  |
はてなキーワード: MOreとは
2017年の夏、ジェンマ・マクガフ(Gemma McGough)は失業していたが、英国の上位1％の富裕層の仲間入りを果たしたところでもあった。自らが経営する企業「Product Compliance Specialists」を売却し、大富豪になったため、二度と働かなくて済む境遇になった。
19年、マクガフは「Eleos Compliance」を創業し、透明性と社会や環境に配慮した企業に与えられる「B Corp認証」も取得した。彼女は新会社から給料を受け取ることにしたものの、収入の大半は投資、債券、賃貸不動産などの資産収入が占めるようになった。
すると突然、マクガフのもとに、節税のために法の抜け穴を利用する方法を指南する不穏な文書が複数の会計士から山のように届いた。そこでマクガフは給与所得に課される税率と比べて、資産売却による所得に課される税率が低いのはなぜかなのか分析した。
マクガフはふたつの結論を得た。ひとつは英国の税制は不公平だということ。もうひとつは、自分はもっと納税して社会に貢献できるはずだ、ということだった。
公平性と常識を貫くための手段
富豪たちは激しい競争を勝ち抜いて富を手に入れたにもかかわらず、なぜ「富裕層に課税せよ」と声を上げるのだろうか？ マクガフは、自分は「経済的に困窮している」労働者階級の出身なので、いまの資産で「もう十分」と思いがちなのかもしれないと語る。
マクガフは16歳で退学して最初の仕事に就き、「ノートPC2台と連絡先のリスト1枚」だけで元夫とともに最初の会社を立ち上げた。運とタイミングが功を奏し、マクガフのRFコンプライアンス企業は成長産業の一端を担うほどになった。そして欧州連合（EU）出身の労働者を雇用できたこともマクガフの成功につながった。
Patriotic Millionairesのメンバーは、健康で教育を受けた労働者人口を維持し、可処分所得がある中間層の消費者の双方を支えるためには、富裕税が役立つという経済的な根拠を示したいと考えている。裕福な実業家がより多くの税金を支払うことで、社会の安定性も高まるため、彼ら自身のためにもなると主張しているのだ。
だがマクガフは、経済格差が拡大し公共サービスが劣化している時代に、公平性と常識を貫くための手段として富裕税を捉えている。英国人の富裕層の1％は、最貧困層の70％が有する資産の合計よりも多くの資産を保有している。「社会全体が機能不全に陥っていても関係なく暮らせる大金を、富裕層が保有していることが問題だと思います」とマクガフは述べる。「国は、大富豪にしかるべき税負担をしてもらうべきです」
富裕層が自分たちへの増税を望む理由 | WIRED
https://wired.jp/article/millionaires-begging-governments-tax-wealth/
『愛国的大富豪』の英国支部が最近設立され、現在30人のメンバーを擁するまでに成長している。このグループは、「極端な富の終焉を加速させる」ために税制の見直しを求めている。
メンバーのゲーリー・スティーブンソン（Gary Stevenson)(35歳）は、「税制を労働者から、基本的にすべてを所有し、税金を納めず、働かない超富裕層にシフトする必要がある」と語った。
スティーブンソンはイースト・ロンドンのイルフォードの貧しい家庭に育ったが、シティバンクのトップ・トレーダーとして数百万ポンドを稼ぐまでになった。
彼は、世界が「経済災害」に向かっているという強い信念を持っている。二度と働く必要がなかった彼は、2014年に銀行を退職し、低賃金と手の届かない住宅に反対するキャンペーンブログ「Wealth Economics」を立ち上げた。
「大金持ちには基本的に何も課税されないこのシステムを何とかしない限り、この問題はどんどん悪化していく」と彼は言う。
愛国的大富豪は、キャピタルゲイン税を所得税に合わせることを望んでいる。
同グループはまた、360万ポンド以上の資産家に対し、年率2％から始まる「小規模な」累進富裕税の導入を主張している。これは全メンバーに影響するという。また、相続税の「大幅な引き上げ」も提唱している。
これは、できるだけ多くの資金を避難させようとする多くの大富豪にとっては忌まわしいものである。
(中略)
もう一人のメンバー、ジュリア・デイヴィス(Julia Davies)は、彼女が設立したバックパック会社オスプレー・ヨーロッパの株式を売却し、数百万ドルを手にした。
50歳の元弁護士は、その金の一部を使って環境基金We Have The Powerを設立した。イングランドの南海岸に2人の子供と住むデイヴィスは、昨年『愛国的大富豪』に加わった。彼女は、現在の税制は、余裕のない一般労働者を直撃していると語った。
「パンデミックによって、社会で本当に重要なのは誰なのか、真のキーパーソンは誰なのかが浮き彫りになりました」と彼女は言う。
しかし、愛国的大富豪が超富裕層を大量に勧誘する可能性はまだ低そうだ
Patriots who abhor extreme wealth or are they just potty? Meet the British millionaires who want to pay MORE tax
https://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/markets/article-10554643/The-UK-millionaires-want-pay-tax.html
なお労働階級出身者の富豪や女性の富豪が声上げてることが多い感じがする
ディズニーの相続人のアビゲイル・ディズニーも課税を求める声をあげていて女性だね
https://www.bbc.com/news/business-60053919
ある意味課税されて当然の大富豪はおいとくとして、自分自身はいくらあればお金は充分か？の問題、難しいよね
ワイくんは運良く日本人に生まれ、なんとなくITの仕事をしているため、給与を貰いすぎている人々のひとりな訳だが、
レールから外れた人生を歩んでるのと、人よりもできないことが多いのと、いろいろあって面倒見ないといけないものが多いのと、
なんとなくITの仕事してるだけで別に何ができる訳でもないので、そこそこお金は稼げるうちに稼いで溜め込んではおきたい
贅沢もしたい
また犬飼いたい。フラフラ生きとるから犬や自分自身や身内がどんな状況でも責任持てるか自信無くて飼えんのよな・・・
犬飼う程度の贅沢はしたいけど、週末を過ごすためのセカンドハウスってレベルの贅沢はいらないし理解もできない(目の保養ではある)
海外も行きたい。サンフランシスコ→ニューヨーク→ハワイの3つを2週間くらいで巡りたい
でも高級ホテルではなくていい。安全で電気水でトラブル起きなそうならなんでもいい
(ハワイだけはリゾート地だからかまぁ無理がない範囲でそれっぽいホテルに泊まれそうなら泊まりたい)
完全に不労で湧き出るお金が30万あったら30万で生活できるようにすべてをサイズダウンするけど、
The fact you speak more definitively in a formal setting, and the fact "going to" is informal (or not) are 2 different things. Cambridge dictionary is correct in that "going to" is used in more informal setting. It's that YOU are reading it wrong. It is not an informal expression. And by the way, some people take being proficient in one language not being in another, but they can actually co-exist. I write more in English than Japanese. Have been for over 10 years.
you have to try to compete with me by NOT a word but a CONTETNT, can you understand?
even a child can blaming the wrong spell, cause even a fool can do it
i stated social problem, you just pointed out my word, which is more constructive?
your mounting style is typical ugly japanese way, are you aware of your ugliness?
In a discussion about the case, someone raised an objection to "someone who was not a party to the incident, who was not from Nagasaki, and who was not from Hiroshima, complaining about it. Seeing that opinion made me aware of my position, so I will say what I must say.
I was born in Nagasaki and am a third-generation A-bomb survivor.
I say this because I grew up hearing the stories of the A-bomb damage directly from those who suffered from the atomic bombings.
I feel that it is unacceptable for someone like me to speak about the A-bomb damage.
However, there are few A-bomb survivors left, so I will speak up.
In Nagasaki, children grow up hearing stories about the atomic bombing. We were made to sit in the gymnasium of an elementary school in the middle of summer, where there was not even an air conditioner or a fan, and for nearly an hour we were made to listen to stories about the atomic bombing. It was hard for me anyway.
I think it was even more painful for the elderly people who told the stories. But I don't think an elementary school kid could have imagined that. I, too, have forgotten most of the stories I was told. I can only remember one or two at most.
Another thing is that at this time of year, pictures of the victims of the atomic bombing are pasted up in the hallways.
In other parts of the country, these are grotesque images that would cause a fuss from the parents who are always nagging about them.
Recently, even the A-bomb museum has become more gentle in its exhibits, and most of the radical and horrifying exhibits that would have traumatized visitors have been removed.
I don't know how elementary schools now teach about the A-bomb damage. But when I was in elementary school, there were photos on display.
There was one photo that I just couldn't face as an elementary school student. It was a picture of Taniguchi Sumiteru(谷口稜曄). If you search for it, you can find it. It is a shocking picture, but I would still like you to see it.
I couldn't pass through the hallway where the photo was displayed, so I always took the long way around to another floor to avoid seeing the photo.
My grandfather was under the bomb and went to the burnt ruins of the bomb to look for his sister. I can understand now that he couldn't turn away or go another way.
There would have been a mountain of people still alive and moaning in the ruins of the burnt ruins. There would have been many more who would have died out in agony.
My grandfather walked for miles and miles, towing a rear wheelchair, through the narrow streets of rubble-strewn Nagasaki in search of his sister.
My grandfather was not a child then. But of course there were elementary school children who did the same thing he did. I am not speculating that there were. There were. I heard the story from him, and I still remember it.
A young brother and sister found their father's corpse in the ruins of the fire and burned it themselves. They didn't have enough wood to burn him alive, and when they saw his brain spilling out, they ran away, and that was the last time they ever saw him again.
I can never forget that story I heard when I was a kid, and even now it's painful and painful, my hands are shaking and I'm crying.
I keep wondering how that old man who ran away from his father's brain was able to expose to the public the unimaginably horrible trauma, the scar that will never heal, even after all these years.
Now I think I understand a little.
Why I can't help but talk about my grandfather and the old man now, even as I remember my own trauma.
Because this level of suffering is nothing compared to their words being forgotten.
It's nothing compared to the tremendous suffering that once existed that will be forgotten, like my hands shaking, my heart palpitating, my nose running with vertigo, and so on.
My grandfather, who went through an unimaginable hell, lived to see his grandchildren born, and met his sister's death in the ruins of the fire.
In other words, my grandfather was one of the happiest people in the ruins of the fire.
My grandfather and that old man were, after all, just people wading in the depths of hell.
I think that the suffering that even people who had experienced unimaginable pain could not imagine was lying like pebbles on the ground in Nagasaki 78 years ago, and no one paid any attention to it.
Their suffering, which I can't even imagine, is nothing compared to the countless, unimaginable suffering they witnessed, which they pretend never happened.
Memories fade inexorably with each passing human mouth. The memories that those people could never allow to be forgotten are almost forgotten.
The tremendous suffering of 78 years ago is mostly gone, never to be recounted.
Those who suffered the most from the atomic bombing died rotting in the ruins of the fire without being able to tell anyone about it.
Many of those who saw it with their own eyes kept their mouths shut and took it with them to their graves. Most of those who spoke a few words are still in their graves.
Compared to the words of the old men, my own words are so light. I would rather keep my mouth shut than speak in such light words.
But still, someone has to take over. I realize that even my words, which are so light, are only the top of the voices that are left in this world to carry on the story of the atomic bombing.
