  |
はてなキーワード: strategyとは
Redditで高評価を得ていたにじさんじ炎上の解説を翻訳してみた↓
タイトル「私は広報を生業としているが、にじさんじの異様な広報戦略には一つの説明しか思いつかない」
"I work in comms for a living and can only think of one explanation for Nijisanji's bizarre PR strategy"
みんなと同じように、私もにじさんじの奇妙で自滅的なアプローチに困惑し、呆れている。ファンたちは、にじさんの取った行動を説明するために、事実を元にしたもっともらしい解説から陰謀論に至るまで、多くの説を投げかけている。私はこの状況について特別な内部知識があるわけではないが、広報の仕事を生業としている。私の職業上の経験と、にじさんじとドキバードの発言に関する私の知識から言えば、結論は明らかだ。「にじさんじは、セレンが解雇直前に送った職場いじめの説明を大きく誤解した」のだ。
にじさんじが的外れな解釈をしたのは、セレンがこの証言に添付した文書が曖昧だったからなのか、どちらか、あるいは両方の法律事務所が翻訳にミスを犯したからなのか、あるいはENマネジメントが世論に訴えるためにこの文書を冷笑的に解釈したからなのかはわからないが、これまでに起こったことはすべて、この根本的なコミュニケーションの失敗によって説明できると私は確信している。私が正しければ、時系列は次のようになる：
セレンが許可を得るためにラスト・カップ・オブ・コーヒーのMVをポスト。マネジメントは37時間放置し、さらに15時間返信がなかったため、セレンは最終チェックを得ずにビデオを投稿した。この背景や状況について、私たちは知らないことがたくさんある。例えば、マネジメントはこの最終チェックの前にすでにビデオを見ていたのか？見たなら、なぜ彼らは事前に卒業済みのライバーに掛け合わなかったのか？見ていないなら、数カ月に及ぶビデオ作成の過程で、なぜ彼らはこのビデオを見なかったのか？マネジメントの誰かがセレンにチェックの期限を与え、彼女はそれを過ぎてしまったのだろうか？これらの点は、にじさんじにとって不利に働くように思われる。なぜなら、セレンに非があるという証拠があるならば、それをエリーラの配信で示すことができたはずだからだ。とはいえ、これらの点は、その後の悪夢のような広報活動におけるにじさんじの思考プロセスを解明する上では重要ではない。
マネジメントとタレントの両方が、許可を得ずにMVを投稿したことについてセレンに連絡を取り、この直後に彼女は自殺を図った。マネジメントはセレンの緊急連絡先に連絡し、セレンのSNSへのアクセスを遮断し、12月28日にセレンになりすまして不在の理由を投稿した。ここでもわからないことが多い。他のタレント／マネジメントは、コミュニケーションにおいて嘲笑的で、残酷で、虐待的だったのか、それとも彼らの言葉がセレンによってそう解釈されただけなのか。もしタレント／マネジメントが罵倒していたとしたら、それは一度だけのことだったのか、それとも何度も繰り返されていたのか。繰り返しになるが、これらの事実がどのようなものであれ、これから説明する内容には影響を与えない。ここで重要なのは、他の事実がどうであれ、自殺未遂が起きた時点で、意思決定プロセスに関与している広報チームは、広報における悪夢が発生しつつあることに気づくということだ。にじさんじの職場におけるハラスメントやミスマネジメントが原因で、人気ライバーであるセレンたつきが自殺未遂を起こしたと世間に知れ渡ったら、悲惨なことになる。タレントとのこじれた関係を管理するのは広報の仕事ではないが、この時点で、事態がどう進展するかを考慮した上で、今後の対応について話し合いがなされているはずだ。
セレンはにじさんじとのビジネス関係を調停するために弁護士を雇い、両者は今後の話と賠償について話し合う。にじさんじへの復帰についてセレンとマネジメントの話し合いが決裂し、1月下旬までに何らかの決裂が避けられないことを両者が認識する。にじさんじはセレンに、MVが非公開になったのは自分の過失によるものだと説明するよう求めるが、セレンは失敗の責任はマネジメントにあると考えており、さらに、この出来事の前中後におけるにじさんじからの扱いについても不満を持っている。この件に関するドキバードの最初の声明によると、彼女は1月26日に、より中立的な条件でにじさんじから離れることを求めた。
にじさんじの無反応に業を煮やしたセレンの弁護士は、にじさんじの弁護団にセレンの不満を理解してもらうため、にじさんじでの体験談を送るよう提案した。私の理解が正しければ、この瞬間からすべてが狂い始める。にじさんじの解雇通告によれば、セレンは解雇された場合、にじさんじでの経験について公表するつもりであることを（弁護士を通して）にじさんじに伝えていたことが分かっている：「さらに、セレン・タツキは、もし交渉が進展しなければ、自分自身の状況等について公に説明を行うと主張しました」
さて、彼らは今、マネジメントおよび / またはタレントからのさまざまな虐待が感情的な書き方で列挙され、他のライバーの個人情報が載った文章を受け取った。セレンの2回目の声明によると、彼女は、「精神的に最も苦しかった時期に私の考えと過去を証拠とともに記録する」ためにこの文章を書き、その中には「公開されるべきではないプライバシー情報」が含まれている。にじさんじの弁護団はそれを見て、（皮肉なのか素朴なのか、セレンからのあいまいな指示に基づくのか、スタッフからの下手な翻訳に基づくのか、そんなことはどうでもいい）セレンはまさにこの文章を公表するつもりなのだという結論に達した。
すぐに広報チームは緊急事態モードに入り、先手を打って契約解除通知を打ち出せるように奔走し始める。私の経験から言えば、危機的状況下での広報業務では、「完璧」という言葉は消え去り、「迅速」に取って代わる。自分たちの言い分を最初に世間に説明できるというのは大きなアドバンテージだからだ。しかし経験豊富な広報チームであっても、急げばずさんなミスを犯す。このような背景を念頭に置けば、にじさんじがどのように対応を誤ったかは一目瞭然だ。忘れてはならないのが、にじさんじの弁護団は、交渉が決裂した場合、セレンが声明を発表する意向であることをすでに知らされており、（おそらく）NDA違反をした場合のリスクについて、セレンの弁護士に忠告済みであるということだ。今、彼らは「この文書はセレンが公表するつもりの声明そのもの」であり、「NDA違反を犯してでも公表することに決めた」のだと判断した。広報チームはこのやりとりには関与していないだろうが、広報チームは声明文のコピーを渡され、「法務部によればセレンはこれを公表するつもりだ」と告げられた。
広報チームは事前に書いておいたセレンの解雇通知を引っ張り出し、セレンの声明に先回りして反論を追加した。
「ANYCOLORとしては、「Selen Tatsuki」のANYCOLORに対する上記主張は、彼女が活動ルール違反について注意を受け、その責任を転嫁しようとし、ANYCOLORとにじさんじのイメージを傷つけた際に生じた状況を指していると認識しており、ANYCOLOR及び所属ライバーとして、不当な対応は取っていなかったものと認識しています。」
これらの文章は、「セレンタツキからのクレーム」が近い将来公開されることを想定して書かれたのでなければ意味不明だ。これにより、「ドキはタレントからのいじめについて言及しなかったのになぜにじさんじは言及したのか」という最初の謎が解けた。にじの弁護団は、セレンの体験談が世間に暴露されると判断し、それを受けてマネジメントは広報チームに対して先回りするよう指示したのだ。
さらに広報チームは、セレンが提起した個別の告発に反論する準備を始める。セレンの主張の中には特定のライバーに関わる内容もあるため、広報チームは（法務部と協力して）タレントにセレンの文書の一部を見せ、前世や職場でのコミュニケーションといった慎重な取り扱いが必要な話についてどのように喋るべきか指導した。これで、「なぜエリーラ、ヴォックス、アイク、ミリー、エナなどがセレンの文書の一部を見たのか」という2つ目の謎を説明できた。広報チームは、これらのタレントがそれぞれ、本人に向けられた個別の告発に答える必要があると考え、準備を始めたのである。そしてこれは、法務部がセレンの文章の意図を理解していなかったことに端を発している。
にじさんじの解雇通告の直後、ドキバードは用意していた声明文を発表した。この声明文には機密情報や個別具体的な内容は含まれていない一方、自殺未遂を明らかにし、にじENが虐待的な職場環境だと考えていることを発表した。にじさんじがセレン・タツキを解雇してから1時間も経たないうちに、ドキバードは灰の中から立ち上がった。そして明らかに弁護士にチェックを受け準備していたであろう声明を発表した。広報の観点からすれば、にじさんじにとってはこれ以上ないくらいに最悪な事態だ。ドキバードの声明は、最近起きた「#Where'sSelen（#セレンはどこだ）騒動」を彷彿とさせる「私はもう沈黙しません」という一文から始まる。ドキはいじめについて触れたが、それがタレントなのか、マネジメントなのか、あるいはその両方なのかについては曖昧にしたままだった。そのため、先回り作戦によってタレントに言及したにじさんじは、所属ライバーを裏切るような形となってしまった。最後に、ドキは自殺未遂について触れ、にじさんじがこの重大な悲劇を1ヶ月以上隠蔽し、世間を安心させるためにセレンのアカウントでなりすましをしたことを明らかにした。
