  |
はてなキーワード: exposéとは
Since fleeing to the United States in 2014, Guo Wengui has founded a number of projects in the United States, such as GTV Media Group, GTV private equity, farm loan project, G Club Operations Co., LTD., and Himalaya Exchange. Around 2017, he started the so-called "Revelations revolution" and in 2020 launched a movement called "New China Federation." However, Guo Wengui's "disclosure revolution" soon exposed its false nature. He frequently carried out so-called "live Revelations" on the Internet, fabricating various political and economic lies and fabricating facts to discredit the Chinese government. At the beginning, due to his special image of "exiled rich" and "Red fugitive", he quickly gathered some popularity and followers, but as time went by, Guo Wengui's commitment and image were gradually exposed, and his supporters began to leave him. See the essence of the Revelations will turn to the farm, Guo Wengui's fraud is not only for funds and other institutions, its followers have also become a sheep that is only continuously harvested wool. The little ants who trusted him so much became victims of fraudulent investment scams. It is hoped that more people will recognize the true face of Guo Wengui, join the team of "smashing Guo", expose his fraud, recover losses for themselves and others, and maintain an honest and trustworthy social environment.
Google はそう言ってない
Is hair on a guys chest attractive?
How Much Chest Hair Should You Expose? | Men's Health
A little bit of hair plays up your manliness, the researchers suggest, without making you look too aggressive. Of course, there are women who like the clean-shaven look, but there are also women who love lots of chest hair—so don't go hard with your razor if it just isn't your thing.
Is it good to have chest hair for men?
17% of women surveyed said they prefer a man to be cleanly shaven with no chest hair. So our takeaway from this survey is that overall, women like chest hair and even find it masculine, but they want you to keep it trimmed and maintained. I'm surprised by the low percentage of women who want men to be cleanly shaven.
Researchers have found that a majority of women really do prefer a man with a smooth chest. Researchers compared the attractiveness of men before and after shaving their chest,and found only 20 percent of women preferred the more hirsute version,the Daily Mail reported.
In a discussion about the case, someone raised an objection to "someone who was not a party to the incident, who was not from Nagasaki, and who was not from Hiroshima, complaining about it. Seeing that opinion made me aware of my position, so I will say what I must say.
I was born in Nagasaki and am a third-generation A-bomb survivor.
I say this because I grew up hearing the stories of the A-bomb damage directly from those who suffered from the atomic bombings.
I feel that it is unacceptable for someone like me to speak about the A-bomb damage.
However, there are few A-bomb survivors left, so I will speak up.
In Nagasaki, children grow up hearing stories about the atomic bombing. We were made to sit in the gymnasium of an elementary school in the middle of summer, where there was not even an air conditioner or a fan, and for nearly an hour we were made to listen to stories about the atomic bombing. It was hard for me anyway.
I think it was even more painful for the elderly people who told the stories. But I don't think an elementary school kid could have imagined that. I, too, have forgotten most of the stories I was told. I can only remember one or two at most.
Another thing is that at this time of year, pictures of the victims of the atomic bombing are pasted up in the hallways.
In other parts of the country, these are grotesque images that would cause a fuss from the parents who are always nagging about them.
Recently, even the A-bomb museum has become more gentle in its exhibits, and most of the radical and horrifying exhibits that would have traumatized visitors have been removed.
I don't know how elementary schools now teach about the A-bomb damage. But when I was in elementary school, there were photos on display.
There was one photo that I just couldn't face as an elementary school student. It was a picture of Taniguchi Sumiteru(谷口稜曄). If you search for it, you can find it. It is a shocking picture, but I would still like you to see it.
I couldn't pass through the hallway where the photo was displayed, so I always took the long way around to another floor to avoid seeing the photo.
My grandfather was under the bomb and went to the burnt ruins of the bomb to look for his sister. I can understand now that he couldn't turn away or go another way.
There would have been a mountain of people still alive and moaning in the ruins of the burnt ruins. There would have been many more who would have died out in agony.