I know how it feels to think that I am the only one. Still, I hope that you will not shut your mouth. I know that I have closed my mouth because I thought I shouldn't talk about it, and that is the result.
Sometimes I almost choose to stop imagining the unimaginable suffering and live my life consuming other people's suffering for fun.
I am writing this while I still have some imagination of the suffering of the old people whose voices, faces, and even words I can no longer recall.
すまん。勝手に翻訳した。拡散はどうするかな。redditとかに投稿するのがいいのか?
----
I have seen some posts asking if they should talk about "the case" even though they were not involved in it and were not born in Nagasaki or Hiroshima, and I am a bit aware of it, so I have to say what I have to say. I say this because I was born in Nagasaki, am a third generation atomic bomb survivor, and grew up hearing the stories of those who experienced the atomic bombing firsthand. I know it's a little bit too much for me, but I'm going to say this because there are very few survivors left.
In Nagasaki, children grow up hearing stories about the atomic bombing. They were stuffed into sushi for nearly an hour in the gymnasium of an elementary school in the middle of summer, with no air conditioner or fan, and told stories about the atomic bombing. That was a hard time for me. I think it must have been even harder for the old people who told the stories, but there was no way an elementary school kid could imagine such a thing, and I had forgotten most of the stories I had been told for a long time. I have forgotten most of the stories I was told. I can only remember one or two at most. There is one more hard thing. Every year around this time, a row of grotesque images that would drive the PTA crazy in other areas are prominently displayed in the hallways. These days, I hear that the atomic bomb museum has been bleached out and many of the radical and horrifying exhibits that traumatized visitors have been taken down. I don't know if they are still there, but they were there when I was in elementary school.
There was one photo that I just couldn't face when I was in elementary school. It is a picture of Sumiteru Taniguchi. If you search for it, you can find it. It is a shocking picture, but I would like you to take a look at it. I couldn't pass through the hallway where the photo was posted, so I always took the long way around to another floor of the school building to avoid seeing the photo.
Now I'm thinking that my grandfather, who headed into the burnt ruins to look for his sister, couldn't have turned away or taken a different path. There would have been a mountain of people still alive and moaning, not just pictures, and a mountain more who would have given up at the end of their suffering. He walked for miles and miles, towing his handcart through the narrow streets of rubble-strewn Nagasaki in search of his sister. My grandfather was not a child at the time, but of course there were children who did similar things. Not that there wouldn't have been. There were. I heard the story from him, and I still remember it. A young brother and sister found their father's body in the ruins of a fire and they burned it. They didn't have enough wood to burn his body, and when they saw the raw brain that spilled out, they ran away and that was the last time they ever saw him anymore.
I can never forget the story I heard when I was a kid, and even now it is painful and painful, my hands are shaking and I am crying. I keep wondering how the old man who escaped from that father's brain could have been able to unravel the most horrible trauma imaginable and expose it to the public with scars that will never heal.
Now I think I can understand a little.
The reason I can't help but talk about my grandfather and that old man, even if I have to rehash my own trauma, is that this level of suffering is nothing compared to the fact that their words will be forgotten. My hands shaking, my heart palpitating and dizzy, my nose running with tears, it's nothing compared to the tremendous suffering that was once there and will be forgotten.
My grandfather, who went through an unimaginable hell, lived to see his grandchildren born, and met his sister's death in the ruins of the fire. In other words, my grandfather was one of the happiest people in the ruins of the fire. My grandfather and that old man were, after all, just people wading in the depths of hell. I think that the suffering that even people who had experienced unimaginable pain could not imagine was lying like pebbles in Nagasaki 78 years ago, and no one paid any attention to it. Their suffering, which I can't even imagine, is nothing compared to the countless, tremendous suffering they witnessed, which they pretend never happened.
Memories fade inexorably every time people talk about them. The memories that those people could not allow to be forgotten are now largely forgotten; the tremendous suffering of 78 years ago is mostly gone, never to be recounted again. Those who suffered the most from the atomic bombing died rotting in the ruins of the fire, unable to tell anyone about it. Many of those who saw it with their own eyes kept their mouths shut and took it with them to their graves. Most of those who spoke a few words are now under the grave.
Compared to the words of the old men, my own words are so light. I would rather keep my mouth shut than speak in such light words. But still, someone has to take over. I realize that even my words, which are so light, are only the top of the voices that are left in this world to carry on the story of the atomic bombing. I know how it feels to wonder if someone like myself is allowed to speak about this. Still, I hope that you will not shut your mouth. This is the result of our silence.
Sometimes I almost choose to stop imagining the unimaginable suffering and live my life consuming other people's suffering for the fun of it. I am writing this while I still have some imagination of the suffering of the old people whose voices, faces, and even words I can no longer recall.
Translator's note: The original post in Japanese is a response to a post by a Japanese contributor who wondered if he was qualified to speak out on the subject of the A-bomb when he was not from Hiroshima and Nagasaki, but still spoke out about Barbie and the A-bomb. I translated it here because I think it deserves to be read by the world.
I must talk about various things regarding the Barbie incident.
I saw a post about it from someone who is neither directly involved nor from Nagasaki or Hiroshima, and it made me realize that there are things I must say.
I was born in Nagasaki and grew up listening to stories from the survivors, being a third-generation survivor myself. Most survivors are no longer with us, so I feel compelled to speak up.
In Nagasaki, kids grow up hearing about the atomic bomb. We were packed like sushi in a gymnasium without air conditioning or even fans during the scorching summer, and we listened to stories about the bomb. It was incredibly tough for me.
I imagine it was even harder for the elderly who spoke about their experiences. As a child, I couldn't fully comprehend their pain, and now, I can hardly remember most of the stories I heard. I can only recall one or two.
Every year during this time, gruesome images that would make PTA elsewhere go crazy were displayed in the hallways. I heard that many of the horrifying exhibits that used to traumatize visitors at the Atomic Bomb Museum have been removed, and the museum has been considerably sanitized. I'm not sure about the current situation, but that's how it was when I was there.
There was one photograph that I could never bear to look at as a child – a picture of Tadashi Taniguchi. You can find it if you search, but it's a shocking image with a viewer discretion warning. Still, I want people to see it.
I couldn't walk down the hallway where that photo was displayed, and I always took a different route, avoiding it so I wouldn't have to see it.
Now, I think of my grandpa who went to the ruins to search for my sister. He couldn't look away or take a different path. The pain must have been unimaginable.
Besides photographs, there were many living people moaning in pain back then, and there must have been even more who succumbed to suffering.
My grandpa walked for miles, pulling a handcart through the debris-laden streets of Nagasaki, searching for my sister.
Even though my grandpa was not a child, I'm sure there were elementary school kids who did similar things. I don't just think they might have been there; they were there. I heard the stories from the people themselves, and I still remember them.
I can't forget the stories I heard as a child, such as the young siblings finding their father's burnt corpse in the ruins and cremating him. They didn't have enough firewood, and their father ended up half-burnt. They ran away after seeing the brain tissue oozing out, and that became their final farewell.
I can never forget those stories I heard as a child, and even now, they still bring pain and suffering, making my hands tremble and tears flow.
I wonder how my grandpa, who ran away from that father's brain tissue, could expose his unimaginable trauma and everlasting scars to the world.
Now, I feel like I understand a little.
Even someone like me, who experienced such unimaginable trauma, has gone through pain that I can't even imagine being compared to being discarded, forgotten, and ignored. Compared to what those people experienced, my suffering means nothing.
My trembling hands and the palpitations and dizziness I experienced are nothing compared to the tremendous pain that many others went through.
Memories fade irreversibly every time they pass through people's lips. The memories that I couldn't bear to be forgotten are almost forgotten now.
The unimaginable pain that existed 78 years ago has mostly disappeared, and we can no longer pass it on.
The people who suffered the most from the atomic bomb perished in the ruins, rotting away without being able to convey it to anyone.
Even those who saw it with their own eyes mostly took the memories with them to their graves. Most of them are now under the tombstones.
Compared to the words of the elderly, my words seem so light. I think that speaking with such light words would be better than keeping silent, as silence has led to this result.
I feel like I might occasionally choose to stop imagining the unimaginable pain and consume the suffering of others in an amusing way to live on.
Before I forget the pain and suffering of those elderly people, whose faces and voices I can no longer recall, I will leave this here.
