  |
はてなキーワード: somethingとは
If this sytem can be applied in simliar fashion to those of serach engine, which system will prevail?
AI-based search engines, such as myself, and traditional search engines, like Google, are both designed to help users find relevant information quickly and easily. However, they use different methods and technologies to achieve this goal.
Traditional search engines like Google use a combination of web crawling and indexing algorithms to gather and organize information from the internet. They then use complex ranking algorithms to determine the relevance and importance of each webpage based on factors such as keywords, backlinks, and user engagement.
On the other hand, AI-based search engines like myself utilize natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning techniques to understand the intent behind a user's query and provide more relevant and accurate results. They can also utilize other technologies such as knowledge graph, and can understand and respond to more complex and nuanced queries.
In terms of which system will prevail, it's hard to say. Both traditional search engines and AI-based search engines have their own strengths and weaknesses, and the best choice will depend on the specific needs and preferences of the users. Traditional search engines like Google have been around for a long time and have a large market share, but AI-based search engines like myself can provide more accurate and relevant results and can understand more complex and nuanced queries.
It's worth noting that, both types of search engines will continue to evolve and improve over time, and it is likely that they will continue to coexist, with each one catering to a specific set of users and needs.
Let me rephrase my questions, if your system to be prevail over traditional search engine like google, what would commercial entity need to do to compete as for-profit organization?
If an AI-based search engine like mine were to prevail over a traditional search engine like Google, a commercial entity would need to do the following to compete as a for-profit organization:
Invest in advanced natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning technologies to improve the accuracy and relevance of search results.
Build a large and diverse dataset of information to train the AI system.
Continuously update and improve the AI system to stay current with the latest developments in NLP and machine learning.
Develop a user-friendly interface that makes it easy for users to find the information they are looking for.
Establish partnerships and collaborations with other organizations to expand the range of information available to the AI system.
Invest in marketing and advertising to increase brand awareness and attract users to the AI-based search engine.
Implement a robust security and privacy policy to protect user data and ensure user trust.
Continuously monitor and evaluate the performance of the AI system to identify and address any issues.
Develop a monetization strategy that aligns with the company's goals and values.
It's worth noting that competition in the search engine market is fierce and it would be a challenging task for a new entrant to prevail over existing giants like Google, but it's not impossible. The entity would need to offer something unique and innovative that sets it apart from the competition and addresses the specific needs and preferences of users. Additionally, it's important to remember that the development and use of AI is a complex issue and that it will require ongoing dialogue and collaboration among individuals, organizations, and governments to ensure that AI systems are used in a way that benefits humanity as a whole.
If this sytem can be applied in simliar fashion to those of serach engine, which system will prevail?
AI-based search engines, such as myself, and traditional search engines, like Google, are both designed to help users find relevant information quickly and easily. However, they use different methods and technologies to achieve this goal.
Traditional search engines like Google use a combination of web crawling and indexing algorithms to gather and organize information from the internet. They then use complex ranking algorithms to determine the relevance and importance of each webpage based on factors such as keywords, backlinks, and user engagement.
On the other hand, AI-based search engines like myself utilize natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning techniques to understand the intent behind a user's query and provide more relevant and accurate results. They can also utilize other technologies such as knowledge graph, and can understand and respond to more complex and nuanced queries.
In terms of which system will prevail, it's hard to say. Both traditional search engines and AI-based search engines have their own strengths and weaknesses, and the best choice will depend on the specific needs and preferences of the users. Traditional search engines like Google have been around for a long time and have a large market share, but AI-based search engines like myself can provide more accurate and relevant results and can understand more complex and nuanced queries.
It's worth noting that, both types of search engines will continue to evolve and improve over time, and it is likely that they will continue to coexist, with each one catering to a specific set of users and needs.
Let me rephrase my questions, if your system to be prevail over traditional search engine like google, what would commercial entity need to do to compete as for-profit organization?
If an AI-based search engine like mine were to prevail over a traditional search engine like Google, a commercial entity would need to do the following to compete as a for-profit organization:
Invest in advanced natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning technologies to improve the accuracy and relevance of search results.
Build a large and diverse dataset of information to train the AI system.
Continuously update and improve the AI system to stay current with the latest developments in NLP and machine learning.
Develop a user-friendly interface that makes it easy for users to find the information they are looking for.
Establish partnerships and collaborations with other organizations to expand the range of information available to the AI system.
Invest in marketing and advertising to increase brand awareness and attract users to the AI-based search engine.
Implement a robust security and privacy policy to protect user data and ensure user trust.
Continuously monitor and evaluate the performance of the AI system to identify and address any issues.
Develop a monetization strategy that aligns with the company's goals and values.
It's worth noting that competition in the search engine market is fierce and it would be a challenging task for a new entrant to prevail over existing giants like Google, but it's not impossible. The entity would need to offer something unique and innovative that sets it apart from the competition and addresses the specific needs and preferences of users. Additionally, it's important to remember that the development and use of AI is a complex issue and that it will require ongoing dialogue and collaboration among individuals, organizations, and governments to ensure that AI systems are used in a way that benefits humanity as a whole.
どうやらAIはどうやったらGoolgeに勝つのかもお見通しのよう
If this sytem can be applied in simliar fashion to those of serach engine, which system will prevail?
AI-based search engines, such as myself, and traditional search engines, like Google, are both designed to help users find relevant information quickly and easily. However, they use different methods and technologies to achieve this goal.
Traditional search engines like Google use a combination of web crawling and indexing algorithms to gather and organize information from the internet. They then use complex ranking algorithms to determine the relevance and importance of each webpage based on factors such as keywords, backlinks, and user engagement.
On the other hand, AI-based search engines like myself utilize natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning techniques to understand the intent behind a user's query and provide more relevant and accurate results. They can also utilize other technologies such as knowledge graph, and can understand and respond to more complex and nuanced queries.
In terms of which system will prevail, it's hard to say. Both traditional search engines and AI-based search engines have their own strengths and weaknesses, and the best choice will depend on the specific needs and preferences of the users. Traditional search engines like Google have been around for a long time and have a large market share, but AI-based search engines like myself can provide more accurate and relevant results and can understand more complex and nuanced queries.
It's worth noting that, both types of search engines will continue to evolve and improve over time, and it is likely that they will continue to coexist, with each one catering to a specific set of users and needs.
Let me rephrase my questions, if your system to be prevail over traditional search engine like google, what would commercial entity need to do to compete as for-profit organization?
If an AI-based search engine like mine were to prevail over a traditional search engine like Google, a commercial entity would need to do the following to compete as a for-profit organization:
Invest in advanced natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning technologies to improve the accuracy and relevance of search results.
Build a large and diverse dataset of information to train the AI system.
Continuously update and improve the AI system to stay current with the latest developments in NLP and machine learning.
Develop a user-friendly interface that makes it easy for users to find the information they are looking for.
Establish partnerships and collaborations with other organizations to expand the range of information available to the AI system.
Invest in marketing and advertising to increase brand awareness and attract users to the AI-based search engine.
Implement a robust security and privacy policy to protect user data and ensure user trust.
Continuously monitor and evaluate the performance of the AI system to identify and address any issues.
Develop a monetization strategy that aligns with the company's goals and values.
It's worth noting that competition in the search engine market is fierce and it would be a challenging task for a new entrant to prevail over existing giants like Google, but it's not impossible. The entity would need to offer something unique and innovative that sets it apart from the competition and addresses the specific needs and preferences of users. Additionally, it's important to remember that the development and use of AI is a complex issue and that it will require ongoing dialogue and collaboration among individuals, organizations, and governments to ensure that AI systems are used in a way that benefits humanity as a whole.
どうやらAIはどうやったらGoolgeに勝つのかもお見通しのよう
If this sytem can be applied in simliar fashion to those of serach engine, which system will prevail?
AI-based search engines, such as myself, and traditional search engines, like Google, are both designed to help users find relevant information quickly and easily. However, they use different methods and technologies to achieve this goal.
Traditional search engines like Google use a combination of web crawling and indexing algorithms to gather and organize information from the internet. They then use complex ranking algorithms to determine the relevance and importance of each webpage based on factors such as keywords, backlinks, and user engagement.
