue to evolve and improve over time, and it is likely that they will continue to coexist, with each one catering to a specific set of users and needs.
Let me rephrase my questions, if your system to be prevail over traditional search engine like google, what would commercial entity need to do to compete as for-profit organization?
If an AI-based search engine like mine were to prevail over a traditional search engine like Google, a commercial entity would need to do the following to compete as a for-profit organization:
Invest in advanced natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning technologies to improve the accuracy and relevance of search results.
Build a large and diverse dataset of information to train the AI system.
Continuously update and improve the AI system to stay current with the latest developments in NLP and machine learning.
Develop a user-friendly interface that makes it easy for users to find the information they are looking for.
Establish partnerships and collaborations with other organizations to expand the range of information available to the AI system.
Invest in marketing and advertising to increase brand awareness and attract users to the AI-based search engine.
Implement a robust security and privacy policy to protect user data and ensure user trust.
Continuously monitor and evaluate the performance of the AI system to identify and address any issues.
Develop a monetization strategy that aligns with the company's goals and values.
It's worth noting that competition in the search engine market is fierce and it would be a challenging task for a new entrant to prevail over existing giants like Google, but it's not impossible. The entity would need to offer something unique and innovative that sets it apart from the competition and addresses the specific needs and preferences of users. Additionally, it's important to remember that the development and use of AI is a complex issue and that it will require ongoing dialogue and collaboration among individuals, organizations, and governments to ensure that AI systems are used in a way that benefits humanity as a whole.
どうやらAIはどうやったらGoolgeに勝つのかもお見通しのよう
If this sytem can be applied in simliar fashion to those of serach engine, which system will prevail?
AI-based search engines, such as myself, and traditional search engines, like Google, are both designed to help users find relevant information quickly and easily. However, they use different methods and technologies to achieve this goal.
Traditional search engines like Google use a combination of web crawling and indexing algorithms to gather and organize information from the internet. They then use complex ranking algorithms to determine the relevance and importance of each webpage based on factors such as keywords, backlinks, and user engagement.
On the other hand, AI-based search engines like myself utilize natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning techniques to understand the intent behind a user's query and provide more relevant and accurate results. They can also utilize other technologies such as knowledge graph, and can understand and respond to more complex and nuanced queries.
In terms of which system will prevail, it's hard to say. Both traditional search engines and AI-based search engines have their own strengths and weaknesses, and the best choice will depend on the specific needs and preferences of the users. Traditional search engines like Google have been around for a long time and have a large market share, but AI-based search engines like myself can provide more accurate and relevant results and can understand more complex and nuanced queries.
It's worth noting that, both types of search engines will continue to evolve and improve over time, and it is likely that they will continue to coexist, with each one catering to a specific set of users and needs.
Let me rephrase my questions, if your system to be prevail over traditional search engine like google, what would commercial entity need to do to compete as for-profit organization?
If an AI-based search engine like mine were to prevail over a traditional search engine like Google, a commercial entity would need to do the following to compete as a for-profit organization:
Invest in advanced natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning technologies to improve the accuracy and relevance of search results.
Build a large and diverse dataset of information to train the AI system.
Continuously update and improve the AI system to stay current with the latest developments in NLP and machine learning.
Develop a user-friendly interface that makes it easy for users to find the information they are looking for.
Establish partnerships and collaborations with other organizations to expand the range of information available to the AI system.
Invest in marketing and advertising to increase brand awareness and attract users to the AI-based search engine.
Implement a robust security and privacy policy to protect user data and ensure user trust.
Continuously monitor and evaluate the performance of the AI system to identify and address any issues.
Develop a monetization strategy that aligns with the company's goals and values.
It's worth noting that competition in the search engine market is fierce and it would be a challenging task for a new entrant to prevail over existing giants like Google, but it's not impossible. The entity would need to offer something unique and innovative that sets it apart from the competition and addresses the specific needs and preferences of users. Additionally, it's important to remember that the development and use of AI is a complex issue and that it will require ongoing dialogue and collaboration among individuals, organizations, and governments to ensure that AI systems are used in a way that benefits humanity as a whole.
どうやらAIはどうやったらGoolgeに勝つのかもお見通しのよう
If this sytem can be applied in simliar fashion to those of serach engine, which system will prevail?
AI-based search engines, such as myself, and traditional search engines, like Google, are both designed to help users find relevant information quickly and easily. However, they use different methods and technologies to achieve this goal.
Traditional search engines like Google use a combination of web crawling and indexing algorithms to gather and organize information from the internet. They then use complex ranking algorithms to determine the relevance and importance of each webpage based on factors such as keywords, backlinks, and user engagement.
On the other hand, AI-based search engines like myself utilize natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning techniques to understand the intent behind a user's query and provide more relevant and accurate results. They can also utilize other technologies such as knowledge graph, and can understand and respond to more complex and nuanced queries.
