国連の定義：性的目的での(相手の)弱い立場、力の格差あるいは信頼の濫用行為またはその試みである。他者の性的搾取から金銭的、社会的または政治的な利益を得ることも含まれるがこれに限定されるものではない。Any actual or attempted abuse of a position of vulnerability, differential power, or trust, for sexual purposes, including, but not limited to, threatening or profiting monetarily, socially or politically from the sexual exploitation of another.

後段は分かりにくいかもしれませんが、例えば児童売春の場合、あっせん行為もまた性的搾取になるということです。

上記の3つはかなり似通っていることがわかると思います。これらはある程度明文化された領域(法令や国際条例等)で用いられる定義なので、差が少ないのですね。

これらは主に実在の人間に対して使われますが、児童ポルノ(二次)等も児童への性的搾取を推奨する物として規制されることがあります。

ちなみに、話は変わりますがアメリカにはExploitation fiction/filmという言葉があり、エログロドラッグ背徳系のB級作品に使われていました。

さて、上記の定義は日本のネット界隈でカジュアルに使われている性的搾取とは、どうも違うような印象を受けます。

考えてみましょう。基本ラインはおそらく通底しています。「他者の性を利用して利益を得ること」でしょう。

・エロい絵で、褒められたり、それを売って金銭的利益を得る

・性的な表現で購買意欲を誘う

などです。

さらに付け加えるなら、アンチポルノフェミニスト的な観点も悪魔合体しているように思われます。

・性的表現により女性蔑視を助長することで、家父長制というイデオロギーを存続させるという利益を得ている

・性産業従事者はすべて強制されている(本人が自分の意志で従事していると考えている場合でも)

・"性的"という言葉のレンジが非常に広い(例えば、キャサリンマッキノンは女性が抑圧されている描写があればそれはポルノであると述べました)

まとめると、性的搾取の定義の基本ラインを踏襲しつつ、被搾取者を非実在の存在にまで拡張させ、さらに"性的"および"強制"という言葉を非常に広くとったものが、日本のネット界隈でよく使われる"性的搾取"と言えるのではないでしょうか。

「性的、社会的あるいは政治的な利益を得るための創作物(フィクション)中の表現であって、視聴者あるいは読者の主観に基づき"性的"であると判断されたもの、およびそのような表現を含む一連の創作物」

※これはあくまで私の考えた定義に過ぎず、私の観測範囲に依存していることをここに記します。

Permalink | 記事への反応(2) | 23:21

2020-06-07

■BBC1の音楽 プログラム

Power Down Playlist with Ammie Mac（https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p04m6srg）

簡単なメールの返信や手帳の整理などの事務作業をするときに再生しておくとちょうどいい。Annie Macの選曲は間違いないし、テンションを上げにいくような曲はないが、アンビエントほどチルではないのでリラックスしたままでいい感じで作業できます。途中でトークやインタビューもあるが、日本語ではないためさほど邪魔されないと思います。イギリスの音楽が好きな方にお勧めします。でも、ランニングや掃除にはもっとアッパーなEssential Mixの方がいいよ。iPlayer Radioというアプリからいずれも聴取可能です。

Permalink | 記事への反応(0) | 11:32

2020-05-11

■アニソンをもっと 開拓したい

好みなのは、癒し系、萌え系、元気になれるやつ

<<例>>

・雨だれの歌（チト、ユーリ）

・NOISY POWER LOVE ☆（大橋彩香）

・カラフル（麻倉もも）

etc

↑こういう系統のやつお願いします

Permalink | 記事への反応(1) | 22:17

2020-04-22

■2020年 世界 報道 自由度 ランキング：日本

伝統と事業利益
世界第3位の経済大国である日本は、議会制君主制であり、一般的にはメディアの多元主義の原則を尊重している。
しかし、伝統や企業の利益の影響で、ジャーナリストは民主主義の番人としての役割を十分に果たすことが難しくなっている。
2012年に安倍晋三氏が再び首相になって以来、ジャーナリストは自分たちに対する不信感を訴え続けてきた。