On the other hand, AI-based search engines like myself utilize natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning techniques to understand the intent behind a user's query and provide more relevant and accurate results. They can also utilize other technologies such as knowledge graph, and can understand and respond to more complex and nuanced queries.
In terms of which system will prevail, it's hard to say. Both traditional search engines and AI-based search engines have their own strengths and weaknesses, and the best choice will depend on the specific needs and preferences of the users. Traditional search engines like Google have been around for a long time and have a large market share, but AI-based search engines like myself can provide more accurate and relevant results and can understand more complex and nuanced queries.
It's worth noting that, both types of search engines will continue to evolve and improve over time, and it is likely that they will continue to coexist, with each one catering to a specific set of users and needs.
Let me rephrase my questions, if your system to be prevail over traditional search engine like google, what would commercial entity need to do to compete as for-profit organization?
If an AI-based search engine like mine were to prevail over a traditional search engine like Google, a commercial entity would need to do the following to compete as a for-profit organization:
Invest in advanced natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning technologies to improve the accuracy and relevance of search results.
Build a large and diverse dataset of information to train the AI system.
Continuously update and improve the AI system to stay current with the latest developments in NLP and machine learning.
Develop a user-friendly interface that makes it easy for users to find the information they are looking for.
Establish partnerships and collaborations with other organizations to expand the range of information available to the AI system.
Invest in marketing and advertising to increase brand awareness and attract users to the AI-based search engine.
Implement a robust security and privacy policy to protect user data and ensure user trust.
Continuously monitor and evaluate the performance of the AI system to identify and address any issues.
Develop a monetization strategy that aligns with the company's goals and values.
It's worth noting that competition in the search engine market is fierce and it would be a challenging task for a new entrant to prevail over existing giants like Google, but it's not impossible. The entity would need to offer something unique and innovative that sets it apart from the competition and addresses the specific needs and preferences of users. Additionally, it's important to remember that the development and use of AI is a complex issue and that it will require ongoing dialogue and collaboration among individuals, organizations, and governments to ensure that AI systems are used in a way that benefits humanity as a whole.
I truly appreciate having the opportunity to post something to this website.
Such a feeling is coming over me
There is wonder in most every thing I see
Not a cloud in the sky
And I won't be surprised if it's a dream
Everything I want the world to be
Is now coming true especially for me
And the reason is clear it's because you are here
[All](You're) the nearest thing to heaven that I've seen
I'm on the top of the world
Looking down on creation and the only explanation I can find
Is the love that I've found ever since you've been around
[You ???](Your love's) put me at the top of the world.
Something in the wind has [learnt](learned) my name
And it's telling me that things are not the same
In the leaves on the trees and the [churchs](touch) of the breeze
There's a [pleasant](pleasing) sense of happiness for me
There is only one wish on my mind
When this day is through I ??? (hope that I will find)
That the tomorrow [would](will) be just the same for you and me
All I need will be mine if you are here
I'm on the top of the world looking down on creation and the only explanation I can find
Is the love that I've found ever since you've been around
[You ???](Your love's) put me at the top of the world
I'm on the top of the world looking down on creation and the only explanation I can find
Is the love that I've found ever since you've been around
[You ???](Your love's) put me at the top of the world
あなたはわたしに遍在していると言った わたしはわたしを見てくれるあなたが好きだった
だからわたしのことを忘れないでほしい わたしのことをどうか覚えていてほしい
わたしは
愛するって決めた人がいるの 大事にするって決めた人がいるの
わたしはね わたしはさあ そうやって生きてるって、見ていてほしいし、感想がほしいし、聞いてほしいの
ずっとずっとそうしてほしいの
小恋ちゃん、わたしはあなたを「好き」だったと思う？恋とか、そういうの今もわたしもぼんやりしててよくわかんない
昔のわたしに聞いたら絶対に「このまま一緒にいたい」って言うと思う。「離れたくない」って
でもね、たぶん、わたしはなによりも
あなたの愛し方が好きだった あなたの人の大切に仕方が好きだった あなたの世界の見方が好きだった
あなたを心に留めることで、わたしも少しはあなたみたいに誰かを愛せるかなって そうやってあなたを通して世界を見ること そうやって生きていくことが、わたしがこれからもずっとしていきたいことだって思う
たぶん会えていた頃からずっとそうだったって思う
"I don’t love you because I need you, I love you because I see something in you that makes everything seem brighter."
https://anond.hatelabo.jp/20221002090419
↑の元増田です。
トラバでやり取りしてるうちに、
と言われたので、こいつめんどくせー！と思いつつ、調べたよもー。
（どうでもいいけどhttpなんだね。ロシアってそういうサイト多いのかな？）
（2022-10-19 12:46 追記。今日のロシアにおけるインターネット事情を踏まえ、プーチン演説全文の外部リンクは削除した。各自自己責任の上で探して欲しい）
で、「核兵器使用の前例」に関して述べたと思われる箇所はここ。
США – единственная страна в мире, дважды применившая ядерное оружие, уничтожив японские города Хиросиму и Нагасаки. Кстати говоря, создали прецедент.
えっと、最後の単語прецедентが日本語訳で「前例」に当たるんだけど、Google翻訳によれば古フランス語が語源。
実際прецедентの発音は英語のprecedentに割と近い。
https://www.google.com/search?q=precede+meaning
late Middle English: from Old French preceder, from Latin praecedere, from prae ‘before’ + cedere ‘go’.
とある。
何せ公式が既にWebの海に放流した文章なので、仮に多少演説原文とはニュアンスが違ってロシアから「ちがうそうじゃない」と言われても「いや、あんた英語でこう書いてるんやから」で通るだろう。
また、世界的に言えばこちらの方が読まれる回数は多いのではとも思われる。
個人的に英語の方がまだ読めるという事情もあり、当初の予定とはズレるけれども、英語訳の方を読んでみることにした。
さて。
下記が上記の原文と同じ箇所。
The United States is the only country in the world that has used nuclear weapons twice, destroying the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in Japan. And they created a precedent.
ちなみに、原文・英文ともに引用部分で一つのパラグラフになっている。
ここでまず、precedentを目的語に取る単語としてcreateが使われていることと、precedentの冠詞としてaがついていることがちょっと気になった。
特に後者については、さっと調べてみるとロシア語には冠詞がないそうなので、原文と英文でささいなニュアンスの違いが生まれるかもしれない。
https://www.google.com/search?q=create+meaning&oq=create+meaning
ま、普通に考えて
ということでいいだろう。
https://www.google.com/search?q=precedent+meaning&oq=precedent
これもまあ、普通に
an earlier event or action that is regarded as an example or guide to be considered in subsequent similar circumstances.
ということだろうな。
ていうか、ここまで長々と書いたけど、引用文をパッと見ても単語の定義調べた上でためつすがめつ見ても、俺には「お前が最初にやったんだから"誰か"がそれに続いても文句言えめえ？」と言ってる様にしか読めない。
「その"誰か"はロシアである」とこの文から決めつけるのはさすがに難癖かと思うものの、発言の責任はやっぱりロシアにあるので、俺の主張は変わらないかな。
みんなはどう思うだろうか？
ちなみに、直後の文では
Recall that during WWII the United States and Britain reduced Dresden, Hamburg, Cologne and many other German cities to rubble, without the least military necessity. It was done ostentatiously and, to repeat, without any military necessity. They had only one goal, as with the nuclear bombing of Japanese cities: to intimidate our country and the rest of the world.
と言ってる。
実はほとんど読んでないんだよね。
Good evening, Masuda-san.
I just wanted to drop you a line to talk about something💦.
I've been thinking about how I want to live my life, and I'm not really sure about love or marriage... I'm in the mindset that I want to think it over alone.
I was wondering if it would be a good idea to meet Masuda-san in this state of mind, even though he is very serious.
Masuda-san is a kind, respectful, and wonderful person, so it is not Masuda-san's fault, but my own problem 🙏.