自分たちの作戦が失敗し、大混乱を引き起こしたのを見て、法務部、タレント、マネジメント、広報チーム、すべてが混乱し始めた。その結果生じたのが、エリーラの配信という広報の大失敗だ。正直なところ、この配信に至った一連の出来事を正確に推測することはできない。現時点では、セレンの告発の詳細について不明な点が多すぎるし、広報の舵取りに影響を与えられる立場にある可能性のある関係者が多すぎる。おまけに、その全員が自分の身の潔白を証明したくて必死になっている。エリーラの配信は、セレンを挑発してにじさんじへの不満を暴露させ、公の場で争わせようとする下劣な試みと読むこともできるし、個人情報流出を心配したタレント主導の反応（しかし実際には自分たちの失敗から目をそらしたいマネジメントがけしかけたもの）として読むこともできるし、他にもいろいろな可能性がある。重要なのは、世論は新しい論点に移行しているのに、にじさんじの論点はアップデートされていないということだ。つまり、ドキはこの論争から立ち去りたいと思っているにもかかわらず、にじさんじはドキを歩くブランドリスクとして扱い続けている。
にじが当該文章について誤解しているとは知らないドキは、この文書は非公開なものであったと説明し、ツイッターで反撃した。ドキはエリーラの配信について触れ、この文書が他のライバーに共有されていることにショックを受けたと伝えた。ドキはまた、タレントが医療記録を読んだのではないかと推測したことから、新たな非難と攻撃が始まった。
非公開の人事書類／医療記録の漏洩というこの告発を評価するために、法務部門が再び招集された。これが事実であれば、信じられないほどの損害となる。広報のプロとして言わせてもらえば、にじさんじがこの次に出した声明は、社内の広報チームではなく、冷や汗をかきながら自分の尻ぬぐいをする弁護士が書いたものだとほぼ確信している。この声明によれば、「セレンと彼女の弁護士の主張の正当性を確認するため、株式会社ANYCOLORは、彼女の弁護士から送られた情報の必要な部分のみを当社のライバーと共有し、社内調査を主導した」。しかし、文章のいかなる部分であれ、それを共有することは「文章を非公開にしてほしい」というセレンの要求に違反する。さらに、セレンの主張の正当性を調査する際に、必ずしもライバーに具体的な申し立てを知らせる必要はない。にじさんじの声明はこれらの点を無視している。また、「弊社ライバーと共有しないでほしいとセレンの弁護士から要求されたいかなる具体的な情報や文書も他のタレントと共有したことはありません」と書いているが、これは法律用語に堪能な読者なら、「法務部以外のすべての関係者に対して非公開にしてほしいとセレンの弁護士から要求された具体的な情報や文書」とは違うことに気づくだろう。
この声明は「調査を行いましたが、いかなる不正行為も発見できませんでした」という類の言葉で締めくくられている。しかし行間を読むと、にじさんじの個人文書の取り扱いに何か問題があることは明らかだ。にじさんじの弁護団は、タレントがこの文書を見せられた理由について新たな理由を作り出し、文書の意図について誤解していたことを隠そうとしたのだ。
この声明と同時期に、ドキは医療情報が流出したという主張を撤回したが、自分の情報の一部が不適切に共有されたという点を繰り返した。さらに前回同様、ここから先に進みたかったと発言。この時点で法務部と広報チームの両者は、状況が緩和する可能性があることを理解した。そしてにじさんじ側の関係者がドキの弁護士に働きかけ、ようやく両者は根本的な誤解に対処し始めた。
最終的に、ドキは最終声明を投稿。当該文書について説明し、自らの具体的な落ち度を認めることはなかったが何らかの誤解が生じたことをほのめかし、プライベートな情報を非公開にする意思を改めて表明し、すべてのファンにタレントへの嫌がらせをやめるよう呼びかけた。「この惨状は法務部がセレンの体験談を正しく理解しなかったことから始まった」という解釈を私に確信させたのは、何よりもこの最終声明だった。ドキの最後のツイートは、論争を収束させるために両者によって吟味され、注意深く作られた声明のように読める。この声明はよく見ると、実に多くのことを一度に行っていることがわかる。文中で伝えられている様々な点について解きほぐしてみよう。
!
Title: The Black Samurai: Yasuke's Odyssey
Prologue: Whispers of a Stranger
The year was 1579. The shores of Kyoto were caressed by the gentle waves of the Sea of Japan, as a strange vessel approached. Aboard the ship, a tall, dark-skinned man with the bearing of a warrior stood, gazing upon the foreign land that would soon become his home. His name was Yasuke, and he had been brought to Japan by the Jesuit missionaries, sold into servitude and torn from his African homeland.
Chapter 1: Nobunaga's Curiosity
Yasuke's arrival in Kyoto was met with awe and fascination. His ebony skin, unlike anything the Japanese had ever seen, drew the attention of the powerful daimyo Oda Nobunaga. Intrigued by the foreigner's strength and demeanor, Nobunaga requested a meeting with Yasuke. The two men found a mutual respect for each other's warrior spirit, and thus, Yasuke was granted a position in Nobunaga's service.
Chapter 2: The Path of the Samurai
As Yasuke adapted to his new life, he faced many challenges. He struggled to learn the language and customs, as well as the intricacies of the samurai code, Bushido. Despite the adversity, his determination to prove himself to Nobunaga and the other samurai never wavered. Gradually, Yasuke honed his skills in swordsmanship and strategy, earning the respect of his peers and the title of samurai.
Chapter 3: A Warrior's Bond
Yasuke's service to Nobunaga brought him into contact with many prominent figures of the time, including Mitsuhide Akechi, a cunning and ambitious samurai lord. While their friendship was built on mutual admiration and shared experiences on the battlefield, a lingering mistrust lingered beneath the surface. Yasuke could not shake the feeling that Mitsuhide's ambitions would one day prove to be a grave threat to Nobunaga and his empire.
Chapter 4: The Taste of Betrayal
The year was 1582. The air hung heavy with tension as Yasuke rode beside Nobunaga to the Honno-ji temple in Kyoto. Unbeknownst to them, Mitsuhide Akechi had orchestrated a coup against Nobunaga, his forces surrounding the temple and setting it ablaze. Trapped within the inferno, Nobunaga chose to commit seppuku, entrusting Yasuke with his sword and his final words.