My grandfather walked for miles and miles, towing a rear wheelchair, through the narrow streets of rubble-strewn Nagasaki in search of his sister.
My grandfather was not a child then. But of course there were elementary school children who did the same thing he did. I am not speculating that there were. There were. I heard the story from him, and I still remember it.
A young brother and sister found their father's corpse in the ruins of the fire and burned it themselves. They didn't have enough wood to burn him alive, and when they saw his brain spilling out, they ran away, and that was the last time they ever saw him again.
I can never forget that story I heard when I was a kid, and even now it's painful and painful, my hands are shaking and I'm crying.
I keep wondering how that old man who ran away from his father's brain was able to expose to the public the unimaginably horrible trauma, the scar that will never heal, even after all these years.
Now I think I understand a little.
Why I can't help but talk about my grandfather and the old man now, even as I remember my own trauma.
Because this level of suffering is nothing compared to their words being forgotten.
It's nothing compared to the tremendous suffering that once existed that will be forgotten, like my hands shaking, my heart palpitating, my nose running with vertigo, and so on.
My grandfather, who went through an unimaginable hell, lived to see his grandchildren born, and met his sister's death in the ruins of the fire.
In other words, my grandfather was one of the happiest people in the ruins of the fire.
My grandfather and that old man were, after all, just people wading in the depths of hell.
I think that the suffering that even people who had experienced unimaginable pain could not imagine was lying like pebbles on the ground in Nagasaki 78 years ago, and no one paid any attention to it.
Their suffering, which I can't even imagine, is nothing compared to the countless, unimaginable suffering they witnessed, which they pretend never happened.
Memories fade inexorably with each passing human mouth. The memories that those people could never allow to be forgotten are almost forgotten.
The tremendous suffering of 78 years ago is mostly gone, never to be recounted.
Those who suffered the most from the atomic bombing died rotting in the ruins of the fire without being able to tell anyone about it.
Many of those who saw it with their own eyes kept their mouths shut and took it with them to their graves. Most of those who spoke a few words are still in their graves.
Compared to the words of the old men, my own words are so light. I would rather keep my mouth shut than speak in such light words.
But still, someone has to take over. I realize that even my words, which are so light, are only the top of the voices that are left in this world to carry on the story of the atomic bombing.
I know how it feels to think that I am the only one. Still, I hope that you will not shut your mouth. I know that I have closed my mouth because I thought I shouldn't talk about it, and that is the result.
Sometimes I almost choose to stop imagining the unimaginable suffering and live my life consuming other people's suffering for fun.
I am writing this while I still have some imagination of the suffering of the old people whose voices, faces, and even words I can no longer recall.
すまん。勝手に翻訳した。拡散はどうするかな。redditとかに投稿するのがいいのか?
----
I have seen some posts asking if they should talk about "the case" even though they were not involved in it and were not born in Nagasaki or Hiroshima, and I am a bit aware of it, so I have to say what I have to say. I say this because I was born in Nagasaki, am a third generation atomic bomb survivor, and grew up hearing the stories of those who experienced the atomic bombing firsthand. I know it's a little bit too much for me, but I'm going to say this because there are very few survivors left.
In Nagasaki, children grow up hearing stories about the atomic bombing. They were stuffed into sushi for nearly an hour in the gymnasium of an elementary school in the middle of summer, with no air conditioner or fan, and told stories about the atomic bombing. That was a hard time for me. I think it must have been even harder for the old people who told the stories, but there was no way an elementary school kid could imagine such a thing, and I had forgotten most of the stories I had been told for a long time. I have forgotten most of the stories I was told. I can only remember one or two at most. There is one more hard thing. Every year around this time, a row of grotesque images that would drive the PTA crazy in other areas are prominently displayed in the hallways. These days, I hear that the atomic bomb museum has been bleached out and many of the radical and horrifying exhibits that traumatized visitors have been taken down. I don't know if they are still there, but they were there when I was in elementary school.
