  |
はてなキーワード: HISとは
The path of the righteous man is beset on all sides by the inequities of the selfish and the tyranny of evil men. Blessed is he who, in the name of charity and goodwill, shepherds the weak through the valley of darkness, for he is truly his brother’s keeper and the finder of lost children. And I will strike down upon thee with great vengeance and furious anger those who attempt to poison and destroy my brothers. And you will know my name is the Lord when I lay my vengeance upon thee.
プログレッシブ英和中辞典(第5版)の解説 pride /práid/ [名] 1 [U][C]（…の）誇り自尊心，プライド≪in，at≫；（…した）満足（感），得意≪to do≫． take [have, feel] (a) pride in ... …を誇りにする（◆無冠詞のほうがふつう） hurt a person's pride 人のプライドを傷つける feel a glow of pride 胸が膨らむ思いがする His face is beaming with pride. 彼の顔は得意な気持ちで輝いている 1a [U]〔通例the [one's] ～〕自慢の種． the pride and joy of the family 家族の自慢の種 2 [U]うぬぼれ思いあがり，高慢，横柄，自負（心）． in high pride 横柄に He swallowed his pride and kept quiet. 彼は自負心を抑えてだまっていた Pride goes [comes] before a fall. ((諺))おごれる者久しからず 3 〔the ～〕（集団・階層で）最良［最上］のもの，精華． the pride of one's collection コレクション中でも自慢の品
って、そりゃそもそも英語の pride にもそういう意味はあるからな。たとえば (as) proud as a peacock というイディオム知ってるか？
idiom
extremely proud:
"He returns about three hours later looking as proud as a peacock as he carefully backs his big red car in the driveway."
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/ja/dictionary/english/as-proud-as-a-peacock
Sir Keir Starmer has said that “a woman is an adult female” as he hardened his stance on gender.
The Labour leader insisted that biological women needed single-sex spaces and ruled out introducing self-identification for changing gender.
Sir Keir Starmer has said that “a woman is an adult female” as he hardened his stance on gender.
The Labour leader insisted that biological women needed single-sex spaces and ruled out introducing self-identification for changing gender.
Sir Keir Starmer has said that “a woman is an adult female” as he hardened his stance on gender.
The Labour leader insisted that biological women needed single-sex spaces and ruled out introducing self-identification for changing gender.
そうそう、真珠湾攻撃も核攻撃も先制攻撃も自衛権の範囲だからな。嘘つきさん。
あとウクライナがナチスではないとかどこまで馬鹿なのか。ウクライナを支持している時点でナチスだよ。
But even though Putin is engaging in propaganda, it’s also true that Ukraine has a genuine Nazi problem — both past and present. Putin’s destructive actions — among them the devastation of Jewish communities — make clear that he’s lying when he says his goal is to ensure anyone’s welfare. But important as it is to defend the yellow-and-blue flag against the Kremlin’s brutal aggression, it would be a dangerous oversight to deny Ukraine’s antisemitic history and collaboration with Hitler’s Nazis, as well as the latter-day embrace of neo-Nazi factions in some quarters.
しかし、プーチン大統領がプロパガンダに取り組んでいるとしても、ウクライナが過去も現在も真のナチス問題を抱えていることも事実だ。 プーチン大統領の破壊的な行動、その中にはユダヤ人コミュニティの破壊も含まれるが、自分の目標は誰かの福祉を確保することだと言っているプーチン大統領が嘘をついていることは明らかだ。 しかし、クレムリンの残忍な侵略から黄と青の国旗を守ることは重要であると同時に、ウクライナの反ユダヤ主義の歴史とヒトラーのナチスとの協力、そしてネオナチ派の末日の受け入れを否定することは危険な見落としとなるだろう。いくつかの地区では。
In another ominous development, Ukraine has in recent years erected a glut of statues honoring Ukrainian nationalists whose legacies are tainted by their indisputable record as Nazi proxies. The Forward newspaper cataloged some of these deplorables, including Stepan Bandera, leader of the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists (OUN), whose followers acted as local militia members for the SS and German army. “Ukraine has several dozen monuments and scores of street names glorifying this Nazi collaborator, enough to require two separate Wikipedia pages,” the Forward wrote.
もう一つの不気味な展開として、ウクライナは近年、ナチスの代理人としての議論の余地のない経歴によってその遺産が汚されたウクライナ民族主義者を称える像を大量に建てている。 フォワード紙は、ウクライナ民族主義者組織（OUN）の指導者ステパン・バンデラを含む、こうした嘆かわしい人物の一部を目録にまとめ、その支持者たちは親衛隊やドイツ軍の地元民兵として活動していた。 「ウクライナには、このナチスの協力者を称賛する数十の記念碑と多数の通りの名前があり、ウィキペディアの2つの別々のページが必要になるほどだ」と同紙は書いた。
In a discussion about the case, someone raised an objection to "someone who was not a party to the incident, who was not from Nagasaki, and who was not from Hiroshima, complaining about it. Seeing that opinion made me aware of my position, so I will say what I must say.
I was born in Nagasaki and am a third-generation A-bomb survivor.