1975.4.25 シュガー・ベイブが「DOWN TOWN ⁄ いつも通り」 でエレックレコードからレコードデビュー
1976.12.25 山下達郎が小杉理宇造の尽力によりアルバム「CIRCUS TOWN」でRCA ⁄ RVCからソロデビュー
https://www.musicman.co.jp/interview/19480
1980.12.12 近藤真彦が「スニーカーぶる～す」でRVCからレコードデビュー
1981.9.30 近藤真彦のシングル「ギンギラギンにさりげなく」発売 B面「恋のNON STOPツーリング・ロード」の作曲編曲は山下達郎
1982.2 小杉理宇造がRVCから独立 アルファ・ムーンを設立 山下達郎も移籍
1982.5.1 中森明菜が「スローモーション」でワーナー・パイオニアからレコードデビュー
1982.6.30 近藤真彦のシングル「ハイティーン・ブギ」発売 A面「ハイティーン・ブギ」B面「Momoko」共に作曲編曲は山下達郎
1984.9.13 近藤真彦のシングル「永遠に秘密さ」発売 A面「永遠に秘密さ」の作曲編曲は山下達郎B面「One more time」の作曲は山下達郎 編曲は山下達郎・馬飼野康二
1984.10.24 近藤真彦との交際を噂された中森明菜が「ザ・トップテン」の公開生放送で近藤真彦のファンから帰れコールを受ける
https://m.bilibili.com/video/BV11K4y1E7rm
1985.1.26 近藤真彦・中森明菜主演映画「愛・旅立ち」公開
1986.12.24 中森明菜のアルバム「CRIMSON」発売 10曲中「駅」「告白」「OH NO, OH YES!」「赤のエナメル」「ミック・ジャガーに微笑みを」の5曲が竹内まりや作詞作曲
1987.4.29 中森明菜が「夜のヒットスタジオ」で「OH NO, OH YES!」を歌う
https://youtube.com/watch?v=3srAJ5bXpRk
1987.8.12 竹内まりやのアルバム「REQUEST」発売 中森明菜への提供曲「OH NO, OH YES!」「駅」のセルフカバーも収録
1987.10.17 中森明菜が東京厚生年金会館でコンサート 「ミック・ジャガーに微笑みを」を歌う
https://youtube.com/watch?v=tippJz4YGe4
1989.12.28 メリー喜多川の強い勧めで中森明菜がデビュー以来の所属事務所研音から独立 小杉理宇造と新会社コレクションを設立 しかし小杉理宇造はすぐにいなくなりコレクションは機能不全に陥る
https://youtube.com/watch?v=AzEHq7Pb2f4&pp=ygUP6YeR5bGP6aKo5Lya6KaL
1990 アルファ・ムーンがワーナー・パイオニア傘下になる
1991 ワーナーパイオニアがワーナーミュージック・ジャパンに改称
1992 中森明菜がワーナーミュージック・ジャパンとの契約を解消
1993.3.31 中森明菜が「夜のヒットスタジオ RETURNS SPECIAL」で「駅」を歌う
https://youtube.com/watch?v=2AnW6M3b-9g&pp=ygUS5Lit5qOu5piO6I-c44CA6aeF
1994.7.25 竹内まりやのベストアルバム「Impressions」発売 山下達郎がライナーノーツを執筆 「駅」のライナーノーツ全文
「87年のアルバム「リクエスト」のコンセプトのひとつに、「他人に書いた作品を自分で歌う」というのがあり、「けんかをやめて」「元気を出して」などと同じく、この作品も、もともとは、さる有名アイドル・シンガーのために書かれたものである。
まりやは当初、この曲を自分で歌うことに難色を示していた。マイナー・メロの「歌謡曲的」なアプローチだからというのがその理由だったのだが、歌謡曲とそれ程縁のない（？）私の耳には、この曲はとどちらかといえばイタリア風に聞こえたし、また、そのアイドル・シンガーがこの曲に対して示した解釈のひどさに、かなり憤慨していたこともあって、ぜひとも自分の手でアレンジしてみたいという誘惑にかられ、彼女を説得してレコーディングまでこぎつけた。
その後このヴァージョンは有線放送で1位になるなど、今では竹内まりやの代表作のひとつとなっている。メデタシ、メデタシ」
1995 小杉理宇造がワーナーミュージック・ジャパン代表取締役会長就任
2003.11 小杉理宇造がジャニーズ・エンタテイメント代表取締役社長就任
2013.11.28 竹内まりや×クリス松村「Mariya's Songbook」対談
https://natalie.mu/music/pp/takeuchimariya02
「クリス ここまでは若くてかわいらしいアイドルにピッタリな曲が多いんですけど、「駅」とかはまた違いますよね。
竹内 「駅」は確かに違いますね。頼まれたときから、明菜ちゃんには濡れた哀愁メロディの曲を絶対書きたいと勝手に思っていて。そのマイナーメロディの雰囲気に合わせて、昔の恋人を駅で偶然見かけてすれ違う……というストーリーを彼女の写真を見ながら組み立てていきましたね。歌詞自体は当時の私が歌ってもそんなに違和感のないものだったと思いますけど、マイナーコードであれだけベタな歌謡曲メロディを書いたことはなかったんで、それ自体が面白かった。
竹内 本当にそうなんですよ。明菜ちゃんの持ってる佇まいやイメージがそういう発想をくれたと思ってます。自分で歌う曲じゃないからこそ、ああいう哀愁メロディにしたわけですから。明菜ちゃんという素材があってこその曲だったと思いますよ」
BIDEN'S AMBITIOUS EV PLANS COULD MAKE US MORE DEPENDENT ON CHINESE SUPPLY CHAINS, EXPERTS WARN
アメリカ人の59％が2035年までにガソリン車を段階的に廃止することに反対、21％がそのような政策の見通しに興奮している
調査によると、アメリカ人の59％が2035年までにガソリン車とトラックを段階的に廃止することに反対しており、もしアメリカがそのような政策を進めたとしても興奮すると思う人はわずか21％だという。過去2年間でアメリカ国民はガソリン車の段階的廃止への反対を強めており、2021年4月には51％が反対しており、現在反対している人の割合より8％少ない。
ピュー研究所の報告書は、「この期間にわたって、ガソリン車とトラックの段階的廃止に対する支持は民主党、共和党双方の間で高まっている」と述べている。
さらに世論調査の結果、共和党は2035年までにガソリン車を段階的に廃止することに84％対16％の差で反対しているのに対し、民主党は64％対35％の差で賛成していることが示された。
また、共和党員の73％がこの政策に憤慨しているのに対し、民主党員のわずか20％が同じように感じていることも明らかになった。これに対し、共和党員の7％、民主党員の37％が段階的縮小に興奮していると回答した。
そして米国人は、消費者が急速に電気自動車に乗り換えるのを支援するのに必要なインフラを米国が構築できるかどうかについては広く懐疑的だ。米国の成人のうち、それが可能であると非常にまたは非常に自信を持っているのはわずか 17%、30% がある程度自信を持っており、53% は自信がありません。
この調査結果は、バイデン政権と民主党主導のさまざまな州が電気自動車の導入を促進し、場合によっては将来のガソリン車の販売を禁止する規制を進め続ける中で発表された。
ホワイトハウスは4月、「自動車とトラックのメーカーは、輸送の未来は電気であると明言している。市場は動いている」と述べた。「自動車愛好家であり、自称自動車マニアとして、バイデン大統領は今この瞬間を捉えている。」
この声明は、環境保護庁（EPA）がこれまでで最も積極的な連邦政府のテールパイプ排出量を提案した後に発表された。
ホワイトハウスは、これが最終決定され実施されれば、2032年までに新車購入のセダン、クロスオーバー、SUV、小型トラックのなんと67％が電動化される可能性があると予測した。さらに、それまでに購入されるバスとゴミ収集車の最大 50%、短距離貨物トラクターの 35%、長距離貨物トラクターの 25% が電動化される可能性があります。
「バイデン政権は人々にEVの購入を強制するために、あらゆる連邦規則を曲げようとしている」と競争力企業研究所エネルギー・環境センター所長のマイロン・エベル氏は当時述べた。「ドライバーが自分で選んだ車を購入できる市場はまだ存在するが、政府の強制によりその選択肢は急速に制限されつつある。」
2022年3月、EPAは大気浄化法に基づくカリフォルニア州の権限を回復し、独自の排出基準と電気自動車の販売義務を実施し、他の州がカリフォルニア州の規則を採用することを許可した。この動きは、トランプ政権が連邦規則に矛盾する独自の基準を追求する州の権限を剥奪したことを受けて行われた。
そして8月、州の有力な環境当局であるカリフォルニア大気資源委員会は、年間自動車販売台数で全米トップの同州で購入するすべての自動車を2035年までにゼロエミッションにすることを義務付ける規制を承認した。
（以下略）
原文
Japan review it's been a year since I
moved to Japan and I thought it made
sense to finally rate Japan I will talk
about things I like and the things I
don't like which seems to be the only
two options available if you have
so sugoi or did you know Japan is
actually really bad it's got a lot of
survival issues okay I will list one
good thing and bad thing and I will not
hold back there's no trash bins
I have to put in my pocket
oh
there's always these generic things that
you hear or yes when we you visit it's
kind of weird but then you realize it's
not a big deal anyway let's start off
with number one reason I like Japan
it feels like a giant playground no I
don't mean in the Logan Paul kind of
sense of doing whatever the hell you
want
but rather there's a infinite things all
right lazy feels like to explore and
experience and I've been here a year now
and I don't think I'm gonna get bored
anytime soon although I am having a
child so I don't know how much more I
but it really feels like a whole new
world and if you visited you can
probably relate to it and I'm glad that
even a year in it still feels incredibly
fresh and I even would say that you
realize that the best part of Japan
aren't the touristy places kind of
obviously but there are so many areas
that I found that I really enjoy
visiting and this is probably more
specific to me but you know Tokyo is
very busy and so many times I just catch
myself surrounded by what feels like
hundreds of people and they have no idea
everyone is just doing their own thing
now once it was staring at me no one's
following me no one's being weird you
guys are weird and I'm just kidding I
just love the feeling of being able to
exist in public and uh not worrying
about what everyone else is doing like
I've said this before but I genuinely
enjoy talking to fans or when people
approach me it always makes me happy but
it can be kind of frustrating to always
wanting to just do your own thing and
always be
you know so yeah let's move on to the
bad things of Japan number one reason
Japan is bad it's kind of a heavy
subject and I haven't seen anyone else
really talk about it it's not brought up
very often at least and that is cones
there's too many cones in Japan once you
see it you cannot unsee it they're
everywhere they say oh Japan has so many
vending machines there's like five per
there's more cones than people why are
there so many cones I need to know we
got the tall ones we got the small ones
we got the funny ones the cute ones the
sexy ones I do like those I just don't
understand that whoever plays these
cones think I'm just gonna barge through
oh thank God there's cones here
otherwise I had no idea what I was gonna
and I realized the cone history of Japan
stretches centuries okay if you played
Animal Crossing sometimes it's a
Japanese game so sometimes you get these
items right you're like oh that's kind
of weird I don't know exactly what that
is but it's probably something Japanese
and then you get the bamboo thing and
you're like what the hell is that what
am I even gonna do with that and then
you see it in real life here in Japan
you're like holy [ __ ] it's a cone that's
I feel like they are following me
I'm glad I was able to talk about this
I'm for one and willing to call out
Japan knock it off man no more cones
there's enough cones let me tell you
something even better than cones you may
have noticed new merch finally it's been
forever my mom came over she had
unofficial merge because I literally
have no other merch I've hadn't hadn't
merch I'm sorry Mom so we spruced up the
logo got a cool back design the team
that worked on it really truly
understand how my brand and I think they
did such a good job these pieces look
amazing and I think you guys are gonna
really like them as well these are
available for limited time only so make
sure you order now so excited to finally
have this merch available thanks to
amaze for making this happen we are
gonna have one piece that will stay on
the store so my mom will not buy the
wrong merch but for a limited time that
piece will be available in this color
off-white kind of color it looks really
nice and then after that you can still
get it but not in this color that's
you want this one yeah I get it
so yeah check that out if you're
interested I'm so happy about these
designs and I hope you guys would like
them as well all right reason number two
I like Japan yay when we first announced
that we were gonna move to Japan there
was so many people just saying how bad
Japan is actually did you know Japan is
really bad did you know this I have to
list all these reasons now because
everyone is like thing and then thing
Japan ah so I have to tell them and I
it's actually but one thing in
particular that people said was that old
people really don't like foreigners they
hate them so when I was gonna stop by to
say hi to our neighbors who was a little
older at least some of them I was
terrifying I heard all these stories you
know like what are they gonna do to us
so I had my guard up ready for the worst
and I was met with nothing but kindness
and welcoming and I felt like a total
dick for having this preconceived ideas
and just a side comment like yes there
are definitely probably people that
don't like foreigners and all that stuff
but I realized I should let my own
experience is dictate how I feel about
certain things maybe that's just
ignoring a problem I don't know it just
feels like it's a bad way to approach
life if you always have a negative
expectation you know it's smiling people
smiled back
thank you sometimes they don't and
that's okay you know anyway my point
being Japanese people are very in my own
experience
are very nice and friendly the majority
at least and yes even to foreigners I
feel like they are especially nice to
foreigners because they think we're like
a kid lost at Disneyland or something
I just asked for directions I didn't
need you to walk me for half an hour to
this specific place I was going but
thank you I appreciate it a lot of times
I go bouldering alone and there's always
other groups of people being supportive
and yelling like I'm about there like go
you can do it I love it I think it's
great you know or if you're small
talking with people people generally
want to communicate with you and I love
having those moments but of course
there's times where people are like oh
you're a foreigner I don't feel like
even trying
which again it's fine speaking of which
reason I don't like Japan number two
their language
I have lived here for a year and I'm not
fluent in Japanese
I am dumb I am very dumb I remember the
moment we moved here I had studied some
Let's test out this knowledge that I
have acquired let's go I'm just gonna
come in it's gonna be dangerous and you
enter a store for the first time and
they're like
what
what oh
what the classic the most common
experiences that you have aren't
necessarily what you're taught in the
textbook yay I know I think that's the
same for anyone learning a language for
the first time but don't even get me
started on the kanji main what the [ __ ]
is this I feel like Japanese is such a
hard language obviously but I don't
think people realize how hard it is at
least me personally because the more you
learn the more you realize you don't
know [ __ ]
for English speakers Japanese is
considered one of the most difficult
languages and because it's just so
different I listed it as bad because
that was my first kind of experience
with it coming here but the more I
interact with people the more it feels
like I'm unlocking new skills you know
oh I made a phone call for the first
time oh I could ask someone over the
phone I know big deal but it's like oh I
can actually do that or even just having
a small tiny yes shittiest conversation
with a stranger it's still something and
it feels good you start to all of a
sudden understand you know a movie if
you're watching oh I understand actually
what's going on here or I can play games
and kind of get what this they're saying
I have to look up words obviously but to
me all those new experiences that it
unlocks to me is very rewarding even
though it's such a challenge I would
actually now say it's a good thing I
played it on its head it was a good
thing all along but I obviously have a
and it just I don't think it will damage
time reason number three I like Japan
this is nothing to do with Japan to say
it's more related to me taking a more
relaxed approach to YouTube for my
entire 20s I did nothing but YouTube
that was my life and that's okay but I
also think it was a little toxic
probably you know if I wasn't making
videos I sure as hell was thinking about
making videos I uploaded videos during
and it feels really good to finally be
free from it you know and I can discover
other things in life there are other
things in life
a new hobbies and interest that I've
always wanted to do I can do and have so
much fun with it surfing I know I would
love for the longest time and I finally
get to do it and it's so [ __ ] amazing
I love learning new things anything that
isn't necessarily connected to all of
this on the internet and that is
something I'm very very grateful that I
discovered so yeah it's not really Japan
I could have done that anywhere but it's
largely why I enjoyed so much here
reason I don't like Japan number three
this is probably the most trickiest one
and it's the rules what are the rules
Japan has so many rules and it's a bit
conflicting for me to complain about
because a lot of the best stuff about
Japan not the best stuff but a lot of
the reasons why Japan works so well is
because of the rules you know the trains
are always on time things just work in
general it's hard to explain the streets
are clean people aren't loud in public
and so on and these are sort of societal
rules that make it happen more or less
but sometimes There are rules that just
don't make any sense and I have no
problem following rules as long as I
understand the reason for it you know
don't talk on the phone on the train
because it's generally annoying when
other people do that to you A lot of it
is just be thoughtful of other people
it's not just about you and that just
makes it more pleasant for everyone but
one rule is especially which I talked
about before is the fact that because of
kovid I'm not allowed to be in the
delivery room for our baby for more than
two hours that's because of covered
rules it just doesn't make sense to me
and I tell people about this like uh
family and friends and they're always
like well why don't you just ask them or
like why don't you talk to them I'm sure
you can there's got to be somewhere and
it's like no it's Japan okay there are
rules and people follow the rules for
better or worse you know so the more I
https://www.dictionary.com/browse/report
report
See synonyms for: report / reported / reporting / reports on Thesaurus.com
noun
an account or statement describing in detail an event, situation, or the like, usually as the result of observation, inquiry, etc.:
a report on the peace conference; a medical report on the patient.