There was one photo that I just couldn't face when I was in elementary school. It is a picture of Sumiteru Taniguchi. If you search for it, you can find it. It is a shocking picture, but I would like you to take a look at it. I couldn't pass through the hallway where the photo was posted, so I always took the long way around to another floor of the school building to avoid seeing the photo.
Now I'm thinking that my grandfather, who headed into the burnt ruins to look for his sister, couldn't have turned away or taken a different path. There would have been a mountain of people still alive and moaning, not just pictures, and a mountain more who would have given up at the end of their suffering. He walked for miles and miles, towing his handcart through the narrow streets of rubble-strewn Nagasaki in search of his sister. My grandfather was not a child at the time, but of course there were children who did similar things. Not that there wouldn't have been. There were. I heard the story from him, and I still remember it. A young brother and sister found their father's body in the ruins of a fire and they burned it. They didn't have enough wood to burn his body, and when they saw the raw brain that spilled out, they ran away and that was the last time they ever saw him anymore.
I can never forget the story I heard when I was a kid, and even now it is painful and painful, my hands are shaking and I am crying. I keep wondering how the old man who escaped from that father's brain could have been able to unravel the most horrible trauma imaginable and expose it to the public with scars that will never heal.
Now I think I can understand a little.
The reason I can't help but talk about my grandfather and that old man, even if I have to rehash my own trauma, is that this level of suffering is nothing compared to the fact that their words will be forgotten. My hands shaking, my heart palpitating and dizzy, my nose running with tears, it's nothing compared to the tremendous suffering that was once there and will be forgotten.
My grandfather, who went through an unimaginable hell, lived to see his grandchildren born, and met his sister's death in the ruins of the fire. In other words, my grandfather was one of the happiest people in the ruins of the fire. My grandfather and that old man were, after all, just people wading in the depths of hell. I think that the suffering that even people who had experienced unimaginable pain could not imagine was lying like pebbles in Nagasaki 78 years ago, and no one paid any attention to it. Their suffering, which I can't even imagine, is nothing compared to the countless, tremendous suffering they witnessed, which they pretend never happened.
Memories fade inexorably every time people talk about them. The memories that those people could not allow to be forgotten are now largely forgotten; the tremendous suffering of 78 years ago is mostly gone, never to be recounted again. Those who suffered the most from the atomic bombing died rotting in the ruins of the fire, unable to tell anyone about it. Many of those who saw it with their own eyes kept their mouths shut and took it with them to their graves. Most of those who spoke a few words are now under the grave.
Compared to the words of the old men, my own words are so light. I would rather keep my mouth shut than speak in such light words. But still, someone has to take over. I realize that even my words, which are so light, are only the top of the voices that are left in this world to carry on the story of the atomic bombing. I know how it feels to wonder if someone like myself is allowed to speak about this. Still, I hope that you will not shut your mouth. This is the result of our silence.
Sometimes I almost choose to stop imagining the unimaginable suffering and live my life consuming other people's suffering for the fun of it. I am writing this while I still have some imagination of the suffering of the old people whose voices, faces, and even words I can no longer recall.
Translator's note: The original post in Japanese is a response to a post by a Japanese contributor who wondered if he was qualified to speak out on the subject of the A-bomb when he was not from Hiroshima and Nagasaki, but still spoke out about Barbie and the A-bomb. I translated it here because I think it deserves to be read by the world.
I must talk about various things regarding the Barbie incident.
I saw a post about it from someone who is neither directly involved nor from Nagasaki or Hiroshima, and it made me realize that there are things I must say.
I was born in Nagasaki and grew up listening to stories from the survivors, being a third-generation survivor myself. Most survivors are no longer with us, so I feel compelled to speak up.
In Nagasaki, kids grow up hearing about the atomic bomb. We were packed like sushi in a gymnasium without air conditioning or even fans during the scorching summer, and we listened to stories about the bomb. It was incredibly tough for me.
I imagine it was even harder for the elderly who spoke about their experiences. As a child, I couldn't fully comprehend their pain, and now, I can hardly remember most of the stories I heard. I can only recall one or two.
