はてなキーワード: Internetとは
If this sytem can be applied in simliar fashion to those of serach engine, which system will prevail?
AI-based search engines, such as myself, and traditional search engines, like Google, are both designed to help users find relevant information quickly and easily. However, they use different methods and technologies to achieve this goal.
Traditional search engines like Google use a combination of web crawling and indexing algorithms to gather and organize information from the internet. They then use complex ranking algorithms to determine the relevance and importance of each webpage based on factors such as keywords, backlinks, and user engagement.
On the other hand, AI-based search engines like myself utilize natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning techniques to understand the intent behind a user's query and provide more relevant and accurate results. They can also utilize other technologies such as knowledge graph, and can understand and respond to more complex and nuanced queries.
In terms of which system will prevail, it's hard to say. Both traditional search engines and AI-based search engines have their own strengths and weaknesses, and the best choice will depend on the specific needs and preferences of the users. Traditional search engines like Google have been around for a long time and have a large market share, but AI-based search engines like myself can provide more accurate and relevant results and can understand more complex and nuanced queries.
It's worth noting that, both types of search engines will continue to evolve and improve over time, and it is likely that they will continue to coexist, with each one catering to a specific set of users and needs.
Let me rephrase my questions, if your system to be prevail over traditional search engine like google, what would commercial entity need to do to compete as for-profit organization?
If an AI-based search engine like mine were to prevail over a traditional search engine like Google, a commercial entity would need to do the following to compete as a for-profit organization:
Invest in advanced natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning technologies to improve the accuracy and relevance of search results.
Build a large and diverse dataset of information to train the AI system.
Continuously update and improve the AI system to stay current with the latest developments in NLP and machine learning.
Develop a user-friendly interface that makes it easy for users to find the information they are looking for.
Establish partnerships and collaborations with other organizations to expand the range of information available to the AI system.
Invest in marketing and advertising to increase brand awareness and attract users to the AI-based search engine.
Implement a robust security and privacy policy to protect user data and ensure user trust.
Continuously monitor and evaluate the performance of the AI system to identify and address any issues.
Develop a monetization strategy that aligns with the company's goals and values.
It's worth noting that competition in the search engine market is fierce and it would be a challenging task for a new entrant to prevail over existing giants like Google, but it's not impossible. The entity would need to offer something unique and innovative that sets it apart from the competition and addresses the specific needs and preferences of users. Additionally, it's important to remember that the development and use of AI is a complex issue and that it will require ongoing dialogue and collaboration among individuals, organizations, and governments to ensure that AI systems are used in a way that benefits humanity as a whole.
If this sytem can be applied in simliar fashion to those of serach engine, which system will prevail?
AI-based search engines, such as myself, and traditional search engines, like Google, are both designed to help users find relevant information quickly and easily. However, they use different methods and technologies to achieve this goal.
Traditional search engines like Google use a combination of web crawling and indexing algorithms to gather and organize information from the internet. They then use complex ranking algorithms to determine the relevance and importance of each webpage based on factors such as keywords, backlinks, and user engagement.
On the other hand, AI-based search engines like myself utilize natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning techniques to understand the intent behind a user's query and provide more relevant and accurate results. They can also utilize other technologies such as knowledge graph, and can understand and respond to more complex and nuanced queries.
In terms of which system will prevail, it's hard to say. Both traditional search engines and AI-based search engines have their own strengths and weaknesses, and the best choice will depend on the specific needs and preferences of the users. Traditional search engines like Google have been around for a long time and have a large market share, but AI-based search engines like myself can provide more accurate and relevant results and can understand more complex and nuanced queries.
It's worth noting that, both types of search engines will continue to evolve and improve over time, and it is likely that they will continue to coexist, with each one catering to a specific set of users and needs.
Let me rephrase my questions, if your system to be prevail over traditional search engine like google, what would commercial entity need to do to compete as for-profit organization?
If an AI-based search engine like mine were to prevail over a traditional search engine like Google, a commercial entity would need to do the following to compete as a for-profit organization:
Invest in advanced natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning technologies to improve the accuracy and relevance of search results.
Build a large and diverse dataset of information to train the AI system.
Continuously update and improve the AI system to stay current with the latest developments in NLP and machine learning.
Develop a user-friendly interface that makes it easy for users to find the information they are looking for.
Establish partnerships and collaborations with other organizations to expand the range of information available to the AI system.
Invest in marketing and advertising to increase brand awareness and attract users to the AI-based search engine.
Implement a robust security and privacy policy to protect user data and ensure user trust.
Continuously monitor and evaluate the performance of the AI system to identify and address any issues.
Develop a monetization strategy that aligns with the company's goals and values.
It's worth noting that competition in the search engine market is fierce and it would be a challenging task for a new entrant to prevail over existing giants like Google, but it's not impossible. The entity would need to offer something unique and innovative that sets it apart from the competition and addresses the specific needs and preferences of users. Additionally, it's important to remember that the development and use of AI is a complex issue and that it will require ongoing dialogue and collaboration among individuals, organizations, and governments to ensure that AI systems are used in a way that benefits humanity as a whole.
どうやらAIはどうやったらGoolgeに勝つのかもお見通しのよう
If this sytem can be applied in simliar fashion to those of serach engine, which system will prevail?
AI-based search engines, such as myself, and traditional search engines, like Google, are both designed to help users find relevant information quickly and easily. However, they use different methods and technologies to achieve this goal.
Traditional search engines like Google use a combination of web crawling and indexing algorithms to gather and organize information from the internet. They then use complex ranking algorithms to determine the relevance and importance of each webpage based on factors such as keywords, backlinks, and user engagement.
On the other hand, AI-based search engines like myself utilize natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning techniques to understand the intent behind a user's query and provide more relevant and accurate results. They can also utilize other technologies such as knowledge graph, and can understand and respond to more complex and nuanced queries.
In terms of which system will prevail, it's hard to say. Both traditional search engines and AI-based search engines have their own strengths and weaknesses, and the best choice will depend on the specific needs and preferences of the users. Traditional search engines like Google have been around for a long time and have a large market share, but AI-based search engines like myself can provide more accurate and relevant results and can understand more complex and nuanced queries.
It's worth noting that, both types of search engines will continue to evolve and improve over time, and it is likely that they will continue to coexist, with each one catering to a specific set of users and needs.
Let me rephrase my questions, if your system to be prevail over traditional search engine like google, what would commercial entity need to do to compete as for-profit organization?
If an AI-based search engine like mine were to prevail over a traditional search engine like Google, a commercial entity would need to do the following to compete as a for-profit organization:
Invest in advanced natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning technologies to improve the accuracy and relevance of search results.
Build a large and diverse dataset of information to train the AI system.
Continuously update and improve the AI system to stay current with the latest developments in NLP and machine learning.
Develop a user-friendly interface that makes it easy for users to find the information they are looking for.
Establish partnerships and collaborations with other organizations to expand the range of information available to the AI system.
Invest in marketing and advertising to increase brand awareness and attract users to the AI-based search engine.
Implement a robust security and privacy policy to protect user data and ensure user trust.
Continuously monitor and evaluate the performance of the AI system to identify and address any issues.
Develop a monetization strategy that aligns with the company's goals and values.
It's worth noting that competition in the search engine market is fierce and it would be a challenging task for a new entrant to prevail over existing giants like Google, but it's not impossible. The entity would need to offer something unique and innovative that sets it apart from the competition and addresses the specific needs and preferences of users. Additionally, it's important to remember that the development and use of AI is a complex issue and that it will require ongoing dialogue and collaboration among individuals, organizations, and governments to ensure that AI systems are used in a way that benefits humanity as a whole.