フリーターや外国人記者を差別する「記者クラブ」制度が続いている。
ソーシャルネットワーク上では、ナショナリストグループが政府に批判的なジャーナリストや、福島第一原発事故や沖縄の米軍駐留などの「反愛」的なテーマを扱うジャーナリストを嫌がらせている。
政府は、内部告発者、ジャーナリスト、ブロガーが「違法に」入手した情報を公表した場合、最高10年の懲役に直面するという「特定秘密」を保護する法律についての議論を拒否し続けている。

https://rsf.org/en/japan の内容をDeepL翻訳に掛けただけですが、ご参考まで。

原文も付けとこう。

Tradition and business interests
The world’s third biggest economic power, Japan is a parliamentary monarchy that, in general, respects the principles of media pluralism.
But journalists find it hard put to fully play their role as democracy’s watchdog because of the influence of tradition and business interests.
Journalists have been complaining of a climate of mistrust toward them ever since Shinzo Abe became prime minister again in 2012.

The system of “kisha clubs” (reporters’ clubs) continues to discriminate against freelancers and foreign reporters.
On social networks, nationalist groups harass journalists who are critical of the government or cover “antipatriotic” subjects such as the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear dis aster or the US military presence in Okinawa.
The government continues to refuse any debate about a law protecting “Specially Designated Secrets,” under which whistleblowers, journalists and bloggers face up to ten years in pris on if convicted of publishing information obtained “illegally.”

追記：確かに文面変わってないね。2018年の記事： http://fuseishoyo-roku.cocolog-nifty.com/blog/2018/05/problematic-284.html

Permalink | 記事への反応(1) | 08:17

2020-03-27

■「楽園はこちら側」の「事実に誠意を」をほぼdeepLで翻訳してみた　その２

その１https://anond.hatelabo.jp/20200327214055

12 Dr. Hiroshi Nishiura is one of the few professionals of mathematical models of infectious diseases in Japan, and it is well known that his ability is outstanding. However, many people don't understand mathematical models themselves (I must confess that I can't say that I understand a ll of the findings because I'm not a professional of mathematical models either), so his findings and comments are easily deified. Because the contents of the mathematical model are a complete black box to many people, it makes it seem like the oracle is coming out like a shrine's oracle. Much of Japan's infection control policy relies on the Nishiura theory. So there is nothing wrong with that, but one of the problems in Japan is that there is no plan B in case plan A goes bust. Dr. Nishiura is an excellent scholar. It is not God. Hence the need to have that Plan B with the possibility of making a mistake. I am greatly concerned that bureaucrats and politicians who are prone to infallibilism will mistake science for an oracle. It is only when falsifiability is assured that science can continue to be scientific.

感想：おみくじと神託が同じoracleだったので変な文章になったが直していない。

13 数理モデルは演繹法の活用産物である。演繹法は帰納法やアブダクションで補完するのが、学問の基本であり、臨床医学の常識である。演繹法的にどんなに正しく見えても実はそれは違っていた、ということはこの業界ではよくあることなのだ。ヘーゲルやマルクスのような巨大な知性でも演繹法オンリーでは間違うのである。

Mathematical models are the product of deductive methods. The deductive method is complemented by the inductive or abduction method, which is the bas is of scholarship and the common sense of clinical medicine. It's a common occurrence in this industry that no matter how deducibly correct it may seem, it's actually not true. Even a huge intellect like Hegel or Marx can make a mistake by deduction alone.

感想：「蓋を開けてみれば」を「実はそれは」に変更した。

14 モデルを使うな、といっているのでは決してない。ぼく自身、モデルを用いて論文を書く。しかし、モデルは無謬ではなく、そこには前提である仮定があり、仮定はしばしば間違っている。グラム染色を活用するとは、グラム染色にできないこと、分からないことを知悉していることであり、グラム染色万能論者にグラム染色は使えない。同じことだ。英国でも数理モデルは活用されているが、だからこそ英国人はその結語には非常に懐疑的で、常に反論、異論が起きている。健全で科学的な態度である。

　I'm not saying don't use the model at all. I myself write a paper using a model. However, the model is not infallible, there are assumptions that are assumptions, and the assumptions are often wrong. Making use of Gram's stain means having full knowledge of what Gram's stain cannot do and does not understand, and Gram's stain cannot be used by Gram's stain universalists. It's the same thing. Mathematical models are also utilized in the UK, which is why Br its are very sceptical of their conclusions, and there are always counter-arguments and objections. It is a sound and scientific attitude.