Every year during this time, gruesome images that would make PTA elsewhere go crazy were displayed in the hallways. I heard that many of the horrifying exhibits that used to traumatize visitors at the Atomic Bomb Museum have been removed, and the museum has been considerably sanitized. I'm not sure about the current situation, but that's how it was when I was there.
There was one photograph that I could never bear to look at as a child – a picture of Tadashi Taniguchi. You can find it if you search, but it's a shocking image with a viewer discretion warning. Still, I want people to see it.
I couldn't walk down the hallway where that photo was displayed, and I always took a different route, avoiding it so I wouldn't have to see it.
Now, I think of my grandpa who went to the ruins to search for my sister. He couldn't look away or take a different path. The pain must have been unimaginable.
Besides photographs, there were many living people moaning in pain back then, and there must have been even more who succumbed to suffering.
My grandpa walked for miles, pulling a handcart through the debris-laden streets of Nagasaki, searching for my sister.
Even though my grandpa was not a child, I'm sure there were elementary school kids who did similar things. I don't just think they might have been there; they were there. I heard the stories from the people themselves, and I still remember them.
I can't forget the stories I heard as a child, such as the young siblings finding their father's burnt corpse in the ruins and cremating him. They didn't have enough firewood, and their father ended up half-burnt. They ran away after seeing the brain tissue oozing out, and that became their final farewell.
I can never forget those stories I heard as a child, and even now, they still bring pain and suffering, making my hands tremble and tears flow.
I wonder how my grandpa, who ran away from that father's brain tissue, could expose his unimaginable trauma and everlasting scars to the world.
Now, I feel like I understand a little.
Even someone like me, who experienced such unimaginable trauma, has gone through pain that I can't even imagine being compared to being discarded, forgotten, and ignored. Compared to what those people experienced, my suffering means nothing.
My trembling hands and the palpitations and dizziness I experienced are nothing compared to the tremendous pain that many others went through.
Memories fade irreversibly every time they pass through people's lips. The memories that I couldn't bear to be forgotten are almost forgotten now.
The unimaginable pain that existed 78 years ago has mostly disappeared, and we can no longer pass it on.
The people who suffered the most from the atomic bomb perished in the ruins, rotting away without being able to convey it to anyone.
Even those who saw it with their own eyes mostly took the memories with them to their graves. Most of them are now under the tombstones.
Compared to the words of the elderly, my words seem so light. I think that speaking with such light words would be better than keeping silent, as silence has led to this result.
I feel like I might occasionally choose to stop imagining the unimaginable pain and consume the suffering of others in an amusing way to live on.
Before I forget the pain and suffering of those elderly people, whose faces and voices I can no longer recall, I will leave this here.
Références
Cour de cassation
chambre sociale
Audience publique du jeudi 12 février 2015
N° de pourvoi: 13-21975
Non publié au bulletin Cassation
Mme Goasguen (conseiller le plus ancien faisant fonction de président), président
SCP Gatineau et Fattaccini, SCP Masse-Dessen, Thouvenin et Coudray, avocat(s)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Texte intégral
LA COUR DE CASSATION, CHAMBRE SOCIALE, a rendu l'arrêt suivant :
Vu l'article 4 du code de procédure civile ;
Attendu, selon le jugement attaqué rendu en dernier ressort, que Mme X... a été engagée par l'oeuvre de perfectionnement de la Loire en qualité de psychomotricienne ; que le contrat ayant été transféré à l'association PEP de la Loire, la salariée était, en dernier lieu, affectée sur deux établissements distincts, l'un situé à Firminy et l'autre à Grand-Croix ; qu'elle a saisi la juridiction prud'homale d'une demande en paiement de frais exposés pour effectuer le trajet entre ces deux établissements ainsi qu'en paiement de dommages-intérêts ;
Attendu que pour débouter la salariée de ses demandes, le jugement retient que les dispositions contractuelles ne prévoient pas la prise en charge par l'association des frais de carburant engagés pour les déplacements entre la résidence habituelle de la salariée et ses différents lieux de travail, et que l'intéressée n'apporte pas la preuve d'un engagement de cette dernière de rembourser ses frais de déplacement pour se rendre à Grand-Croix ;