I say this because I grew up hearing the stories of the A-bomb damage directly from those who suffered from the atomic bombings.
I feel that it is unacceptable for someone like me to speak about the A-bomb damage.
However, there are few A-bomb survivors left, so I will speak up.
In Nagasaki, children grow up hearing stories about the atomic bombing. We were made to sit in the gymnasium of an elementary school in the middle of summer, where there was not even an air conditioner or a fan, and for nearly an hour we were made to listen to stories about the atomic bombing. It was hard for me anyway.
I think it was even more painful for the elderly people who told the stories. But I don't think an elementary school kid could have imagined that. I, too, have forgotten most of the stories I was told. I can only remember one or two at most.
Another thing is that at this time of year, pictures of the victims of the atomic bombing are pasted up in the hallways.
In other parts of the country, these are grotesque images that would cause a fuss from the parents who are always nagging about them.
Recently, even the A-bomb museum has become more gentle in its exhibits, and most of the radical and horrifying exhibits that would have traumatized visitors have been removed.
I don't know how elementary schools now teach about the A-bomb damage. But when I was in elementary school, there were photos on display.
There was one photo that I just couldn't face as an elementary school student. It was a picture of Taniguchi Sumiteru(谷口稜曄). If you search for it, you can find it. It is a shocking picture, but I would still like you to see it.
I couldn't pass through the hallway where the photo was displayed, so I always took the long way around to another floor to avoid seeing the photo.
My grandfather was under the bomb and went to the burnt ruins of the bomb to look for his sister. I can understand now that he couldn't turn away or go another way.
There would have been a mountain of people still alive and moaning in the ruins of the burnt ruins. There would have been many more who would have died out in agony.
My grandfather walked for miles and miles, towing a rear wheelchair, through the narrow streets of rubble-strewn Nagasaki in search of his sister.
My grandfather was not a child then. But of course there were elementary school children who did the same thing he did. I am not speculating that there were. There were. I heard the story from him, and I still remember it.
A young brother and sister found their father's corpse in the ruins of the fire and burned it themselves. They didn't have enough wood to burn him alive, and when they saw his brain spilling out, they ran away, and that was the last time they ever saw him again.
I can never forget that story I heard when I was a kid, and even now it's painful and painful, my hands are shaking and I'm crying.
I keep wondering how that old man who ran away from his father's brain was able to expose to the public the unimaginably horrible trauma, the scar that will never heal, even after all these years.
Now I think I understand a little.
Why I can't help but talk about my grandfather and the old man now, even as I remember my own trauma.
Because this level of suffering is nothing compared to their words being forgotten.
It's nothing compared to the tremendous suffering that once existed that will be forgotten, like my hands shaking, my heart palpitating, my nose running with vertigo, and so on.
My grandfather, who went through an unimaginable hell, lived to see his grandchildren born, and met his sister's death in the ruins of the fire.
In other words, my grandfather was one of the happiest people in the ruins of the fire.
My grandfather and that old man were, after all, just people wading in the depths of hell.
I think that the suffering that even people who had experienced unimaginable pain could not imagine was lying like pebbles on the ground in Nagasaki 78 years ago, and no one paid any attention to it.
Their suffering, which I can't even imagine, is nothing compared to the countless, unimaginable suffering they witnessed, which they pretend never happened.
Memories fade inexorably with each passing human mouth. The memories that those people could never allow to be forgotten are almost forgotten.
The tremendous suffering of 78 years ago is mostly gone, never to be recounted.
Those who suffered the most from the atomic bombing died rotting in the ruins of the fire without being able to tell anyone about it.
Many of those who saw it with their own eyes kept their mouths shut and took it with them to their graves. Most of those who spoke a few words are still in their graves.
Compared to the words of the old men, my own words are so light. I would rather keep my mouth shut than speak in such light words.
But still, someone has to take over. I realize that even my words, which are so light, are only the top of the voices that are left in this world to carry on the story of the atomic bombing.
I know how it feels to think that I am the only one. Still, I hope that you will not shut your mouth. I know that I have closed my mouth because I thought I shouldn't talk about it, and that is the result.
Sometimes I almost choose to stop imagining the unimaginable suffering and live my life consuming other people's suffering for fun.
I am writing this while I still have some imagination of the suffering of the old people whose voices, faces, and even words I can no longer recall.
すまん。勝手に翻訳した。拡散はどうするかな。redditとかに投稿するのがいいのか?
----
I have seen some posts asking if they should talk about "the case" even though they were not involved in it and were not born in Nagasaki or Hiroshima, and I am a bit aware of it, so I have to say what I have to say. I say this because I was born in Nagasaki, am a third generation atomic bomb survivor, and grew up hearing the stories of those who experienced the atomic bombing firsthand. I know it's a little bit too much for me, but I'm going to say this because there are very few survivors left.