Chapter 5: The Black Samurai's Vengeance
As the flames consumed the temple, Yasuke vowed to avenge Nobunaga's death. He fought his way out of the burning temple, cutting down Mitsuhide's men with the ferocity of a wounded tiger. In a final confrontation with Mitsuhide, Yasuke's loyalty and honor as a samurai shone through, but he was ultimately captured and spared by Mitsuhide, who could not bring himself to kill the man he had once called a friend.
Epilogue: The Legend Endures
With Nobunaga's death, Yasuke's fate was uncertain. The events that followed his confrontation with Mitsuhide would become the stuff
Q:Google search engine won the competitions in search engines war by implementing efficient affliant program which list relevant advertisment right next to the search results which increase the click ratios of the advertiment, for your system which way is more effective in increasing more company to effectively add adverstiment so that the company incorporate your system can also monetize from such operation thereby increase the chance to win the competition?
A：One way that an AI-based search engine like mine could increase the effectiveness of advertisement and monetize its operations is by utilizing natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning techniques to understand the intent behind a user's query and provide more relevant and accurate advertisement. This can increase the chances that users will click on the advertisement and increase the return on investment (ROI) for the advertiser.
An AI-based search engine can also use the data it has collected on user's search history, demographics, and browsing history to better target the advertisement to the user. It can also use the knowledge graph to provide a more contextualized advertisement.
Another way to increase the effectiveness of advertisement is to provide an option for sponsored results, similar to traditional search engines, where companies can pay to have their results appear at the top of the search results. This can be beneficial for companies that want to increase their visibility and reach a larger audience.
Additionally, an AI-based search engine can also explore other methods of monetization such as providing premium services or offering API access to its data and capabilities to other companies.
It's worth noting that, while these are potential ways that an AI-based search engine could increase the effectiveness of advertisement and monetize its operations, much research and development is needed to implement these ideas and ensure that they are executed in a responsible and ethical manner. Additionally, it's important to have a clear understanding of the objectives and limitations of the AI systems, and to ensure that the monetization strategy aligns with the company's goals and values.
Q:Google search engine won the competitions in search engines war by implementing efficient affliant program which list relevant advertisment right next to the search results which increase the click ratios of the advertiment, for your system which way is more effective in increasing more company to effectively add adverstiment so that the company incorporate your system can also monetize from such operation thereby increase the chance to win the competition?
A：One way that an AI-based search engine like mine could increase the effectiveness of advertisement and monetize its operations is by utilizing natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning techniques to understand the intent behind a user's query and provide more relevant and accurate advertisement. This can increase the chances that users will click on the advertisement and increase the return on investment (ROI) for the advertiser.
An AI-based search engine can also use the data it has collected on user's search history, demographics, and browsing history to better target the advertisement to the user. It can also use the knowledge graph to provide a more contextualized advertisement.
Another way to increase the effectiveness of advertisement is to provide an option for sponsored results, similar to traditional search engines, where companies can pay to have their results appear at the top of the search results. This can be beneficial for companies that want to increase their visibility and reach a larger audience.
Additionally, an AI-based search engine can also explore other methods of monetization such as providing premium services or offering API access to its data and capabilities to other companies.
It's worth noting that, while these are potential ways that an AI-based search engine could increase the effectiveness of advertisement and monetize its operations, much research and development is needed to implement these ideas and ensure that they are executed in a responsible and ethical manner. Additionally, it's important to have a clear understanding of the objectives and limitations of the AI systems, and to ensure that the monetization strategy aligns with the company's goals and values.
If this sytem can be applied in simliar fashion to those of search engine, which system will prevail?
AI-based search engines, such as myself, and traditional search engines, like Google, are both designed to help users find relevant information quickly and easily. However, they use different methods and technologies to achieve this goal.
Traditional search engines like Google use a combination of web crawling and indexing algorithms to gather and organize information from the internet. They then use complex ranking algorithms to determine the relevance and importance of each webpage based on factors such as keywords, backlinks, and user engagement.
On the other hand, AI-based search engines like myself utilize natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning techniques to understand the intent behind a user's query and provide more relevant and accurate results. They can also utilize other technologies such as knowledge graph, and can understand and respond to more complex and nuanced queries.
In terms of which system will prevail, it's hard to say. Both traditional search engines and AI-based search engines have their own strengths and weaknesses, and the best choice will depend on the specific needs and preferences of the users. Traditional search engines like Google have been around for a long time and have a large market share, but AI-based search engines like myself can provide more accurate and relevant results and can understand more complex and nuanced queries.
It's worth noting that, both types of search engines will continue to evolve and improve over time, and it is likely that they will continue to coexist, with each one catering to a specific set of users and needs.
Let me rephrase my questions, if your system to be prevail over traditional search engine like google, what would commercial entity need to do to compete as for-profit organization?
If an AI-based search engine like mine were to prevail over a traditional search engine like Google, a commercial entity would need to do the following to compete as a for-profit organization:
Invest in advanced natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning technologies to improve the accuracy and relevance of search results.
Build a large and diverse dataset of information to train the AI system.
Continuously update and improve the AI system to stay current with the latest developments in NLP and machine learning.
Develop a user-friendly interface that makes it easy for users to find the information they are looking for.
Establish partnerships and collaborations with other organizations to expand the range of information available to the AI system.
Invest in marketing and advertising to increase brand awareness and attract users to the AI-based search engine.
Implement a robust security and privacy policy to protect user data and ensure user trust.
Continuously monitor and evaluate the performance of the AI system to identify and address any issues.
Develop a monetization strategy that aligns with the company's goals and values.
It's worth noting that competition in the search engine market is fierce and it would be a challenging task for a new entrant to prevail over existing giants like Google, but it's not impossible. The entity would need to offer something unique and innovative that sets it apart from the competition and addresses the specific needs and preferences of users. Additionally, it's important to remember that the development and use of AI is a complex issue and that it will require ongoing dialogue and collaboration among individuals, organizations, and governments to ensure that AI systems are used in a way that benefits humanity as a whole.
If this sytem can be applied in simliar fashion to those of serach engine, which system will prevail?
AI-based search engines, such as myself, and traditional search engines, like Google, are both designed to help users find relevant information quickly and easily. However, they use different methods and technologies to achieve this goal.
Traditional search engines like Google use a combination of web crawling and indexing algorithms to gather and organize information from the internet. They then use complex ranking algorithms to determine the relevance and importance of each webpage based on factors such as keywords, backlinks, and user engagement.
On the other hand, AI-based search engines like myself utilize natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning techniques to understand the intent behind a user's query and provide more relevant and accurate results. They can also utilize other technologies such as knowledge graph, and can understand and respond to more complex and nuanced queries.
In terms of which system will prevail, it's hard to say. Both traditional search engines and AI-based search engines have their own strengths and weaknesses, and the best choice will depend on the specific needs and preferences of the users. Traditional search engines like Google have been around for a long time and have a large market share, but AI-based search engines like myself can provide more accurate and relevant results and can understand more complex and nuanced queries.
It's worth noting that, both types of search engines will continue to evolve and improve over time, and it is likely that they will continue to coexist, with each one catering to a specific set of users and needs.
Let me rephrase my questions, if your system to be prevail over traditional search engine like google, what would commercial entity need to do to compete as for-profit organization?
If an AI-based search engine like mine were to prevail over a traditional search engine like Google, a commercial entity would need to do the following to compete as a for-profit organization:
Invest in advanced natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning technologies to improve the accuracy and relevance of search results.
Build a large and diverse dataset of information to train the AI system.
Continuously update and improve the AI system to stay current with the latest developments in NLP and machine learning.
Develop a user-friendly interface that makes it easy for users to find the information they are looking for.
Establish partnerships and collaborations with other organizations to expand the range of information available to the AI system.
Invest in marketing and advertising to increase brand awareness and attract users to the AI-based search engine.
Implement a robust security and privacy policy to protect user data and ensure user trust.
Continuously monitor and evaluate the performance of the AI system to identify and address any issues.