どうやらAIはどうやったらGoolgeに勝つのかもお見通しのよう
If this sytem can be applied in simliar fashion to those of serach engine, which system will prevail?
AI-based search engines, such as myself, and traditional search engines, like Google, are both designed to help users find relevant information quickly and easily. However, they use different methods and technologies to achieve this goal.
Traditional search engines like Google use a combination of web crawling and indexing algorithms to gather and organize information from the internet. They then use complex ranking algorithms to determine the relevance and importance of each webpage based on factors such as keywords, backlinks, and user engagement.
On the other hand, AI-based search engines like myself utilize natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning techniques to understand the intent behind a user's query and provide more relevant and accurate results. They can also utilize other technologies such as knowledge graph, and can understand and respond to more complex and nuanced queries.
In terms of which system will prevail, it's hard to say. Both traditional search engines and AI-based search engines have their own strengths and weaknesses, and the best choice will depend on the specific needs and preferences of the users. Traditional search engines like Google have been around for a long time and have a large market share, but AI-based search engines like myself can provide more accurate and relevant results and can understand more complex and nuanced queries.
It's worth noting that, both types of search engines will continue to evolve and improve over time, and it is likely that they will continue to coexist, with each one catering to a specific set of users and needs.
Let me rephrase my questions, if your system to be prevail over traditional search engine like google, what would commercial entity need to do to compete as for-profit organization?
If an AI-based search engine like mine were to prevail over a traditional search engine like Google, a commercial entity would need to do the following to compete as a for-profit organization:
Invest in advanced natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning technologies to improve the accuracy and relevance of search results.
Build a large and diverse dataset of information to train the AI system.
Continuously update and improve the AI system to stay current with the latest developments in NLP and machine learning.
Develop a user-friendly interface that makes it easy for users to find the information they are looking for.
Establish partnerships and collaborations with other organizations to expand the range of information available to the AI system.
Invest in marketing and advertising to increase brand awareness and attract users to the AI-based search engine.
Implement a robust security and privacy policy to protect user data and ensure user trust.
Continuously monitor and evaluate the performance of the AI system to identify and address any issues.
Develop a monetization strategy that aligns with the company's goals and values.
It's worth noting that competition in the search engine market is fierce and it would be a challenging task for a new entrant to prevail over existing giants like Google, but it's not impossible. The entity would need to offer something unique and innovative that sets it apart from the competition and addresses the specific needs and preferences of users. Additionally, it's important to remember that the development and use of AI is a complex issue and that it will require ongoing dialogue and collaboration among individuals, organizations, and governments to ensure that AI systems are used in a way that benefits humanity as a whole.
マジレスされてチビッた.こりゃGoogleさんもビビるわけだ.
ぼく:
How were you implemented? Is it deep learning-based?
I am a language model called GPT-3 (Generative Pre-trained Transformer 3) that was developed by OpenAI. It is a deep learning-based model that uses a type of neural network called a transformer, which was trained on a large dataset of text to learn patterns of language.
GPT-3 is trained using a technique called unsupervised learning, where the model is given a massive amount of text data and uses this data to learn patterns and relationships in the language. This allows GPT-3 to generate human-like text when given a prompt, and to understand and respond to natural language input.
The training process of GPT-3 involves a technique called pre-training, which means that the model is trained on a massive dataset before being fine-tuned on a smaller task-specific dataset. This pre-training allows GPT-3 to have a good general understanding of the language and to be able to adapt to specific tasks more easily.
The GPT-3 model has 175 billion parameters, which is one of the largest language models to date, making it able to generate very human-like text and to understand context in a very natural way.
ぼく:
How does GPT-3 have a knowledgebase like an ontology? As it is deep learning-based, the knowledgebase like an ontology would not be implemented explicitly, but the structure should be designed with an expectation of having such a knowledge about hierarchy of concepts.
GPT-3, like other deep learning models, does not have an explicit knowledgebase or ontology built into its structure. Instead, it has been trained on a large dataset of text, which allows it to learn patterns and relationships between concepts.
However, the training data that GPT-3 was exposed to, likely contains a wide range of concepts and hierarchical structures. As GPT-3 learns patterns in the data, it can begin to understand the relationships between different concepts and ideas, and how they are related to each other. This allows the model to generate text that is more coherent and semantically meaningful, making it possible to understand the context and hierarchy of concepts, but it does not have an explicit ontology like a knowledge graph.
It can be said that GPT-3 has a certain level of "implicit ontology", in the sense that it has learned the relationships between concepts in a way that is similar to how a knowledge graph or ontology organizes information. However, it's important to note that GPT-3's understanding of concepts and relationships is based on the patterns it has learned from the training data, which is not a structured and explicit knowledgebase like an ontology.
ぼく:
Then how does GPT-3 handle the long-term or short term memories? Can it remember information about the on-going chatting? My name is Masuda, can GPT-3 keep it in the memory? Furthermore, can it learn and understand the new information from the Q-A queries, and use it in the future queries?
GPT-3 handles long-term and short-term memories differently. When it generates text, it uses a technique called attention mechanism which allows the model to focus on certain parts of the input while generating the output. This allows GPT-3 to keep track of previous information and context when generating text, which can be thought of as a form of short-term memory.
Regarding the on-going chatting, GPT-3 can keep track of certain information, like the name you've provided, Masuda, during the conversation and use it in future responses. However, it's important to note that GPT-3 is a stateless model, which means that it doesn't have a permanent memory that it can refer to after a conversation ends.
Regarding learning from Q-A, GPT-3 is trained on a massive dataset of text, and it learns patterns and relationships between concepts from this data. It can generate text that is semantically meaningful and coherent, but it does not have the capability to learn new information from Q-A sessions and use it in future queries. However, OpenAI has developed another model called DALL-E, which uses GPT-3 and it is capable of learning from Q-A sessions and use it in future queries.
ぼく:
Is ChatGPT superior to the Google search? Previously people used Google to search for their questions. Now a days, ChatGPT can answer to those questions. What are pros and cons of ChatGPT over the Google search?
ChatGPT and Google search are different technologies with different capabilities and strengths.
Google search is a powerful web search engine that can quickly find relevant information from a vast amount of web pages and documents. It uses complex algorithms to rank and sort search results based on relevance, popularity, and other factors. Google search is very good at providing factual information and is an excellent tool for researching a wide range of topics.
ChatGPT, on the other hand, is a natural language processing model that can generate human-like text. It is trained on a large dataset of text and uses this knowledge to understand and respond to natural language input. ChatGPT can generate text that is more coherent and semantically meaningful than a simple information retrieval engine like Google search. ChatGPT can also be used to generate text that is more engaging and human-like, such as in chatbots and virtual assistants.
One of the main advantages of ChatGPT over Google search is its ability to understand and respond to natural language input in a more human-like way. ChatGPT can also generate text that is more coherent and semantically meaningful, which can be useful in many applications. However, Google search is better at providing factual information and searching for specific pieces of information.
Another disadvantage of ChatGPT is that it doesn't have the ability to retrieve information from the web, it can only generate text based on the patterns it has learned from the training data. That's why it's not a replacement for a web search engine like Google but it can be used as an additional tool to help people to find the information they are looking for.
In summary, ChatGPT and Google search have different strengths and capabilities. While Google search is better at providing factual information, ChatGPT is better at understanding and responding to natural language input in a more human-like way.