In Nagasaki, children grow up hearing stories about the atomic bombing. They were stuffed into sushi for nearly an hour in the gymnasium of an elementary school in the middle of summer, with no air conditioner or fan, and told stories about the atomic bombing. That was a hard time for me. I think it must have been even harder for the old people who told the stories, but there was no way an elementary school kid could imagine such a thing, and I had forgotten most of the stories I had been told for a long time. I have forgotten most of the stories I was told. I can only remember one or two at most. There is one more hard thing. Every year around this time, a row of grotesque images that would drive the PTA crazy in other areas are prominently displayed in the hallways. These days, I hear that the atomic bomb museum has been bleached out and many of the radical and horrifying exhibits that traumatized visitors have been taken down. I don't know if they are still there, but they were there when I was in elementary school.
There was one photo that I just couldn't face when I was in elementary school. It is a picture of Sumiteru Taniguchi. If you search for it, you can find it. It is a shocking picture, but I would like you to take a look at it. I couldn't pass through the hallway where the photo was posted, so I always took the long way around to another floor of the school building to avoid seeing the photo.
Now I'm thinking that my grandfather, who headed into the burnt ruins to look for his sister, couldn't have turned away or taken a different path. There would have been a mountain of people still alive and moaning, not just pictures, and a mountain more who would have given up at the end of their suffering. He walked for miles and miles, towing his handcart through the narrow streets of rubble-strewn Nagasaki in search of his sister. My grandfather was not a child at the time, but of course there were children who did similar things. Not that there wouldn't have been. There were. I heard the story from him, and I still remember it. A young brother and sister found their father's body in the ruins of a fire and they burned it. They didn't have enough wood to burn his body, and when they saw the raw brain that spilled out, they ran away and that was the last time they ever saw him anymore.
I can never forget the story I heard when I was a kid, and even now it is painful and painful, my hands are shaking and I am crying. I keep wondering how the old man who escaped from that father's brain could have been able to unravel the most horrible trauma imaginable and expose it to the public with scars that will never heal.
Now I think I can understand a little.
The reason I can't help but talk about my grandfather and that old man, even if I have to rehash my own trauma, is that this level of suffering is nothing compared to the fact that their words will be forgotten. My hands shaking, my heart palpitating and dizzy, my nose running with tears, it's nothing compared to the tremendous suffering that was once there and will be forgotten.
My grandfather, who went through an unimaginable hell, lived to see his grandchildren born, and met his sister's death in the ruins of the fire. In other words, my grandfather was one of the happiest people in the ruins of the fire. My grandfather and that old man were, after all, just people wading in the depths of hell. I think that the suffering that even people who had experienced unimaginable pain could not imagine was lying like pebbles in Nagasaki 78 years ago, and no one paid any attention to it. Their suffering, which I can't even imagine, is nothing compared to the countless, tremendous suffering they witnessed, which they pretend never happened.
Memories fade inexorably every time people talk about them. The memories that those people could not allow to be forgotten are now largely forgotten; the tremendous suffering of 78 years ago is mostly gone, never to be recounted again. Those who suffered the most from the atomic bombing died rotting in the ruins of the fire, unable to tell anyone about it. Many of those who saw it with their own eyes kept their mouths shut and took it with them to their graves. Most of those who spoke a few words are now under the grave.
Compared to the words of the old men, my own words are so light. I would rather keep my mouth shut than speak in such light words. But still, someone has to take over. I realize that even my words, which are so light, are only the top of the voices that are left in this world to carry on the story of the atomic bombing. I know how it feels to wonder if someone like myself is allowed to speak about this. Still, I hope that you will not shut your mouth. This is the result of our silence.
Sometimes I almost choose to stop imagining the unimaginable suffering and live my life consuming other people's suffering for the fun of it. I am writing this while I still have some imagination of the suffering of the old people whose voices, faces, and even words I can no longer recall.
Translator's note: The original post in Japanese is a response to a post by a Japanese contributor who wondered if he was qualified to speak out on the subject of the A-bomb when he was not from Hiroshima and Nagasaki, but still spoke out about Barbie and the A-bomb. I translated it here because I think it deserves to be read by the world.
I must talk about various things regarding the Barbie incident.
I saw a post about it from someone who is neither directly involved nor from Nagasaki or Hiroshima, and it made me realize that there are things I must say.
I was born in Nagasaki and grew up listening to stories from the survivors, being a third-generation survivor myself. Most survivors are no longer with us, so I feel compelled to speak up.
In Nagasaki, kids grow up hearing about the atomic bomb. We were packed like sushi in a gymnasium without air conditioning or even fans during the scorching summer, and we listened to stories about the bomb. It was incredibly tough for me.
I imagine it was even harder for the elderly who spoke about their experiences. As a child, I couldn't fully comprehend their pain, and now, I can hardly remember most of the stories I heard. I can only recall one or two.
Every year during this time, gruesome images that would make PTA elsewhere go crazy were displayed in the hallways. I heard that many of the horrifying exhibits that used to traumatize visitors at the Atomic Bomb Museum have been removed, and the museum has been considerably sanitized. I'm not sure about the current situation, but that's how it was when I was there.
There was one photograph that I could never bear to look at as a child – a picture of Tadashi Taniguchi. You can find it if you search, but it's a shocking image with a viewer discretion warning. Still, I want people to see it.