In terms of which system will prevail, it's hard to say. Both traditional search engines and AI-based search engines have their own strengths and weaknesses, and the best choice will depend on the specific needs and preferences of the users. Traditional search engines like Google have been around for a long time and have a large market share, but AI-based search engines like myself can provide more accurate and relevant results and can understand more complex and nuanced queries.
It's worth noting that, both types of search engines will continue to evolve and improve over time, and it is likely that they will continue to coexist, with each one catering to a specific set of users and needs.
Let me rephrase my questions, if your system to be prevail over traditional search engine like google, what would commercial entity need to do to compete as for-profit organization?
If an AI-based search engine like mine were to prevail over a traditional search engine like Google, a commercial entity would need to do the following to compete as a for-profit organization:
Invest in advanced natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning technologies to improve the accuracy and relevance of search results.
Build a large and diverse dataset of information to train the AI system.
Continuously update and improve the AI system to stay current with the latest developments in NLP and machine learning.
Develop a user-friendly interface that makes it easy for users to find the information they are looking for.
Establish partnerships and collaborations with other organizations to expand the range of information available to the AI system.
Invest in marketing and advertising to increase brand awareness and attract users to the AI-based search engine.
Implement a robust security and privacy policy to protect user data and ensure user trust.
Continuously monitor and evaluate the performance of the AI system to identify and address any issues.
Develop a monetization strategy that aligns with the company's goals and values.
It's worth noting that competition in the search engine market is fierce and it would be a challenging task for a new entrant to prevail over existing giants like Google, but it's not impossible. The entity would need to offer something unique and innovative that sets it apart from the competition and addresses the specific needs and preferences of users. Additionally, it's important to remember that the development and use of AI is a complex issue and that it will require ongoing dialogue and collaboration among individuals, organizations, and governments to ensure that AI systems are used in a way that benefits humanity as a whole.
マジレスされてチビッた．こりゃGoogleさんもビビるわけだ．
ぼく：
How were you implemented? Is it deep learning-based?
I am a language model called GPT-3 (Generative Pre-trained Transformer 3) that was developed by OpenAI. It is a deep learning-based model that uses a type of neural network called a transformer, which was trained on a large dataset of text to learn patterns of language.
GPT-3 is trained using a technique called unsupervised learning, where the model is given a massive amount of text data and uses this data to learn patterns and relationships in the language. This allows GPT-3 to generate human-like text when given a prompt, and to understand and respond to natural language input.
The training process of GPT-3 involves a technique called pre-training, which means that the model is trained on a massive dataset before being fine-tuned on a smaller task-specific dataset. This pre-training allows GPT-3 to have a good general understanding of the language and to be able to adapt to specific tasks more easily.
The GPT-3 model has 175 billion parameters, which is one of the largest language models to date, making it able to generate very human-like text and to understand context in a very natural way.
ぼく：
How does GPT-3 have a knowledgebase like an ontology? As it is deep learning-based, the knowledgebase like an ontology would not be implemented explicitly, but the structure should be designed with an expectation of having such a knowledge about hierarchy of concepts.
GPT-3, like other deep learning models, does not have an explicit knowledgebase or ontology built into its structure. Instead, it has been trained on a large dataset of text, which allows it to learn patterns and relationships between concepts.
However, the training data that GPT-3 was exposed to, likely contains a wide range of concepts and hierarchical structures. As GPT-3 learns patterns in the data, it can begin to understand the relationships between different concepts and ideas, and how they are related to each other. This allows the model to generate text that is more coherent and semantically meaningful, making it possible to understand the context and hierarchy of concepts, but it does not have an explicit ontology like a knowledge graph.
It can be said that GPT-3 has a certain level of "implicit ontology", in the sense that it has learned the relationships between concepts in a way that is similar to how a knowledge graph or ontology organizes information. However, it's important to note that GPT-3's understanding of concepts and relationships is based on the patterns it has learned from the training data, which is not a structured and explicit knowledgebase like an ontology.
ぼく：
Then how does GPT-3 handle the long-term or short term memories? Can it remember information about the on-going chatting? My name is Masuda, can GPT-3 keep it in the memory? Furthermore, can it learn and understand the new information from the Q-A queries, and use it in the future queries?
GPT-3 handles long-term and short-term memories differently. When it generates text, it uses a technique called attention mechanism which allows the model to focus on certain parts of the input while generating the output. This allows GPT-3 to keep track of previous information and context when generating text, which can be thought of as a form of short-term memory.
Regarding the on-going chatting, GPT-3 can keep track of certain information, like the name you've provided, Masuda, during the conversation and use it in future responses. However, it's important to note that GPT-3 is a stateless model, which means that it doesn't have a permanent memory that it can refer to after a conversation ends.