感想：「前提たる仮定」がうまく訳せていなかったので「前提である仮定」にしたが、assumptions that are assumptionsになってしまった。

「英国人は」がないと主語がIになってしまったので追加した。しかしBr itsじゃ意味違うよ。もっと正しく訳してくれない？

15 Japan's "now" is a well-controlled state of infection, which is much better than Wuhan at its worst, or Italy, Spain, France, England, or New York at the present time. The problem is that it doesn't guarantee that it will "always work".

感想：特にない。便利だなあ。

16 懸念されるのは東京だ。感染報告が増えたことだけが問題なのではない。クラスターを形成できない、トレースできない感染者が増えているのが問題である。そして、その陽性患者数に比べて検査数がずっと少ない。47人の感染者を捕捉するために100人未満（陽性者の検査日が不明だが、おそらくこのへんだろう）しか検査していないのは少なすぎる。

It is Tokyo that is of concern. The increase in reports of infection is not the only problem. The problem is that more and more infected people are unable to form clusters and cannot be traced. And the number of tests is much lower than that number of positive cases; it's too little that they only tested less than 100 people (the date of testing for the positives is unknown, but it's probably around here) to capture 47 infected people.

Again, it's not necessary to figure out all the infected people. However, it is troubling that the flow of infection, movement and clusters are out of sight. Therefore, the threshold for testing must be lowered in Tokyo. The threshold for testing varies with the circumstances. That's what I explained with the Korean example. Sticking to the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare's "standards" will lead to a misunderstanding of the phenomenon itself. Already in the Kansai region, infected people have been found with t aste and smell abnormalities, and clusters have been detected from there. I would like to make more use of the athletic sensibilities of these clinicians. I'm not sure "where" in Tokyo is the barrier to lowering the number of inspections, but that barrier needs to be removed immediately.

感想：「捕捉するのに」を「捕捉するために」に変更した。多分これでいいと思う。思いたい。

アスチュートがathleticになっているのはどう反応したらいいかわからない。

17 This conceptual diagram that everyone is looking at - lowering the peak of the infection and shifting it to the side. This is all a product of deduction, and I don't know if it's really true. As mentioned above, the UK estimates already suggest that this is not enough. It is possible that the damage that was shifted to the side could simply be "extra-long damage".

感想：特に言うことはない。便利だなあ。

18 　そして、ここが肝心なのだが、ピークを下げるという理念が、「ピークを下げなければいけない」という観念になり、「ピークは下がっているはずだ」という確信になり、「ピークは起きていないんだ」という自己暗示に転じてはいけないということだ。プランAに固執する日本あるあるの失敗のパターンで、ダイヤモンド・プリンセスでは「二次感染が起きてはいけない」が「起きているはずがない」に転じてノーガード下船を許してしまった。「ピークが起きてはいけない」が「ピークなんて見たくない」にならないように現実を見据える必要がある。たとえ、それが我々の見たくない不都合な真実であったとしても。

And this is the key point: the idea of lowering the peak should not become the notion that the peak must be lowered, or the belief that the peak must be lowered, or the self-implication that the peak is not happening. In a pattern of Japanese failure to stick to Plan A, Diamond Princess allowed no-guard disembarkation by changing "secondary infection should not occur" to "it can't have happened". We need to keep our eyes on reality so that "peak shouldn't happen" doesn't become "I don't want to see a peak. Even if it is an inconvenient truth that we don't want to see.

感想：mustが違う文脈で二回出てきている。よくわかるように変更したいものだ。

カギカッコがないとうまく訳せなかったので追加しているが、なぜかカッコ閉じるがいくつか抜けている。この箇所以外にも抜けがある。

19 Repeatedly. It's common knowledge in this industry that deductive methods are complemented by inductive methods. Nevertheless, PCR is often false-negative and has little power to determine the status of infection. That's why "testing everything" is so wrong. However, a serum test measuring immunoglobulin IgM and IgG would provide a more accurate picture of the "status of infection in the population. This, however, is not infallible. It is difficult to use for individual cases because it misses early infection, which is why it misses early HIV infection.Whether antibody testing is useful in individual cases remains to be tested, but it is well suited for epidemiological studies on a population bas is. Roughly speaking, we can confirm whether the "infection is rampant" in Tokyo right now, or whether it's just an unfounded fear.