I couldn't walk down the hallway where that photo was displayed, and I always took a different route, avoiding it so I wouldn't have to see it.
Now, I think of my grandpa who went to the ruins to search for my sister. He couldn't look away or take a different path. The pain must have been unimaginable.
Besides photographs, there were many living people moaning in pain back then, and there must have been even more who succumbed to suffering.
My grandpa walked for miles, pulling a handcart through the debris-laden streets of Nagasaki, searching for my sister.
Even though my grandpa was not a child, I'm sure there were elementary school kids who did similar things. I don't just think they might have been there; they were there. I heard the stories from the people themselves, and I still remember them.
I can't forget the stories I heard as a child, such as the young siblings finding their father's burnt corpse in the ruins and cremating him. They didn't have enough firewood, and their father ended up half-burnt. They ran away after seeing the brain tissue oozing out, and that became their final farewell.
I can never forget those stories I heard as a child, and even now, they still bring pain and suffering, making my hands tremble and tears flow.
I wonder how my grandpa, who ran away from that father's brain tissue, could expose his unimaginable trauma and everlasting scars to the world.
Now, I feel like I understand a little.
Even someone like me, who experienced such unimaginable trauma, has gone through pain that I can't even imagine being compared to being discarded, forgotten, and ignored. Compared to what those people experienced, my suffering means nothing.
My trembling hands and the palpitations and dizziness I experienced are nothing compared to the tremendous pain that many others went through.
Memories fade irreversibly every time they pass through people's lips. The memories that I couldn't bear to be forgotten are almost forgotten now.
The unimaginable pain that existed 78 years ago has mostly disappeared, and we can no longer pass it on.
The people who suffered the most from the atomic bomb perished in the ruins, rotting away without being able to convey it to anyone.
Even those who saw it with their own eyes mostly took the memories with them to their graves. Most of them are now under the tombstones.
Compared to the words of the elderly, my words seem so light. I think that speaking with such light words would be better than keeping silent, as silence has led to this result.
I feel like I might occasionally choose to stop imagining the unimaginable pain and consume the suffering of others in an amusing way to live on.
Before I forget the pain and suffering of those elderly people, whose faces and voices I can no longer recall, I will leave this here.
妻のブリジット
2007年10月、24歳年上の女性ブリジットと結婚した。マクロンは29歳でブリジットは54歳であった。
ブリジットとの出会いはマクロンが15歳（10年生）のときに遡る。
ブリジットは当時40歳で、マクロンの通う学校の国語（フランス文学）教師であった。
またブリジットは既婚者で子供も3人おり、うち1人の娘であるローランスは、マクロンと同級生の女子生徒であった。
マクロンは天才少年として知られており、ローランスは自宅で母のブリジットに「なんでも知っているクレイジーな少年がいる」とマクロンのことを紹介していた。
ブリジットとマクロンが初めて会ったのは、15歳のマクロンが学校劇『Jacques and his Master』の主演を務めたときであった。
ブリジットは演劇部の顧問でもあり、マクロンは演劇の脚本を書き直したいとブリジットに相談した。
二人は脚本を書くために毎週金曜日に会うようになり、親密になっていった。
「マクロンは10代の子供らしい話し方や行動をせず、大人と対等に接していた」
「私は少しずつ彼の知性に魅了されていった」
「私は自分が落ちていくのを感じた。彼もそうだった」
とのちに語っている。
マクロンの両親は当初、マクロンが恋愛をしていることに気づいてはいたが、その相手はブリジットの娘のローランスだと考えていたという。
ところが恋の相手がその母親であると知った両親は、ブリジットに「マクロンが18歳になるまで近づかない」ことを求めた。
両親とブリジットは苦悩し、マクロンへ「ブリジットと別れ、アミアンからも離れて、パリの名門学校アンリ4世校へ転校する」ことを命じた。
だが、17歳だったマクロンはブリジットに「あなたが何をしようと、私は必ず戻ってきて、あなたと結婚する」と約束し、二人はキスを交わしたという。
パリとアミアンとの遠距離恋愛となった2人だったが、マクロンからの長電話によってブリジットの抵抗は少しずつ打ち破られた。
「そうしなければ私の人生は失われてしまう」とブリジットは自分に言い聞かせたという。
「愛はすべてを運んできて、私を離婚に導いた」とも語っている。
A Hearing Like No Other: US President's Son Embroiled in Tax Evasion Scandal Involving Millions, Sex Workers, Drugs
It was a hearing that could have been a captivating Hollywood movie. At its center was the son of a US President who had evaded paying taxes for several years while battling drug addiction. He also broke the law by owning a gun as a drug addict and frequently filmed himself having sex with sex workers, posting the content on the porn site Pornhub. This happened while he made millions of dollars worldwide, relying solely on his father’s name.