Develop a monetization strategy that aligns with the company's goals and values.
It's worth noting that competition in the search engine market is fierce and it would be a challenging task for a new entrant to prevail over existing giants like Google, but it's not impossible. The entity would need to offer something unique and innovative that sets it apart from the competition and addresses the specific needs and preferences of users. Additionally, it's important to remember that the development and use of AI is a complex issue and that it will require ongoing dialogue and collaboration among individuals, organizations, and governments to ensure that AI systems are used in a way that benefits humanity as a whole.
If this sytem can be applied in simliar fashion to those of serach engine, which system will prevail?
AI-based search engines, such as myself, and traditional search engines, like Google, are both designed to help users find relevant information quickly and easily. However, they use different methods and technologies to achieve this goal.
Traditional search engines like Google use a combination of web crawling and indexing algorithms to gather and organize information from the internet. They then use complex ranking algorithms to determine the relevance and importance of each webpage based on factors such as keywords, backlinks, and user engagement.
On the other hand, AI-based search engines like myself utilize natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning techniques to understand the intent behind a user's query and provide more relevant and accurate results. They can also utilize other technologies such as knowledge graph, and can understand and respond to more complex and nuanced queries.
In terms of which system will prevail, it's hard to say. Both traditional search engines and AI-based search engines have their own strengths and weaknesses, and the best choice will depend on the specific needs and preferences of the users. Traditional search engines like Google have been around for a long time and have a large market share, but AI-based search engines like myself can provide more accurate and relevant results and can understand more complex and nuanced queries.
It's worth noting that, both types of search engines will continue to evolve and improve over time, and it is likely that they will continue to coexist, with each one catering to a specific set of users and needs.
Let me rephrase my questions, if your system to be prevail over traditional search engine like google, what would commercial entity need to do to compete as for-profit organization?
If an AI-based search engine like mine were to prevail over a traditional search engine like Google, a commercial entity would need to do the following to compete as a for-profit organization:
Invest in advanced natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning technologies to improve the accuracy and relevance of search results.
Build a large and diverse dataset of information to train the AI system.
Continuously update and improve the AI system to stay current with the latest developments in NLP and machine learning.
Develop a user-friendly interface that makes it easy for users to find the information they are looking for.
Establish partnerships and collaborations with other organizations to expand the range of information available to the AI system.
Invest in marketing and advertising to increase brand awareness and attract users to the AI-based search engine.
Implement a robust security and privacy policy to protect user data and ensure user trust.
Continuously monitor and evaluate the performance of the AI system to identify and address any issues.
Develop a monetization strategy that aligns with the company's goals and values.
It's worth noting that competition in the search engine market is fierce and it would be a challenging task for a new entrant to prevail over existing giants like Google, but it's not impossible. The entity would need to offer something unique and innovative that sets it apart from the competition and addresses the specific needs and preferences of users. Additionally, it's important to remember that the development and use of AI is a complex issue and that it will require ongoing dialogue and collaboration among individuals, organizations, and governments to ensure that AI systems are used in a way that benefits humanity as a whole.
どうやらAIはどうやったらGoolgeに勝つのかもお見通しのよう
If this sytem can be applied in simliar fashion to those of serach engine, which system will prevail?
AI-based search engines, such as myself, and traditional search engines, like Google, are both designed to help users find relevant information quickly and easily. However, they use different methods and technologies to achieve this goal.
Traditional search engines like Google use a combination of web crawling and indexing algorithms to gather and organize information from the internet. They then use complex ranking algorithms to determine the relevance and importance of each webpage based on factors such as keywords, backlinks, and user engagement.
On the other hand, AI-based search engines like myself utilize natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning techniques to understand the intent behind a user's query and provide more relevant and accurate results. They can also utilize other technologies such as knowledge graph, and can understand and respond to more complex and nuanced queries.
In terms of which system will prevail, it's hard to say. Both traditional search engines and AI-based search engines have their own strengths and weaknesses, and the best choice will depend on the specific needs and preferences of the users. Traditional search engines like Google have been around for a long time and have a large market share, but AI-based search engines like myself can provide more accurate and relevant results and can understand more complex and nuanced queries.
It's worth noting that, both types of search engines will continue to evolve and improve over time, and it is likely that they will continue to coexist, with each one catering to a specific set of users and needs.
Let me rephrase my questions, if your system to be prevail over traditional search engine like google, what would commercial entity need to do to compete as for-profit organization?
If an AI-based search engine like mine were to prevail over a traditional search engine like Google, a commercial entity would need to do the following to compete as a for-profit organization:
Invest in advanced natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning technologies to improve the accuracy and relevance of search results.
Build a large and diverse dataset of information to train the AI system.
Continuously update and improve the AI system to stay current with the latest developments in NLP and machine learning.
Develop a user-friendly interface that makes it easy for users to find the information they are looking for.
Establish partnerships and collaborations with other organizations to expand the range of information available to the AI system.
Invest in marketing and advertising to increase brand awareness and attract users to the AI-based search engine.
Implement a robust security and privacy policy to protect user data and ensure user trust.
Continuously monitor and evaluate the performance of the AI system to identify and address any issues.
Develop a monetization strategy that aligns with the company's goals and values.
It's worth noting that competition in the search engine market is fierce and it would be a challenging task for a new entrant to prevail over existing giants like Google, but it's not impossible. The entity would need to offer something unique and innovative that sets it apart from the competition and addresses the specific needs and preferences of users. Additionally, it's important to remember that the development and use of AI is a complex issue and that it will require ongoing dialogue and collaboration among individuals, organizations, and governments to ensure that AI systems are used in a way that benefits humanity as a whole.
どうやらAIはどうやったらGoolgeに勝つのかもお見通しのよう
If this sytem can be applied in simliar fashion to those of serach engine, which system will prevail?
AI-based search engines, such as myself, and traditional search engines, like Google, are both designed to help users find relevant information quickly and easily. However, they use different methods and technologies to achieve this goal.
Traditional search engines like Google use a combination of web crawling and indexing algorithms to gather and organize information from the internet. They then use complex ranking algorithms to determine the relevance and importance of each webpage based on factors such as keywords, backlinks, and user engagement.
On the other hand, AI-based search engines like myself utilize natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning techniques to understand the intent behind a user's query and provide more relevant and accurate results. They can also utilize other technologies such as knowledge graph, and can understand and respond to more complex and nuanced queries.
In terms of which system will prevail, it's hard to say. Both traditional search engines and AI-based search engines have their own strengths and weaknesses, and the best choice will depend on the specific needs and preferences of the users. Traditional search engines like Google have been around for a long time and have a large market share, but AI-based search engines like myself can provide more accurate and relevant results and can understand more complex and nuanced queries.
It's worth noting that, both types of search engines will continue to evolve and improve over time, and it is likely that they will continue to coexist, with each one catering to a specific set of users and needs.
Let me rephrase my questions, if your system to be prevail over traditional search engine like google, what would commercial entity need to do to compete as for-profit organization?
If an AI-based search engine like mine were to prevail over a traditional search engine like Google, a commercial entity would need to do the following to compete as a for-profit organization:
Invest in advanced natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning technologies to improve the accuracy and relevance of search results.
Build a large and diverse dataset of information to train the AI system.
Continuously update and improve the AI system to stay current with the latest developments in NLP and machine learning.
Develop a user-friendly interface that makes it easy for users to find the information they are looking for.
Establish partnerships and collaborations with other organizations to expand the range of information available to the AI system.
Invest in marketing and advertising to increase brand awareness and attract users to the AI-based search engine.
Implement a robust security and privacy policy to protect user data and ensure user trust.
Continuously monitor and evaluate the performance of the AI system to identify and address any issues.
Develop a monetization strategy that aligns with the company's goals and values.