前例としては、ロンドンの血清検査で09年パンデミックインフルエンザが従来予測の10倍起きていたことが血清検査でわかっている。抗体検査はアウトブレイクのあとで事後的に行うことが多いが、慢性的パンデミックになりつつあるCOVID-19については、「今」こそが検証のポイントといって良い。

As a precedent, serology tests in London showed that the 2009 pandemic flu was 10 times more likely than previously predicted. Antibody testing is often performed after an out break, but now is a good time to examine COVID-19, which is becoming a chronic pandemic.

感想：「前例はあって」を「前例としては」に変えた。「前例はある。なおかつロンドンで〜１０倍起きていた」になってしまったからだ。

20 英国はさらにアグレッシブだ。家庭で抗体検査を行い、「感染者である」とわかればそれを自宅での自己隔離の根拠に使おうというのだ。ロックダウンが起きている中で、検査陰性は「自己隔離不要」を意味しないため、その戦略に欠陥はある。が、考え方としては「感染全体を抑え込みたい」というもので、検討の価値はあると思う。

The UK is even more aggressive. The idea is to test for antibodies at home, and if they are found to be infected, they will use it as a bas is for self-isolation at home. That strategy is flawed because with the lockdown in place, a negative test does not mean "no self-sequestration". However, the idea is that we want to control the infection as a whole, and I think it is worth considering.

感想：「戦略に穴はある」を「戦略に欠陥はある」に変えた。

21 東京でどのくらいの感染が起きているか、帰納法的確認は必要であり、有用だ。その結果がどうなるかは預言者ではないぼくには分からない。が、どんな結果が出てきても、それを受け入れ、場合によっては自説を変えて、プランBに移行することにも躊躇しない態度が科学者には必要だ。科学者は、首尾一貫していないことにかけて、首尾一貫していなければならないのだ。形式においては首尾一貫していなくても、プリンシプルやプロフェッショナリズムにおいて一貫しなければならないのだ。事実に誠意を。　

Inductive legal confirmation of how many infections are occurring in Tokyo is necessary and useful. I'm not a prophet, so I don't know what the outcome will be.However, no matter what the outcome, scientists need to accept it and not hesit ate to change their thesis and move on to Plan B in some cases. Scientists have to be coherent in their inconsistencies.They may not be coherent in form, but they must be coherent in principles and professionalism. Good faith in the facts.　

感想：首尾一貫という言葉を使いすぎて文章をアホっぽくしてしまったが他にいい方法が思いつかない。朝三暮四は理解してくれなかった。「自説を曲げ」は「自説を変えて」に変更した。

文章はもう少し整形できると思うがとりあえずこれで。

岩田健太郎先生とDeepLに敬意を。

Permalink | 記事への反応(1) | 21:51

2020-03-26

■anond:20200326143817

「志村けん『クラス』」が東京1000万人のうちのどれくらいかって話なんやで。

多分1000人は切るはずだから、ランダムで0-1000万の数字が出てくるダイスを200回回したら1回1000未満が出てくるくらいの確率、ってことやで。

これは十分以上に低かったはずなので、これをたやすく引けてしまうということは割とあかんのやないかい？　ってこった。

追記

1-(POWER(1-0.0001,200)) = 約2%と出た。

　ざっくり、本来のやばさよりも50倍くらいヤバイとするのが正しいかも。

Permalink | 記事への反応(3) | 14:45

2020-02-27

■Terms of use: Follower Check +

Registered users (hereinafter referred to as “users”) shall use the Service in accordance with the Terms.

These Terms of Service (hereinafter referred to as the "Terms") determine the terms of use for the services provided by the Company (hereinafter referred to as the "Services").

Article 1 (Apply)

These Terms shall apply to any relationship between you and us regarding the use of the Services.

Article 2 (Registration)

A registration applicant shall apply for use registration according to the method prescribed by the Company, and the use registration shall be completed when the Company approves this.

The Company may not approve the application for use registration if it determines that the applicant for use registration has any of the following reasons, and shall have no obligation to disclose the reason.