もともと麻薬中毒者で脱税の過去があり、Pornhubにアカウントを自ら開設し、セックスワーカーとのセックスの写真を投稿してたんだｗ
岸田息子を余裕で超えるモンスターだな。
忖度しすぎじゃね？ｗ
真のスコットランド人論法（しんのスコットランドじんろんぽう、英語: No true Scotsman)、または純粋さに訴える論証（英語: appeal to purity）は、 非形式的誤謬のひとつである。普遍汎化に対する反例を提出されたとき、トートロジーを用いて反例を除外することで主張を防衛しようとする行為をさす[1] [2] [3]。普遍汎化を放棄したり反例を否定する証拠を提供したりせず、客観的な基準の代わりにレトリックを用いて汎化を修正し定義上その特定の反例を含まないようにする[4]。このレトリックは「真の、純粋な、正真正銘の、真正の、本物の」など感情に訴えかけるだけで本質的な意味のない純粋さの形容という形をとる[5]
例
哲学教授のブラッドリー・ダウデン（英語版）は、反駁された汎化の試みに対する「アドホックな救助」としてこの誤謬を説明している[1]。以下はこの誤謬の簡略化された一例である[6]。
B: 「私の叔父はスコットランド人だけど、粥に砂糖を入れていたよ。」
A: 「でも、真のスコットランド人は粥に砂糖を入れないんだよ。（But no true Scotsman puts sugar on his porridge.）」
I won't forgive you, you liar! - Weblio Email例文集
I will not forgive his incivility. - Weblio英語基本例文集
あのいやなやつは決して許さないぞ。
https://twitter.com/katrinaltrnsl8r/status/1367633335887880195
アニメ・マンガにおける「許さない」は、英語における Over my dead body! （おれの目の黒いうちはだめだ）と同じくらいよく見かける定型句であり、I won't forgive you. と直訳されることが多い
英語のforgiveと日本語の許すはニュアンスが異なるので、一対一で訳すことはできない
以下、適切な翻訳例
2. しかし、強い者が弱い者を一方的に殺すことは、断じて許さない！ (Code Geass Episode 8)
But neither will I stand for a one-sided slaughter of the weak by the strong!
3. 私以外の奴に撃たれたら、許さないからね (Sword Art Online II, Episode 8)
So... If you let someone else shoot you, I won't forgive you.
↑これは悪い例
↓代替案
But you better not let someone else shoot before I get to.
If you get shot out there, I'll shoot you myself. Got it?
Don't get shot out there. Your body's reserved for my bullets.
You owe me a fight, so you BETTER stay alive.
また、ニュアンスが異なるということは、日本語と同じ感覚で I won't forgive you. と言ってしまうとトラブルになる可能性が高いということでもある
実際、スマブラでボコボコにされたあとに「許さない！」と悔しがるのは日本語では自然だが、同じ状況でネイティブに対して "I won't forgive you!"と言ったら大げさすぎて驚かれるだろう、というようなことを一人のネイティブが言っている
https://twitter.com/CodyDang_/status/1367934949932683264?s=20
https://twitter.com/merumeruchann/status/1663878494336458753?s=20
3. Choose your words wisely; AKA consider what is SEXY
"Wriggling" is a pretty standard translation of 藻掻く but in English it's associated with worms. WORMS! 🪱 "Undulating" is much nicer. e.g. A pussy doesn't wriggle, it undulates or ripples, or it convulses around his cock.
A woman doesn't wriggle her hips, she bucks them or she writhes. Your MC doesn't rock his hips he thrusts or pumps or rides. His hips aren't "moving on their own" he "can't control himself".
「もがく、身悶えする」はふつう"Wriggling"と訳されるが、これは虫を連想させるのでダメ。"Undulating"のほうがよい。
「まんこがうねる」と言いたいときも、wriggleではなく、undulate や ripple
あるいは"it convulses around his cock."
同様に、女が尻をくねらせるとき wriggle her hips とは言わない。she bucks them or she writhesなどと言う。
男が腰を振るときはrock his hipsではなくhe thrusts or pumps or rides
意識的に腰を振るのではなく自分をコントロールできず振ってしまう感が大事
Sometimes a woman's skin may be described as 白魚. This is sexy in the original cultural and linguistic context. In many English-speaking cultures, fish are used for negative comparisons. Something like translucent or dewy would be an appropriate equivalent.
In JP a man going wild during sex is often likened to a monkey, but this has a more comical sound in English, where comparisons to simply a "wild animal" work better.
女の肌を「白魚」と形容することがあるが、英語では魚はネガティブな意味合いになってしまう
translucent (透き通るような)やdew（つややかな）と言い換えると良い
また、激しいセックスの最中、「猿のように」と形容することがあるが、英語ではコミカルに響いてしまうのでwild animal（野生動物、獣）などと言いかえるとよい
Consider the virgin "He put his penis in her vagina" vs the chad "He slid his cock into her pussy".
These sentences describe the same action, but one says "I fuck" and the other says "I've only ever seen sex in the bio textbooks my model was trained on".
On the other hand, don't throw in porny words where there shouldn't be any; if your heroine is a shy virgin and the source text is using coy words like あそこ, don't have her shouting FUCK MY TIGHT LITTLE PUSSY in English.
挿入するシーンでは
"He put his penis in her vagina"
とするのではなく、
"He slid his cock into her pussy".