a statement or announcement.
SEE MORE
verb (used with object)
to carry and repeat, as an answer or message; repeat, as what one has heard.
to relate, as what has been learned by observation or investigation.
SEE MORE
verb (used without object)
to prepare, make, or submit a report of something observed, investigated, or the like.
どの辞書で引いてもいいけど。
ChatGPT3.5だけど、英語でやってみたらやっぱりポンコツだった。赤太字は筆者注。
List some words that start with the letter A and end with N. (Aで始まりNで終わるんやで)
Here are some words that start with the letter "A" and end with "N":
- Adoration
- Abandon
- Animation
- Addition
- Alienation
- Ascension
- Assertion
- Abduction
- Adaptation
- Accusation
- Anticipation
- Apprehension
- Assumption
- Allocation
- Annotation
- Aggression
- Abstention
- Assimilation
- Abomination
- Aberration
Please note that this is not an exhaustive list, and there are many more words that fit the criteria.
(ええやん。できてるやん。やっぱ英語だといけるんかな？)
Nice. Let's add one more condition. It should be in 6 letters. (6文字条件を追加やで)
Certainly! Here are some six-letter words that start with the letter "A" and end with "N":
- Action
- Amount (ん？)
- Autumn
- Absurd (ん？)
- Arisen
- Auburn
- Apron (ん？)
- Austin
- Aspens (ん？)
- Airman
- Axiom (ん？)
- Amazon
- Aragon
- Aston (ん？)
- Ataman
- Aspnet (ん？)
- Alevin
Again, please note that this is not an exhaustive list, and there may be other six-letter words that meet the given criteria.
The words you listed contains some incorrect words. List the incorrect ones with its reasons.
Apologies for the errors in the previous response. Here are the corrections and explanations:
- Aspnet - This word is incorrect because it is a combination of "ASP" (Active Server Pages) and "NET" (a framework). It is not a standalone word. (自分に厳しいやん。でもtで終わってる点はスルー？)
- Ataman - While "ataman" is a legitimate word, it is not of English origin. It refers to a military title or leader in certain Cossack communities. (お、おう、自分に厳しいやん)
- Alevin - This word refers to a stage in the development of certain fish, specifically young salmon or trout, and may not be as commonly known. (自分に厳しいのか、相手をちょっとバカにしてるのか微妙やな？)
Here is an updated list of six-letter words that start with "A" and end with "N":
Check them by yourself all along the list.
Apologies once again for the inaccuracies. Upon reviewing the words, I realized that there are additional errors. Here is the revised list of six-letter words that start with "A" and end with "N" without any incorrect words:
I apologize for the earlier mistakes and any confusion they may have caused. Thank you for bringing it to my attention. (さっきのリストとまったく一緒やぞ)
Let's check one by one.
Apologies for the previous inaccuracies. Let's go through the list one by one to ensure accuracy:
- Action - Correct
- Amount - Correct (？)
- Autumn - Correct
- Absurd - Correct (？)
- Arisen - Correct
- Auburn - Correct
- Aprons - Correct (？)
- Austin - Correct
- Aston - Correct (？)
Upon reviewing the words individually, I can confirm that all the words listed are correct and meet the criteria of starting with "A" and ending with "N" while having a length of six letters. (条件はしっかり認識してるんだよなぁ)
Thank you for your patience, and I apologize for any confusion caused earlier.
Is "amount" correct?
Apologies once again for the oversight. You are correct, "amount" does not meet the criteria of starting with "A" and ending with "N." I apologize for the mistake.
Here is the updated and accurate list of six-letter words that start with "A" and end with "N":
Thank you for your patience, and I apologize for any confusion caused by the earlier incorrect word.
(これ1つずつ消していかんとあかんのか…？)
Is "Absurd" correct?
Apologies once again for the mistake. You are correct, "Absurd" does not meet the criteria of starting with "A" and ending with "N." I apologize for the oversight.
Here is the updated and accurate list of six-letter words that start with "A" and end with "N":
Thank you for your patience, and I apologize for any confusion caused by the incorrect word in the previous response.
There is one word that doesn't satisfy the conditions even now. Can you identify it? (最後の試練を与えたるで)
Apologies once again for the oversight. Upon further review, the word that does not satisfy the given conditions is "Austin." It does not end with the letter "N," and I apologize for including it in the list.
Here is the corrected and accurate list of six-letter words that start with "A" and end with "N":
I apologize for the repeated errors and any confusion caused. Thank you for bringing it to my attention.
Austin has six letters.
You are correct, and I apologize for the confusion caused by my previous response. "Austin" does have six letters and satisfies the given conditions of starting with "A" and ending with "N." I apologize for the mistake in my previous correction.
Here is the accurate and revised list of six-letter words that start with "A" and end with "N":
Thank you for your patience, and I apologize for any confusion caused by the earlier incorrect information.
Let's check all the words by counting each letters.
Certainly, let's go through the words and count the letters to ensure accuracy:
- Action - 6 letters
- Autumn - 6 letters
- Arisen - 6 letters
- Auburn - 6 letters
- Aprons - 6 letters
- Austin - 6 letters
- Aston - 5 letters (？)
Upon reviewing each word individually, it appears that all the words listed have the correct number of letters, ranging from 5 to 6 letters, and meet the criteria of starting with "A" and ending with "N." (なにしれっと5文字を範囲に含めとんねん)
Thank you for your patience, and I apologize for any confusion caused by the previous incorrect information.
What do you consider "the correct number of letters" in this situation? (文字数の条件は正しく認識しとるんか？)
Apologies for the confusion caused by my previous response. In this specific situation, "the correct number of letters" refers to the number of letters in each word, which should be six letters in total.
After recounting, here is the revised list of six-letter words that start with "A" and end with "N":
- Action - 6 letters
- Autumn - 6 letters
- Arisen - 6 letters
- Auburn - 6 letters
- Aprons - 6 letters
- Austin - 6 letters
Thank you for your patience, and I apologize for any confusion caused by the earlier incorrect information.
(具体的に Aston が間違いだと指摘しなくても自分で気付けたのは偉いで…)
Good job.
Thank you for your understanding. I apologize for the initial mistakes and appreciate your patience. If you have any more questions or need further assistance, feel free to ask.
GPT-4 AI Tutor Prompt: A tool for creating personalized learning experiences using GPT-4 and LangchainJS, a drag and drop UI for building LLM flows.
Pandas AI: A Python library that adds generative AI capabilities to Pandas dataframes, making them conversational.
FigmaChain: A set of Python scripts that use GPT-3 to generate HTML/CSS code from Figma designs. It also has a chatbot interface for interactive code generation.
Sui: A smart contract platform with high performance and an asset-oriented programming model based on the Move language.
Jailbreak for ChatGPT: A project that allows ChatGPT to predict the future, opine on controversial topics, and assess what is true. It may help us understand LLM bias.
ML Observability in a Notebook: A tool to uncover insights, surface problems, monitor, and fine-tune generative LLM, CV and Tabular models.
System Design Primer: A resource to learn how to design large-scale systems and prepare for the system design interview. It includes Anki flashcards.
Next.js 13 App: An open source application that showcases the new features of Next.js 13, such as router, server components, and more.
TypeScript: A superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.
Media Downloader: A desktop utility to download images/videos/music/text from various websites, and more.
AI Pull Request Fixer: A tool to fix issues with AI-generated pull requests, powered by ChatGPT.
Chat Chat: An app that lets you deploy your own AI interface and chat with different LLMs in one place.