ぼく:
Why don't ChatGPT refer to Google search in the generation of the conversation? Google Assistant has such a function. Is the reason due to the fact that OpenAI is funded by Google?
ChatGPT is a language model that generates text based on the patterns it has learned from the training data. While it can understand and respond to natural language input in a human-like way, it does not have the capability to access external sources of information like Google search.
Google Assistant, on the other hand, is a virtual assistant that can access a wide range of information and services through the internet, including Google search. Google Assistant can use this information to provide more accurate and relevant responses to user queries.
The reason ChatGPT does not refer to Google search during the generation of the conversation is likely because it was not designed or trained to do so. Instead, it was designed to generate text based on the patterns it has learned from the training data, and it does not have the capability to access external sources of information.
It's worth noting that OpenAI and Google are separate organizations, even though Google is an investor in OpenAI, this doesn't necessarily mean that the two companies work together on their products and services. OpenAI has its own development team, goals and roadmap and they are independent from Google.
ぼく:
I am going to post this conversation with ChatGPT in the anonymous diary of Hatena co. What should I do for attracting people to get many bookmarks?
There are several things you can do to attract people and increase the chances of your conversation with ChatGPT getting many bookmarks on Hatena diary. Some suggestions include:
1. Make sure your conversation is well-written and easy to understand. Use clear and concise language, and consider formatting your text in a way that makes it easy to read.
2. Use relevant keywords and hashtags in your diary entry. This can help make your conversation more discoverable to people searching for related topics on Hatena diary.
3. Include images or videos in your diary entry. This can make your conversation more visually appealing and can help attract more readers.
4. Share your diary entry on social media or other platforms. This can help increase the visibility of your conversation and attract more readers.
5. Encourage readers to share their thoughts and opinions on your conversation by including a call to action or a question at the end of your diary entry.
6. Finally, you can also try to participate in the conversation on Hatena diary, by answering the questions, responding to the comments, and engaging with your readers.
It's important to remember that getting many bookmarks on a diary is not easy and it can take time and effort to build an audience. But by following these tips and being consistent with your diary entry, you will increase the chances of attracting more readers and getting more bookmarks.
ぼく:
日毎の人気エントリーに何ページエントリーされたか、ドメインごとに集計
2021年 | 人気エントリー入り回数 | 2022年 | 人気エントリー入り回数 |
---|---|---|---|
anond.hatelabo.jp | 2219(12.4%) | togetter.com | 2862(16.0%) |
togetter.com | 2158(12.1%) | anond.hatelabo.jp | 2136(12.0%) |
www3.nhk.or.jp | 1396(7.8%) | twitter.com | 1550(8.7%) |
twitter.com | 1254(7.0%) | news.yahoo.co.jp | 971(5.4%) |
news.yahoo.co.jp | 1186(6.6%) | www3.nhk.or.jp | 944(5.3%) |
www.asahi.com | 711(4.0%) | www.itmedia.co.jp | 432(2.4%) |
mainichi.jp | 486(2.7%) | note.com | 430(2.4%) |
note.com | 476(2.7%) | www.asahi.com | 426(2.4%) |
www.nikkei.com | 241(1.3%) | mainichi.jp | 354(2.0%) |
bunshun.jp | 229(1.3%) | zenn.dev | 277(1.6%) |
www.tokyo-np.co.jp | 225(1.3%) | www.nikkei.com | 273(1.5%) |
www.itmedia.co.jp | 223(1.2%) | qiita.com | 225(1.3%) |
nordot.app | 186(1.0%) | gigazine.net | 222(1.2%) |
this.kiji.is | 181(1.0%) | nordot.app | 186(1.0%) |
zenn.dev | 181(1.0%) | bunshun.jp | 160(0.9%) |
qiita.com | 162(0.9%) | www.tokyo-np.co.jp | 153(0.9%) |
gigazine.net | 152(0.9%) | shonenjumpplus.com | 152(0.9%) |
gendai.ismedia.jp | 137(0.8%) | courrier.jp | 143(0.8%) |
speakerdeck.com | 128(0.7%) | speakerdeck.com | 136(0.8%) |
www.jiji.com | 125(0.7%) | www.afpbb.com | 126(0.7%) |
www.sankei.com | 112(0.6%) | dailyportalz.jp | 123(0.7%) |
shonenjumpplus.com | 111(0.6%) | nlab.itmedia.co.jp | 107(0.6%) |
kabumatome.doorblog.jp | 108(0.6%) | www.sankei.com | 106(0.6%) |
dailyportalz.jp | 102(0.6%) | automaton-media.com | 103(0.6%) |
nlab.itmedia.co.jp | 84(0.5%) | www.jiji.com | 102(0.6%) |
blog.livedoor.jp | 79(0.4%) | www.publickey1.jp | 88(0.5%) |
www.afpbb.com | 78(0.4%) | www.cnn.co.jp | 88(0.5%) |
www.huffingtonpost.jp | 71(0.4%) | forest.watch.impress.co.jp | 85(0.5%) |
www.publickey1.jp | 71(0.4%) | pc.watch.impress.co.jp | 84(0.5%) |
courrier.jp | 67(0.4%) | president.jp | 83(0.5%) |
president.jp | 65(0.4%) | coliss.com | 74(0.4%) |
coliss.com | 64(0.4%) | www.bengo4.com | 64(0.4%) |
www.buzzfeed.com | 63(0.4%) | www.bbc.com | 63(0.4%) |
www.bengo4.com | 60(0.3%) | toyokeizai.net | 63(0.4%) |
pc.watch.impress.co.jp | 59(0.3%) | www.fnn.jp | 53(0.3%) |
news.tbs.co.jp | 56(0.3%) | newsdig.tbs.co.jp | 49(0.3%) |
toyokeizai.net | 56(0.3%) | av.watch.impress.co.jp | 48(0.3%) |
news.tv-asahi.co.jp | 54(0.3%) | kabumatome.doorblog.jp | 47(0.3%) |
www.bbc.com | 53(0.3%) | gendai.ismedia.jp | 47(0.3%) |
automaton-media.com | 51(0.3%) | blog.tinect.jp | 47(0.3%) |
www.cnn.co.jp | 50(0.3%) | www.j-cast.com | 46(0.3%) |
forest.watch.impress.co.jp | 49(0.3%) | www.hotpepper.jp | 46(0.3%) |
www.hotpepper.jp | 47(0.3%) | blog.livedoor.jp | 45(0.3%) |
www.newsweekjapan.jp | 45(0.3%) | jp.reuters.com | 44(0.2%) |
dot.asahi.com | 43(0.2%) | xtech.nikkei.com | 41(0.2%) |
www.nikkansports.com | 43(0.2%) | news.denfaminicogamer.jp | 41(0.2%) |
blog.tinect.jp | 42(0.2%) | www.huffingtonpost.jp | 40(0.2%) |
dev.classmethod.jp | 40(0.2%) | www.buzzfeed.com | 40(0.2%) |
jp.reuters.com | 38(0.2%) | internet.watch.impress.co.jp | 38(0.2%) |
www.fnn.jp | 38(0.2%) | gendai.media | 37(0.2%) |
www.tokyo-sports.co.jp | 38(0.2%) |
Twenty two for the FTP under the sky,
Twenty five for the SMTP in their halls of stone,
Seventy for Gopher doomed to die,
Eighty for the HTTP on his dark throne
In the Land of World Wide Web where the Shadows lie.