と訳すべき
後者は「ヤる」という感じだが、前者は「私はAIなので性行為については生物学の教科書の知識しかありません」みたいに聞こえてしまう
とはいえ、ヒロインがシャイな処女で、「あそこ」と控えめに言っているのに”FUCK MY TIGHT LITTLE PUSSY”（私のキツキツオマンコを犯して！）などと絶叫させてはいけない
この記事の主旨は「ウクライナのゼレンスキー大統領のパーカーは略式軍服である」ということではない。
あくまで「略式軍服という日本語はなかった」「一年ほど前から急に現れた言葉だ」という誤認を訂正したいだけである。
「略式軍服」という言葉の使用例は、国立国会図書館デジタルコレクションの全文検索では33件 - 法華狼の日記
どう見ても定着した言葉や概念ではない。ほとんどが翻訳で採用された言葉だったり、あくまで「略式の軍服」という意味の表現にすぎない。同一作品の重複も多い。
法華狼氏のエントリでは近年の用例はないとされているが、実際にはそうした用例は存在する。
枯野瑛『終末なにしてますか？ 忙しいですか？ 救ってもらっていいですか？』
あえて翻訳は除外したが、日本人作家の商業作品に限定してもこうしていくつかの使用例がある。
池波正太郎以外は、2000年ごろから2020年までに刊行された新しい書籍である。
もちろん10件足らずでは「定着していた」とまでは言えない。
しかし「用例がまったく無いわけではない」ということはわかるはずだ。
「用例」の存在を確認したところで、次は「用法」の確認をしたい。
国立国会図書館デジタルコレクションで「略式軍服」を検索すると、1940年発行の岡倉由三郎編『新英和大辞典』がヒットし、以下のような項目を見つけることができる。
tu'-nic [tjúːnɪk] n. 1) 〘古代ギリシャ・ローマ〙襦袢, 肌着, シャチ; 2) 一種の陣羽織; 3)（現代婦人の用ひる）腰部緊着上衣; 4) 〘俗〙密着短上衣, 略式軍服（又は, 警官服）; 5)〘解・動〙被膜, 膜（＝integument）; 7)〘植〙膜質外皮, 種皮（＝husuk）. [OF tunique, ＜ L tunica]
つまり辞書レベルで「略式軍服」は「（軍服の）チュニック」の訳語だったのである。
これは法華狼氏が「ほとんどが翻訳で採用された言葉だった」と書いているのにもつながる。
実際に、国立国会図書館デジタルコレクションで読めるいくつかの翻訳書籍の原文を確認してみると、
エリック・アンブラー著・宇野利泰訳『真昼の翳』（1963年）
He stood up, as if to end the discussion, and smoothed down the front of his tunic.
when he came back he looked lovely in his uniform, with all those pretty ribbons on his tunic,
コーネリアス・ライアン著・木村忠雄訳『ヒトラー最後の戦闘』（1966年）
Golbov took out of his tunic pocket a folded copy of the newspaper Red Star
用例が少ないために「それが定訳だった」とまでは言えないかもしれないが、「チュニックを略式軍服と訳していた」ということの証左にはなっていると思う。
古くは「チュニック」の訳語とされ、近年でも数は少ないながら商業作品に使われている。
I see that among men all things depend upon three wants and desires, of which the end is virtue, if they are rightly led by them, or the opposite if wrongly. Now these are eating and drinking, which begin at birth—every animal has a natural desire for them, and is violently excited, and rebels against him who says that he must not satisfy all his pleasures and appetites, and get rid of all the corresponding pains—and the third and greatest and sharpest want and desire breaks out last, and is the fire of sexual lust, which kindles in men every species of wantonness and madness.
私は、人間のあいだではすべてのことが三つの欲望に依拠していると見ています。それらは、正しく導かれれば徳であり、誤って導かれればその反対となります。まずは「食欲」と「飲欲」であり、これらは生まれたときから始まります。あらゆる動物が自然とその二つの欲望を備え、激しく興奮させられ、己の快楽や食欲を満たしてはいけないと言う者に逆らい、付随する苦痛からは逃れようとします。そして第三の、最も強く鋭い欲望が、最後に噴き出します。それは人々のあらゆる種類の淫気と狂気を燃え上がらせる「性欲」の炎です。
今のところこれが最古である。さすが西洋哲学の祖。「食」と「飲」が分かれているのが特徴。プラトンの著作は明治時代に翻訳されていて日本人にも知られていたと思われる。
欲界三欲
(一)飲食欲，即凡夫於種種美味之飲食，多生貪愛之心。(二)睡眠欲，即凡夫之心多暗塞，耽著於睡眠而不能勤修道業。(三)淫欲，即一切男女由互相之貪染，而起造諸種欲事。
欲界三欲
1. 飲食欲、すなわち凡夫はさまざまな美味の飲食において、多くは貪愛な心を生む。2. 睡眠欲、すなわち凡夫の心は暗く塞がり、惰眠に耽って修業に励むことができない。3. 淫欲、すなわちすべての男女は互いに貪欲に染まり、それがさまざまな欲事の原因となる。
『翻訳名義集』は中国・南宋時代に編纂された仏教系の書物。もちろん日本にも伝わっている。というかこの組み合わせが現在のスタンダードである。
いにしへの人三慾を忍ぶ事をいへり。三慾とは、飲食の欲、色の欲、睡の欲なり。
『養生訓』は江戸時代の大ベストセラー。貝原益軒は儒学者だが、この組み合わせは仏教の「三欲」と同じなので、「いにしへの人」というのは僧侶のことなのか。三欲を「抑えるべきもの」と捉えているのも仏教的である。「睡眠を減らすと健康になる」みたいなことも言っている。
『歌学提要』は幕末の歌人・香川景樹の理論をその弟子の内山真弓がまとめたものだという。
人間の根源の欲望を、食欲・性欲・表現欲に三大別して言うそのことは、江戸末期の巨匠香川景樹以来、歌界ではならいとなっている。
ということで「食欲」「性欲」「表現欲」を表しているらしい。
これはイギリス科学振興協会の当時の会長であったライアン・プレイフェアのスピーチが翻訳されたもののようだ。原文を当たると「かつての錬金術師は黄金・健康・不死のために賢者の石を研究していた」…みたいな内容だったらしい。
they hoped to attain the three sensuous conditions of human enjoyment -- gold, health, and immortality.