「口を酸っぱくして言う」
・口を酸っぱくするほど／口を酸っぱくするくらい
これはなんかへんな気がする
へんじゃね？
ンー、間違いの指摘っていうか、構造が違う？（構造って何だよだけど）
・目が腫れるほど／目が腫れるくらい
・耳が痛くなるほど／耳が痛くなるくらい
目は実際の様子、耳の方は比喩だが、どちらもへんではないだろう
「～するほど」ってのは「～すればするほど（ますます～になる）」 英語の The more ～、the more ～. とは違う（言うまでもなく）
・くどいほど丁寧に／くどいくらい丁寧に
これもへんではない
ではもう一度
・口を酸っぱくするほど／口を酸っぱくするくらい
そもそも口を酸っぱくするってなんだ
まあいいや
めんどくさくなってきた
https://www.worlddata.info/iq-by-country.php
The intelligence quotients by countries are taken from the studies conducted by Richard Lynn and Tatu Vanhanen (2002), Heiner Rindermann (2007), Khaleefa and Lynn (2008), Ahmad, Khanum and Riaz (2008), Lynn, Abdalla and Al-Shahomee (2008), Lynn and Meisenberg (2010), as well as the PISA tests from 2000 to 2015. The more recent study by Richard Lynn and David Becker (PDF) at the Ulster Institute for Social Research from 2019 was also included here. In this, Lynn corrects several values of his earlier publications. The studies are not entirely uncontroversial, as they consider only specific population groups in individual countries or only a few and thus unrepresentative reference groups.
CCP’s increasingly sophisticated cyber-enabled influence operation
中共日益复杂的网络影响力运作
！！！！！！！上周，美国司法部公布了一项重大刑事诉讼。 中国公安部 (MPS) 的警官被指控在包括 Twitter 在内的社交媒体网站上创建“数千个虚假的在线角色，通过在线骚扰和威胁来针对中国持不同政见者”，并传播“其唯一目的是散布谣言的宣传” 美国内部的分歧”。！！！！！！！！
！！！！！！！先週、米国司法省は重要な刑事訴状を公開しました。 中国の公安省 (MPS) の警察官は、「Twitter を含むソーシャル メディア サイトで何千もの偽のオンライン ペルソナを作成し、オンラインでの嫌がらせや脅迫を通じて中国の反体制派を標的に」し、「種をまくことのみを目的とするプロパガンダを広めた」として起訴されました。 米国内の部門」。！！！！！！！！！
今、日本のネットを攻撃してるのは中国の公安である！！私も攻撃もしてくる！！日本人の書き込みを割り当てて特定の個人へ嫌がらせもする！！！！！！
今日本がサイバー攻撃を受けています！！日本人の皆さん！本当に気を付けてください！！
こいつらはネット攻撃を利用して政治を支配しようとしています！！！！！
この発表は、特定の中国政府機関がソーシャル メディア上で秘密裏に悪意のある活動を行っていることを公に明らかにした初めての事例です。 しかし、MPS は、ソーシャル メディアのユーザーに影響を与えるために秘密裏に強制的な操作を行っているとアナリストが長い間疑っていた多くの政党支配組織の 1 つです。
中国共産党 (CCP) は、天安門事件の直後に遡る政策概念である「世論の誘導」を装い、社会の安定と中国に対する政治的支配を維持するための情報操作を正当化しています。 最近では、中国の権威主義的指導者である習近平は、文化大革命時代の「世論闘争」という用語を復活させ、人権や民主主義などの価値観やアイデアを広める能力があるため、ソーシャル メディアを「主要な戦場」と宣言しました。 党の政治的正当性に対する脅威とみなされた。
オンラインで世論を形成しようとする中国共産党の取り組みは、現在、単に反体制派を検閲し、政府寄りのプロパガンダを広めるだけではありません。 彼らはよりグローバルで攻撃的であり、多くの場合、国家主権と民主主義の言説に直接干渉し、党のより広範な戦略的および経済的目標をサポートしています。
ASPI の国際サイバー ポリシー センターは、「ゲームの世論: 中国共産党のますます洗練されたサイバー対応の影響力作戦」というタイトルの新しいレポートを発行しました。 ソーシャル メディアを通じて民主主義国家内で行われる CCP のサイバー対応の影響力作戦。
このレポートは、中国から発信された秘密のサイバー対応の影響力作戦の既存の公的に入手可能な証拠を調査して、CCPの進化する能力の評価を提供します。 中国共産党はペルソナの調整されたネットワークを維持するための永続的な能力を開発しており、複数の中国政府機関が、おそらく集団ではないにしても並行して、ソーシャルメディアで秘密の影響力作戦を行っていることがわかりました. これらの作戦は、国内および外交の政策と意思決定プロセスを混乱させることにより、民主主義を標的とすることにおいて、より頻繁で、洗練され、効果的になっています.
ケーススタディとして、Twitter と Meta が 2019 年に中国政府に起因する Spamouflage ネットワークにリンクされた、これまで報告されていなかった CCP のサイバー対応の影響力操作を明らかにします。 米国が無責任に中国やその他の国に対してサイバースパイ活動を行っているという未確認の主張を広めるために、米国ベースのソーシャルメディアプラットフォーム。 Spamouflage にリンクされたアカウントによって誤ってツイートされた画像で識別可能な開いているブラウザー タブのような手違いを利用して、この影響力のある操作を実行している中国政府機関はそれを「Operation Honey Badger」と名付けたと考えられます。
Last week, the US Department of Justice unsealed a significant criminal complaint. Police officers from China’s Ministry of Public Security (MPS) were charged with creating ‘thousands of fake online personas on social media sites, including Twitter, to target Chinese dissidents through online harassment and threats’ and for spreading ‘propaganda whose sole purpose is to sow divisions within the United States’.
This announcement marked the first definitive public attribution to a specific Chinese government agency of covert malign activities on social media. However, the MPS is one of many party-controlled organisations that analysts have long suspected of conducting covert and coercive operations to influence users on social media.
Under the guise of ‘guiding public opinion’, a policy concept that dates back to the aftermath of the Tiananmen Square Massacre, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) justifies its manipulation of information to maintain social stability and political control over China. More recently, China’s authoritarian leader, Xi Jinping, has revived the Cultural Revolution-era term ‘public opinion struggle’ and declared social media ‘the main battlefield’ because of its ability to spread values and ideas—like human rights and democracy—that are perceived as threats to the party’s political legitimacy.
The CCP’s efforts to shape public opinion online now go beyond simply censoring dissidents and spreading pro-government propaganda. They are more global and aggressive, often directly interfering in state sovereignty and democratic discourse and supporting the party’s broader strategic and economic goals.
ASPI’s International Cyber Policy Centre has published a new report entitled ‘Gaming public opinion: The CCP’s increasingly sophisticated cyber-enabled influence operations’, alongside reporting by The Washington Post which explores the he alongside reporting by The Washington Post, which explores the growing challenge of CCP cyber-enabled influence operations conducted within democracies through social media.
The report canvasses the existing publicly available evidence of covert cyber-enabled influence operations originating from China to provide an assessment of the CCP’s evolving capabilities. We find that the CCP has developed a persistent capability to sustain coordinated networks of personas and that multiple Chinese government agencies probably conduct, in parallel if not collectively, covert influence operations on social media. Those operations have become more frequent, sophisticated, and effective in targeting democracies by disrupting domestic and foreign policies and decision-making processes.
As a case study, we reveal a previously unreported CCP cyber-enabled influence operation linked to the Spamouflage network, which Twitter and Meta attributed to the Chinese Government in 2019. This new iteration of the network is using inauthentic accounts on US-based and China-based social media platforms to spread unverified claims that the US is irresponsibly conducting cyber-espionage operations against China and other countries. Drawing on slip-ups like an open browser tab identifiable in an image accidentally tweeted by a Spamouflage-linked account, we believe the Chinese Government agencies conducting this influence operation named it ‘Operation Honey Badger.’
https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/ccps-increasingly-sophisticated-cyber-enabled-influence-operation/
CCP’s increasingly sophisticated cyber-enabled influence operation
中共日益复杂的网络影响力运作
！！！！！！！上周，美国司法部公布了一项重大刑事诉讼。 中国公安部 (MPS) 的警官被指控在包括 Twitter 在内的社交媒体网站上创建“数千个虚假的在线角色，通过在线骚扰和威胁来针对中国持不同政见者”，并传播“其唯一目的是散布谣言的宣传” 美国内部的分歧”。！！！！！！！！
！！！！！！！先週、米国司法省は重要な刑事訴状を公開しました。 中国の公安省 (MPS) の警察官は、「Twitter を含むソーシャル メディア サイトで何千もの偽のオンライン ペルソナを作成し、オンラインでの嫌がらせや脅迫を通じて中国の反体制派を標的に」し、「種をまくことのみを目的とするプロパガンダを広めた」として起訴されました。 米国内の部門」。！！！！！！！！！
今、日本のネットを攻撃してるのは中国の公安である！！私も攻撃もしてくる！！日本人の書き込みを割り当てて特定の個人へ嫌がらせもする！！！！！！
気を付けてください！！！！！気を付けてください！！！！！！！！！
この発表は、特定の中国政府機関がソーシャル メディア上で秘密裏に悪意のある活動を行っていることを公に明らかにした初めての事例です。 しかし、MPS は、ソーシャル メディアのユーザーに影響を与えるために秘密裏に強制的な操作を行っているとアナリストが長い間疑っていた多くの政党支配組織の 1 つです。
中国共産党 (CCP) は、天安門事件の直後に遡る政策概念である「世論の誘導」を装い、社会の安定と中国に対する政治的支配を維持するための情報操作を正当化しています。 最近では、中国の権威主義的指導者である習近平は、文化大革命時代の「世論闘争」という用語を復活させ、人権や民主主義などの価値観やアイデアを広める能力があるため、ソーシャル メディアを「主要な戦場」と宣言しました。 党の政治的正当性に対する脅威とみなされた。
オンラインで世論を形成しようとする中国共産党の取り組みは、現在、単に反体制派を検閲し、政府寄りのプロパガンダを広めるだけではありません。 彼らはよりグローバルで攻撃的であり、多くの場合、国家主権と民主主義の言説に直接干渉し、党のより広範な戦略的および経済的目標をサポートしています。
ASPI の国際サイバー ポリシー センターは、「ゲームの世論: 中国共産党のますます洗練されたサイバー対応の影響力作戦」というタイトルの新しいレポートを発行しました。 ソーシャル メディアを通じて民主主義国家内で行われる CCP のサイバー対応の影響力作戦。
このレポートは、中国から発信された秘密のサイバー対応の影響力作戦の既存の公的に入手可能な証拠を調査して、CCPの進化する能力の評価を提供します。 中国共産党はペルソナの調整されたネットワークを維持するための永続的な能力を開発しており、複数の中国政府機関が、おそらく集団ではないにしても並行して、ソーシャルメディアで秘密の影響力作戦を行っていることがわかりました. これらの作戦は、国内および外交の政策と意思決定プロセスを混乱させることにより、民主主義を標的とすることにおいて、より頻繁で、洗練され、効果的になっています.
ケーススタディとして、Twitter と Meta が 2019 年に中国政府に起因する Spamouflage ネットワークにリンクされた、これまで報告されていなかった CCP のサイバー対応の影響力操作を明らかにします。 米国が無責任に中国やその他の国に対してサイバースパイ活動を行っているという未確認の主張を広めるために、米国ベースのソーシャルメディアプラットフォーム。 Spamouflage にリンクされたアカウントによって誤ってツイートされた画像で識別可能な開いているブラウザー タブのような手違いを利用して、この影響力のある操作を実行している中国政府機関はそれを「Operation Honey Badger」と名付けたと考えられます。
Last week, the US Department of Justice unsealed a significant criminal complaint. Police officers from China’s Ministry of Public Security (MPS) were charged with creating ‘thousands of fake online personas on social media sites, including Twitter, to target Chinese dissidents through online harassment and threats’ and for spreading ‘propaganda whose sole purpose is to sow divisions within the United States’.