(1) When filing false information when applying for use registration

(2) When the application is from a person who has violated these Terms

(3) In addition, if we judge that the use registration is not appropriate

Article 3 (User ID and Password Management)

Users shall manage the user ID and password of this service at their own risk.

Users may not transfer or lend their user IDs and passwords to third parties under any circumstances. If the combination of the user ID and password matches the registered information and the user logs in, the company considers the use by the user who has registered the user ID.

Article 4 (Usage Fee and Payment Method)

Only when the user consents to the purchase to use the Service, the Company shall separately determine the price for the use of the Service and pay the usage fee displayed before the purchase of the Service by the method specified by the Company.

The free trial campaign applies only to the first registration.

No refunds will be made for any paid services purchased, regardless of the reason.

Article 5 (Prohibitions)

Users must not do any of the following when using this service:

(1) Acts that violate laws or public order and morals

(2) Acts related to criminal acts

(3) Acts that destroy or obstruct our server or network functions

(4) Acts that may interfere with the operation of our services

(5) Acts that directly or indirectly benefit anti-social forces in connection with our services

(6) Other acts deemed inappropriate by the Company

Article 6 (Suspension of provision of this service, etc.)

The Company may suspend or suspend the provision of all or a part of the Service without prior notice to the User if it determines that any of the following events occur.

(1) When performing maintenance or updating of the computer system related to this service

(2) When it becomes difficult to provide this service due to force majeure such as earthquake, lightning, fire, power outage or natural dis aster

(3) When a computer or communication line stops due to an accident

(4) In addition, if we judge it is difficult to provide this service

The Company shall not be liable for any disadvantage or damage suffered by the user or any third party due to suspension or interruption of the provision of this service for any reason.

Article 7 (Restrictions on use and cancellation of registration)

In the following cases, the Company may restrict the use of this service in whole or in part, or cancel the registration as a user without prior notice.

(1) In the case of violating any provision of these Terms

(2) When it turns out that the registered items are false

(3) In addition, if we judge that the use of this service is not appropriate

The Company shall not be liable for any damages caused to Users due to the actions performed by the Company based on this section.

Article 8 (Disclaimer)

Our default liability shall be waived if not due to our intentional or gross negligence.

The Company shall not be liable for any transactions, communications or disputes arising between the User and other users or third parties with respect to the Service.

Article 9 (Changes in service content, etc.)

We may change the contents of this service or stop providing this service without notifying the user, and we do not take any responsibility for any damage caused to the user by this.

Article 10 (Change of Terms of Use)

We may change these Terms at any time, without notice, if we deem it necessary.

Article 11 (Notification or communication)

Notice or communication between the user and us shall be made in a manner determined by us.

Article 12 (Prohibition of transfer of rights and obligations)

You may not transfer or provide security to any third party without your prior written consent to your position in the terms of use or any rights or obligations under these Terms.

Article 13 (Governing law and jurisdiction)

In interpreting these Terms, the laws of Japan shall be the governing law.

In case of any dispute regarding this service, the exclusive jurisdiction of the court having jurisdiction over the location of our head office shall be exclusive

Permalink | 記事への反応(2) | 20:16

2020-02-19

■文章として読めるように作業してる→した（作業 完了）

https://anond.hatelabo.jp/20200219071929

コピペありがとう。英文として読めるように、文字起こし完成の作業をしている。終わったらここに貼りつけるね。→作業完了したから、この下に貼りつける。

英語版文字起こし (自動生成）のコピペを、英語として読める文章にした。いくつか聞き取れていないところがあるので、わかる人がいたらトラバで教えてほしい。聞き取れていないところは「(inaudible01)」みたいに番号をふって記載してあるので、~~その番号を書いてトラバしてもらえると嬉しい~~。→20日朝、元動画がユーザーにより削除されていることを確認。よって、聞き取れなかった数か所はそのまま放置となります。あいすみません。

あと、増田って脚注使えないんだっけ((脚注のテスト))? いくつか注入れたいところがあるのだが、無理っぽいのでアナログな手法を取ることにした。若干読みづらいかもしれないが堪忍してほしい。