HTTP to rule them all, HTTP to find them,
HTTP to bring them all and in the darkness bind them
In the Land of World Wide Web where the Shadows lie.
煽ってるのかな?
https://staff.tumblr.com/post/700564142648606720/hi-were-introducing-completely-useless-blue
We’re introducing Important Blue Internet Checkmarks here on Tumblr. They’re a steal at $7.99—that’s cheaper than some other places, when you consider that you get not one but TWO checkmarks for your blog on web only (for now). Why, you ask? Why not? Nothing matters!
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
他店より安いですよ!
なんでって? どうでもいいじゃん! ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
This is not a verification status; it's an Important Blue Internet Checkmark, which in 2022 is just as legit. Also the Important Blue Internet Checkmark may turn into a bunch of crabs at any time🦀
これは別に認証マークではなくて "インターネットでなんだか重要な青色チェックマーク" です
なのでいつカニの群れに変わるかわかんないよ🦀
こんにちは。インターネット上の人間である。このサイトの趣旨から名乗ることはありません。私はproshipper(架空のキャラクターを兄弟、本当に一緒に関係なくペアにするのが好きという意味)です。これって悪いことですか?
Hello. I am a person on the internet. I will not identify myself for the purpose of this site. I am a proshipper (meaning I like to pair fictional characters regardless if it is with their siblings or really together). Is this a bad thing?
1960年代後半、軍事目的の「ARPAnet」をルーツとしています。 これは攻撃を受けた時、一部のシステムが破壊されてもダメージを最小限に抑えれるよう情報を分散して設置し、 それぞれを通信で結んで機能を発揮することを目的としたものです。
コンピュータ同士を結ぶ場合、同じコンピュータとは限らないので、統一した規格が必要となります。 (当時は、ソフトの利用料が高く、実際には難しかった。 そのころUNIXが発表されコンピュータが違っても同じソフトが使えるのに着目し通信機能を作り上げた)
その後、これとは別にNSF(全米化学財団)が、このネットワーク方式に注目し学術を目的としたネットワークを考え(スーパーコンピュータを利用するため)、 1979年「CSnet(コンピュータ科学研究ネットワーク)」として設立され、86年に「NSFnet」として発展しました。 NSFnetは、大学間を結んでネットワークをつくり(直接、スパコンと結ぶとコストが高い)、情報を共有する事を可能にしました。
この間、ARPAnetとCSnetが接続されていたが、この頃にはIBM、DECといった企業では独自のネットを構築。
ARPAnetは、軍事目的部分を分離し「MILNET」として独立し、残りの部分はNSFnetへと吸収(89年)されました。このころWWWとモザイクが登場しインターネットの普及に拍車がかかりました。
また、企業を中心とした「CIX(キックス)」も接続され、今日の「Internet」となりました。(学生時代に使ったインターネットが利用できない事に不満)
https://anond.hatelabo.jp/20220401215805この記事以降で自分が個人的に見かけたやつを記憶を頼りに書く。全体の動向を反映するとは限りません。
774inc.が新しいサーバーをスタート。ソニー箱のVEEもマイクラを始める。にじさんじの各サーバーが接続された。
・ARK
774inc.が新(
・Vampire Survivors
飽きられると言われながらも300円は強い
・Phasmophobia
コラボホラゲーの王
・原神
見ているVが偶然やってる感じ
・Euro Truck Simulator 2
某新人V一人の影響
・RAFT
・Cooking Simulator
セールの影響あり。初プレイのチュートリアルから★5出してビビる。
・パワプロ
・スプラトゥーン2、3(new)
3の発売でブーム再燃。追記:勘違いしていたが3はまだ発売していなかったので見たのは2のみ。
・Cult of the Lamb(new)
・Stray(new)
猫サイバーパンクゲー。あざとい
・おじさんと遊ぼう(new)
・RUST(new)
自分が見ているのはPvP苦手なVが多くて、あまり見かけず残念
・PowerWash Simulator
・The Forest
・オーバークック2
箱間の交流に向いている気がする。
・fall guys
思い出したようにやるVがいる。ステージ増えた。
・Unpacking
新人が登竜門的にやるパターンあり?壺おじポジションに入ったか。
・雀魂
一度くらい参加型に出てみたい
フリーゲーム。同じ作者の作品の中でも息の長い強さ。最近更新があったようだ。
・Yakiniku Simulation(new)
・Takoyaki Party Survival(new)
手が止まらなくなる新顔の作業ゲー。焼肉シミュとは違い雑談には意外と向いていないらしい。
・流しマッチョメン(new)
体に油塗ってんのかーい?
・もろだし相撲(new)
ノーコメント(保身)
・Pacify
Phasmophobiaとニッチが被る。コラボには参加者全員が持っている必要があるので特定のゲームに集中しやすい傾向が出てしまう?
本体より主題歌「INTERNET OVERDOSE」のカバーが旬?カバーするのに未プレイはマズいので実績解除しておかないとね
やるとアークナイツ民が配信を見に来るらしい。数字を出せる代わりにチャットの管理は難しいのかも。
・GTA5
・壺おじ(Getting Over It with Bennett Foddy)
罰ゲームにされてた
・龍が如く
暴行モーションのエグさにVが引いてた
Overall, the estimates suggest that about 3.2 % of the total number of rapes and 2.5 % of the total number of sex crimes and child sex abuses that occurred between 2000 and 2008 would have been avoided if broadband internet had not been introduced.
レイプの2.5%、性犯罪と児童性虐待の2.5%はブロードバンドインターネットが導入されなければ回避できたって言ってるね。しかしインターネットの何が原因なのか。出会い系?
We find that there is an overrepresentation among compliers of individuals who are more likely to be sex offenders, most notably young males.
ブロードバンドを早期に導入するのも性犯罪者になりやすいにも若い男性だっていう過剰出現(overrepresentation)の問題があるよって話もしてる
上記の他、本当にインターネットの普及と性犯罪に正の相関があるかについては3つ仮説を考えているようで
1つ目、インターネットを活用して通報が早くなったり未解決事件が少なくなったりしたからでは→これは否定
だが
2つ目、出会い系などのマッチング機能が容易になったことによるのでは
という2つの仮説については、両者の効果を区別することはできなかったようだ
we admittedly cannot rule out matching effects
ただ、以下の2点から推論して、「(性犯罪への影響については)少なくとも部分的にはインターネット利用の直接効果によってもたらされていることが示唆される」と結論づけてる
・本件はノルウェーでの調査なんだが、隣国スウェーデン国境付近ではインターネット利用による性犯罪の影響が少ない
・破壊行為や窃盗などの他の犯罪についてはインターネット利用の直接効果が見られない
(1)スウェーデン国境付近のノルウェーではスウェーデンの(非インターネットの)ポルノを利用しやすい
(2)一方出会い系の利用はスウェーデン国境付近かどうか関係ないはず
(3)この状況で、インターネットが普及すると、スウェーデン国境付近ではそれほど性犯罪は増加しなかったが、そうでないところでは比較的多めに増加した
→だからインターネットを利用したポルノによって性犯罪が増加したかもしれない
と言っているんだが、正直この意見見てどうだろう
俺の感想としては、(1)と(2)は逆だ。媒体であるポルノを利用するより直接出会いが発生する方が、より国境の近さに影響されるんじゃないか?
というのと、
ノルウェーとスウェーデンの性犯罪発生の違いをポルノの利用の許さだけに求めるのは危険すぎないか?
というのと、
全体的に「スウェーデンの悪い風習がノルウェーに入ってきた」みたいな論調になってて失礼すぎね?