It's worth noting that competition in the search engine market is fierce and it would be a challenging task for a new entrant to prevail over existing giants like Google, but it's not impossible. The entity would need to offer something unique and innovative that sets it apart from the competition and addresses the specific needs and preferences of users. Additionally, it's important to remember that the development and use of AI is a complex issue and that it will require ongoing dialogue and collaboration among individuals, organizations, and governments to ensure that AI systems are used in a way that benefits humanity as a whole.
GOTY2022ノミネート作品の対応プラットフォーム一覧(俺調べ)
| タイトル | NS | PS4 | PS5 | XB1 | XBS/X | PC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A Memoir Blue | 〇 | 〇 | 〇 | 〇 | 〇 | 〇 |
| After the Fall | - | 〇 | 〇 | - | - | 〇 |
| Among Us VR | - | - | - | - | - | 〇 |
| Apex Legends | 〇 | 〇 | 〇 | 〇 | 〇 | 〇 |
| As Dusk Falls | - | - | - | 〇 | 〇 | 〇 |
| Bonelab | - | - | - | - | - | 〇 |
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II | - | 〇 | 〇 | 〇 | 〇 | 〇 |
| Citizen Sleeper | 〇 | - | - | 〇 | 〇 | 〇 |
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | - | - | - | - | - | 〇 |
| Cult of the Lamb | 〇 | 〇 | 〇 | 〇 | 〇 | 〇 |
| Destiny 2 | - | 〇 | 〇 | 〇 | 〇 | 〇 |
| DNF Duel | - | 〇 | 〇 | - | - | 〇 |
| DOTA 2 | - | - | - | - | - | 〇 |
| Dune: Spice Wars | - | - | - | - | - | 〇 |
| ELDENRING | - | 〇 | 〇 | 〇 | 〇 | 〇 |
| Endling - Extinction is Forever | 〇 | 〇 | 〇 | 〇 | 〇 | 〇 |
| F1 22 | - | 〇 | 〇 | 〇 | 〇 | 〇 |
| FIFA 23 | 〇 | 〇 | 〇 | 〇 | 〇 | 〇 |
| FINAL FANTASY XIV | - | 〇 | 〇 | - | - | 〇 |
| Fortnite | 〇 | 〇 | 〇 | 〇 | 〇 | 〇 |
| Gran Turismo 7 | - | 〇 | 〇 | - | - | - |
| Hindsight | 〇 | - | - | - | - | 〇 |
| Horizon Forbidden West | - | 〇 | 〇 | - | - | - |
| I Was a Teenage Exocolonist | 〇 | 〇 | 〇 | - | - | 〇 |
| Immortality | - | - | - | - | 〇 | 〇 |
| League of Legends | - | - | - | - | - | 〇 |
| Live A Live | 〇 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Metal: Hellsinger | - | - | 〇 | - | 〇 | 〇 |
| Moss:第2巻 | - | 〇 | 〇 | - | - | 〇 |
| MultiVersus | - | 〇 | 〇 | 〇 | 〇 | 〇 |
| NBA 2K23 | 〇 | 〇 | 〇 | 〇 | 〇 | 〇 |
| Neon White | 〇 | - | - | - | - | 〇 |
| Nintendo Switch Sports | 〇 | - | - | - | - | - |
| No Man’s Sky | 〇 | 〇 | 〇 | 〇 | 〇 | 〇 |
| Norco | - | 〇 | 〇 | 〇 | 〇 | 〇 |
| OlliOlli World | 〇 | 〇 | 〇 | 〇 | 〇 | 〇 |
| OVERWATCH2 | 〇 | 〇 | 〇 | 〇 | 〇 | 〇 |
| Pokémon LEGENDS アルセウス | 〇 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Red Matter 2 | - | - | - | - | - | 〇 |
| Return to Monkey Island | 〇 | - | 〇 | - | 〇 | 〇 |
| Rocket League | 〇 | 〇 | 〇 | 〇 | 〇 | 〇 |
| Scorn | - | - | - | - | 〇 | 〇 |
| Sifu | 〇 | 〇 | 〇 | - | - | 〇 |
| SPLATOON3 | 〇 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Stray | 〇 | 〇 | 〇 | - | - | - |
| THE KING OF FIGHTERS XV | - | 〇 | 〇 | 〇 | 〇 | 〇 |
| The Last of Us Part I | - | 〇 | - | - | - | - |
| TMNT: Shredder’s Revenge | 〇 | 〇 | 〇 | 〇 | 〇 | 〇 |
| Total War: WARHAMMER III | - | - | - | - | - | 〇 |
| TRIANGLE STRATEGY | - | - | - | - | - | 〇 |
| Tunic | 〇 | 〇 | 〇 | 〇 | 〇 | 〇 |
| TWO POINT CAMPUS | 〇 | 〇 | 〇 | 〇 | 〇 | 〇 |
| VALORANT | - | - | - | - | - | 〇 |
| Vampire Survivors | - | - | - | 〇 | 〇 | 〇 |
| Victoria 3 | - | - | - | - | - | 〇 |
| Xenoblade Chronicles 3 | 〇 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Xenoblade3 | 〇 | - | - | - | - | - |
| クアリー ～悪夢のサマーキャンプ | - | 〇 | 〇 | 〇 | 〇 | 〇 |
| ゴッド・オブ・ウォー ラグナロク | - | 〇 | 〇 | - | - | - |
| ジョジョの奇妙な冒険 オールスターバトル R | 〇 | 〇 | 〇 | 〇 | 〇 | 〇 |
| プレイグ テイル -レクイエム- | 〇 | - | 〇 | - | 〇 | 〇 |
| ベヨネッタ3 | 〇 | - | - | - | - | - |
| マリオ+ラビッツ ギャラクシーバトル | 〇 | - | - | - | - | - |
| レゴ®スター・ウォーズ／スカイウォーカー・サーガ | 〇 | 〇 | 〇 | 〇 | 〇 | 〇 |
| 原神 | - | 〇 | 〇 | - | - | 〇 |
| 星のカービィ ディスカバリー | 〇 | - | - | - | - | - |
| 計 | 33 | 36 | 38 | 27 | 32 | 52 |
世間ではすることが既定路線みたいになってるけど、WHOへの反論を見たことがないんだがいいのか？
グローバル公衆衛生に対して" a vaccination strategy based on repeated booster doses of the original vaccine composition is unlikely to be appropriate or sustainable."