This announcement marked the first definitive public attribution to a specific Chinese government agency of covert malign activities on social media. However, the MPS is one of many party-controlled organisations that analysts have long suspected of conducting covert and coercive operations to influence users on social media.
Under the guise of ‘guiding public opinion’, a policy concept that dates back to the aftermath of the Tiananmen Square Massacre, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) justifies its manipulation of information to maintain social stability and political control over China. More recently, China’s authoritarian leader, Xi Jinping, has revived the Cultural Revolution-era term ‘public opinion struggle’ and declared social media ‘the main battlefield’ because of its ability to spread values and ideas—like human rights and democracy—that are perceived as threats to the party’s political legitimacy.
The CCP’s efforts to shape public opinion online now go beyond simply censoring dissidents and spreading pro-government propaganda. They are more global and aggressive, often directly interfering in state sovereignty and democratic discourse and supporting the party’s broader strategic and economic goals.
ASPI’s International Cyber Policy Centre has published a new report entitled ‘Gaming public opinion: The CCP’s increasingly sophisticated cyber-enabled influence operations’, alongside reporting by The Washington Post which explores the he alongside reporting by The Washington Post, which explores the growing challenge of CCP cyber-enabled influence operations conducted within democracies through social media.
The report canvasses the existing publicly available evidence of covert cyber-enabled influence operations originating from China to provide an assessment of the CCP’s evolving capabilities. We find that the CCP has developed a persistent capability to sustain coordinated networks of personas and that multiple Chinese government agencies probably conduct, in parallel if not collectively, covert influence operations on social media. Those operations have become more frequent, sophisticated, and effective in targeting democracies by disrupting domestic and foreign policies and decision-making processes.
As a case study, we reveal a previously unreported CCP cyber-enabled influence operation linked to the Spamouflage network, which Twitter and Meta attributed to the Chinese Government in 2019. This new iteration of the network is using inauthentic accounts on US-based and China-based social media platforms to spread unverified claims that the US is irresponsibly conducting cyber-espionage operations against China and other countries. Drawing on slip-ups like an open browser tab identifiable in an image accidentally tweeted by a Spamouflage-linked account, we believe the Chinese Government agencies conducting this influence operation named it ‘Operation Honey Badger.’
https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/ccps-increasingly-sophisticated-cyber-enabled-influence-operation/
CCP’s increasingly sophisticated cyber-enabled influence operation
中共日益复杂的网络影响力运作
！！！！！！！上周，美国司法部公布了一项重大刑事诉讼。 中国公安部 (MPS) 的警官被指控在包括 Twitter 在内的社交媒体网站上创建“数千个虚假的在线角色，通过在线骚扰和威胁来针对中国持不同政见者”，并传播“其唯一目的是散布谣言的宣传” 美国内部的分歧”。！！！！！！！！
！！！！！！！先週、米国司法省は重要な刑事訴状を公開しました。 中国の公安省 (MPS) の警察官は、「Twitter を含むソーシャル メディア サイトで何千もの偽のオンライン ペルソナを作成し、オンラインでの嫌がらせや脅迫を通じて中国の反体制派を標的に」し、「種をまくことのみを目的とするプロパガンダを広めた」として起訴されました。 米国内の部門」。！！！！！！！！！
今、日本のネットを攻撃してるのは中国の公安である！！私も攻撃もしてくる！！日本人の書き込みを割り当てて特定の個人へ嫌がらせもする！！！！！！
気を付けてください！！！！！気を付けてください！！！！！！！！！
この発表は、特定の中国政府機関がソーシャル メディア上で秘密裏に悪意のある活動を行っていることを公に明らかにした初めての事例です。 しかし、MPS は、ソーシャル メディアのユーザーに影響を与えるために秘密裏に強制的な操作を行っているとアナリストが長い間疑っていた多くの政党支配組織の 1 つです。
中国共産党 (CCP) は、天安門事件の直後に遡る政策概念である「世論の誘導」を装い、社会の安定と中国に対する政治的支配を維持するための情報操作を正当化しています。 最近では、中国の権威主義的指導者である習近平は、文化大革命時代の「世論闘争」という用語を復活させ、人権や民主主義などの価値観やアイデアを広める能力があるため、ソーシャル メディアを「主要な戦場」と宣言しました。 党の政治的正当性に対する脅威とみなされた。
オンラインで世論を形成しようとする中国共産党の取り組みは、現在、単に反体制派を検閲し、政府寄りのプロパガンダを広めるだけではありません。 彼らはよりグローバルで攻撃的であり、多くの場合、国家主権と民主主義の言説に直接干渉し、党のより広範な戦略的および経済的目標をサポートしています。
ASPI の国際サイバー ポリシー センターは、「ゲームの世論: 中国共産党のますます洗練されたサイバー対応の影響力作戦」というタイトルの新しいレポートを発行しました。 ソーシャル メディアを通じて民主主義国家内で行われる CCP のサイバー対応の影響力作戦。
このレポートは、中国から発信された秘密のサイバー対応の影響力作戦の既存の公的に入手可能な証拠を調査して、CCPの進化する能力の評価を提供します。 中国共産党はペルソナの調整されたネットワークを維持するための永続的な能力を開発しており、複数の中国政府機関が、おそらく集団ではないにしても並行して、ソーシャルメディアで秘密の影響力作戦を行っていることがわかりました. これらの作戦は、国内および外交の政策と意思決定プロセスを混乱させることにより、民主主義を標的とすることにおいて、より頻繁で、洗練され、効果的になっています.
ケーススタディとして、Twitter と Meta が 2019 年に中国政府に起因する Spamouflage ネットワークにリンクされた、これまで報告されていなかった CCP のサイバー対応の影響力操作を明らかにします。 米国が無責任に中国やその他の国に対してサイバースパイ活動を行っているという未確認の主張を広めるために、米国ベースのソーシャルメディアプラットフォーム。 Spamouflage にリンクされたアカウントによって誤ってツイートされた画像で識別可能な開いているブラウザー タブのような手違いを利用して、この影響力のある操作を実行している中国政府機関はそれを「Operation Honey Badger」と名付けたと考えられます。
Last week, the US Department of Justice unsealed a significant criminal complaint. Police officers from China’s Ministry of Public Security (MPS) were charged with creating ‘thousands of fake online personas on social media sites, including Twitter, to target Chinese dissidents through online harassment and threats’ and for spreading ‘propaganda whose sole purpose is to sow divisions within the United States’.
This announcement marked the first definitive public attribution to a specific Chinese government agency of covert malign activities on social media. However, the MPS is one of many party-controlled organisations that analysts have long suspected of conducting covert and coercive operations to influence users on social media.
Under the guise of ‘guiding public opinion’, a policy concept that dates back to the aftermath of the Tiananmen Square Massacre, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) justifies its manipulation of information to maintain social stability and political control over China. More recently, China’s authoritarian leader, Xi Jinping, has revived the Cultural Revolution-era term ‘public opinion struggle’ and declared social media ‘the main battlefield’ because of its ability to spread values and ideas—like human rights and democracy—that are perceived as threats to the party’s political legitimacy.
The CCP’s efforts to shape public opinion online now go beyond simply censoring dissidents and spreading pro-government propaganda. They are more global and aggressive, often directly interfering in state sovereignty and democratic discourse and supporting the party’s broader strategic and economic goals.
ASPI’s International Cyber Policy Centre has published a new report entitled ‘Gaming public opinion: The CCP’s increasingly sophisticated cyber-enabled influence operations’, alongside reporting by The Washington Post which explores the he alongside reporting by The Washington Post, which explores the growing challenge of CCP cyber-enabled influence operations conducted within democracies through social media.
The report canvasses the existing publicly available evidence of covert cyber-enabled influence operations originating from China to provide an assessment of the CCP’s evolving capabilities. We find that the CCP has developed a persistent capability to sustain coordinated networks of personas and that multiple Chinese government agencies probably conduct, in parallel if not collectively, covert influence operations on social media. Those operations have become more frequent, sophisticated, and effective in targeting democracies by disrupting domestic and foreign policies and decision-making processes.
As a case study, we reveal a previously unreported CCP cyber-enabled influence operation linked to the Spamouflage network, which Twitter and Meta attributed to the Chinese Government in 2019. This new iteration of the network is using inauthentic accounts on US-based and China-based social media platforms to spread unverified claims that the US is irresponsibly conducting cyber-espionage operations against China and other countries. Drawing on slip-ups like an open browser tab identifiable in an image accidentally tweeted by a Spamouflage-linked account, we believe the Chinese Government agencies conducting this influence operation named it ‘Operation Honey Badger.’
https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/ccps-increasingly-sophisticated-cyber-enabled-influence-operation/
CCP’s increasingly sophisticated cyber-enabled influence operation
中共日益复杂的网络影响力运作
！！！！！！！上周，美国司法部公布了一项重大刑事诉讼。 中国公安部 (MPS) 的警官被指控在包括 Twitter 在内的社交媒体网站上创建“数千个虚假的在线角色，通过在线骚扰和威胁来针对中国持不同政见者”，并传播“其唯一目的是散布谣言的宣传” 美国内部的分歧”。！！！！！！！！
！！！！！！！先週、米国司法省は重要な刑事訴状を公開しました。 中国の公安省 (MPS) の警察官は、「Twitter を含むソーシャル メディア サイトで何千もの偽のオンライン ペルソナを作成し、オンラインでの嫌がらせや脅迫を通じて中国の反体制派を標的に」し、「種をまくことのみを目的とするプロパガンダを広めた」として起訴されました。 米国内の部門」。！！！！！！！！！
この発表は、特定の中国政府機関がソーシャル メディア上で秘密裏に悪意のある活動を行っていることを公に明らかにした初めての事例です。 しかし、MPS は、ソーシャル メディアのユーザーに影響を与えるために秘密裏に強制的な操作を行っているとアナリストが長い間疑っていた多くの政党支配組織の 1 つです。
中国共産党 (CCP) は、天安門事件の直後に遡る政策概念である「世論の誘導」を装い、社会の安定と中国に対する政治的支配を維持するための情報操作を正当化しています。 最近では、中国の権威主義的指導者である習近平は、文化大革命時代の「世論闘争」という用語を復活させ、人権や民主主義などの価値観やアイデアを広める能力があるため、ソーシャル メディアを「主要な戦場」と宣言しました。 党の政治的正当性に対する脅威とみなされた。
オンラインで世論を形成しようとする中国共産党の取り組みは、現在、単に反体制派を検閲し、政府寄りのプロパガンダを広めるだけではありません。 彼らはよりグローバルで攻撃的であり、多くの場合、国家主権と民主主義の言説に直接干渉し、党のより広範な戦略的および経済的目標をサポートしています。
ASPI の国際サイバー ポリシー センターは、「ゲームの世論: 中国共産党のますます洗練されたサイバー対応の影響力作戦」というタイトルの新しいレポートを発行しました。 ソーシャル メディアを通じて民主主義国家内で行われる CCP のサイバー対応の影響力作戦。
このレポートは、中国から発信された秘密のサイバー対応の影響力作戦の既存の公的に入手可能な証拠を調査して、CCPの進化する能力の評価を提供します。 中国共産党はペルソナの調整されたネットワークを維持するための永続的な能力を開発しており、複数の中国政府機関が、おそらく集団ではないにしても並行して、ソーシャルメディアで秘密の影響力作戦を行っていることがわかりました. これらの作戦は、国内および外交の政策と意思決定プロセスを混乱させることにより、民主主義を標的とすることにおいて、より頻繁で、洗練され、効果的になっています.