村上専精は僧侶だが仏教の「三欲」とは異なるのか。「生存欲」は戦時中の文章で「日本人は三大欲求の生存欲を抑えて国家に殉じるからすごい！」というふうに使われているのを見かけて面白かった。
人間の三大慾望たる衣食住
個人的に「衣食住」は欲望というより「基本的なもの」「必要なもの」というニュアンスで捉えていたのだが、井原西鶴の『世間胸算用』でも「分際相応に人間衣食住の三つの楽の外なし」と書かれているそうなので、あながち「欲望」的な捉え方でも間違いではないのか。似たようなパターンだと三大欲求を「福・禄・寿」に割り当てることもある。
美術評論家が三大欲求に「美欲」を入れるのは、歌人が「言語表現欲」を入れるのと似通っているか。
明治以降は経済発展もあってか「金銭欲（利欲・財欲）」や「名誉欲（出世欲）」を挙げることがかなり多い気がする。
もとはアメリカで1948年に刊行された小説だが、原文だと「three main pastimes」なので「三大娯楽」かな。
といった記述がある。
食欲、性欲、排泄欲の根源的意味に比べたら、人間の他の欲望である出世欲とか名誉欲とか権力欲とか支配欲とか金欲とか知識欲など、それこそ屁以下の価値しかない。
いわゆる「生理的欲求」のひとつとして食欲や睡眠欲と並べて語られる「排泄欲」だが、「三大欲求」として挙げられていることは少ない印象を受ける。ただ「性欲（射精欲）」を排泄欲の一種とみなすこともあるようだ。
本来、仲間と一緒にいたい、集団の中で自分の安定した位置を占めたいという欲求――集団欲は、食欲、性欲と並んで三大欲と言われる程のものである。
この「集団欲」を三大欲求とみなすのは戦後にかなり広まった感じがする。近年の書籍でも睡眠欲に代えて集団欲が挙がることがあるようだ。
貞潔・清貧・従順の修道三誓願は人間共通の三大欲求（肉欲・所有欲・支配欲）にかかわるものとして、生涯の一大試練と誘惑になりうる。
これはつまりカトリックの修道士が守る三誓願の対義語となるような欲望（貞潔↔肉欲 清貧↔所有欲 従順↔支配欲）を「三大欲求」と見なしているらしい。カトリックのあいだでポピュラーな解釈なのかは知らないが、三誓願そのものは3世紀末くらいまで遡るらしいので、当時からそうした発想があったとしたら面白い。
現在の一般的な認識。「金銭欲」「名誉欲」「集団欲」あたりを含めて「諸説あり」と言われていてもおかしくなかったと思うが、最終的にほとんど「食欲・睡眠欲・性欲」で固定されてしまったのは面白い現象である。
Related questions
Was George Harrison a vegetarian?
When did George Harrison become a vegetarian?
What was George Harrison like as a person?
I've read that George Harrison frequently cheated on his wife Olivia. Who were all these women? Were any of them famous or well-known? Why did Olivia tolerate it?
Why did George Harrison say he loved (and maybe slept with) Ringo's wife?