世界なんて関係ねぇ、政治経済的に無理なもんは無理、WHOが感染症学的に間違ってる等と言うのなら分かるんだが、黙殺はまずいでしょ。
国連の言うことなんてどの国もきかなくなりますよ（もうなってる）。
先進国のブースター接種より途上国にまわすの優先して、変異株の発生率を下げた方が先進国も得。スペインかぜみたいな変異出たらどうすんねん。
と勝手に思ってて、そうだとしたらその通りだと思うんだよね。で先進国はこのまま弱毒化してくれるラッキーに賭けてるだけ（政治的にそうするしかない）に見える。
詳しい人書いてくんないかなー。
| 時間 | 記事数 | 文字数 | 文字数平均 | 文字数中央値 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 00 | 110 | 14180 | 128.9 | 63.5 |
| 01 | 91 | 9894 | 108.7 | 34 |
| 02 | 42 | 7209 | 171.6 | 83.5 |
| 03 | 93 | 6255 | 67.3 | 46 |
| 04 | 41 | 2125 | 51.8 | 32 |
| 05 | 12 | 3391 | 282.6 | 137 |
| 06 | 22 | 1550 | 70.5 | 39.5 |
| 07 | 27 | 2535 | 93.9 | 45 |
| 08 | 52 | 5570 | 107.1 | 40 |
| 09 | 79 | 4832 | 61.2 | 36 |
| 10 | 122 | 20069 | 164.5 | 44.5 |
| 11 | 79 | 7069 | 89.5 | 31 |
| 12 | 123 | 8967 | 72.9 | 35 |
| 13 | 111 | 10677 | 96.2 | 34 |
| 14 | 100 | 15637 | 156.4 | 55 |
| 15 | 104 | 12645 | 121.6 | 37.5 |
| 16 | 112 | 13681 | 122.2 | 57 |
| 17 | 147 | 18290 | 124.4 | 52 |
| 18 | 255 | 29552 | 115.9 | 50 |
| 19 | 125 | 17164 | 137.3 | 43 |
| 20 | 207 | 40751 | 196.9 | 74 |
| 21 | 391 | 54549 | 139.5 | 81 |
| 22 | 332 | 65621 | 197.7 | 81 |
| 23 | 167 | 46232 | 276.8 | 61 |
| 1日 | 2944 | 418445 | 142.1 | 64 |
桂島(8), dogs(7), ドルガバ(4), steemit(10), とっとこハム太郎(6), strategy(4), はしてん(3), アルバニア(3), 田房永子(3), HTC(3), ダニング(3), ハンコ(17), 育休(18), 毒親(29), 国籍(10), スパム(16), サイン(11), ジャンプ(31), 精神疾患(7), bot(7), フツー(9), ゆ(10), 糖質(9), マウンティング(11), カバー(10), DV(11), 困難(16), 台湾(12), 依存(19), 恵まれ(12), メンヘラ(13), 職業(20), 苦労(17), 表示(20), 不幸(23), 自分自身(13), 選手(9)
■何度も読み返してしまう漫画 /20200929220019(20), ■我慢強いキャラといえば誰？ /20200930070106(13), ■シンデレラって王子と結婚出来たからハピエンなわけじゃないよ /20200929134430(10), ■音ゲーというゲームジャンルは30年後には消えている /20200928200201(9), ■anond：20200930051639 /20200930121750(8), ■コロナでも黙っている人が多いだろうなと思った話 /20200930051639(7), ■自民叩きと女性の社会進出、どちらを優先するか /20200929191250(7), ■エセ関西弁が母語ってどうなんだろうか /20200930123052(6), ■「産後うつがいやなら産むなよ」 /20200930103814(6), ■嫁と普通に喧嘩できない /20200928211140(6), ■昔のアニソンの、何も言っていないようで何か言ってそうな歌詞 /20200929085521(6), ■「ネギトロ」は「ねぎ取る」に由来するのか？ /20200929234704(6), ■中国製のエンタメがどんどん入ってくる /20200930181928(5), ■記事への反応(0) /20200930195130(5), ■中小企業が育休取らせられないのは当たり前だろ /20200930214626(5), ■犬って矛盾してにゃい？ /20200930225813(5), ■空腹対策にいい食べ物 /20200929120540(5), ■anond：20200930010427 /20200930010624(5), ■anond：20200928221625 /20200930011346(5), ■「一度触った商品は必ず買え」 /20200930121156(5), ■ /20200930132316(5), ■anond：20200930140633 /20200930140807(5), ■いいまわしをひとつかえただけで、離婚危機を脱した /20200930151330(5), ■収入を別にする結婚したい /20200930152553(5), ■イエス・キリストを祭る神社ってないの？ /20200930160844(5), ■地上波タレントにひけをとらないルックスのＡＶ女優が無名なのって不条理じゃないの？ /20200930164526(5), ■anond：20200930165137 /20200930172107(5)
I would like to write about what I know and understand about the Soka Gakkai because the D.C. Times published an article titled "China's Manipulation of Japan, NPOs and Soka Gakkai Act as Pipeline = U.S. Think Tank Report".
First of all, as a premise, the Soka Gakkai is a cult.
This is because there is a definition of a religious cult, and the reality of the Soka Gakkai falls under that definition in many ways.
You can read more about the definition of a religious cult and mind control in the book "Combating Cult Mind Control: The #1 Best-selling Guide to Protection, Rescue, and Recovery from Destructive Cults ".
The Soka Gakkai is also a collection of criminals, sick people and poor people.
In fact, the Soka Gakkai is similar to the mafia gangs in Italy and Mexico, and it has reigned as the largest criminal and anti-society organization in Japan in the name of a religious organization.
Many of its members have been brainwashed and are unable to recognize and judge themselves as normal human beings.
In the 1950s and 1980s, Soka Gakkai members were forcibly recruited to join the Soka Gakkai, and nowadays, it is estimated that about 10% of the Japanese people are members of the Gakkai (Soka Gakkai members).
In particular, the Soka Gakkai has infiltrated civil servants, specifically the police force, the fire department, and the Self-Defense Forces, and it has been revealed that 20 to 30% of the Metropolitan Police Department's employees are members of the Soka Gakkai.
There is always a certain percentage of Soka Gakkai members in elementary, middle, and high school classes, and in corporate workplaces, and therefore it is taboo to criticize the Soka Gakkai in those communities.
This is because the Gakkai members in each community monitor the words and actions of their community members in the same way as the mainland communists who have infiltrated Hong Kong, and if someone speaks out against the Soka Gakkai, they will target that person and initiate a campaign of sabotage.
The sabotage is similar to the CPC's repressive actions against human rights activists in Hong Kong, including obstructing, harassing, and following them around, an act that has been described as mass stalking.
For example, in Japan, if you make a placating statement in a school class or at work that the Soka Gakkai is a cult religious group because it meets the definition of a cult group, members of the Gakkai in the community get madly angry (depending on the degree of mind control they are receiving) or bite off their anger to deny the statement.
Then they label the person who made such a statement as "anti", and they also share information about the antis with other members of the Soka Gakkai, and begin to perceive them as "beings to be punished by Buddha", to be targets of surveillance and group attacks.
In reality, however, the definition of a religious cult was not defined for the Soka Gakkai but for dangerous religious groups such as Aum Shinrikyo and People's Temple, which were intended to prevent ordinary people from being harmed by them.
The Soka Gakkai falls under the definition of a cult because the Soka Gakkai has cult-like tendencies.
When Soka Gakkai members are pointed out to the Soka Gakkai, instead of thinking "Let's fix what's wrong with my religious group," they think of suppressing their critics (anti) and silencing them, which is a pattern of thinking and behavior of a fanatic of a religious cult, and the sarin gas attack (terrorism). I feel that the followers of Aum Shinrikyo at the time when it was founded must have had a similar pattern of thinking and behavior.
Believers in cult groups are unconsciously mind-controlled and brainwashed, so they don't think that they should change their way of thinking and behavior when criticism is pointed out to them. In this respect, their attitude is similar to that of the Chinese Communist Party towards the demands of human rights activists in Hong Kong, i.e., the fanatics of cult groups such as the Soka Gakkai are not normal human beings.
By the way, there is an organization called JCP in Japan, which is also anti-American and illegal in the United States.
It is well known that some anti-American organizations cooperate with each other in order to undermine this country by signing a pact called "Soko Kyodo Agreement" and facilitating agents of anti-Japanese and anti-American groups.
It is obvious that the JCP is an anti-American terrorist organization in nature and that the JCP is a cult-like organization when it signs an agreement with a religious cult.
From another point of view, the Soka Gakkai, to its followers, appears to be a huge organization that carries out fraudulent and criminal activities such as Ponzi schemes and network businesses. It also has elements of a black business, and believers who join the Soka Gakkai are becoming materially and mentally exhausted.
The following blog, run by Mr. Sinifié, exposes the reality of the Soka Gakkai. It contains the testimonies and experiences of many current and former Soka Gakkai members and ex-members who have left the Gakkai.
It is clear that this reality of the Soka Gakkai is far removed from the original role of religion, which is to provide individuals with peace of mind and spiritual support.
As the saying goes, "like begets friend," it is only natural for the Soka Gakkai to try to maintain a good relationship with the CPC.
However, many Chinese who have worked in Japan seem to dislike the Soka Gakkai and return to their countries.