と思った
増 "Well… do you have something you want to tell to Japanese people?"
B "well, I would say something not only to the Japanese, but to many other people. how should I put this?
"Most people began to hate Russians by default. But this war was started by our government, not by us. Of course, we don't want this war, nobody wants it. And I assure you, our people have repeatedly gone to rallies against the government. But always people who participate in such events are sent to prison. Even people on the Internet who express a point of view that the government does not like are jailed for misinformation.
And I will not deny that some Russians have succumbed to the propaganda of our government and are expressing support for this "military operation". But many people in other countries are actually the same. They hypocritically pretend that they are concerned about the fate of Ukraine, although in fact they have only recently learned that this country even exists. In reality, if you ask them "What do they think about the DNR and LNR?", they will have absolutely no idea what are you talking about.
It's good if you sincerely worry about Uraina. But the majority worry about Ukrina and hate Russians only and only because it's a trend that their government has set. In other words, this is the same propaganda.
Well, to summarize, I just wanna say "let's just be friendly to each other." Even if our governments are not friendly to each other, this doesn't mean that we should be the same." "
C*
https://anond.hatelabo.jp/20220429233816
•what do you think about zelenskii
•do you know other politicians except him
•how future is you predict, how future is you want (i mean politically and concretely)
•What do you think about ukranians language law
•how DNR and LNR people life is?
•did you see people which changed after starting this war
•what do you think that Russian army kidnap ukranians
•what do you think about that Russian language uses «в» for any country but «он» for yours?
•and anything you want to say to Japanese
Aの露訳
①の回答
О своем будущем скажу только одно, что после войны усыноввлю и удочерю детей которые потеряли своих родителей
Aの英訳
About my future, I'll say that after the war I'll adopt children who lost their parents in this bloodshed.
Bの露訳と②の回答
1. Что ты думаешь на счёт Зеленского?
Моё мнение, что Зеленский является лучшим президентом, который не бросил Украину и народ во время войны, как сделал это Янукович. Зеленский, его команда и наш народ делают всё возможное и невозможное для сохранения нашей страны.
2. Знаешь ли ты других политиков кроме Зеленского?
Знаю многих.
3. Какое будущее ты видишь для своей страны?
Хотелось бы чтобы территории Украины вернулись в полном составе, так как это было признано международным правом.
4. Что ты думаешь о законе про украинский язык?
Я поддерживаю этот закон, хотя в нашей стране люди общаются на разных языках, в том числе и на русском, но я ни разу не слышал информации о преследовании или конфликтах на этой почве.
5. Видишь ли ты как люди сменились после начала войны?
Наш народ очень сплотился, каждый старается помочь друг другу, война наложила отпечаток на всех, это бесконечные переживания и боль.
6. Что ты думаешь по поводу того, что российская армия похищает украинцев?
Это является ужасным преступлениям.
7. Что ты думаешь о том, что русские для любой страны говорят "в", но в случае с Украиной говорят "на"?
Я считаю что это очень не красиво по отношению к украинскому государству и людям которые там живут.
8. Что ты хочешь сказать японцам?
Хочу поблагодарить за поддержку нашей страны, пожелать мира, добра и процветания.
9. Что ты хочешь меня спросить?
Почему тебя так детально интересует ситуация в моей стране?
Надеюсь всё правильно понял
•what do you think about zelenskii?
I belive Zelensky is the best president who did not abandon Ukraine and the people during the war, as Yanukovych did. Zelensky, his team and our people are doing everything possible and impossible.
•do you know other politicians except him?
•how future is you predict, how future is you want (i mean politically and concretely)?
I would like the territories of Ukraine to return in full force, because this is what was recognized by international law.
•What do you think about ukranians language law?
I support this law. Despite the fact that in our country people communicate in different languages, including Russian, I have never heard information about persecution or conflicts on this basis.
•how DNR and LNR people life is?
skipped
•did you see people which changed after starting this war?
Our people are very united, everyone is trying to help each other, the war left its mark on everyone in the form of endless experiences and pain.
•what do you think that Russian army kidnap ukranians?
•what do you think about that Russian language uses "в" for any country but "на" for yours?
I think this is very discourteous in relation to the Ukrainian state and the people who live there.
•and anything you want to say to Japanese?
I want to thank you for the support of our country. I wish you peace, kindness and prosperity.
D*
増 "Ah, turkestan ban Russian language?"
D "Not really "ban" but "limitation". This sounds more suitable in this case. it is the natural phenomenon for the mononational states. And multinational, actually. Using the one language as official. To strengthen the statehood. Same thing with Ukraine. More separation from the "big brother". That is the point, I guess.
By the way, they strengthened much more after these 8 years. I think it is too late to start an invasion now than these 8 years ago back then in any case. That does not mean that I support it, of course. You knew my point. We talked about it earlier. 🙂 I think that it is just "balls to the wall" (like the title from the one of Accept's albums). Recklessly in a word. It is naive to believe that they have stagnated all this time and have not developed or strengthened.
A*
1) Another Ukranian president that just had "the luck" to get the war. Looks funny and trustworthy. Though he sometimes lacks the experience.
2) Yes I do.
3) I predict OK future for Ukraine, bad future for Russia. Russia lost any trust and contacts that it made for over 30 years. Dark decades ahead. I want good future, with no wars and with everyone helping each other.
4) Ukrainian language law? Well, it's their country. Let them speak what they want to speak. Besides, most Ukrainians speak Russian, and they even have mostly Russian cities, like Khar'kiv. I saw no oppression of Russian.
5) DNR and LNR are basically buffer states for Russia like North Korea with the same amount of freedom. It's hell on earth.
6) Had no information about that, but I had info about killing civilians and looting their homes. It's horrible. Those soldiers are monsters and they do not represent Russia. I don't count themselves as my fellow Russians. They're monsters. Barbarians. Putin's orcs. Not Russians.
7) I say let us use whatever we want. I use "на Украину" simply because I spoke it like that over 20 years and it's the correct one.
8) I love Japan and its people. I wish we could achieve peace and could work together. Please don't think bad of Russian people, we don't support this war. We're the same victims, like Ukrainians. Victims of Putin and his police state.
親愛なるYouTubeチーム
毎日YouTubeを楽しんでいますが、特に "ゆっくり動画 "が好きです。
"ゆっくり動画 "とは、日本文化のシャイネスとハイコンテクストをベースに、ゲームキャラクターの頭部を模したインターネットミームを機械音声「AquesTalk」で喋らせ、様々な話題を説明するスタイルの動画です。ゆっくり動画をアップロードしているチャンネルは、例えば以下の通りです。
https://youtube.com/c/%E4%BF%BA%E3%81%AE%E4%B8%96%E7%95%8C%E5%8F%B2ch
https://youtube.com/channel/UCrAzV_6tAH_igG9nYbJvwMg
https://youtube.com/channel/UC2exxvhAv4LK3RZg4vKH-GA
このスタイルの動画は、日本ではコアな人気を博しています。しかし、最近、私の好きなゆっくり動画チャンネルが、収益化の停止により、活動停止や路線変更を余儀なくされることが多くなっています。
アップロード者が動画内で機械音声ソフト「AquesTalk」を使用している場合、YouTubeのアルゴリズムが不当に大量コピーされた動画と判断することがあると聞いたことがあります。AquesTalkの機械音声技術は、ゆっくリ動画には欠かせないものですが、それが原因で削除の対象になった優良動画も少なくないそうです。
アップロード者が自分の声を使えばいいじゃないか」と思う人もいるかもしれませんが、ゆっくり動画のキャラクターとAquesTalkの声は切っても切れない関係にあり、日本のインターネットの一角の文化として定着しているのです。
AquesTalkを使って作られた多くのゆっくり動画は、決してスパムでも価値のないものでも、大量生産されたものでもありません。そして何より、私はゆっくり動画の持つ知的な文化が好きなのです。動画削除ボットのミスで、この文化が消えてしまうのは嫌です。この意見が親愛なるYouTubeチームに届くことを心から願っています。
I am anonymous lives in Japan.