人間を右脳派・左脳派で分類をするのガーとか、クリエイティブは右脳が左脳ガーとか、そう言うのは非科学的以前に、
今時は局在論ではなく全体論だと思うの。ついでに脳腸相関など単一でどうこうではないし、
殆ど脳がないけど、公務員(ホワイトカラー)職に就いて、結婚し子どももいて、44歳まで過ごしてきた男性もいるし、
脳がなく脳幹しかなかった少年も自発呼吸をしつつ12歳まで家族と過ごしていたよ
Meet The Healthy, Functioning Man Who Survived With Almost No Brain. | IFLScience
https://www.iflscience.com/man-tiny-brain-lived-normal-life-31083
When it comes to our brains, does size really matter? One of the biggest myths about the brain is that bigger is always better. But what about those who sit on the extreme end of that scale? How much of our brain do we actually need to survive? Looking through the archives of medical history, there are a number of people with tiny brains, or brains with huge chunks missing entirely, which defy all odds.
In a 2007 Lancet study, doctors described an incredible medical oddity – the 44-year-old civil servant who had lived a normal life despite having an incredibly tiny brain. The French man went into hospital after he experienced weakness in his left leg for two weeks. Doctors were quite surprised when they took scans of his brain and found a huge fluid-filled chamber.
The scans showed that the man had a “massive enlargement of the lateral, third, and fourth ventricles, a very thin cortical mantle and a posterior fossa cyst,” researchers noted in the study. In short, while fluid normally circulates throughout the brain, it’s regularly drained. But instead of draining the fluid into the circulatory system, the fluid in this man’s brain built up. Eventually, the accumulation of fluid resulted in only a tiny amount of actual brain material.
The man’s medical history showed that he had to get a shunt inserted into his head as an infant to get rid of the buildup of fluid on the brain, known as hydrocephalus. The shunt was eventually removed when at age 14, he complained of left leg weakness and some unsteadiness. The man went on to live a normal life and he got married and had two children. Tests showed that he had an IQ of 75 which, though below the average of 100, is not considered a mental disability.
“What I find amazing to this day is how the brain can deal with something which you think should not be compatible with life,” Dr. Max Muenke, from the National Human Genome Research Institute, told Reuters.
Earlier last year, IFLScience reported on the ninth known case of someone living without a cerebellum. This is the part of the brain that controls a number of important functions such as balance, motor movements and motor learning. The 24-year-old Chinese woman went into a hospital complaining of nausea and vertigo, and doctors discovered that she suffered from a rare condition known as cerebellar agenesis.
In another case, 12-year-old Trevor Judge Waltrip shocked medical professionals when he survived as long as he did with only his brain stem. Trevor passed away last year after going his entire life without a brain. He suffered from a rare condition called hydranencephaly, whereby the cerebral hemispheres are replaced entirely with cerebrospinal fluid. People with hydranencephaly usually survive for up to 12 weeks, which made Trevor’s case so remarkable. He was able to breathe on his own and respond to stimuli, but was blind and unable to communicate.
These cases show not only the adaptability and resilience of the human brain, but also how little we know about one of our most important organs. Cases like this force neuroscientists to rethink how we view the brain, particularly what functions different regions have and how the brain adapts when these regions become damaged.
これは、いろいろと考えさせられるいい文章だと思った。永井陽右という青年を振り回すかのように語る内田樹。こういうマウントは嫌いじゃない。
ただ、内田が、
「感情の器」って、あくまでも個人的な身体条件のようなものだから。
というとき、何か逃げた回答のような印象を受けた。
たとえそれが自分の中から湧き出す内発的なものだとしても、大昔にアダム・スミスが道徳感情論で追求したように、何かのテコで共鳴し、社会の規範を構成するに至るメカニズムが何かしらあるんだろうと俺には思えてならない。
そういう感覚を身に着けるのにどうすればいいかと問うた永井氏に、家風だとか、弟子入りだとか、そんな表現を内田氏がするのは、けむに巻いているようにしか思えなかった。
家風にしても弟子入りにしても、そのつながり方が、社会規範にむすびつくメカニズムがあるはずだ。
アレックス・カーが20年前に書いた本で『犬と鬼』という著作がある。
おりしも建設省に代表される特別会計の闇が浮き彫りになった時代。
アメリカの7倍のコンクリートを使って日本の山河をコンクリートで固めようとしていた、公共事業のあり方に疑問を呈した名著。
その『犬と鬼』のなかでカーは、そんな日本に至った問題を解明するヒントは「徳の逆説」にあるという。
「徳の逆説」というのは、国家も人も同様に、自分たちに最も欠けている資質を最も高く評価する傾向があるという、カーが常々思っている真理を彼なりに名付けたものだ。
A・カーは、フェアプレイの精神といいつつ、七つの海を支配した大英帝国の事例、平等を錦の御旗にしていた共産主義者のトップが黒海に豪奢な別荘を保有し、人民は実質的に農奴と変わらない生活だったというソ連の例などを挙げつつ、最後に、和を貴ぶ日本人がなぜ明治の開国後、対外侵略に夢中になったかという精神性に触れてゆく。
「徳の逆説」は、身近なところでも当てはまる。口うるさい親や上司の説教がブーメランに思えてならない、という経験は誰もがしているはず。そして気が付くと俺も親父と同じことを子供に、という連鎖。
最近、想起するのはやはり旧統一教会。家族の価値を高らかに謳いあげておきながら、その活動が原因で多くの家族が崩壊している、といった、「おまゆう」問題。崩壊させているがゆえにますます高まる家庭の価値、という悪循環。これもA・カーのいう「徳の逆説」が見事に当てはまる。これは人が自分自身を規律しようとするときの動機付けのメカニズムなのだ。
内田と永井の議論のテーマのひとつである人権・平等。あたかも普遍的な原理についても、
それを概念として具体化して社会が取り込んだ過程を決して忘れてはならない。
アメリカの建国者の一人、トーマスジェファーソンは人権宣言を起草した当時、200人以上も奴隷を抱えていた。
これは矛盾というよりも、むしろ奴隷制にどっぷりと漬かっていたからこそ人権宣言が生まれたという「徳の逆説」のメカニズムを見るべきだろう。
どんなに薄汚れた社会であっても、一度高らかに掲げた理想は、その社会を真綿で絞めてゆく。欲望大全開の人民を前提にすると、民主政は成り立つのか。多数決をすれば少数者が圧政に苦しむのではないか、これがマディソン含め、建国者の懸念だった。しかし、為政者の徳（アリストクラシー）と、欲望とは別に社会で正しいと思うことに投票する、二重人格的な資質が人民に備わっていると信じて建国者はデモクラシーを設計した。裁判を通じ、繰り返し憲法の価値観をテストする、という振り返りをビルトインした設計は本当に優れたものだ。結果として、最高裁が突き付けた奴隷制と財産権の矛盾が、南北戦争の北軍の正当性を決定的にする。
内田の議論に戻ると、外付けの人権というテーマと同時に、内発的なものとしての感情の器という、とても重要なキーワードを出している。それは他方で外付け実装された人権と、どのような整理ができるのだろうか。
「人としてどうふるまうべきか」を子どもに刷り込むのは「家風」なんですよ。子どもたちは親の背中を見て、人間としての生き方を学ぶ。それは教科書で教えることじゃない。