Qu'en statuant ainsi, alors que la salariée demandait le remboursement de frais exposés pour le trajet entre les deux établissements auxquels elle était affectée, le conseil de prud'hommes a méconnu l'objet du litige dont il était saisi ;
CASSE ET ANNULE, dans toutes ses dispositions, le jugement rendu le 27 mai 2013, entre les parties, par le conseil de prud'hommes de Saint-Etienne ; remet, en conséquence, la cause et les parties dans l'état où elles se trouvaient avant ledit jugement et, pour être fait droit, les renvoie devant le conseil de prud'hommes de Lyon ;
Condamne l'association PEP 42 aux dépens ;
Vu l'article 700 du code de procédure civile, la condamne à payer à Mme X... la somme de 3 000 euros ;
Dit que sur les diligences du procureur général près la Cour de cassation, le présent arrêt sera transmis pour être transcrit en marge ou à la suite du jugement cassé ;
Ainsi fait et jugé par la Cour de cassation, chambre sociale, et prononcé par le président en son audience publique du douze février deux mille quinze.
Moyen produit par la SCP Masse-Dessen, Thouvenin et Coudray, avocat aux Conseils, pour Mme X...
Le moyen fait grief au jugement attaqué d'AVOIR débouté Madame Véronique X... de ses demandes tendant au remboursement des frais exposés pour ses déplacements et au paiement de dommages-intérêts.
AUX MOTIFS QUE selon les dispositions de l'article L.3261-3 du Code du travail, « l'employeur peut prendre en charge, dans les conditions prévues à l'article L.3261-4 du Code du travail tout ou partie des frais de carburant engagés pour leurs déplacements entre leur résidence habituelle et leur lieu de travail par ceux de ses salariés : 1° Dont la résidence habituelle ou le lieu de travail est situé en dehors de la région d'Ile de France et d'un périmètre de transports urbains défini par l'article 27 de la loi n° 82-1153 du 30 décembre 1982 d'orientation des transports intérieurs ; 2° Ou pour lesquels l'utilisation d'un véhicule personnel est rendue indispensable par des conditions d'horaires de travail particuliers ne permettant pas d'emprunter un mode collectif de transport ; que dans les mêmes conditions, l'employeur peut prendre en charge les frais exposés pour l'alimentation de véhicules électriques ou hybrides rechargeables et permettre la recharge desdits véhicules sur le lieu de travail. Le bénéfice de cette prise en charge ne peut être cumulé avec celle prévue à l'article L.3261-2 du Code du travail» ; que l'article L.3261-47 dudit Code précise : « La prise en charge des frais de carburant mentionnée à l'article L.3261-3 du même Code est mise en oeuvre : 1° Pour les entreprises entrant dans le champ d'application de l'article L.2242-1 du Code du travail par accord entre l'employeur et les représentants d'organisations syndicales représentatives dans l'entreprise ; 2° Pour les autres entreprises, par décision unilatérale de l'employeur après consultation du comité d'entreprise ou, à défaut, des délégués du personnel s'il en existe » ; que les dispositions contractuelles entre Madame X... et l'APEP 42 ne prévoient pas la prise en charge par l'employeur des frais de carburant engagés pour les déplacements entre la résidence habituelle de Madame X... et ses différents lieux de travail ; que Madame X... n'apporte pas la preuve d'un engagement de son employeur de rembourser les frais de déplacement pour se rendre à Grand Crois ; que lors de la réorganisation de l'entreprise signifié à Madame X... par courrier du 21 juin 2010, par lequel il était bien précisé deux lieux de travail différents, Madame X... aurait pu demander à son employeur l'application des dispositions de l'article R.3261-15 du Code du travail : « Le salarié qui exerce son activité sur plusieurs ces différents lieux et entre ces lieux et la résidence habituelle du salarié peut prétendre à la prise en charge des frais de carburant ou d'alimentation électrique d'un véhicules engagés lui permettant de réaliser l'ensemble des déplacements qui lui sont imposés entre sa résidence habituelle et ses différents lieux de travail, ainsi qu'entre ces lieux de travail » ; que cette demande n'a été faite qu'en novembre 2010 ; qu'en tout état de cause, la prise en charge des frais relève d'une disposition unilatérale de l'employeur ; qu'en l'espèce, pour la prise en charge des frais de déplacement domicile/lieu de travail l'APEP 42 a confirmé à Madame X... que la faculté ouverte à l'employeur de prendre en charge une partie des frais engagés par le salarié, ne présente aucun caractère obligatoire pour l'entreprise ; qu'en conséquence, la demande de Madame X... de paiement de ses frais de déplacement n'est pas fondée.