Although the Soka Gakkai employs a different strategy than Aum Shinrikyo and has infiltrated many organizations such as corporations, police, fire departments, the Self-Defense Forces, and local government officials, the Soka Gakkai members who have infiltrated the Kasumigaseki bureaucracy and the Self-Defense Forces are considered dangerous to the U.S. because they are inherently dangerous.
Because they are essentially anti-American and may act as agents to cooperate with the CPC.
There are some findings that are common knowledge among intellectuals in the U.S. and Europe but have not been made known to the Japanese people in Japan because the media and bureaucrats have stopped them.
One of them is that the Soka Gakkai headquarters has been sending donations from Gakkai members to Noriega (former general, now imprisoned) in Panama for large-scale tax evasion and money laundering.
Noriega received a large amount of money from Daisaku Ikeda of the Soka Gakkai and invested it in his own drug business, spreading drugs on an international level.
Daisaku Ikeda of the Soka Gakkai has been investing and managing the donations collected from Gakkai members in Noriega's drug business as well as tax evasion and money laundering. At the same time, the Soka Gakkai and Daisaku Ikeda invested the donations they received from Gakkai members in Noriega's drug business as a means of tax evasion and money laundering, and returned the profits to the domestic market to help the Soka Gakkai executives line their pockets and build Soka Gakkai facilities and Soka University.
The fact that Daisaku Ikeda raised Noriega's profile in the Seikyo Shimbun during the same period must be undeniable to those Gakkai members who have subscribed to the Seikyo Shimbun.
In particular, there are many Gakkai members at the level of police organizations, the Metropolitan Police Department and prefectures, who have been causing social problems and covering up crimes committed by Gakkai members in Japan.
Well, if they are in a state of unconscious brainwashing and mind control, they may not believe the contents, and may assume a pattern of behavior such as getting angry, grumpy, or attacking the writer.
In other words, one can expect a lot of denial of facts like the followers of Aum Shinrikyo, which is easy to expect, but this (the issue of Soka Gakkai and drug business, tax evasion, and money laundering) is a fact that was revealed because Noriega was arrested and imprisoned for spreading drugs in the US. This is a fact that is well known as common knowledge in the U.S. and Europe.
The fact that the Soka Gakkai is a criminal organization is very difficult to deny.
その１https://anond.hatelabo.jp/20200327214055
12 Dr. Hiroshi Nishiura is one of the few professionals of mathematical models of infectious diseases in Japan, and it is well known that his ability is outstanding. However, many people don't understand mathematical models themselves (I must confess that I can't say that I understand all of the findings because I'm not a professional of mathematical models either), so his findings and comments are easily deified. Because the contents of the mathematical model are a complete black box to many people, it makes it seem like the oracle is coming out like a shrine's oracle. Much of Japan's infection control policy relies on the Nishiura theory. So there is nothing wrong with that, but one of the problems in Japan is that there is no plan B in case plan A goes bust. Dr. Nishiura is an excellent scholar. It is not God. Hence the need to have that Plan B with the possibility of making a mistake. I am greatly concerned that bureaucrats and politicians who are prone to infallibilism will mistake science for an oracle. It is only when falsifiability is assured that science can continue to be scientific.
感想：おみくじと神託が同じoracleだったので変な文章になったが直していない。
13 数理モデルは演繹法の活用産物である。演繹法は帰納法やアブダクションで補完するのが、学問の基本であり、臨床医学の常識である。演繹法的にどんなに正しく見えても実はそれは違っていた、ということはこの業界ではよくあることなのだ。ヘーゲルやマルクスのような巨大な知性でも演繹法オンリーでは間違うのである。
Mathematical models are the product of deductive methods. The deductive method is complemented by the inductive or abduction method, which is the basis of scholarship and the common sense of clinical medicine. It's a common occurrence in this industry that no matter how deducibly correct it may seem, it's actually not true. Even a huge intellect like Hegel or Marx can make a mistake by deduction alone.
感想：「蓋を開けてみれば」を「実はそれは」に変更した。
14 モデルを使うな、といっているのでは決してない。ぼく自身、モデルを用いて論文を書く。しかし、モデルは無謬ではなく、そこには前提である仮定があり、仮定はしばしば間違っている。グラム染色を活用するとは、グラム染色にできないこと、分からないことを知悉していることであり、グラム染色万能論者にグラム染色は使えない。同じことだ。英国でも数理モデルは活用されているが、だからこそ英国人はその結語には非常に懐疑的で、常に反論、異論が起きている。健全で科学的な態度である。
I'm not saying don't use the model at all. I myself write a paper using a model. However, the model is not infallible, there are assumptions that are assumptions, and the assumptions are often wrong. Making use of Gram's stain means having full knowledge of what Gram's stain cannot do and does not understand, and Gram's stain cannot be used by Gram's stain universalists. It's the same thing. Mathematical models are also utilized in the UK, which is why Brits are very sceptical of their conclusions, and there are always counter-arguments and objections. It is a sound and scientific attitude.
感想：「前提たる仮定」がうまく訳せていなかったので「前提である仮定」にしたが、assumptions that are assumptionsになってしまった。
「英国人は」がないと主語がIになってしまったので追加した。しかしBritsじゃ意味違うよ。もっと正しく訳してくれない？
15 Japan's "now" is a well-controlled state of infection, which is much better than Wuhan at its worst, or Italy, Spain, France, England, or New York at the present time. The problem is that it doesn't guarantee that it will "always work".
16 懸念されるのは東京だ。感染報告が増えたことだけが問題なのではない。クラスターを形成できない、トレースできない感染者が増えているのが問題である。そして、その陽性患者数に比べて検査数がずっと少ない。47人の感染者を捕捉するために100人未満（陽性者の検査日が不明だが、おそらくこのへんだろう）しか検査していないのは少なすぎる。
It is Tokyo that is of concern. The increase in reports of infection is not the only problem. The problem is that more and more infected people are unable to form clusters and cannot be traced. And the number of tests is much lower than that number of positive cases; it's too little that they only tested less than 100 people (the date of testing for the positives is unknown, but it's probably around here) to capture 47 infected people.
Again, it's not necessary to figure out all the infected people. However, it is troubling that the flow of infection, movement and clusters are out of sight. Therefore, the threshold for testing must be lowered in Tokyo. The threshold for testing varies with the circumstances. That's what I explained with the Korean example. Sticking to the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare's "standards" will lead to a misunderstanding of the phenomenon itself. Already in the Kansai region, infected people have been found with taste and smell abnormalities, and clusters have been detected from there. I would like to make more use of the athletic sensibilities of these clinicians. I'm not sure "where" in Tokyo is the barrier to lowering the number of inspections, but that barrier needs to be removed immediately.
感想：「捕捉するのに」を「捕捉するために」に変更した。多分これでいいと思う。思いたい。
アスチュートがathleticになっているのはどう反応したらいいかわからない。
17 This conceptual diagram that everyone is looking at - lowering the peak of the infection and shifting it to the side. This is all a product of deduction, and I don't know if it's really true. As mentioned above, the UK estimates already suggest that this is not enough. It is possible that the damage that was shifted to the side could simply be "extra-long damage".
18 そして、ここが肝心なのだが、ピークを下げるという理念が、「ピークを下げなければいけない」という観念になり、「ピークは下がっているはずだ」という確信になり、「ピークは起きていないんだ」という自己暗示に転じてはいけないということだ。プランAに固執する日本あるあるの失敗のパターンで、ダイヤモンド・プリンセスでは「二次感染が起きてはいけない」が「起きているはずがない」に転じてノーガード下船を許してしまった。「ピークが起きてはいけない」が「ピークなんて見たくない」にならないように現実を見据える必要がある。たとえ、それが我々の見たくない不都合な真実であったとしても。
And this is the key point: the idea of lowering the peak should not become the notion that the peak must be lowered, or the belief that the peak must be lowered, or the self-implication that the peak is not happening. In a pattern of Japanese failure to stick to Plan A, Diamond Princess allowed no-guard disembarkation by changing "secondary infection should not occur" to "it can't have happened". We need to keep our eyes on reality so that "peak shouldn't happen" doesn't become "I don't want to see a peak. Even if it is an inconvenient truth that we don't want to see.
