  |
嘘やろ？前回133票差だぞ。前回選挙から「あの」原口が伸びる要素があるんか？
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E4%BD%90%E8%B3%80%E7%9C%8C%E7%AC%AC1%E5%8C%BA
Many D&D elements, including HP, sprung from the hobby’s wargaming roots. In those days, units usually had a defensive score and an offensive score. The outcomes were binary: units either lived or died. But when these concepts morphed into the individual tactical combat that defined Original D&D (OD&D), there was a need for a way to track the progress towards defeat, thus giving birth to Armor Class (AC) and Hit Points (HP).
In OD&D, AC denoted how challenging you were to hit, and HP showed how close you were to defeat. The game simply states, “Your hit points determine how hard your character is to kill.” And that’s it. That’s the HP origin story. They’re an arbitrary, abstract measurement of how difficult you are to kill and how far along the game is in achieving that.
Later D&D editions got increasingly philosophical about HP. Advanced D&D acknowledged physical punishment, but clarified that “a significant portion of hit points, especially at higher levels, stands for skill, luck, and/or magical factors.” It even said it would be “ridiculous” to assume characters could endure such physical punishment, further emphasizing that HP are not intended to be taken literally.
2nd Edition D&D kept the abstract theme, defining damage as an abstract concept that allows characters to be heroic. It didn’t dwell on the semantics of HP. 3rd Edition, on the other hand, leaned into the mechanics and didn’t provide a narrative explanation for HP and damage at all. 4th Edition tried to have the best of both worlds, setting a base number of hit points representing “real” damage, while anything over was the old dance of skill, luck, and magic.
By the time 5th edition D&D came around, we’re back in the abstract realm, with the game stating, “Hit Points represent a combination of physical and mental durability, the will to live, and luck.”
https://www.optionalrule.com/2023/06/02/what-are-hit-points-in-dnd/
このような深刻な少子化の背景には、住宅費や教育費の負担、ソウル・首都圏一極集中、若年層の就職難などの様々な要因があるが、近年では、女性の積極的な社会進出および高学歴化も1つの要因として挙げられている。