ALORS QUE Madame Véronique X... poursuivait le remboursement des frais exposés au titre des trajets effectués entre les deux établissements auxquels elle était affectée ; qu'en statuant sur les frais exposés pour les trajets entre la résidence habituelle de la salariée et ses différents lieux de travail, le Conseil de prud'hommes a méconnu l'objet du litige en violation des articles 4 et 5 du Code de procédure civile.
ET ALORS QUE Madame Véronique X... soutenait que le contrat de travail transféré à la PEP 42 prévoyait le remboursement des frais de déplacement et que le contrat régularisé avec la PEP 42 à l'occasion de ce transfert constituait un simple avenant n'emportant pas novation du contrat initial en ce qu'il prévoyait le remboursement des frais exposés pour les trajets ; qu'en omettant de répondre à ce moyen déterminant des écritures d'appel de la salariée, le Conseil de prud'hommes a entaché sa décision d'un défaut de réponse à conclusions en violation de l'article 455 du Code de procédure civile.
ALORS encore QU'en application de l'article R.3261-15 du Code du travail, le salarié qui exerce son activité sur plusieurs lieux de travail au sein d'une même entreprise qui n'assure pas le transport entre ces différents lieux et entre ces lieux et la résidence habituelle du salarié peut prétendre à la prise en charge des frais de carburant ou d'alimentation électrique d'un véhicule engagés lui permettant de réaliser l'ensemble des déplacements qui lui sont imposés entre ces lieux de travail ; qu'en se fondant sur les dispositions des articles L.3261-3 et L.3261-4 du Code du travail, relatifs aux seuls déplacements entre la résidence habituelle et le lieu de travail, pour rejeter la demande de la salariée, le Conseil de prud'hommes a violé lesdits articles L.3261-3 et L.3261-4 du Code du travail par fausse application.
ALORS de plus QU'en application de l'article R.3261-15 du Code du travail, le salarié qui exerce son activité sur plusieurs lieux de travail au sein d'une même entreprise qui n'assure pas le transport entre ces différents lieux et entre ces lieux et la résidence habituelle du salarié peut prétendre à la prise en charge des frais de carburant ou d'alimentation électrique d'un véhicule engagés lui permettant de réaliser l'ensemble des déplacements qui lui sont imposés entre ces lieux de travail ; qu'en reprochant à la salariée de n'avoir pas demandé l'application des dispositions de cet article dès qu'elle avait été informée de son affectation sur deux établissements différents, le Conseil de prud'hommes a violé l'article R.3261-15 du Code du travail en y ajoutant une condition qu'il ne prévoit pas.
ALORS QUE la renonciation à un droit ne se présume pas ; qu'en reprochant à la salariée de n'avoir pas demandé l'application des dispositions de l'article R.3261-15 du Code du travail dès qu'elle avait été informée de son affectation sur deux établissements différents, quand cette circonstance, fût-elle établie, ne pouvait caractériser la renonciation de la salariée à se prévaloir du droit au remboursement des frais de trajet exposés, le Conseil de prud'hommes a violé l'article 1134 du Code civil.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