ケーススタディとして、Twitter と Meta が 2019 年に中国政府に起因する Spamouflage ネットワークにリンクされた、これまで報告されていなかった CCP のサイバー対応の影響力操作を明らかにします。 米国が無責任に中国やその他の国に対してサイバースパイ活動を行っているという未確認の主張を広めるために、米国ベースのソーシャルメディアプラットフォーム。 Spamouflage にリンクされたアカウントによって誤ってツイートされた画像で識別可能な開いているブラウザー タブのような手違いを利用して、この影響力のある操作を実行している中国政府機関はそれを「Operation Honey Badger」と名付けたと考えられます。
Last week, the US Department of Justice unsealed a significant criminal complaint. Police officers from China’s Ministry of Public Security (MPS) were charged with creating ‘thousands of fake online personas on social media sites, including Twitter, to target Chinese dissidents through online harassment and threats’ and for spreading ‘propaganda whose sole purpose is to sow divisions within the United States’.
This announcement marked the first definitive public attribution to a specific Chinese government agency of covert malign activities on social media. However, the MPS is one of many party-controlled organisations that analysts have long suspected of conducting covert and coercive operations to influence users on social media.
Under the guise of ‘guiding public opinion’, a policy concept that dates back to the aftermath of the Tiananmen Square Massacre, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) justifies its manipulation of information to maintain social stability and political control over China. More recently, China’s authoritarian leader, Xi Jinping, has revived the Cultural Revolution-era term ‘public opinion struggle’ and declared social media ‘the main battlefield’ because of its ability to spread values and ideas—like human rights and democracy—that are perceived as threats to the party’s political legitimacy.
The CCP’s efforts to shape public opinion online now go beyond simply censoring dissidents and spreading pro-government propaganda. They are more global and aggressive, often directly interfering in state sovereignty and democratic discourse and supporting the party’s broader strategic and economic goals.
ASPI’s International Cyber Policy Centre has published a new report entitled ‘Gaming public opinion: The CCP’s increasingly sophisticated cyber-enabled influence operations’, alongside reporting by The Washington Post which explores the he alongside reporting by The Washington Post, which explores the growing challenge of CCP cyber-enabled influence operations conducted within democracies through social media.
The report canvasses the existing publicly available evidence of covert cyber-enabled influence operations originating from China to provide an assessment of the CCP’s evolving capabilities. We find that the CCP has developed a persistent capability to sustain coordinated networks of personas and that multiple Chinese government agencies probably conduct, in parallel if not collectively, covert influence operations on social media. Those operations have become more frequent, sophisticated, and effective in targeting democracies by disrupting domestic and foreign policies and decision-making processes.
As a case study, we reveal a previously unreported CCP cyber-enabled influence operation linked to the Spamouflage network, which Twitter and Meta attributed to the Chinese Government in 2019. This new iteration of the network is using inauthentic accounts on US-based and China-based social media platforms to spread unverified claims that the US is irresponsibly conducting cyber-espionage operations against China and other countries. Drawing on slip-ups like an open browser tab identifiable in an image accidentally tweeted by a Spamouflage-linked account, we believe the Chinese Government agencies conducting this influence operation named it ‘Operation Honey Badger.’
https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/ccps-increasingly-sophisticated-cyber-enabled-influence-operation/
CCP’s increasingly sophisticated cyber-enabled influence operation
中共日益复杂的网络影响力运作
！！！！！！！上周，美国司法部公布了一项重大刑事诉讼。 中国公安部 (MPS) 的警官被指控在包括 Twitter 在内的社交媒体网站上创建“数千个虚假的在线角色，通过在线骚扰和威胁来针对中国持不同政见者”，并传播“其唯一目的是散布谣言的宣传” 美国内部的分歧”。！！！！！！！！
！！！！！！！先週、米国司法省は重要な刑事訴状を公開しました。 中国の公安省 (MPS) の警察官は、「Twitter を含むソーシャル メディア サイトで何千もの偽のオンライン ペルソナを作成し、オンラインでの嫌がらせや脅迫を通じて中国の反体制派を標的に」し、「種をまくことのみを目的とするプロパガンダを広めた」として起訴されました。 米国内の部門」。！！！！！！！！！
この発表は、特定の中国政府機関がソーシャル メディア上で秘密裏に悪意のある活動を行っていることを公に明らかにした初めての事例です。 しかし、MPS は、ソーシャル メディアのユーザーに影響を与えるために秘密裏に強制的な操作を行っているとアナリストが長い間疑っていた多くの政党支配組織の 1 つです。
中国共産党 (CCP) は、天安門事件の直後に遡る政策概念である「世論の誘導」を装い、社会の安定と中国に対する政治的支配を維持するための情報操作を正当化しています。 最近では、中国の権威主義的指導者である習近平は、文化大革命時代の「世論闘争」という用語を復活させ、人権や民主主義などの価値観やアイデアを広める能力があるため、ソーシャル メディアを「主要な戦場」と宣言しました。 党の政治的正当性に対する脅威とみなされた。
オンラインで世論を形成しようとする中国共産党の取り組みは、現在、単に反体制派を検閲し、政府寄りのプロパガンダを広めるだけではありません。 彼らはよりグローバルで攻撃的であり、多くの場合、国家主権と民主主義の言説に直接干渉し、党のより広範な戦略的および経済的目標をサポートしています。
ASPI の国際サイバー ポリシー センターは、「ゲームの世論: 中国共産党のますます洗練されたサイバー対応の影響力作戦」というタイトルの新しいレポートを発行しました。 ソーシャル メディアを通じて民主主義国家内で行われる CCP のサイバー対応の影響力作戦。
このレポートは、中国から発信された秘密のサイバー対応の影響力作戦の既存の公的に入手可能な証拠を調査して、CCPの進化する能力の評価を提供します。 中国共産党はペルソナの調整されたネットワークを維持するための永続的な能力を開発しており、複数の中国政府機関が、おそらく集団ではないにしても並行して、ソーシャルメディアで秘密の影響力作戦を行っていることがわかりました. これらの作戦は、国内および外交の政策と意思決定プロセスを混乱させることにより、民主主義を標的とすることにおいて、より頻繁で、洗練され、効果的になっています.
ケーススタディとして、Twitter と Meta が 2019 年に中国政府に起因する Spamouflage ネットワークにリンクされた、これまで報告されていなかった CCP のサイバー対応の影響力操作を明らかにします。 米国が無責任に中国やその他の国に対してサイバースパイ活動を行っているという未確認の主張を広めるために、米国ベースのソーシャルメディアプラットフォーム。 Spamouflage にリンクされたアカウントによって誤ってツイートされた画像で識別可能な開いているブラウザー タブのような手違いを利用して、この影響力のある操作を実行している中国政府機関はそれを「Operation Honey Badger」と名付けたと考えられます。
Last week, the US Department of Justice unsealed a significant criminal complaint. Police officers from China’s Ministry of Public Security (MPS) were charged with creating ‘thousands of fake online personas on social media sites, including Twitter, to target Chinese dissidents through online harassment and threats’ and for spreading ‘propaganda whose sole purpose is to sow divisions within the United States’.
This announcement marked the first definitive public attribution to a specific Chinese government agency of covert malign activities on social media. However, the MPS is one of many party-controlled organisations that analysts have long suspected of conducting covert and coercive operations to influence users on social media.
Under the guise of ‘guiding public opinion’, a policy concept that dates back to the aftermath of the Tiananmen Square Massacre, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) justifies its manipulation of information to maintain social stability and political control over China. More recently, China’s authoritarian leader, Xi Jinping, has revived the Cultural Revolution-era term ‘public opinion struggle’ and declared social media ‘the main battlefield’ because of its ability to spread values and ideas—like human rights and democracy—that are perceived as threats to the party’s political legitimacy.
The CCP’s efforts to shape public opinion online now go beyond simply censoring dissidents and spreading pro-government propaganda. They are more global and aggressive, often directly interfering in state sovereignty and democratic discourse and supporting the party’s broader strategic and economic goals.
ASPI’s International Cyber Policy Centre has published a new report entitled ‘Gaming public opinion: The CCP’s increasingly sophisticated cyber-enabled influence operations’, alongside reporting by The Washington Post which explores the he alongside reporting by The Washington Post, which explores the growing challenge of CCP cyber-enabled influence operations conducted within democracies through social media.
The report canvasses the existing publicly available evidence of covert cyber-enabled influence operations originating from China to provide an assessment of the CCP’s evolving capabilities. We find that the CCP has developed a persistent capability to sustain coordinated networks of personas and that multiple Chinese government agencies probably conduct, in parallel if not collectively, covert influence operations on social media. Those operations have become more frequent, sophisticated, and effective in targeting democracies by disrupting domestic and foreign policies and decision-making processes.