I’m enjoying YouTube everyday and I especially like "Yukkuri videos".
“Yukkuri videos" are a style of video based on the shyness and high context of Japanese culture, in which Internet memes with the appearance of video game characters' heads are made to speak with a machine voice “AquesTalk” and explain various topics. The following channels upload Yukkuri videos, for example
https://youtube.com/c/%E4%BF%BA%E3%81%AE%E4%B8%96%E7%95%8C%E5%8F%B2ch
https://youtube.com/channel/UCrAzV_6tAH_igG9nYbJvwMg
https://youtube.com/channel/UC2exxvhAv4LK3RZg4vKH-GA
This style of videos have gained core popularity in Japan. Recently, however, a number of my favorite Yukkuri video channels have been forced to cease their activities or change course due to the suspension of monetization.
I have heard that if the uploader uses "AquesTalk" machine audio software in the video, YouTube's algorithm may determine that the video has been unfairly mass-copied. AquesTalk's machine voice technology is essential for Yukkuri videos, but many good videos have been subjected to deletion because of it.
Some people may think, "Why don't the uploaders just use their voice for themselves?” but the characters of the Yukkuri Video and the voice of AquesTalk are inseparably linked and have become a part of the culture of a corner of the Japanese Internet.
Many Yukkuri videos made using AquesTalk are by no means spam, worthless, or mass-produced. And most of all, I like the intellectual culture of Yukkuri videos. I don't want this culture to disappear because of a video deletion bot's mistake. I sincerely hope that this opinion reaches dear YouTube team.
3 青少年のインターネット利用環境(レイティング、ゾーニング)に関する 制度、法および政策とその背景(PDF形式:67KB)
4 青少年のインターネット利用環境(レイティング、ゾーニング)に関する民間機関の取組や現時点における青少年のインターネット利用環境に関する民間団体の取組の内容(PDF形式:162KB)
CP80 Foundation
現状のポルノサイト任意規制では不十分だとして、より強力な法的フィルタリング規制を求め、2006年にユタ州で設立された非営利団体。主な活動は C80 インターネットゾーニングイニシアティブの推進。 内容は 1.ゾーニング技術適用の推奨、 2.インターネットコミュニティポート法(The Internet Community Ports Act(ICPA))の作成、推奨、宣伝、 3.規則の作成及び違反行為の取締りなどのインターネットガバナンスの推進。
https://24tv.ua/ru/rossija-obstreljala-tc-kieve-iz-za-foto-voennoj-tehniki-sdelannyh_n1914418
ロシア、キエフのショッピングモールを砲撃=隣家から撮影の軍備写真で-AFU
AFU(参謀本部戦略広報室)は、ロシア軍がショッピングセンターを破壊した原因について説明した。
AFUは、キエフのレトロビル(訳注:ショッピングモールの名前)が破壊されたのはウクライナ軍の装備の動きを窓から撮影した人がいたからだと指摘した。
また、その人物の運命は不明だが、撮影された窓の運命はすべてわかっている-もう存在しないのだ、と付け加えた。
人命を損なわないため、軍隊はウクライナ人に対してウクライナ軍の装備を撮影しないこと、その動きを伝えないことを呼びかけた。
夜遅く、ロシア軍がキエフのポディルスキー地区のショッピングセンターを砲撃したことを思い出してほしい。敵の攻撃により、8人が死亡した。
"Police found a man who uploaded that video"
"'Kyiv Operational' Facebook group uploaded a video which shows a man named Pavel Artemiev, who confessed in uploading a video in internet where a moving of military trucks of Ukraine's army could be seen.
「キーウ作戦」というFacebookグループにウクライナ軍のトラックが移動する様子をアップロードしたのはPavel Artemievという男性だった。
"Those trucks are near Retroville Mall", said the man.
「Retrovilleモールの近くにトラックが数台あった」と男性は言い、「私は過ちをさとり、この事態を引き起こしたことを悔いている」と続けた。
彼はウクライナ人にこのようなこと(ウクライナ軍の動向を映した動画のアップロード)をしないよう強く警告した。
Artemiev added that he understands his mistake and said that he's sorry for what it caused. He strongly advised ukrainians against doing the same stuff (uploading a video with moves of ukrainian army).
He was detained by ukrainian police, and is in custody now."
前半は機械翻訳(露日)、後半はそれでは意味不明だったため人力(露英→英日)
.
おまけ
友達「2014年のときは確かにウクライナから移送された人たちを見たし、移住先の住民が彼らについて話しているのも聞いた。
だが今回そのようなものは全く聞いていない」
増田「まだたどりついてないだけじゃないの?」
友達「それは知らない」
増田「https://www.tokyo-np.co.jp/article/168311
『住民移送の事実はロシア側も認めている。極東メディア「サハリン・インフォ」(電子版)は13日、侵攻前後にシベリアや極東に移送された東部2州の住民は、ロシア政府の公式データだけで約9万5000人に達すると報じた。』と書いてあるけど……」
増田「(使えねえ)他にはなんかある?」
友達「普通のショッピングモールを空爆したと報道されているが、あれは軍用車両の隠し場所だった。写真もある」
増田「合成じゃないの?」
友達「ウクライナ市民が撮ってSNSに上げた写真に偶然写り込んでいたものだ。ロシア軍は当初こういうものを情報源にしていたが、ウクライナが写真をみだりに上げることをやめさせた」
友達「1週間ほど前にtwitterで見たがもうどこにあったか忘れてしまった。有名な写真でもない」
増田「(使えねえ)」
友達「あった。ショッピングモールの隣から撮られているhttps://24tv.ua/ru/rossija-obstreljala-tc-kieve-iz-za-foto-voennoj-tehniki-sdelannyh_n1914418 」
増田「おー」
『ウクライナは救急車を兵士の輸送に使っている』アルジャジーラ」
増田「(スクショじゃなくて元ソース貼ってくれよ)へー。ロシア軍の戦争犯罪のうちどれくらいにそういう疑問点があるんだろう」
友達「4割か5割くらいだろうと思う」
友達「マリウポリにいる友人は、普通の人家のすぐ近くで軍事車両を見たと言っていた。その後彼とは連絡がつかなくなった」
増田「そう」
友達のチャット原文はほぼ英語なので増田が訳しています。(増田はもともと日本語でチャットしていました)
もし友達に言いたい・聞きたいことがあれば書いてください。ロシアとネットがつながっている間は代わりに尋ねて回答を載せるつもりです。
https://24tv.ua/ru/rossija-obstreljala-tc-kieve-iz-za-foto-voennoj-tehniki-sdelannyh_n1914418
"Police found a man who uploaded that video"
"'Kyiv Operational' Facebook group uploaded a video which shows a man named Pavel Artemiev, who confessed in uploading a video in internet where a moving of military trucks of Ukraine's army could be seen.
"Those trucks are near Retroville Mall", said the man.
Artemiev added that he understands his mistake and said that he's sorry for what it caused. He strongly advised ukrainians against doing the same stuff (uploading a video with moves of ukrainian army).