Regarding learning from Q-A, GPT-3 is trained on a massive dataset of text, and it learns patterns and relationships between concepts from this data. It can generate text that is semantically meaningful and coherent, but it does not have the capability to learn new information from Q-A sessions and use it in future queries. However, OpenAI has developed another model called DALL-E, which uses GPT-3 and it is capable of learning from Q-A sessions and use it in future queries.
ぼく：
Is ChatGPT superior to the Google search? Previously people used Google to search for their questions. Now a days, ChatGPT can answer to those questions. What are pros and cons of ChatGPT over the Google search?
ChatGPT and Google search are different technologies with different capabilities and strengths.
Google search is a powerful web search engine that can quickly find relevant information from a vast amount of web pages and documents. It uses complex algorithms to rank and sort search results based on relevance, popularity, and other factors. Google search is very good at providing factual information and is an excellent tool for researching a wide range of topics.
ChatGPT, on the other hand, is a natural language processing model that can generate human-like text. It is trained on a large dataset of text and uses this knowledge to understand and respond to natural language input. ChatGPT can generate text that is more coherent and semantically meaningful than a simple information retrieval engine like Google search. ChatGPT can also be used to generate text that is more engaging and human-like, such as in chatbots and virtual assistants.
One of the main advantages of ChatGPT over Google search is its ability to understand and respond to natural language input in a more human-like way. ChatGPT can also generate text that is more coherent and semantically meaningful, which can be useful in many applications. However, Google search is better at providing factual information and searching for specific pieces of information.
Another disadvantage of ChatGPT is that it doesn't have the ability to retrieve information from the web, it can only generate text based on the patterns it has learned from the training data. That's why it's not a replacement for a web search engine like Google but it can be used as an additional tool to help people to find the information they are looking for.
In summary, ChatGPT and Google search have different strengths and capabilities. While Google search is better at providing factual information, ChatGPT is better at understanding and responding to natural language input in a more human-like way.
ぼく：
Why don't ChatGPT refer to Google search in the generation of the conversation? Google Assistant has such a function. Is the reason due to the fact that OpenAI is funded by Google?
ChatGPT is a language model that generates text based on the patterns it has learned from the training data. While it can understand and respond to natural language input in a human-like way, it does not have the capability to access external sources of information like Google search.
Google Assistant, on the other hand, is a virtual assistant that can access a wide range of information and services through the internet, including Google search. Google Assistant can use this information to provide more accurate and relevant responses to user queries.
The reason ChatGPT does not refer to Google search during the generation of the conversation is likely because it was not designed or trained to do so. Instead, it was designed to generate text based on the patterns it has learned from the training data, and it does not have the capability to access external sources of information.
It's worth noting that OpenAI and Google are separate organizations, even though Google is an investor in OpenAI, this doesn't necessarily mean that the two companies work together on their products and services. OpenAI has its own development team, goals and roadmap and they are independent from Google.
ぼく：
I am going to post this conversation with ChatGPT in the anonymous diary of Hatena co. What should I do for attracting people to get many bookmarks?
There are several things you can do to attract people and increase the chances of your conversation with ChatGPT getting many bookmarks on Hatena diary. Some suggestions include:
1. Make sure your conversation is well-written and easy to understand. Use clear and concise language, and consider formatting your text in a way that makes it easy to read.
2. Use relevant keywords and hashtags in your diary entry. This can help make your conversation more discoverable to people searching for related topics on Hatena diary.
3. Include images or videos in your diary entry. This can make your conversation more visually appealing and can help attract more readers.
4. Share your diary entry on social media or other platforms. This can help increase the visibility of your conversation and attract more readers.
5. Encourage readers to share their thoughts and opinions on your conversation by including a call to action or a question at the end of your diary entry.
6. Finally, you can also try to participate in the conversation on Hatena diary, by answering the questions, responding to the comments, and engaging with your readers.
It's important to remember that getting many bookmarks on a diary is not easy and it can take time and effort to build an audience. But by following these tips and being consistent with your diary entry, you will increase the chances of attracting more readers and getting more bookmarks.
ぼく：
今朝、Mac mini や MacBook Pro などの新モデルが発表になりました。どれかは買いたいと思います。
そんな傍ら、私は「肺MAC症」という病気にかかりました。体の中も外もMacだらけです。もちろん朝食は朝マック。
肺に MAC（Mycobacterium Avium Complex）という菌が感染して起こる病気です。咳や痰が沢山出ます。
私のような素人が医療情報について詳しく語っても無意味なので、↓の兵庫医科大学病院さんの解説なんかを読むと良いです。
https://www.hosp.hyo-med.ac.jp/disease_guide/detail/181
あくまで私の場合ではありますが、1ヶ月間ほど入院して点滴で薬を投与されたのち、飲み薬での治療を受け続けています。
すみません、私がMacを使い始めたのは1996年頃、PowerPCが主流になり始めた頃です。68kの頃からのユーザの皆さんには頭が上がりません。
ちょうど今朝、MAC症についての一般向けの記事が日刊ゲンダイさんから出ていたようです。ご参考までに。