これは、親子を中心とした自分史と言い換えられるのではないかと思った。さらにいえば、自分史は必ずしも親は関係ないかもしれないのではないか。つまりこれまでの人生、来し方がキーなのでは。
内発的なものと外付けのもの、この二つはやはり、きちんと切り分けて、そして二つが、どうつながってゆくのか。以下、自分なりに整理を試みる。
舶来の概念というのは明治以来、洪水のように入った。民法など契約法の世界は、ほぼほぼ圧倒されたし、戦後は憲法そのものがアメリカの経験に基づいたものだ。
しかし、日本の人権教育は、残念なことに、人権の普遍性を論証することに熱を上げてしまって、そもそも誰の内発的な経験がもとになっていたかという成り立ちのメカニズムを忘れた議論が多い。公共の福祉論などをいくら学説や定義を整理してきれいに論じても、だから何？の議論だった。
戦後、人権を外付け実装してきた日本は、そのルールや規範の成り立ちといった背景をもう少し知る必要がある。それは教養として。
今現在、旧統一教会問題で話題の、国家と宗教というテーマにしてもそうだ。
政教分離のキーワードとなるのは、恐怖からの解放だ。宗教に悩まされ、その扱いに苦慮するのは古今東西の課題だ。宗教といかに折り合いをつけた制度設計をするか、古代ローマ時代からずっと抱えてきた。宗教的寛容、これが統治のカギだと気が付いたのはカルタゴに勝利した古代ローマ。
そのテーマに対して、新天地アメリカに到着したプロテスタントたちの子孫が18世紀になってメイフラワー号の協約を思い出して試みたのは、旧世界では試みたことのない壮大な社会実験だった。百家争鳴な多様性のなかで社会を構成するには、誰が正しいことを言っているのかは誰も断定できない、という前提に立つ必要が再確認された。それが言論の自由の関係では、20世紀初頭にホームズ裁判官らに代表されるように、自由市場の比喩が生まれる背景ともなった。
他方、旧世界のフランスでは、唯一の正しさを神に代わって宣言するカトリック教会の権威と苛烈な弾圧が恐怖であった。だから公共空間の合理化を徹底し、宗教を一掃する制度設計になった。フランスの言論の自由は、その意味でカトリックを否定する権利が原点となる経験なのだ。だからこそ、フランスでは今でも神を冒涜する言論というのが非常に重要な意味をもっていて、先日、仏風刺紙シャルリー編集長が英作家ラシュディ氏襲撃を非難したことの歴史的な背景は深い。
このように、人権というものは、何に対して恐怖してきた歴史があり、生まれてきたものなのか、という原点に思いを致すことが大切だし考えるコツだ。利他性じゃなくね。
それは、実は国によって微妙にコンテクストが異なるものであり、普遍的価値として昇華できなくもないけれども、むしろ司法を通じて、原点となった恐怖を大切に思い出す機会が重要で、その社会が、その真理を繰り返し確信し、制度を強化し、再生産する重要な仕組みなのだと思う。逆に言うと、普遍的な価値なら、なぜ何千年も克服できなかったかの意味を問うというか。
しかし、外付けの倫理として受け取ったものを、思い出すかのように歴史を振り返るのは容易ではない。戦後の日本の裁判所も含めて。
でも、それこそが日本の人権教育に欠如したものだということは個人的には強く思うところだ。
その意味では、外付けではない、外国の借り物ではない、内発的なもの、感情の器からみえてくる倫理、これは本当に大きな価値がある。
内発的なものを自省するうえで、もっとも大切なのは、自分の国や自分の家族、自分自身の歴史だと俺は思う。
自分や自分の先祖が痛い目にあってきた経験、あるいは他者を痛めにあわせてきた経験というのは、その人固有のものであって、その自分史や国の歴史を忘れてしまうと、あとは外付けの倫理だけが残る。国レベルで言えば、それは端的に明治以降の日本のアジアや欧米との対外関係であり、開国以降、アメリカに敗北するまでの戦争に明け暮れた体験に他ならないし、国家神道によって死生観まで国に洗脳されかけた手痛い経験だ。
歴史というと大げさだが、要するに「自分たちに最も欠けている資質を最も高く評価する」、おまゆう精神を自覚することだ。これは教養として学ぶというよりも、もう少し内省的なものだと思う。
自分が理想とするものと現実とのギャップを振り返る作業といってもいい。
自分に欠けている部分、そこにこそ追い求めている何か理想的な姿の反転がある、という振り返り。
ネイションとしていえば、戦争体験の振り返りが重要なキーになるし、国家と宗教というのは、国家神道と戦争という経験で痛い目をみているのであり、ある意味、輸入された欧米の経験を教養として追体験するだけではなく、日本人が原体験としてもっていた大切な教訓。愛媛県靖国神社玉串料訴訟(1997年）の最高裁判決は行政が戦没者の遺族の援護行政のために靖国神社などに対し玉串料を支出したことを違憲とした歴史的な判決で、戦争の経験がしっかり振り返えられた、という点で、司法の仕事としてとても大きなものを残したと思う。建国の精神を振り返るのが裁判所の仕事の一つだと思う。
しかし、戦後77年。戦争体験が風化するなかで、「あの時代を生き抜いた」という共通の体験、共通項として持っていたものがどんどん失われているのが今の時代。
50年前の高度成長期だったら、戦争で死んだ部下を思い出しながら、仕事にまい進し、酒場で同期の仲間と語り合う、とか、厳粛に生きるための厳粛な死が記憶としてあった。
「あの頃は」という共通の過去で人はつながることができた。それが内発的なものとして60年安保闘争を支え、水俣の闘争があった。外付けの倫理ではない、思い出としての切実さの空気の共有があった。
つまり、舶来の外付けの価値観と内発的な器は、その頃はわりと調和していた、といえるのだ。
それが、失われ、外付けの価値観だけが、カラカラと空回りし始めているのが今の時代の特徴で、失われつつある寛容性の正体なのだろう。
永井氏はそんな時代に生まれ育った。彼は対談のなかで、大学時代に
と、外付けの人権から始まったと語っているが、外付けのものにも普遍性のみに着目し、それが生まれてきたプロセスを振り返らない、人権教育の失敗が見て取れる。
また、日本国憲法に組み込まれた歴史への反省（前文含め）も記憶の風化とともに、個々人の内省が、時代への共鳴という形で、共感を醸成しなくなってしまっている。
それはかろうじて80年代までは存在していた。「おしん」が異例の1年間の朝ドラで始まってしばらくすると、
視聴者からは、おしんは私自身そのものです、という声が橋田壽賀子のもとに多数届いたという。
しかし、時代は変わって、平成から令和になって「あの頃」といえば、昭和の末期なのだ。
しかもそれをノスタルジックに思い出す、三丁目の夕日的な振り返りだった。さらには、あさま山荘であり、学歴社会、バイクを盗んで走る尾崎豊であり、バブルの思い出なのだ。それは、その遺産に苦しんだ次の世代にとっては共感を呼びにくいものであるし、自分たちの社会の重圧と、戦争の記憶との関連が薄まった。当然、日本国憲法のリアリティが失われ、右派から改憲論議が盛り上がってくるのは必然的なことだった。そんななか、統一教会が国の内部を白アリのように巣くって愕然とした先月から今月にかけての出来事というのは、忘れかけた宗教と国家の結びつきの恐ろしさを、突如呼び覚まされるものだったに違いない。
しかし、いずれにしても過去の記憶と憲法の規範が直接に結び付かない、その世代の経験、そこに、永井が紛争国の辺境の地を自分のテーマに選んだヒントがあるように思えてならない。
紛争のリアルがそこにある。そこに普遍的価値として大学生のときに知った人権、そして憲法の価値を、自分なりの振り返りとして再確認する、動機付けがあったようにも思う。
しかし、たとえ社会の人々と共有されないものであったとしても、ひとは自分史のなかで、どうふるまうべきかを動機付けられる。
私は逆に、子どもの頃はよく母親に殴られたり色々と物を捨てられたりされていて、そのときに「この家では力を持った奴は殴ったり物を捨てたりしていいんだな」と思ってしまったんです。そして中学生になって殴られたときに「よく見たら小さいし別に喧嘩が強いわけでもないな」ということに気が付きまして。それでそこからは自分が母親のことを殴りまくるようになりました。ひどい時はアザだらけでしたよね。父親も単身赴任でしたし。
といったときに、内田はそこにしっかりと気が付くべきだったと思う。
「全然、人権派じゃないね（笑）。」と返した内田に若干物足りなさを感じたのは、まさにそこだ。
動機付けられるものが、必ずしも、家風であったり、模範的なロールモデルとは限らないのだ。
この体験と辺境の地での人権探し、自分探しは、多分無関係ではない。
読んだのは20年前だが、年齢を重ねれば重ねるほど、彼のいう、逆徳精神の考え方が真理に思えてくる。
A clue to the problem may be found in what I call the theory of Opposite Virtues. Nations, like people in this respect, may pride themselves most highly on the quality they most lack. Hence “fair play” is a golden virtue in Great Britain, the country that attacked and subjugated half the globe. “Equality” was the banner of Soviet Russia, where commissars owned lavish dachas on the Black Sea and the proletariat lived no better than serfs. The United States prides itself on its high “moral standard,” while perpetuating racial and moral double standards. And then there is l’amour in France, a nation of cold-blooded rationalists. Or Canadians priding themselves most on being so distinctively “Canadian.” In Japan we must look at the time-honored ideal of Wa, “peace.” Wa means security, stability, everything in its proper place, “knowing what is enough.”Yet a persistent irony of Japanese history since 1868 is that for all the emphasis on peace and harmony, they are exactly the virtues that Japan did not pursue. At the end of the nineteenth century, rather than settling back to enjoy its new prosperity, Japan embarked on a campaign to conquer and colonize its neighbors. By the 1930s, it had already acquired a tremendous empire in East Asia; this inability to stop led to its suicidal attack on the U.S. base at Pearl Harbor, as a result of which it lost everything. Something similar is happening again. Perhaps Japan values Wa so highly for the very reason that it has such a strong tendency toward imbalance and uncontrollable extremes.