As a case study, we reveal a previously unreported CCP cyber-enabled influence operation linked to the Spamouflage network, which Twitter and Meta attributed to the Chinese Government in 2019. This new iteration of the network is using inauthentic accounts on US-based and China-based social media platforms to spread unverified claims that the US is irresponsibly conducting cyber-espionage operations against China and other countries. Drawing on slip-ups like an open browser tab identifiable in an image accidentally tweeted by a Spamouflage-linked account, we believe the Chinese Government agencies conducting this influence operation named it ‘Operation Honey Badger.’
https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/ccps-increasingly-sophisticated-cyber-enabled-influence-operation/
CCP’s increasingly sophisticated cyber-enabled influence operation
中共日益复杂的网络影响力运作
！！！！！！！上周，美国司法部公布了一项重大刑事诉讼。 中国公安部 (MPS) 的警官被指控在包括 Twitter 在内的社交媒体网站上创建“数千个虚假的在线角色，通过在线骚扰和威胁来针对中国持不同政见者”，并传播“其唯一目的是散布谣言的宣传” 美国内部的分歧”。！！！！！！！！
！！！！！！！先週、米国司法省は重要な刑事訴状を公開しました。 中国の公安省 (MPS) の警察官は、「Twitter を含むソーシャル メディア サイトで何千もの偽のオンライン ペルソナを作成し、オンラインでの嫌がらせや脅迫を通じて中国の反体制派を標的に」し、「種をまくことのみを目的とするプロパガンダを広めた」として起訴されました。 米国内の部門」。！！！！！！！！！
この発表は、特定の中国政府機関がソーシャル メディア上で秘密裏に悪意のある活動を行っていることを公に明らかにした初めての事例です。 しかし、MPS は、ソーシャル メディアのユーザーに影響を与えるために秘密裏に強制的な操作を行っているとアナリストが長い間疑っていた多くの政党支配組織の 1 つです。
中国共産党 (CCP) は、天安門事件の直後に遡る政策概念である「世論の誘導」を装い、社会の安定と中国に対する政治的支配を維持するための情報操作を正当化しています。 最近では、中国の権威主義的指導者である習近平は、文化大革命時代の「世論闘争」という用語を復活させ、人権や民主主義などの価値観やアイデアを広める能力があるため、ソーシャル メディアを「主要な戦場」と宣言しました。 党の政治的正当性に対する脅威とみなされた。
オンラインで世論を形成しようとする中国共産党の取り組みは、現在、単に反体制派を検閲し、政府寄りのプロパガンダを広めるだけではありません。 彼らはよりグローバルで攻撃的であり、多くの場合、国家主権と民主主義の言説に直接干渉し、党のより広範な戦略的および経済的目標をサポートしています。
ASPI の国際サイバー ポリシー センターは、「ゲームの世論: 中国共産党のますます洗練されたサイバー対応の影響力作戦」というタイトルの新しいレポートを発行しました。 ソーシャル メディアを通じて民主主義国家内で行われる CCP のサイバー対応の影響力作戦。
このレポートは、中国から発信された秘密のサイバー対応の影響力作戦の既存の公的に入手可能な証拠を調査して、CCPの進化する能力の評価を提供します。 中国共産党はペルソナの調整されたネットワークを維持するための永続的な能力を開発しており、複数の中国政府機関が、おそらく集団ではないにしても並行して、ソーシャルメディアで秘密の影響力作戦を行っていることがわかりました. これらの作戦は、国内および外交の政策と意思決定プロセスを混乱させることにより、民主主義を標的とすることにおいて、より頻繁で、洗練され、効果的になっています.
ケーススタディとして、Twitter と Meta が 2019 年に中国政府に起因する Spamouflage ネットワークにリンクされた、これまで報告されていなかった CCP のサイバー対応の影響力操作を明らかにします。 米国が無責任に中国やその他の国に対してサイバースパイ活動を行っているという未確認の主張を広めるために、米国ベースのソーシャルメディアプラットフォーム。 Spamouflage にリンクされたアカウントによって誤ってツイートされた画像で識別可能な開いているブラウザー タブのような手違いを利用して、この影響力のある操作を実行している中国政府機関はそれを「Operation Honey Badger」と名付けたと考えられます。
Last week, the US Department of Justice unsealed a significant criminal complaint. Police officers from China’s Ministry of Public Security (MPS) were charged with creating ‘thousands of fake online personas on social media sites, including Twitter, to target Chinese dissidents through online harassment and threats’ and for spreading ‘propaganda whose sole purpose is to sow divisions within the United States’.
This announcement marked the first definitive public attribution to a specific Chinese government agency of covert malign activities on social media. However, the MPS is one of many party-controlled organisations that analysts have long suspected of conducting covert and coercive operations to influence users on social media.
Under the guise of ‘guiding public opinion’, a policy concept that dates back to the aftermath of the Tiananmen Square Massacre, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) justifies its manipulation of information to maintain social stability and political control over China. More recently, China’s authoritarian leader, Xi Jinping, has revived the Cultural Revolution-era term ‘public opinion struggle’ and declared social media ‘the main battlefield’ because of its ability to spread values and ideas—like human rights and democracy—that are perceived as threats to the party’s political legitimacy.
The CCP’s efforts to shape public opinion online now go beyond simply censoring dissidents and spreading pro-government propaganda. They are more global and aggressive, often directly interfering in state sovereignty and democratic discourse and supporting the party’s broader strategic and economic goals.
ASPI’s International Cyber Policy Centre has published a new report entitled ‘Gaming public opinion: The CCP’s increasingly sophisticated cyber-enabled influence operations’, alongside reporting by The Washington Post which explores the he alongside reporting by The Washington Post, which explores the growing challenge of CCP cyber-enabled influence operations conducted within democracies through social media.
The report canvasses the existing publicly available evidence of covert cyber-enabled influence operations originating from China to provide an assessment of the CCP’s evolving capabilities. We find that the CCP has developed a persistent capability to sustain coordinated networks of personas and that multiple Chinese government agencies probably conduct, in parallel if not collectively, covert influence operations on social media. Those operations have become more frequent, sophisticated, and effective in targeting democracies by disrupting domestic and foreign policies and decision-making processes.
As a case study, we reveal a previously unreported CCP cyber-enabled influence operation linked to the Spamouflage network, which Twitter and Meta attributed to the Chinese Government in 2019. This new iteration of the network is using inauthentic accounts on US-based and China-based social media platforms to spread unverified claims that the US is irresponsibly conducting cyber-espionage operations against China and other countries. Drawing on slip-ups like an open browser tab identifiable in an image accidentally tweeted by a Spamouflage-linked account, we believe the Chinese Government agencies conducting this influence operation named it ‘Operation Honey Badger.’
https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/ccps-increasingly-sophisticated-cyber-enabled-influence-operation/
CCP’s increasingly sophisticated cyber-enabled influence operation
中共日益复杂的网络影响力运作
！！！！！！！上周，美国司法部公布了一项重大刑事诉讼。 中国公安部 (MPS) 的警官被指控在包括 Twitter 在内的社交媒体网站上创建“数千个虚假的在线角色，通过在线骚扰和威胁来针对中国持不同政见者”，并传播“其唯一目的是散布谣言的宣传” 美国内部的分歧”。！！！！！！！！
！！！！！！！先週、米国司法省は重要な刑事訴状を公開しました。 中国の公安省 (MPS) の警察官は、「Twitter を含むソーシャル メディア サイトで何千もの偽のオンライン ペルソナを作成し、オンラインでの嫌がらせや脅迫を通じて中国の反体制派を標的に」し、「種をまくことのみを目的とするプロパガンダを広めた」として起訴されました。 米国内の部門」。！！！！！！！！！
この発表は、特定の中国政府機関がソーシャル メディア上で秘密裏に悪意のある活動を行っていることを公に明らかにした初めての事例です。 しかし、MPS は、ソーシャル メディアのユーザーに影響を与えるために秘密裏に強制的な操作を行っているとアナリストが長い間疑っていた多くの政党支配組織の 1 つです。
中国共産党 (CCP) は、天安門事件の直後に遡る政策概念である「世論の誘導」を装い、社会の安定と中国に対する政治的支配を維持するための情報操作を正当化しています。 最近では、中国の権威主義的指導者である習近平は、文化大革命時代の「世論闘争」という用語を復活させ、人権や民主主義などの価値観やアイデアを広める能力があるため、ソーシャル メディアを「主要な戦場」と宣言しました。 党の政治的正当性に対する脅威とみなされた。
オンラインで世論を形成しようとする中国共産党の取り組みは、現在、単に反体制派を検閲し、政府寄りのプロパガンダを広めるだけではありません。 彼らはよりグローバルで攻撃的であり、多くの場合、国家主権と民主主義の言説に直接干渉し、党のより広範な戦略的および経済的目標をサポートしています。
ASPI の国際サイバー ポリシー センターは、「ゲームの世論: 中国共産党のますます洗練されたサイバー対応の影響力作戦」というタイトルの新しいレポートを発行しました。 ソーシャル メディアを通じて民主主義国家内で行われる CCP のサイバー対応の影響力作戦。
このレポートは、中国から発信された秘密のサイバー対応の影響力作戦の既存の公的に入手可能な証拠を調査して、CCPの進化する能力の評価を提供します。 中国共産党はペルソナの調整されたネットワークを維持するための永続的な能力を開発しており、複数の中国政府機関が、おそらく集団ではないにしても並行して、ソーシャルメディアで秘密の影響力作戦を行っていることがわかりました. これらの作戦は、国内および外交の政策と意思決定プロセスを混乱させることにより、民主主義を標的とすることにおいて、より頻繁で、洗練され、効果的になっています.
ケーススタディとして、Twitter と Meta が 2019 年に中国政府に起因する Spamouflage ネットワークにリンクされた、これまで報告されていなかった CCP のサイバー対応の影響力操作を明らかにします。 米国が無責任に中国やその他の国に対してサイバースパイ活動を行っているという未確認の主張を広めるために、米国ベースのソーシャルメディアプラットフォーム。 Spamouflage にリンクされたアカウントによって誤ってツイートされた画像で識別可能な開いているブラウザー タブのような手違いを利用して、この影響力のある操作を実行している中国政府機関はそれを「Operation Honey Badger」と名付けたと考えられます。
Last week, the US Department of Justice unsealed a significant criminal complaint. Police officers from China’s Ministry of Public Security (MPS) were charged with creating ‘thousands of fake online personas on social media sites, including Twitter, to target Chinese dissidents through online harassment and threats’ and for spreading ‘propaganda whose sole purpose is to sow divisions within the United States’.
This announcement marked the first definitive public attribution to a specific Chinese government agency of covert malign activities on social media. However, the MPS is one of many party-controlled organisations that analysts have long suspected of conducting covert and coercive operations to influence users on social media.
Under the guise of ‘guiding public opinion’, a policy concept that dates back to the aftermath of the Tiananmen Square Massacre, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) justifies its manipulation of information to maintain social stability and political control over China. More recently, China’s authoritarian leader, Xi Jinping, has revived the Cultural Revolution-era term ‘public opinion struggle’ and declared social media ‘the main battlefield’ because of its ability to spread values and ideas—like human rights and democracy—that are perceived as threats to the party’s political legitimacy.
The CCP’s efforts to shape public opinion online now go beyond simply censoring dissidents and spreading pro-government propaganda. They are more global and aggressive, often directly interfering in state sovereignty and democratic discourse and supporting the party’s broader strategic and economic goals.
ASPI’s International Cyber Policy Centre has published a new report entitled ‘Gaming public opinion: The CCP’s increasingly sophisticated cyber-enabled influence operations’, alongside reporting by The Washington Post which explores the he alongside reporting by The Washington Post, which explores the growing challenge of CCP cyber-enabled influence operations conducted within democracies through social media.
The report canvasses the existing publicly available evidence of covert cyber-enabled influence operations originating from China to provide an assessment of the CCP’s evolving capabilities. We find that the CCP has developed a persistent capability to sustain coordinated networks of personas and that multiple Chinese government agencies probably conduct, in parallel if not collectively, covert influence operations on social media. Those operations have become more frequent, sophisticated, and effective in targeting democracies by disrupting domestic and foreign policies and decision-making processes.
As a case study, we reveal a previously unreported CCP cyber-enabled influence operation linked to the Spamouflage network, which Twitter and Meta attributed to the Chinese Government in 2019. This new iteration of the network is using inauthentic accounts on US-based and China-based social media platforms to spread unverified claims that the US is irresponsibly conducting cyber-espionage operations against China and other countries. Drawing on slip-ups like an open browser tab identifiable in an image accidentally tweeted by a Spamouflage-linked account, we believe the Chinese Government agencies conducting this influence operation named it ‘Operation Honey Badger.’
https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/ccps-increasingly-sophisticated-cyber-enabled-influence-operation/
