■anond:20200914193908

えっと脈絡がなさすぎ意味が分からん。

なんとか解釈するに、twerkがフェミニズムムーブメントだという人がいるが、フェミニストとして知られるビヨンセがtwerkしてることに対して批判して、「twerkはフェミニズムじゃない！」と怒ってる人がいるってことかな。

うん。で？

その人が正当だという根拠はどこにあるの？ビヨンセが間違っているという根拠はどこにあるの？

増田の世界ではそうなのでは？

現実は違うけど

とまで言い切るからには膨大な根拠があるんだろうけど。

自分は先に検索して一番最初に出てきたこれを出しとくわ。

For Lennox to say, as if she were the definitive expert, that sexual performance is not feminism shows how far removed she is from current third-wave feminist theory, because the jury is still out on that one. Twerking, along with all sexual performances, can be both empowering and exploitive and are widely acknowledged as not mutually exclusive. In fact, the ways in which women present their sexuality and take it back from the male gaze is a popular topic with young feminists.

The real kicker is that in the past, Lennox herself has often displayed her sexuality in public, posing for photos in nothing but boots and a floppy hat, all while sporting a short cropped haircut to distance herself from her femininity. So why is this sexual performance empowering when Lennox does it, or when say, Madonna or Iggy Azalea do it, but not when Beyoncé, Rihanna, or Nicki Minaj do it?

https://thehumanist.com/arts_entertainment/culture/what-does-twerking-have-to-do-with-feminism

Permalink | 記事への反応(1) | 20:20

ツイートシェア