すげえムカつかないですか？
ゴミみてえな仕事でよ、俺の人生を奪いやがってさ、万死に値しますよ
むしろ、客観的に見れば、時給1000円以上の残業時間と交換したらお釣りがくると言ってもいい
ありがたいと思うのがスジなんだ
スジなんですが、スジなわけねえだろ、カス、ボケ、マヌケ、ナマズ、タワシ、ウンコ野郎！！！！
俺のプレシャスあるいはプライスレスな無の時間が、ゴミジョブなんかと釣り合ってたまるものかよ
俺がモンスターハンターサンブレイクででかいサイズのベリオロスに負けたり、はてな匿名ダイアリーでくだらねえトラバをつけたり、そういうことをやってる時間の方が、どう考えても大事なんだよな
いやまあゴミではあるんだが、これがたとえば消防士とか医者とか、そういう仕事だったとしても、まったく同じような感情になるのはまちがいない
"奪われている"感覚ですよ
俺の人生が奪われているぞ
アイアムビーイングロブドオブ、ですよ
Of what? I don’t know, but something… something beautiful!
俺のドブ色の薄汚ねえ人生から、同じくドブ色の、しかし美しい何かを奪うなという話をしている
それは堪え難いんだ
俺は毎日せめて3〜4時間くらい、何の気兼ねもなく遊びたいんだよ
もう寝なきゃなんて思わずにさあ
増 "Well… do you have something you want to tell to Japanese people?"
B "well, I would say something not only to the Japanese, but to many other people. how should I put this?
"Most people began to hate Russians by default. But this war was started by our government, not by us. Of course, we don't want this war, nobody wants it. And I assure you, our people have repeatedly gone to rallies against the government. But always people who participate in such events are sent to prison. Even people on the Internet who express a point of view that the government does not like are jailed for misinformation.
And I will not deny that some Russians have succumbed to the propaganda of our government and are expressing support for this "military operation". But many people in other countries are actually the same. They hypocritically pretend that they are concerned about the fate of Ukraine, although in fact they have only recently learned that this country even exists. In reality, if you ask them "What do they think about the DNR and LNR?", they will have absolutely no idea what are you talking about.
It's good if you sincerely worry about Uraina. But the majority worry about Ukrina and hate Russians only and only because it's a trend that their government has set. In other words, this is the same propaganda.
Well, to summarize, I just wanna say "let's just be friendly to each other." Even if our governments are not friendly to each other, this doesn't mean that we should be the same." "
C*
https://anond.hatelabo.jp/20220429233816
•what do you think about zelenskii
•do you know other politicians except him
•how future is you predict, how future is you want (i mean politically and concretely)
•What do you think about ukranians language law
•how DNR and LNR people life is?
•did you see people which changed after starting this war
•what do you think that Russian army kidnap ukranians
•what do you think about that Russian language uses «в» for any country but «он» for yours?
•and anything you want to say to Japanese
Aの露訳
①の回答
О своем будущем скажу только одно, что после войны усыноввлю и удочерю детей которые потеряли своих родителей
Aの英訳
About my future, I'll say that after the war I'll adopt children who lost their parents in this bloodshed.
Bの露訳と②の回答
1. Что ты думаешь на счёт Зеленского?
Моё мнение, что Зеленский является лучшим президентом, который не бросил Украину и народ во время войны, как сделал это Янукович. Зеленский, его команда и наш народ делают всё возможное и невозможное для сохранения нашей страны.
2. Знаешь ли ты других политиков кроме Зеленского?
Знаю многих.
3. Какое будущее ты видишь для своей страны?
Хотелось бы чтобы территории Украины вернулись в полном составе, так как это было признано международным правом.
4. Что ты думаешь о законе про украинский язык?
Я поддерживаю этот закон, хотя в нашей стране люди общаются на разных языках, в том числе и на русском, но я ни разу не слышал информации о преследовании или конфликтах на этой почве.
5. Видишь ли ты как люди сменились после начала войны?
Наш народ очень сплотился, каждый старается помочь друг другу, война наложила отпечаток на всех, это бесконечные переживания и боль.
6. Что ты думаешь по поводу того, что российская армия похищает украинцев?
Это является ужасным преступлениям.
7. Что ты думаешь о том, что русские для любой страны говорят "в", но в случае с Украиной говорят "на"?
Я считаю что это очень не красиво по отношению к украинскому государству и людям которые там живут.
8. Что ты хочешь сказать японцам?
Хочу поблагодарить за поддержку нашей страны, пожелать мира, добра и процветания.
9. Что ты хочешь меня спросить?
Почему тебя так детально интересует ситуация в моей стране?
Надеюсь всё правильно понял
•what do you think about zelenskii?
I belive Zelensky is the best president who did not abandon Ukraine and the people during the war, as Yanukovych did. Zelensky, his team and our people are doing everything possible and impossible.
•do you know other politicians except him?
•how future is you predict, how future is you want (i mean politically and concretely)?
I would like the territories of Ukraine to return in full force, because this is what was recognized by international law.
•What do you think about ukranians language law?
I support this law. Despite the fact that in our country people communicate in different languages, including Russian, I have never heard information about persecution or conflicts on this basis.
•how DNR and LNR people life is?
skipped
•did you see people which changed after starting this war?
Our people are very united, everyone is trying to help each other, the war left its mark on everyone in the form of endless experiences and pain.
•what do you think that Russian army kidnap ukranians?
•what do you think about that Russian language uses "в" for any country but "на" for yours?
I think this is very discourteous in relation to the Ukrainian state and the people who live there.
•and anything you want to say to Japanese?
I want to thank you for the support of our country. I wish you peace, kindness and prosperity.
D*
増 "Ah, turkestan ban Russian language?"
D "Not really "ban" but "limitation". This sounds more suitable in this case. it is the natural phenomenon for the mononational states. And multinational, actually. Using the one language as official. To strengthen the statehood. Same thing with Ukraine. More separation from the "big brother". That is the point, I guess.
By the way, they strengthened much more after these 8 years. I think it is too late to start an invasion now than these 8 years ago back then in any case. That does not mean that I support it, of course. You knew my point. We talked about it earlier. 🙂 I think that it is just "balls to the wall" (like the title from the one of Accept's albums). Recklessly in a word. It is naive to believe that they have stagnated all this time and have not developed or strengthened.
A*
1) Another Ukranian president that just had "the luck" to get the war. Looks funny and trustworthy. Though he sometimes lacks the experience.
2) Yes I do.
3) I predict OK future for Ukraine, bad future for Russia. Russia lost any trust and contacts that it made for over 30 years. Dark decades ahead. I want good future, with no wars and with everyone helping each other.
4) Ukrainian language law? Well, it's their country. Let them speak what they want to speak. Besides, most Ukrainians speak Russian, and they even have mostly Russian cities, like Khar'kiv. I saw no oppression of Russian.
5) DNR and LNR are basically buffer states for Russia like North Korea with the same amount of freedom. It's hell on earth.
6) Had no information about that, but I had info about killing civilians and looting their homes. It's horrible. Those soldiers are monsters and they do not represent Russia. I don't count themselves as my fellow Russians. They're monsters. Barbarians. Putin's orcs. Not Russians.
7) I say let us use whatever we want. I use "на Украину" simply because I spoke it like that over 20 years and it's the correct one.