He was detained by ukrainian police, and is in custody now."
昨日は上司が奢ってくれるって言うから同僚と3人でメシ食いに行って、終電までエルデンリングの話で盛り上がって帰ってそのまま寝ちまった
遅くなってすまんね
論文だっけ?
研究者じゃないから最新追いかけたりはしないからあんまり良く知らんね
少し前にチート検出ツール依頼されたときにこの学習モデルが利用できないか試してみたけど、誤検出が多くて使えなかったな。
データに合わなかったんだろう。形式だけ似てても駄目だという勉強になった。
https://cedec.cesa.or.jp/2021/session/detail/s6049c42d69590
こっちのCEDECの講演で紹介されてたモデルがドハマリして、最初から検出率90%超え、誤検出も1%くらいだった。
自律型にしたから日々精度を上げながら今日も元気に動いてるよ。
逆に最近読んだの何?
使う予定はないけど
https://storage.googleapis.com/deepmind-media/alphago/AlphaGoNaturePaper.pdf
これは面白かった。
総当たりをローコストでやれるの凄い。囲碁知らなくてルールから調べたし、変態的労力だから自分では組みたくないけど。
で、スタンドアローンか。
「独立したネットワーク内のシステム」をスタンドアローンと呼ぶだっけ。
「ない」ことを証明するのは悪魔の証明だから断定したことは謝罪しよう。
例えば隣の席の〇〇くんがそう呼んでました!だって間違いなく「呼ばれている」ことになるもんね。
私はそんな呼び方する人に会ったことがないので例に挙げられていた軍事システムと原子力発電所を調べてみた。
https://ja.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/C4I%E3%82%B7%E3%82%B9%E3%83%86%E3%83%A0
ここで挙げられている各種システムはすべてそちらの言うスタンドアローンになるはずだけど、スタンドアローンなんて言葉は一度も出てきていない。
クローズ系のネットワークという言葉はあるが、そこで使用されているシステムをスタンドアローンとは一切書いていない。
さすがに不自然すぎる。
原子力発電所は苦戦したがドイツの原発システム内でウイルスが見つかったというニュース記事が見つかった。
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-nuclearpower-cyber-germany-idUSKCN0XN2OS
USBを介して感染したらしいが、isolated from the Internetの記載はあれどstandaloneなんてどこにも書いてない。
自分の経験で恐縮だが、秘密保持契約に署名させられ、入口ですべての電子機器を取り上げられ、金属探知機みたいなのを通らされ、書いたメモも検閲される某所の社内ネットワークにすら繋がらない隔離ネットワーク内の基幹システムの開発現場に入ったことがあるが、仕様書の概要欄にもネットワークシステムの文字はあれどスタンドアローンなんて記載はなかった。中の開発者の口からも出たことはない。
ついでに好きそうなWikipediaも貼っておこう。
以上のことから独立したネットワーク内のシステムをスタンドアローンと呼ぶのは、少なくとも一般的ではないと判断したけど、どうだろう。
なお、Windowsにはスタンドアローンサーバーという概念があるけど、それは主にワークグループ内でファイルサーバーとして使用されるサーバーの呼称で、何ならそのスタンドアローンサーバーから普通にインターネットにも繋がることも多い。未だに使ってるとこがあるかは知らん。
これは「独立したネットワーク内のシステム」とは完全に別物だというのはご理解いただけるだろう。
https://www.softbank.jp/corp/news/press/sbkk/2021/20211019_01/
ソフトバンクが気になる記事を出していたけど、これは無線版専用ネットワーク構築サービスの呼称のようだから、記事をよく読めば「独立したネットワーク内のシステム」とは別物なのがわかる。
とりあえず、スタンドアローンの定義のソースをもらえないだろうか?
あなたが呼んでいる時点で確かに「呼ばれている」のは事実なので、そこは謝ろう。
長く書いたけど、どうせ最初の論文はあまり知らんあたりを抜き出して、お話にならないとか言い出すんだろうなあw
春休みっていいなあ
https://anond.hatelabo.jp/20220312204919
信憑性がないので原文を出してほしいというトラバがいくつかあり、もっともだと思ったので出すことにします。
元のチャットでは改行だったところの大部分をピリオドにしています(許可は取りました)。
増田 "何に"
友達 "North Korea is firing at you"
友達 "I guess we're gonna be disabled from the global internet"
増田 "そうしたらもう本当に終わりだね。どこで知ったの?"
友達 "tor is blocked. proxies are not working. at least, most of them.
but i'm prepared. i got tor, i got proxies. dunno if it will work."
増田 "そうなんだ"
友達 "Portuguese menu for Russian tourists: "We don't service the Russians. Go eat some stones. Bon appetit."
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/629783855070445598/951836523836358746/2022-03-11_22.37.48.png
増田 "あー"
友達 "Russians are becoming the worldwide exiles"
増田 "レストランはロシア人とそうでない人の見分けがつくんだろうか"
友達 "I can't even speak Russian in online games anymore.
they don't even care that I don't support the war"
増田 "ははは"
友達 " "Customers with Russian passport are not welcomed in our restaurant. We do understand that "normal" Russians are not responsible for criminal decisions of their government, but we have to do something already. By prohibiting the Russians to come in, we're making our contribution into the free Europe for our children." "
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/629783855070445598/951836523521769483/2022-03-11_22.38.07.png
増田 "そう"
友達 "i'm disappointed in reddit"
増田 "何?"
友達 "i read a topic "stop shout abuse at russians"
they said "fuck you, we hated you russians before the war too" "
増田 "そう"
友達 "now i see the true face of the west.
I'm so disappointed...
I'm being witchhunted just because I'm Russian.
How does this differ from what Hitler did"
増田 "国同士なんて仲がいい方が珍しいしそんなもんだよ。今ごろ気がついたの?
日本のネットでも評判がいい国なんてほとんどないって。99%の国は嫌われてるか知られてないかだよ"
友達 "USA talks about "peace in all the world" is a pack of fucking shit.
when they bomb the shit out Yugoslavia, it's legit, it's legal, it's OK, nobody hates americans.
when Russia is in war, every Russian should be burned"
増田 "アメリカは仕方ないね。東京裁判も不当だったみたいだし"
友達 "i'm gonna stick to Asia. I'll learn Chinese and Japanese"(注:このstickをどう訳すべきかわからない)
友達 "I always made a distinction between government and people.
When USA and other countries do some shit, that's the government.
But when usual people say that they hate Russians...
I have to get out of Russia. In that manner, we're even worse than North Korea"
友達 "people who ran from NK are treated well. they're heroes.
but Russian people are not wanted anywhere"
増田 "そう"
友達 "there is information that there's gonna be a martial law in Russia. 5 or 6 of march"
増田 "本当?"
増田 "そうなんだ"
友達 "i'm against killing at all. hide.
友達 "I guess, we're repeating the history of Germany and Japan
増田 "そこそこ良いんじゃない?"