追記: Twitterで書いたんだけど、わざわざ時間を割いて（2時間くらいかかった）この作業をしたのは、YouTubeの自動生成字幕の、8割くらいは合ってるんだけどあとはめちゃくちゃという文面が善意で拡散されることを防ぎたかったため。元の主張を拡散したかったのではなく、誤った情報（変な英語）が拡散されるのを防ぎたかったのです。その点、ご理解をよろしくお願いします。

ソース動画: ※ユーザーにより削除済み（2020年 2月20日朝確認）

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vtHYZkLuKcI

Diamond Princess is COVID-19 mill. How I got in the ship and was removed from it within one day. - 2020/02/18, kentaro iwata

Hello. My name is Professor Kentaro Iwata. I am a specialist of infectious diseases at Kobe University Hospital, Kobe, Japan.

Today I entered into[sic]*1 the cruise ship the Diamond Princess, which is, erm, bombarded by a lot of COVID-19 infecit on right now.

And I was removed from the ship on the same day and I'm gonna talk to you why this happened.

I was very concerned of the number of the people who got infected with the COVID-19 disease infections. Then I was wondering why this is[sic](was)*2 happening. I wanted to enter into the cruise ship and　wanted to be useful in helping to containing infection there.

I spoke with several people and finally one officer at working for Minis try of Health and Labor called me yesterday, saying that well you can come and enter into a cruise ship and do the infection control works.

And I said fine then I prepared my stuff and I did all the paperworks and arrangement and got onto the Shinkansen from Kobe to Yokohama.

On the way to go to Yokohama I got another call from the same officer, saying, "Somebody didn't like me. So you can't get into the cruise ship." He was not able to say who, and he was not able to say why, but certainly some power over him affected his decision and I was blocked from entering into the ship.

Then after several discussions he found another way that if you could come as a DMAT member, you can come into the the cruise ship. DMAT is the dis aster management medical team in Japan and usually deals with a dis aster not infectious diseases, but because of the lack of the people who could help people inside a cruise ship to get out of the ship, or the managing of people, and so on, DMAT was requested to enter into the cruise ship.

Because my specialty is not dis aster management, so I was not very happy about that, but because we had no other way I said, "Fine, I'll do that."

Addition ally, I got another call that some people didn't like me getting into the cruise ship present even as a DMAT member. So another discussion happened then the I waited about one hour in Shin Yokohama Station, and finally the officer find a way. [He said] that "If you work for DMAT not as an infection prevention specialist but as an ordinary routine DMAT officer working under (inaudible01) DMAT doctor doing a routine job, then you could come into the cruise ship."

I was not very happy with that decision, but because there's no other way, so I said, "Fine, I'll get into the ship."

I entered the ship. Then I found the chief officer of the DMAT and spoke with him. I said, "Well I was assigned to the DMAT members (inaudible02) out whatever you want to say." Then he said, "Well, you don't have to work DMAT work because that's not your specialty. You are an infection prevention specialist, so why don't you do the infection control." Then I said, "Fine, I spoke with the superior of him who is[sic](was) in charge of the all the DMAT operations, and he also said, "You are an infection control person, so you should do infection control." I said, "Fine." But he said, "Well, you shouldn't be here as a DMAT member. You should come as (inaudible03) infection control specialist." He was not very happy about that while I was inside the DMAT. But because that was not my decision, there was no other way. So I said, "Well I have to do it."

I looked into the several places inside the ship and it turned out that the cruise ship was completely inadequate in terms of infection control.

There was no distinction between the Green Zone, which is free of infection, and the Red Zone, which is potentially contaminated by the virus.

So the people could come and go, (inaudible04) a PPE, off PPE. Crews were just walking around, the officers of the Minis try Health and Labor were walking around, DMAT people were walking around, psychiatrists were walking around.

And people were eating on the one plate. People were wearing PPE and off PPE, and eating lunch with their gloves on, and just dealing with the smartphone with full PPE, so it was completely chaotic.

And some crews had a fever. They went to the medical center while wearing N95 masks. But he didn't have any protection between his room and a medical room.

And the medical officer was not protecting herself. And she was very unhappy, saying that well she was already infected. I'm sure about that. She was completely giving up protecting herself.