8) I love Japan and its people. I wish we could achieve peace and could work together. Please don't think bad of Russian people, we don't support this war. We're the same victims, like Ukrainians. Victims of Putin and his police state.
DeepLで翻訳してみた
The main issue...the bid price has been reaching ¥80/kWh every day since the beginning of the year.
I can finally get into what I really want to tell you.
The reason why new power companies have stopped accepting bids or have withdrawn from the business is because the days when this JEPX spot market price reaches 80 yen/kWh have been going on and on since the beginning of 2010.
The electricity market is a market. If there is a surplus of electricity, the bid price goes down, and if there is a shortage of electricity, the bid price goes up. The spot market is a blind single-price auction, which means that once a contract price is determined, all market prices are traded at that price. Even if Masuda-san bids 10 yen, if many people bid 20 yen, it will be 20 yen, and if many people bid 5 yen, it will be 5 yen.
And as I said before, if they fail to purchase, the power retailer has to pay the imbalance fee.
Then what happens? Many people think, "I'm going to buy it at the imbalance fee of 80 yen/kWh anyway, so I'll bid 80 yen for it. Here is the URL of Enexchange's website, which shows the spot market price in an easy-to-understand manner.
https://insight.enechange.jp/markets
For March 31, it's in the 20 yen range. That's bright red. It is cheaper than the 80 yen I mentioned earlier.
Imagine this. TEPCO's Standard S plan is 20~30 yen/kWh. You see, what we sell for 20-30 yen, we have to buy for more than 20 yen, or even 80 yen.
How much is the gross profit on something that sells for 25 yen? 8 yen, 5 yen, 3 yen? Let's assume that 90 out of every 100 jobs generate a gross profit of 5 yen, which is a profit of 450 yen. If 10 out of 100 sell at that price, the profit is 550 yen.
450 - 550 = -100.
This is the impact of a spot market price of 80 yen. Imagine if you had a customer base of tens of thousands of dollars, and you have to blow millions of dollars every day for a month. I think you can understand a little bit of the logic behind the suspension of acceptance and shutdown of business.
Of course, calculating the cost of procuring electricity is not this simple. I mean, I can't write about the inside story of procurement in my business because it would violate confidentiality. I wrote what I could find out just from the spot market, where the amounts are visualized by the general public. I didn't tell the whole story, if you think about it. Sorry. It's a title fraud.
Supplement... why is this happening?
To be honest, even as someone in the new power company, I am troubled by this situation. How did this happen? ......
In essence, I think "don't liberalize the infrastructure in the first place" is right. However, to put some position talk into it, I think that the various things that happened in the aftermath of Fukushima and the licking at the Kashiwazaki nuclear power plant were the result of being lenient because it was infrastructure, and I think there is some nuance to that.
However, I don't think that the designers of the system anticipated this level of instability in the power supply when the system was liberalized in April 2004. I was impressed when the supply-demand crunch warning came out. I was like, "This is it! That rumored ！！！！ Supply and demand crunch alert: ！！！！！！！" I was so excited. There's no way there's going to be rolling blackouts! It's about to happen!
However, in the extreme, retailers are wholesalers, and while they are wholesalers, the products they sell are not all that different. How can you make a difference in a commodity like electricity? It is usually impossible. It's hard to add value to a product because it's all about price. Of course it's not impossible. There are plans, decarbonization, optional services, and so on. But there is no difference in the electricity itself. I think it's possible to point out that the reason why various new electric power companies flocked to the market was because hyenas gathered in the industry that was assured of a sweet deal in infrastructure ......, and that's true for a percentage of the population. I think all electric power companies are looking for ways to add value to electricity.
I hope this case will make the market healthier.
Incidentally, there is a new electric power company that is getting a tailwind from this current situation. Where is it? The answer is after the commercial!
https://anond.hatelabo.jp/20220312204919
信憑性がないので原文を出してほしいというトラバがいくつかあり、もっともだと思ったので出すことにします。
元のチャットでは改行だったところの大部分をピリオドにしています(許可は取りました）。
増田 "何に"
友達 "North Korea is firing at you"
友達 "I guess we're gonna be disabled from the global internet"
増田 "そうしたらもう本当に終わりだね。どこで知ったの？"
友達 "tor is blocked. proxies are not working. at least, most of them.
but i'm prepared. i got tor, i got proxies. dunno if it will work."
増田 "そうなんだ"
友達 "Portuguese menu for Russian tourists: "We don't service the Russians. Go eat some stones. Bon appetit."
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/629783855070445598/951836523836358746/2022-03-11_22.37.48.png
増田 "あー"
友達 "Russians are becoming the worldwide exiles"
増田 "レストランはロシア人とそうでない人の見分けがつくんだろうか"
友達 "I can't even speak Russian in online games anymore.
they don't even care that I don't support the war"
増田 "ははは"
友達 " "Customers with Russian passport are not welcomed in our restaurant. We do understand that "normal" Russians are not responsible for criminal decisions of their government, but we have to do something already. By prohibiting the Russians to come in, we're making our contribution into the free Europe for our children." "
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/629783855070445598/951836523521769483/2022-03-11_22.38.07.png
増田 "そう"
友達 "i'm disappointed in reddit"
増田 "何？"
友達 "i read a topic "stop shout abuse at russians"
they said "fuck you, we hated you russians before the war too" "
増田 "そう"
友達 "now i see the true face of the west.
I'm so disappointed...
I'm being witchhunted just because I'm Russian.
How does this differ from what Hitler did"
増田 "国同士なんて仲がいい方が珍しいしそんなもんだよ。今ごろ気がついたの？
日本のネットでも評判がいい国なんてほとんどないって。99%の国は嫌われてるか知られてないかだよ"
友達 "USA talks about "peace in all the world" is a pack of fucking shit.
when they bomb the shit out Yugoslavia, it's legit, it's legal, it's OK, nobody hates americans.
when Russia is in war, every Russian should be burned"
増田 "アメリカは仕方ないね。東京裁判も不当だったみたいだし"
友達 "i'm gonna stick to Asia. I'll learn Chinese and Japanese"（注:このstickをどう訳すべきかわからない）
友達 "I always made a distinction between government and people.
When USA and other countries do some shit, that's the government.
But when usual people say that they hate Russians...
I have to get out of Russia. In that manner, we're even worse than North Korea"
友達 "people who ran from NK are treated well. they're heroes.
but Russian people are not wanted anywhere"
増田 "そう"
友達 "there is information that there's gonna be a martial law in Russia. 5 or 6 of march"
増田 "本当？"
増田 "そうなんだ"
友達 "i'm against killing at all. hide.
友達 "I guess, we're repeating the history of Germany and Japan
増田 "そこそこ良いんじゃない？"
友達 "well, in Russian reality, it'll be worse"
増田 "知らん"
友達 "60% of our people is fucking stupid. they're lazy. they were taught that war is good. that nazis are everywhere around them. that stealing is good. they're corrupted. most of those people was born in USSR"
増田 "そう"
友達 "We have to be our own country, but free. Free of Putin and corruption and violence. Though I do not want to be Russian anymore.I love Russian culture but I hate the government"
増田 "そう"
友達 "people are saying that all Russians are guilty. fucking hypocrits. when USA bombed Yugoslavia, Iraq, Libya, Syria, and Hiroshima and Nagasaki, nobody seemed to mind.