友達 "well, in Russian reality, it'll be worse"
増田 "知らん"
友達 "60% of our people is fucking stupid. they're lazy. they were taught that war is good. that nazis are everywhere around them. that stealing is good. they're corrupted. most of those people was born in USSR"
増田 "そう"
友達 "We have to be our own country, but free. Free of Putin and corruption and violence. Though I do not want to be Russian anymore.I love Russian culture but I hate the government"
増田 "そう"
友達 "people are saying that all Russians are guilty. fucking hypocrits. when USA bombed Yugoslavia, Iraq, Libya, Syria, and Hiroshima and Nagasaki, nobody seemed to mind.
when the West says: "We're tolerant, we're free, we're not racists", know that they lie"
増田 "そう"
友達 "the only nation that didn't say that all russians are guilty, was Japanese. I've heard that Japanese people think that only Putin is guilty. and not all Russians"
友達 "I've asked a couple of my japanese friends"
増田 "this is.. probably very biased sample actually"(注:増田もたまに英語を使うことがある)
増田 "私が知る限りそのredditのトピックと日本のネットでそこまで雰囲気変わらないと思う。ロシア食品店が襲われて壊されたらしいし"
増田 "ところで他の国の友達にもロシア人についてどう思ってるか聞いたの?"
友達 "they won't even speak to me, most of them"
増田 "あっ"
友達 "if they are affected by public opinion and ready to betray their friends, they're no longer my friends"
増田 "そう"
友達 "in Russia, we have a proverb "You can only find true friends in a trouble" "Друг познаётся в беде" "
増田 "日本語に似たようなことわざがあった気がしたけど今調べたら『昨日の友は今日の敵』しかなかった"
(注:チャットをそのまま載せると身バレ&グダグダすぎるので日本語訳版では適当に要約してあるが、友達のウクライナ人の知り合いが無事だと聞いたのは本当)
増田 "よかったね。……あ、ウクライナ人の友達は話してくれるんだ"
友達 "we speak. ukrainian friends are still with me. just imagine. the victims of war are still friends with me. and this two-faced West fucks are not"
友達 "those West fuck just love to write hate messages knowing that we can't do anything in return. that they are in comfort. they scream "NO TO WAR", and after that they go to a happy dinner with their families"
増田 "●●さんは本当に自分のことを西洋人とは思ってないんだな"
友達 "maybe i had some sparks of western in me. but now i fucking don't"
増田 "たいていの日本人にとって白人=西洋。私も●●さんに会って話すまではそう思ってた"
友達 "well you know now that it's not"
増田 "うん"
増田 "制裁はロシア国民が政府に反旗を翻すことを目的に行われているらしい"(注:よく調べずに適当なことを言ったので間違ってるかも)
友達 "yes. but it's useless. people won't turn against government. they are zombified by propaganda"
友達 "but there are not too much people. Russia is basically like Hitler's Germany now"
友達 "it's not optimistic at all. russians are being equated to fascists. they don't make the distinction. they say that we all are guilty
増田 "you have to hope you all aren't like german in Traité de Versailles"
友達 "in fact, if I say in Internet that I don't support war, I can go in jail for 15 years"
増田 "それにしてはあのredditのロシア人は普通にプーチン批判や戦争反対を言ってたけど"
友達 "the law came after that post."
増田 "ええっ"
友達 "when they wrote it, it was OK. but now Putin does everything he can to stay in power. they're frantically making new laws. so they can stay in power for a little longer. what happens now is the blackest page in Russia's history. since Russia-Japan war"
友達 "USA always hated Russia. They are using every chance they get to destroy us. if instead of Russia it was Finland or China, attacking Ukraine, they wouldn't do shit about it. we several times tried to have friendly relationships with USA and each time they basically said "Fuck off, Russians". I didn't have any illusions about them before. but now I plainly fucking hate them. Japanese are the best"
増田 "また始まったよ"
友達 "first time was during World War 2 lend-lease they helped us (注: チャットなので文章がところどころ適当になることがある)
we tried to be friends with them after, but they had secret plan to conquer USSR while it's weak. it was cancelled"
友達 "then Cold War, a lot of hating each other. next time we tried to be friends in 90s. "Bush's chicken legs", helping each other"
友達 "USA's bombing of Yugoslavia made us enemies again. since then, we were not friends"
友達 "when that happened, Russian premier Primakov was on the flight to USA. there was gonna be a deal that could help Russia greatly. when Primakov heard about Yugoslavia, he asked his pilot to turn around, back to Moscow, and cancelled that deal. in Russia, it's known as "Primakov's turn" "
増田 "なんでそれで帰るの?"
友達 "he didn't want to work with countries that act like that. it was a war crime"
増田 "プリマコフという人は今の日本ではあまり知られてませんよ。私も今初めて聞きました"
友達 "he's not well known in Russia too :D "
増田 "失脚させられたみたいだからね。こんな政治家について今のロシアで報道されないのは自然だ"
友達 "he's still in government, if i remember correct"
増田 "……
エフゲニー・マクシモヴィチ・プリマコフ(ロシア語: Евгений Максимович Примаков、ラテン文字転写の例:Evgenii Maksimovich Primakov、1929年10月29日 - 2015年6月26日」 "
友達 "ah"
増田 "やっぱりさ、西洋の人たちがロシア人全部を雑に罵倒してくるの仕方ないと思うんだよ"
友達 "meh. fuck them then. i'm not gonna contact them then"
増田 "charmという単語があるでしょう。likable appealという意味だよね"
友達 "you can say it that way, yes"
増田 "でもmagicという意味もある。超自然的で恐ろしくて強いものだ"
増田 "日本語では魅力というけどこの"魅"は実は化け物のこと。
人間はこのcharmとか魅力とかいう恐ろしいものに支配されて生きている。
なんでアメリカの空爆のときとロシアの侵略のときで世論が全然違うのか? それはアメリカやウクライナには魅力があるけどロシアやユーゴにはないからだよ。人間にはかわいくもかっこよくもない人々の命より好きな人ひとりのほうが大事なんだ"
友達 "for me, all people are the same. every life is equal. (注:ここでは彼は「生命は尊い」とは言っていないが、普段の態度と前後の文脈からそう思っているのが明らかなので勝手に足しておいた)
death of Yugoslavians person is as tragic as the death of American and other people"
増田 "●●さんはそうでもたいていの人はそうではないからね。だから仕方がないんだ。実のところ私も他人のこと言えないんだよ。だって私もシリアの内戦とかクリミア侵略とか外国のニュースは気にしなかったのに、●●さんに出会ったからってだけでウクライナ侵略ばかり気にしてるからその『西洋人たち』と同じなんだよ。だから、仕方がないと思う"
「ツイッターでユーザー名やプロフにウクライナの国旗を使うのをやめよう。ウクライナ人は国旗を見て同胞を探して情報交換しているから」みたいな真偽不明のツイートが日本語にも翻訳されて、なぜか反維新、れいわ支持者が拡散するという情報戦が始まっているみたいね。
アカ名やプロフに🇺🇦使うのはやめ、💙💛にしてくださいと…🇺🇦安否確認や情報共有に使われてるらしい。
無期限消費税0でインボイス丸々廃止🔥反新自由主義💥💢反構造改革。打倒維新の会💥💢🍀生き易い社会🍀🔥打倒緊縮財政💥積極財政の為党派超えた協働必要🔥れいわ新選組&三橋貴明/月刊三橋会員/令和ピボット
https://twitter.com/Y0ororafish777/status/1497410340404875269
My Russian is pretty rough but in short : you should avoid using the Ukrainian flag in your bio/username because Ukrainians use it to find each other on the internet and exchange information
The comments suggest using the hashtag instead
元の人は、善意で「ロシア語はよくわからないけど」と、ロシア語のツイートをシェアしただけみたいで、いろいろウクライナ人などからツッコミが入っているみたいだけど。でも、れいわ支持者の狡猾なところはもとのツイートのURLを示さないんだよね。そして、元のツイートでなされている議論に触れる機会を減らして、事実を覆い隠してしまうところ。