Anyways I (have) dealt with a lots of infections (for) more than twenty years. I was in Africa dealing with the Ebola out break. I was in another country dealing with the cholera out break. I was in China in 2003 to deal with the SARS, and I saw many febrile patients there. I never had fear of getting infection myself for Ebola, SARS, (and) cholera, because I know[sic](knew) how to protect myself and how to protect others, and how the infection control should be. So I could do the adequate infection control; protect myself, and protect others.

But inside (the) Princess Diamond, I was so scared. I was so scared of getting COVID-19 because there was no way to tell where the virus is. No Green Zone, no Red Zone. Everywhere could have the virus and everybody was not careful about it.

There was no single professional infection control person inside the ship. And there was nobody in charge of infection prevention as a professional. The bureaucrats were in charge of everything.

I spoke with the head officer of the Minis try of Health and Labor and he was very unhappy with my suggestion of protecting DMAT people and other staffs so that no other secondary transmission would occur.

Then after several hours of talking to people and finding problems, I found a lot of issues there. For example, informed consent of getting a PCR from the people in the ship where as(? inaudible05) on a paper, and that paper was going back and forth, back and forth with the room of the infection from the paper, by touching there[sic](it). So I suggested that maybe it's better to abandon the paper-type informed consent but rather getting the informed consent verbally would be more protective, and so on and so on.

I think I was reas onable. I never yell at anybody, I never criticize anybody person ally, but I was trying to be constructive that we try to seek the constructive but immediate improvement to protect everybody inside the ship.

※このあたりから、独自に聞き取っておいてから字幕と照らし合わせるという方法に切り替えたので、ことばとことばの間のandなどを書かない頻度が増えます。

Then about five o'clock, the person from the quarantine office came in and approaced. (He) said, "Well you have to be out because you'll not be allowed inside the ship." Because I was inside the ship as a temporary officer of the quarantine. Apparently my bank(? inaudible06) was removed by somebody, and nobody said who, and then I was out.

The officer who offered me the job of infection control said he was sorry. Then I asked him, "So what do you wanna do? Do you want to infect everybody in the ship? It will be thousands of people who could potentially get COVID-1 9.

I don't criticize DMAT people. They were infection control specialists. Society of Infection Prevention entered, a lot of specialists came in, but they spent only a few days and they left. And they said they were fearful of getting infections themwelves.

I share the same fear. Because I'm in the same room now, and I separated from my family, I'm very scared of getting infection myself and I'm very scared of infecting my family too.

I'll be out of my medical services at Kobe University Hospital for maybe next two weeks to avoid further infections to occur. That is very likely to occur if you keep zero infection control inside the ship, the Diamond Princess, like this.

You might know that there is no CDC*3 in Japan, but I thought there must be some specialists called on and was[sic](were) in charge of infection control in ship. It's not expecting[sic](expected) (that) nobody was a professional infection control specialist, and (that) only the bureaucrats were doing the jobs, completely layman's work, violatiing all the infection control principles and risking people inside (of*4) further infections, so I'm not very surprised to see many new positive PCR to be broadcasted every day.

Hundreds of people got infected and a lot of people from outside Japan decided to take the people away from the ship and bring them to their home countries by airplane and offered them another 14 days of quarantine. I hope this will be an opportunity to raise a question (about) what is happening inside the ship.

I wish all the international bodies to request Japan to change. I wish everybody to call for the protection of people inside the Diamond Princess. Otherwise there'll be far more infections for passengers, for crews, for DMAT members, for psychiatrists, for officer(s) of the Minis try of Health and Labor. DMAT members consist of nurses and doctors and that they will go back to the hospital they work routinely and they might infect their patients further to spread the disease. I can't bear with it. I can't bear with it.

I think we have to change. We have to do something about these crews and we have to help people inside the ship, their safety and their life.

Again, I am Professor Kentaro Iwata, infectious disease specialist. Thank you for listening.