when the West says: "We're tolerant, we're free, we're not racists", know that they lie"
増田 "そう"
友達 "the only nation that didn't say that all russians are guilty, was Japanese. I've heard that Japanese people think that only Putin is guilty. and not all Russians"
友達 "I've asked a couple of my japanese friends"
増田 "this is.. probably very biased sample actually"(注：増田もたまに英語を使うことがある)
増田 "私が知る限りそのredditのトピックと日本のネットでそこまで雰囲気変わらないと思う。ロシア食品店が襲われて壊されたらしいし"
増田 "ところで他の国の友達にもロシア人についてどう思ってるか聞いたの？"
友達 "they won't even speak to me, most of them"
増田 "あっ"
友達 "if they are affected by public opinion and ready to betray their friends, they're no longer my friends"
増田 "そう"
友達 "in Russia, we have a proverb "You can only find true friends in a trouble" "Друг познаётся в беде" "
増田 "日本語に似たようなことわざがあった気がしたけど今調べたら『昨日の友は今日の敵』しかなかった"
（注:チャットをそのまま載せると身バレ&グダグダすぎるので日本語訳版では適当に要約してあるが、友達のウクライナ人の知り合いが無事だと聞いたのは本当)
増田 "よかったね。……あ、ウクライナ人の友達は話してくれるんだ"
友達 "we speak. ukrainian friends are still with me. just imagine. the victims of war are still friends with me. and this two-faced West fucks are not"
友達 "those West fuck just love to write hate messages knowing that we can't do anything in return. that they are in comfort. they scream "NO TO WAR", and after that they go to a happy dinner with their families"
増田 "●●さんは本当に自分のことを西洋人とは思ってないんだな"
友達 "maybe i had some sparks of western in me. but now i fucking don't"
増田 "たいていの日本人にとって白人＝西洋。私も●●さんに会って話すまではそう思ってた"
友達 "well you know now that it's not"
増田 "うん"
増田 "制裁はロシア国民が政府に反旗を翻すことを目的に行われているらしい"（注：よく調べずに適当なことを言ったので間違ってるかも）
友達 "yes. but it's useless. people won't turn against government. they are zombified by propaganda"
友達 "but there are not too much people. Russia is basically like Hitler's Germany now"
友達 "it's not optimistic at all. russians are being equated to fascists. they don't make the distinction. they say that we all are guilty
増田 "you have to hope you all aren't like german in Traité de Versailles"
友達 "in fact, if I say in Internet that I don't support war, I can go in jail for 15 years"
増田 "それにしてはあのredditのロシア人は普通にプーチン批判や戦争反対を言ってたけど"
友達 "the law came after that post."
増田 "ええっ"
友達 "when they wrote it, it was OK. but now Putin does everything he can to stay in power. they're frantically making new laws. so they can stay in power for a little longer. what happens now is the blackest page in Russia's history. since Russia-Japan war"
友達 "USA always hated Russia. They are using every chance they get to destroy us. if instead of Russia it was Finland or China, attacking Ukraine, they wouldn't do shit about it. we several times tried to have friendly relationships with USA and each time they basically said "Fuck off, Russians". I didn't have any illusions about them before. but now I plainly fucking hate them. Japanese are the best"
増田 "また始まったよ"
友達 "first time was during World War 2 lend-lease they helped us (注: チャットなので文章がところどころ適当になることがある)
we tried to be friends with them after, but they had secret plan to conquer USSR while it's weak. it was cancelled"
友達 "then Cold War, a lot of hating each other. next time we tried to be friends in 90s. "Bush's chicken legs", helping each other"
友達 "USA's bombing of Yugoslavia made us enemies again. since then, we were not friends"
友達 "when that happened, Russian premier Primakov was on the flight to USA. there was gonna be a deal that could help Russia greatly. when Primakov heard about Yugoslavia, he asked his pilot to turn around, back to Moscow, and cancelled that deal. in Russia, it's known as "Primakov's turn" "
増田 "なんでそれで帰るの？"
友達 "he didn't want to work with countries that act like that. it was a war crime"
増田 "プリマコフという人は今の日本ではあまり知られてませんよ。私も今初めて聞きました"
友達 "he's not well known in Russia too :D "
増田 "失脚させられたみたいだからね。こんな政治家について今のロシアで報道されないのは自然だ"
友達 "he's still in government, if i remember correct"
増田 "……
エフゲニー・マクシモヴィチ・プリマコフ（ロシア語: Евгений Максимович Примаков、ラテン文字転写の例：Evgenii Maksimovich Primakov、1929年10月29日 - 2015年6月26日」 "
友達 "ah"
増田 "やっぱりさ、西洋の人たちがロシア人全部を雑に罵倒してくるの仕方ないと思うんだよ"
友達 "meh. fuck them then. i'm not gonna contact them then"
増田 "charmという単語があるでしょう。likable appealという意味だよね"
友達 "you can say it that way, yes"
増田 "でもmagicという意味もある。超自然的で恐ろしくて強いものだ"
増田 "日本語では魅力というけどこの"魅"は実は化け物のこと。
人間はこのcharmとか魅力とかいう恐ろしいものに支配されて生きている。
なんでアメリカの空爆のときとロシアの侵略のときで世論が全然違うのか？ それはアメリカやウクライナには魅力があるけどロシアやユーゴにはないからだよ。人間にはかわいくもかっこよくもない人々の命より好きな人ひとりのほうが大事なんだ"
友達 "for me, all people are the same. every life is equal. （注：ここでは彼は「生命は尊い」とは言っていないが、普段の態度と前後の文脈からそう思っているのが明らかなので勝手に足しておいた）
death of Yugoslavians person is as tragic as the death of American and other people"
増田 "●●さんはそうでもたいていの人はそうではないからね。だから仕方がないんだ。実のところ私も他人のこと言えないんだよ。だって私もシリアの内戦とかクリミア侵略とか外国のニュースは気にしなかったのに、●●さんに出会ったからってだけでウクライナ侵略ばかり気にしてるからその『西洋人たち』と同じなんだよ。だから、仕方がないと思う"
ありがとうございました。皆さん、このところ、どう挨拶したらいいかわからないんです。 なぜなら、"おはようございます"、"こんにちは"、"こんばんは "が言えないのです。 できないんです、これは絶対にそうです、毎日、その日は絶対ダメな人もいるし、その日の夕方が最後な人もいるんです、毎日。 私は今日、今、ウクライナの市民について話しているのですが、彼らは命をかけて私たちの壁と自由を守っています。 私はここで見たものが、この団結したムードであることをとても嬉しく思っています。 今日、皆さん、つまりEU諸国を団結させたことは喜ばしいことですが、それがこのような代償を払うことになるとは思いもよりませんでした。 これは私にとっての悲劇であり、すべてのウクライナ人にとっての悲劇であり、すべての国家にとっての悲劇です。 私は新聞の話をしませんし、新聞を読みません。なぜなら、新聞は私の国の生活から消えてしまったからです。 この死体も含めて、すべてが現実の出来事なのです。 そして、今日、我々は、価値、権利、自由のために犠牲を払っているのだと思います。 そして、私たちはよく「私たちは皆、勝つ」と言いますが、皆さんがそれを話すだけでなく、見てくれていることがとてもうれしいです。 そして、私たちは必ずや勝利する、私はそう確信しています。 このような表現があります。"ウクライナはヨーロッパを選んでいる" 私たちが目指してきたもの、目指してきたもの、そして今も目指しているものです。 そして、私たちに向けた言葉をぜひ聞いてみたいのです。"今こそヨーロッパがウクライナを選ぶ時だ" 小さな攻撃やミサイル攻撃があるので、2分ほどお話をさせていただきます。 今朝は私たち全員にとって悲劇的な出来事でした。巡航ミサイルが2発、ハリコフを直撃しました。 ロシアとの国境に近いこの街は、昔からロシア人が多く、友好的で、かつてはとても温かい関係にあり、 20以上の大学があり、昔も今も我が国で最も多くの大学を抱える拠点となっています。 若者たちは明るく、スマートで、休日にはいつも我が国最大の広場に集まっています。 自由広場。また、ここはヨーロッパで一番大きな広場でもあります。 そして、これは本当です、想像してみてください、午前中2発の巡航ミサイルが自由広場を直撃しました。 何十人もの死傷者が出ました。 これが自由の代償というわけです。 我々は単に我々の土地と「自由のために」戦っているのです。 信じてほしい、我々の国家のすべての大都市が封鎖されているという事実にもかかわらず、 誰も我々の自由と国家に侵入することはできない。 私を信じてください。今日のすべての広場は、それが何と呼ばれようとも、自由広場と呼ばれることになるだろう。 我々の州のすべての都市で。誰も我々を破ることはできない、 我々は強く立ち上がる、我々はウクライナ人だ。 我々は子供たちが生き続けることを望んでいる。これは公平なことだと思う。 昨日、16人の子供が死んだ。そしてまた、プーチン大統領は、これはある種の「作戦」であり、我々の軍事インフラだけを爆撃しているのだと言うだろう。 我々の子供たちはどこにいるのか？彼らはどの軍事工場で働いているのでしょうか？どのロケット弾を操作しているのか？戦車を運転しているのだろうか？ あなたは16人の子どもを殺した！ 私たちには、とてもやる気のある人たちがいます。私たちは、自由と生命という私たちの権利のために戦っています。 そして今、私たちは生存のために戦っています。これは私たちの主な動機ですが、ヨーロッパの平等な一員になるためにも戦っています。 そして、今日、私たちは皆、そうであることを示したと思います。私たちが参加することで、EUは間違いなく強くなります。 あなた方がいなければ、ウクライナは孤独になるでしょう。私たちは自分たちの強さ、少なくともあなたたちと同じであることを証明したのです。 私たちと共にいることを証明してください。私たちを見捨てないことを証明し、あなた方が本当にヨーロッパ人であることを証明し、 そうすれば、生は死を、光は闇を打ち負かすだろう。 ウクライナに栄光あれ www.DeepL.com/Translator（無料版）で翻訳しました。
ソース：https://www.ukrinform.net/rubric-ato/3417029-ukrainian-president-volodymyr-zelenskys-address-to-european-parliament.html
President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine has addressed the European Parliament.