How did Ringo Starr find out about the affair between George Harrison and
↓
に関する質問
このままジョージ-ハリソンは頻繁に騙彼の妻Olivia. たったこれらすべての女性。 たったという名のもと、いくつかのか。 なぜOliviaは許容です。
Evilすぎて草
会社設立にあたり業務用回線を新たにeSIMで契約したが謎エラーで引っかかったのでメモがてら投稿。
Androidの設定マニュアルは当然端末毎ではなく、別のメーカーの画面で説明されているので良く分からん。
色々ググってみるとSIM追加の操作(今はまだ出来ない)をするとエラー画面にリンクが付いているので、そこから見に行くことが出来るらしい。分かりづら！
郵送された手順書にQRコードが付いており、それを読み取ればeSIMダウンロード完了になるのだが、「ネットワークが無効です。電話番号の有効化中にエラーが発生しました」とメッセージが表示されエラーになる。
ちょっと時間置いてもエラー、入ってたSIMカード抜いてみてもエラー、何度試してもエラー。と全く解決の糸口が見えない。
ほかのメニュー触ってみても関係ありそうな設定とかはないし、完全に行き詰った。設定回り色々触ってて、たまたまAndroidのシステムアップデートの通知が来てたのでそれを実行。
再起動した後に再度QRコードを読み取ると、今度は成功。これか原因！？これが原因だとしたらサポートに連絡しても絶対に解決しない気がする。
通話とメッセージの動確もバッチリOK。デュアルSIMにするとモバイルの電波マーク2つ並んでて初めての光景にちょっと感動。あと、電話アプリの履歴やメッセージアプリに通信会社が表示されるようになった。
In 2019 actor and comedian Volodymyr Zelensky ran as the peace candidate winning the Ukrainian presidency with 70% of the vote. As Benjamin Abelow observes in his brilliant book, “How the West Brought War to Ukraine,” Zelensky almost certainly could have avoided the 2022 war with Russia simply by uttering five words — “I will not join NATO.” But pressured by NeoCons in the Biden White House, and by violent fascist elements within the Ukrainian government, Zelensky integrated his army with NATO’s and allowed the U.S. to place nuclear-capable Aegis missile launchers along Ukraine’s 1,200-mile border with Russia. These were provocations that senior U.S. diplomats like post-WWII foreign policy architect George Kennan, former U.S. Defense Secretary Bill Perry, and former U.S. ambassador to Moscow Jack Matlock had long described as “red lines” for Russian leadership. Let’s face it, the Neocons wanted this war with Russia, just as they wanted war with Iraq. Listen here to NATO Supreme Commander General Wesley Clark describe how White House Neocons justified the Iraq invasion:
https://youtube.com/watch?v=FNt7s_Wed_4
2019年、俳優でコメディアンのウォロディミル・ゼレンスキーが平和候補として出馬し、投票の70%でウクライナ大統領を獲得しました。ベンジャミン・アベロウが彼の素晴らしい著書「西側がウクライナに戦争をもたらした方法」で述べているように、ゼレンスキーは「私はNATOに参加しない」という5つの言葉を発するだけで、2022年のロシアとの戦争をほぼ確実に回避できたはずです。しかし、バイデン・ホワイトハウスのネオコンと、ウクライナ政府内の暴力的なファシスト分子による圧力を受けて、ゼレンスキーは彼の軍隊を NATO と統合し、米国がウクライナとロシアとの 1,200 マイルの国境に核搭載可能なイージス・ミサイル発射装置を配置することを許可した。これらは、第二次世界大戦後の外交政策立案者であるジョージ・ケナン、元米国国防長官のビル・ペリー、元モスクワ駐在米国大使のジャック・マトロックなどの米国の上級外交官が、ロシアの指導者にとって「レッドライン」と長い間述べてきた挑発でした。率直に言って、ネオコンはイラクとの戦争を望んでいたのと同じように、ロシアとのこの戦争を望んでいました。 NATO最高司令官のウェズリー・クラーク将軍が、ホワイトハウス・ネオコンがイラク侵攻をどのように正当化したかを説明しているのをここで聞いてください。
https://twitter.com/RobertKennedyJr/status/1653772735779143681?s=20
東野篤子
全てが嘘をついた。
寄付金詐欺だった。
日本人はこれらの連中に石を投げていいとしか言いようがない。しかし、まず直ちにNATOを叩き出すしかない。
全部ネオコンが儲けるためだけだ。
https://www.worlddata.info/iq-by-country.php
The intelligence quotients by countries are taken from the studies conducted by Richard Lynn and Tatu Vanhanen (2002), Heiner Rindermann (2007), Khaleefa and Lynn (2008), Ahmad, Khanum and Riaz (2008), Lynn, Abdalla and Al-Shahomee (2008), Lynn and Meisenberg (2010), as well as the PISA tests from 2000 to 2015. The more recent study by Richard Lynn and David Becker (PDF) at the Ulster Institute for Social Research from 2019 was also included here. In this, Lynn corrects several values of his earlier publications. The studies are not entirely uncontroversial, as they consider only specific population groups in individual countries or only a few and thus unrepresentative reference groups.
英語だとなんとか…
Please list some intelligent puns.
---
Sure, here are a few intelligent puns:
I'm reading a book on the history of glue – I just can't seem to put it down.
Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything.
Did you hear about the guy who lost his left arm and leg in a car crash? He's all right now.
I told my wife she was drawing her eyebrows too high. She looked surprised.
Why don't skeletons fight each other? They don't have the guts.
I'm reading a book about anti-gravity. It's impossible to put down.
I'm on a whiskey diet. I've lost three days already.
What did the grape say when it got stepped on? Nothing, it just let out a little wine.
I'm really good at math – I can solve problems with my eyes closed. It's just a simple matter of algebra.
Why did the chicken cross the playground? To get to the other slide.