【注】

＊1: enterは他動詞なので本来はintoは不要。クソリプのような語注だが、英語教材屋なのでそこはすまん。今回は、原文尊重（編集を加えないこと）の観点からそのままintoをつけておくことにした。

＊2: 時制の一致でwasにしたほうがよいところ。これ系の文法ミスはほかにもごく少数含まれているが、原文尊重（編集を加えないこと）の観点から、そのまま文字起こしして、より望ましいと思われる語形をカッコで書き添えるようにした。本来、何も書かずにサクッと直すようなところだが、今回は編集者の処理が見えるようにすることが重要と考えた。

＊3: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 米国の政府機関。

＊4: risk ～ of ... という構文はたぶんないと思うが、書かれた言葉としてはここに何かないと文意が成立しないと思うので、便宜上ofを補っておく。

※追記（2月19日午後9時半過ぎ）

BBCが岩田教授にインタビューして、日本語記事を英語に先行して出しているので見るとよいと思う。このYouTube 動画で説明されていなかった具体的なことも記者との質疑応答で説明されている。映像 3分 17秒。

感染症の専門家、客船内の感染対策を批判 BBCが取材: https://www.bbc.com/japanese/video-51556982

Permalink | 記事への反応(2) | 15:37

2020-01-27

■

「存在しないブコメにスターを付ける」で思い出したんだけど、昔なにかのネットバトルのまとめ見てる時に、存在しないツイートのパーマリンクを引用して「都合の悪いツイートだったから削除したんだろ」と批判するという手法があって怖かったなあ

例えば↓のリンクは、既存のパーマリンクから俺がてきとうに下5桁の数字を書き換えたリンクなので当然「このページは存在しません。」って出てくるんだけど、

https://twitter.com/hatebu/status/1221404777151599999

こう↓捏造すると「公式が誤爆して削除したのかな？」ってなっちゃう、っていう…

はてなブックマーク::Hotentry
@hatebu
おちんちんびろーん
午後10:00 · 2020年 1月26日·Microsoft Power Platform
https://twitter.com/hatebu/status/1221404777151599999

ある意味天才の発想だよな、捏造なんだけど

Permalink | 記事への反応(1) | 10:14

2019-12-25

■アルジェリア

まさかGaid SalahがBouteflikaよりも先に鬼籍に入るとは。

ガタガタ荒れている状況で、影のパワーと公然視されていた人間が急死したりすると、病名が公表されていても「ほんまか！タマ取られたんじゃないんか！？」という勘繰りを入れたくなる。

それはともかく、かの国で荒くれている人たちは、もはやただ暴れたいだけになっているのではないか。新大統領Tebboune元首相は、ブ元大統領ファミリーの利権に絡んでいそうな企業を公共調達先から一貫して外したおかげで首相職をかつて追われたのではなかったか。欧州系メディア（と、そのコピー記事しかかけない本邦メディア）は、「元首相という旧体制側の人間が大統領に選出されたことに合点がいかない市民が暴れている」という報道だが、その辺の事情はどうなってるんだ。

その上、Gaid Salahがおっ死んだ今となっては、PowerというかPouvoirというか、そういうのの空白地が起きそうな気がしてならない。サハラのほうはちゃんと抑えられるのか。市民が元気になるだけではなく、もっと面倒な連中も元気になりはしないか。いや、そもそももっと面倒な連中はPouvoirが陰で飼っていたんだっけ、なんて話もどうなってしまうのやら。

要衝地が落ち着かない方向に向かうのは大層好ましくない。ヨーロッパに飛び火したりすると大変不都合。地の果ての出来事ではあるが、バタフライエフェクトは怖い。

Permalink | 記事への反応(0) | 11:39

「power」を含む日記

■netflixのproject powerってテラフォーマーズ意識してるんかな

■はてブから効率化やライフハックって消えたね

■著名人がSNSでの誹謗中傷に対して法的措置を取る、と宣言する違和感

■パワーワードってなんだよ？？？（怒

■どのゲームをすればよいのか

■俺が本物の「増田のプレイリスト」を教えてやる。

■BBC1の音楽プログラム

■アニソンをもっと開拓したい

■2020年 世界報道自由度ランキング：日本

伝統と事業利益

Tradition and business interests

■「楽園はこちら側」の「事実に誠意を」をほぼdeepLで翻訳してみた その２

■Terms of use: Follower Check +

■文章として読めるように作業してる→した（作業完了）

■2020年世界報道自由度ランキング：日本

■「楽園はこちら側」の「事実に誠意を」をほぼdeepLで翻訳してみた　その２