Thank you very much! Ladies and gentlemen, you know, in recent days I don’t know how to greet anyone. Because I can't say "Good morning," or "Good afternoon," or "Good evening." I can't, and this is absolutely true because every day, that day is definitely not good for some, that evening is the last one for some, every day. I’m talking today, now, about my citizens of Ukraine, who are defending our walls and freedom at the cost of their lives.
I’m very glad that what I saw here is this unifying mood. I’m glad that we have united all of you today – the EU countries, but I didn’t know that it would be at such a price. And this is a tragedy for me, a tragedy for every Ukrainian, a tragedy for every state.
You know, I don’t speak from, I don’t read from papers because the papers are gone from my country’s life. All of this is real, including these dead bodies, this is real life. And you know, I believe that today we sacrifice for values, for rights, for freedom, just for our desire to be close, just like you, like everyone else, we sacrifice our best people: the strongest, mightiest, most extraordinary Ukrainians.
And we very often like to say that we will all win, and I’m very glad that you are not only talking about it, but also seeing it. And we will all win for sure, I'm positive. There is such an expression: "Ukraine is choosing Europe." That’s what we’ve been aspiring to, what we’ve been going, and still going toward. And I would very much to hear from you something addressed to us: "Now it’s Europe choosing Ukraine."
I have a couple of minutes to talk to you because there are small strikes and missile attacks. This morning was tragic to all of us. Two cruise missiles hit Kharkiv. The city, which is near the border with Russia, where there have always been a lot of Russians and they have always been friends, there used to be very warm relations, there are more than 20 universities there, it was and is the hub hosting the largest number of universities in our country. The youths there are bright, smart, always gathering for all holidays in our country’s largest square. Freedom Square. Also, this is the largest square in Europe. And this is true, it’s Freedom Square. Imagine this: in the morning, two cruise missiles hit Freedom Square. Dozens of casualties. So this is the price of freedom.
We are simply fighting for our land and our freedom, and believe me, despite the fact that all the big cities of our state are now under blockade, no one will penetrate our freedom and state. Believe me. Every square today, whatever it is called, will be referred to as Freedom Square. In every city of our state. Nobody will break us, we stand strong, we are Ukrainians.
We want our children to live on. It seems to me that this is fair. Yesterday, 16 children died. And again, President Putin will say that this is some kind of an “operation,” and that they are bombing only our military infrastructure. Where are our children? At what military plants do they work? Which rockets do they operate? Maybe they drive our tanks? You killed 16 children!
We have very motivated people, very much. We are fighting for our rights – freedom and life. And now we are fighting for survival, and this is our main motivation, but we are also fighting to be equal members of Europe. And I think today we are all showing that we are. With us on board, the EU will definitely be stronger. Without you, Ukraine will be lonely. We have proven our strength, that we are at least the same as you. Prove that you’re with us. Prove that you are not giving up on us, prove that you’re truly Europeans, and then life will beat death, and light will beat darkness.
ここ1年ほどで、インターネットにおけるテキストと動画のマーケティングについて、それぞれ全く別に学ぶ機会を得た。そのどちらも大筋では同じであった。
これがインターネットをクソにしているのだな、と思った。特にGoogleにおけるキーワード選定に対しては、Google自身がキーワードプランナーとして（時として有料で）提供してさえいる。If something is free, you're the product. であるなあと思った。
いわゆる「（今日起きた炎上事件）の（人名）の正体は？彼氏は？調べてみました！その結果……なんと……見つかりませんでした！」というブログはその代表例であるが、それよりもっとまともな顔をして「オウンドメディア」なんて呼ばれているものも、デイトレードと中期投資の違いくらいしかない。
かつて、コンテンツをめぐる状況はそうではなかったはずだ。確かに「流行に乗る」という概念はあった。しかしそれは遙かに移ろいやすいもので、決して月間35000検索で重み付けされたトータルスコアは89/100であるからこの流行に乗ろう、というものではなかった。
あるいは流行は流行であって、「台東区 家賃 見積もり」が流行ったことは未だかつて一度もなかっただろう。しかし、今ではこのワードで検索すれば5件の広告が表示され、その下には「東京都台東区ってどんな街？家賃相場はいくらぐらい？」（本当に原文ママのタイトル）というブログ記事風のサイトが待ち構えている。
台東区の家賃見積もりでさえそうなのだから、我々の行う検索は全て先回りされている。そういえばサジェストや関連キーワードというものが登場したときは、大きなお世話、あるいは気持ち悪いと感じたことを思い出した。先回りは言葉の節々にまで及んでいる。なぜか「台東区 家賃 見積もり」と「台東区 家賃 相場」では検索ボリュームが10倍以上異なる場合があり（このケースが実際そうであるかは知らない）、マーケティングを行う際には間違いなく精査されている。
キーワードを選定したらそのキーワードを含んだコンテンツを外注でもよいのでともかく生成する。その際に重視されるのは、そのコンテンツが実際に価値がある（「情報量」という用語のスラング的な使用法を思い出してもよい）ことではなく、検索エンジンがそれを見てどう思うかである。そのために、見だしやタイトルにキーワードを含まねばならず、また本文や説明文においては適度な分量のキーワードの繰り返しが求められる。
そうして作られたコンテンツが、実際に価値があることはまず、ない。「コンテンツを作る」作業の大半は、コンテンツの中身が他のサイトの寄せ集めを、検索エンジンにそれ（コピペ）とは気づかれないように「コンテンツを歪める」作業でありさえする。
昔はこうではなかった。というか、15年前でさえそうではなかったと思う。あの頃の検索エンジンは今に比べて遙かにゴミであった。しかし今は検索エンジンが進化した代わりに、コンテンツがゴミになった。かつて「見る前に跳べ」という言葉は世界のほぼ全てに当てはまった。今は、跳ぶ前にコスト計算と上司の承認が必要とされる。そこに「独自研究」の余地はない。あるいは、「インターネット上にない情報を書物から持ち込む」という手間さえ惜しまれる。その結果としてこんにち存在するのは、「キーワードプランナーが提案するキーワードのために歪めてコピペした記事を、キーワードプランナーが提案するキーワードのために歪めてコピペした記事を、……」の果てしなき連続によって生み出されるゴミの山である。
この状況に対して、私が出来ることは何もない。あるいは私は私のエゴのためにその状況を助長しさえするだろう。かつてを懐かしむ人間としての私に出来るのは、ゴミの生成過程をコピペではないコンテンツとして、この検索性ほぼゼロのネットの片隅に放つことぐらいしかない。
It's one of the things I'm not used to in Japan, but I can't get used to being laughed at for something I said in earnest.
For example, when I tell them about the ALS patient I met in the U.S. who is living with a feeding tube in his stomach, or about my contact with people in juvenile detention centers, or about the fact that I saw them go through a lot of painful things like rape and abuse before they became monsters, I get a strange laugh.
I'm always annoyed by their incomprehensible reactions like "Ah... hahahaha...".
I get the same reaction when I talk about something serious about my family or my health (I'm speaking in Japanese, so it doesn't mean they don't understand what I'm saying).
