Which is better? China and Japan のように二国を比較してこっちがいいあっちがいいと評するようなスレッドが英語圏webではしばしば見られる。経験則的には投稿者は5割はポーランド人、3割は他の東欧系、2割はブラジル人であることが多い。自分の感覚的には無関係の第三者が勝手に誰ぞをリングに上げて、レディゴーで戦わせるなど失礼極まりないと思うのだが、この種の失礼さへの鈍感がなぜ東欧に集中しているのか以前から考えてきた。
友達 " "Customers with Russian passport are not welcomed in our restaurant. We do understand that "normal" Russians are not responsible for criminal decisions of their government, but we have to do something already. By prohibiting the Russians to come in, we're making our contribution into the free Europe for our children." "
I'm so disappointed...
友達 "60% of our people is fucking stupid. they're lazy. they were taught that war is good. that nazis are everywhere around them. that stealing is good. they're corrupted. most of those people was born in USSR"
友達 "those West fuck just love to write hate messages knowing that we can't do anything in return. that they are in comfort. they scream "NO TO WAR", and after that they go to a happy dinner with their families"
友達 "when they wrote it, it was OK. but now Putin does everything he can to stay in power. they're frantically making new laws. so they can stay in power for a little longer. what happens now is the blackest page in Russia's history. since Russia-Japan war"
友達 "USA always hated Russia. They are using every chance they get to destroy us. if instead of Russia it was Finland or China, attacking Ukraine, they wouldn't do shit about it. we several times tried to have friendly relationships with USA and each time they basically said "Fuck off, Russians". I didn't have any illusions about them before. but now I plainly fucking hate them. Japanese are the best"
友達 "when that happened, Russian premier Primakov was on the flight to USA. there was gonna be a deal that could help Russia greatly. when Primakov heard about Yugoslavia, he asked his pilot to turn around, back to Moscow, and cancelled that deal. in Russia, it's known as "Primakov's turn" "
Yes, at great cost, yes, through the tragic events of the actual civil war, because now there are still brothers shooting at each other, separated by belonging to the Russian and Ukrainian armies - but Ukraine as the anti-Russia will no longer exist.
If we refused to do this, if we allowed the temporary division to take hold for centuries, we would not only betray the memory of our ancestors, but we would be damned by our descendants - for allowing the collapse of the Russian land.
The first would always remain a complex of divided people, a complex of national humiliation - when the Russian house first lost part of its foundation (Kiev), and then was forced to accept the existence of two states no longer one, but two peoples.
Bringing Ukraine back, that is, turning it back to Russia, would be more and more difficult with each passing decade - the recoding, derussification of Russians, and the setting against Russian Little Russians-Ukrainians would gain momentum.
In what borders, in what form will the union with Russia be fixed (through the CSTO and the Eurasian Union or the Union State of Russia and Belarus)? This will be decided after the end of the history of Ukraine as anti-Russia.
Did anyone in the old European capitals, Paris and Berlin, seriously believe that Moscow would give up Kiev? That Russians would forever be a divided people? And at the same time that Europe is uniting, when German and French elites are trying to seize control of European integration from the Anglo-Saxons and assemble a united Europe? Forgetting that the unification of Europe was only possible thanks to the unification of Germany, which happened by Russian good (albeit not very clever) will.
Europe, as part of the West, wanted autonomy - the German project of European integration does not make strategic sense while maintaining Anglo-Saxon ideological, military and geopolitical control over the Old World.
But Europe also needs autonomy for another reason - in case the United States moves to self-isolation (as a result of growing internal conflicts and contradictions) or concentrates on the Pacific region, where the geopolitical center of gravity is shifting.
But the confrontation with Russia, into which the Anglo-Saxons are dragging Europe, deprives Europeans of even a chance for autonomy - not to mention the fact that in the same way they are trying to impose on Europe a break with China.
While the Atlanticists are now happy that the "Russian threat" will unite the Western bloc, those in Berlin and Paris cannot but understand that, having lost hope of autonomy, the European project will simply collapse in the medium term.
Because the construction of a new world order - and this is the third dimension of current events - is accelerating, and its contours are becoming clearer through the sprawling cover of Anglo-Saxon globalization.
Because the rest of the world can see and understand perfectly well - this is a conflict between Russia and the West, this is a response to the geopolitical expansion of the Atlanticists, this is Russia's return of its historical space and its place in the world.
They have no experience of war.
They just stand behind US army and help them.
The combination of upside inflation risk and downside growth risk has mixed implications for monetary policy. Historically, Fed officials have sometimes preferred to delay major policy decisions until uncertainty surrounding geopolitical risks diminished. In some cases, such as after September 11 or during the US-China trade war, the FOMC has cut the funds rate.
|外国株式||661||KYG2119W1069||CHINA EVERGRANDE GROUP||13,283,000.00||2,794,158,107|
|外国債券||2072||XS1982040641||CHINA EVERGRANDE GROUP 10.5PCT 11APR24||15,631,000.00||1,626,686,580|
|外国債券||2073||XS2106834299||CHINA EVERGRANDE GROUP 11.5PCT 22JAN23||10,114,000.00||1,075,041,389|
|外国債券||2074||XS1627599498||CHINA EVERGRANDE GROUP 7.5PCT 28JUN23||16,340,000.00||1,591,910,882|
|外国債券||2075||XS1580431143||CHINA EVERGRANDE GROUP 8.25PCT 23MAR22||402,000.00||42,382,261|
|外国債券||2076||XS1627599654||CHINA EVERGRANDE GROUP 8.75PCT 28JUN25||16,912,000.00||1,527,167,672|
|外国債券||2077||XS1982036961||CHINA EVERGRANDE GROUP 9.5PCT 11APR22||402,000.00||44,625,178|
Source: https://www.gpif.go.jp/operation/last-years-results.html (2020年度の運用状況) - https://www.gpif.go.jp/operation/unyoujoukyou_2020_15.xlsx (保有全銘柄（2020年度末）［EXCEL:1.4MB］)