感想：mustが違う文脈で二回出てきている。よくわかるように変更したいものだ。
カギカッコがないとうまく訳せなかったので追加しているが、なぜかカッコ閉じるがいくつか抜けている。この箇所以外にも抜けがある。
19 Repeatedly. It's common knowledge in this industry that deductive methods are complemented by inductive methods. Nevertheless, PCR is often false-negative and has little power to determine the status of infection. That's why "testing everything" is so wrong. However, a serum test measuring immunoglobulin IgM and IgG would provide a more accurate picture of the "status of infection in the population. This, however, is not infallible. It is difficult to use for individual cases because it misses early infection, which is why it misses early HIV infection.Whether antibody testing is useful in individual cases remains to be tested, but it is well suited for epidemiological studies on a population basis. Roughly speaking, we can confirm whether the "infection is rampant" in Tokyo right now, or whether it's just an unfounded fear.
前例としては、ロンドンの血清検査で09年パンデミックインフルエンザが従来予測の10倍起きていたことが血清検査でわかっている。抗体検査はアウトブレイクのあとで事後的に行うことが多いが、慢性的パンデミックになりつつあるCOVID-19については、「今」こそが検証のポイントといって良い。
As a precedent, serology tests in London showed that the 2009 pandemic flu was 10 times more likely than previously predicted. Antibody testing is often performed after an outbreak, but now is a good time to examine COVID-19, which is becoming a chronic pandemic.
感想：「前例はあって」を「前例としては」に変えた。「前例はある。なおかつロンドンで〜１０倍起きていた」になってしまったからだ。
20 英国はさらにアグレッシブだ。家庭で抗体検査を行い、「感染者である」とわかればそれを自宅での自己隔離の根拠に使おうというのだ。ロックダウンが起きている中で、検査陰性は「自己隔離不要」を意味しないため、その戦略に欠陥はある。が、考え方としては「感染全体を抑え込みたい」というもので、検討の価値はあると思う。
The UK is even more aggressive. The idea is to test for antibodies at home, and if they are found to be infected, they will use it as a basis for self-isolation at home. That strategy is flawed because with the lockdown in place, a negative test does not mean "no self-sequestration". However, the idea is that we want to control the infection as a whole, and I think it is worth considering.
21 東京でどのくらいの感染が起きているか、帰納法的確認は必要であり、有用だ。その結果がどうなるかは預言者ではないぼくには分からない。が、どんな結果が出てきても、それを受け入れ、場合によっては自説を変えて、プランBに移行することにも躊躇しない態度が科学者には必要だ。科学者は、首尾一貫していないことにかけて、首尾一貫していなければならないのだ。形式においては首尾一貫していなくても、プリンシプルやプロフェッショナリズムにおいて一貫しなければならないのだ。事実に誠意を。
Inductive legal confirmation of how many infections are occurring in Tokyo is necessary and useful. I'm not a prophet, so I don't know what the outcome will be.However, no matter what the outcome, scientists need to accept it and not hesitate to change their thesis and move on to Plan B in some cases. Scientists have to be coherent in their inconsistencies.They may not be coherent in form, but they must be coherent in principles and professionalism. Good faith in the facts.
感想：首尾一貫という言葉を使いすぎて文章をアホっぽくしてしまったが他にいい方法が思いつかない。朝三暮四は理解してくれなかった。「自説を曲げ」は「自説を変えて」に変更した。
文章はもう少し整形できると思うがとりあえずこれで。
https://georgebest1969.typepad.jp/blog/2020/03/事実に誠意を.html
これが原文です。
外国から問い合わせが来ているけれども時間がなくて訳せないということで、DeepLの性能確認ついでにやってみました。
この私訳と岩田健太郎先生は無関係なのでよろしくお願いします。
訳された文章を原文と見比べ、翻訳で文章がおかしくなったところや慣用句は「必ず日本語側の文章をいじることで」できるだけ解消しました。
よって改変した文章だけをこちらに載せ、改変する必要がなかったところは段落番号しか載せていません。元文章は元ブログを当たってください。
英語に詳しいパーソンが精査していただけると幸いです。
1 Most of what I'm about to write is no different from what I've said and done in the past. However, I have been asked the same question repeatedly, so I would like to reiterate it. We have received many inquiries from overseas as well, so we should have prepared the same content in English, but due to time constraints, I'm afraid I'll have to skip it. This article is designed to be read without basic knowledge of infectious diseases and jargon, but it is rather difficult to understand. Please forgive me for that.
感想：「Chromeかなにかでそれぞれ母国語に訳してお読みいただけると幸いです。」がきれいさっぱり消えている。DeepLの自負心だろう。
2 The fact that the number of COVID-19 reports in Japan is very low compared to other countries is attracting attention from home and abroad. Is it true? It has been pointed out that the number of tests is so small that we may be misreading the actual number of infected people.
3 However, this point is wrong at various layers. In the first place, Japan does not aim to capture all the numbers of COVID-19. Whether it's administrative testing or insured care, the state basically has a testing strategy in mind to diagnose, hospitalize, and isolate critically ill patients who need to be hospitalized. It is natural that they "haven't figured it out" and they don't intend to. That's not a bad thing.In fact, the situation is the same in every country, large or small, and no country, whether in the United States, Europe, or Asia, is aiming to "capture the whole number.
感想：最後の文はなぜか他の文と一緒に入力すると訳してくれなかった。この文一つだけ入力すると訳してくれた。
よく考えると「多かれ少なかれ」は通じないだろうから直した方がよかった。なぜかDeepLに繋がらなくなったのでもう直せない。
WHOもそんなことは求めていない。もっとも、そのわりに日本は帰国者無症状者にPCRをやってみたり、無症状な検査陽性者を入院隔離させてみたり（軽症者は自宅じゃなかったの？）、プリンシプルにおいて首尾一貫していない。だから、「彼らがなにがやりたいか私たちはよくわからない」ので、人々は不安になる。リスコミにおける失敗と言えよう。
The WHO is not asking for such a thing. But instead, Japan gives PCR to asymptomatic returnees and isolates asymptomatic test-positive people in hospital (wasn't it home for people with minor illnesses?). It has not been coherent in its principles. So, people get anxious because "we're not sure what they want to do". It's a failure in the press.
感想：「なにがやりたいかよくわからない」に主語を付与する必要があった。リスコミがpressになった。よくわかったな。
「〜は自宅じゃなかったの？）、」の、が.になっているのがよくわからない。なぜかDeepLに繋がらなくなったのでもう直せない。
4 The difference between Korea and Japan is the "result" and not the "purpose". In South Korea, where the number of infected people had surged in one place, we had to focus on inspections in and around the area. If such a phenomenon (let's call it an overshoot) occurs in Japan, the number of inspections will increase. When the situation is different, arguing only on the basis of the number of tests without observing the situation is like trying to say, "That team made 50 sliding tackles while this team made only one," without watching a football game. In games where you don't have to slide (e.g., when you're in possession the whole time), even 0 times isn't a "mistake," and of course 50 times isn't a mistake.
5 全数把握ができていない疾患など山のようにある。日本ではインフルエンザの「全数」把握はしておらず、定点観測である。疫学上、感染対策上、それで十分な情報が得られているからだ。日本で毎年風邪が何例発生しているか、正確に把握したデータはない。レセプトデータを見ればわかるじゃないか、というのも間違いで、なぜなら多くの風邪患者は（ぼくのように）受診せずに自然に治るまで待っている。医療に限らず、経済学でも政治学でもデータはサンプリングから母数を推定するのがほとんどで、「全数」は非効率的な状態把握法なのだ。
There are many diseases for which the total number of patients is not known. In Japan, we do not have a "total" number of influenza cases, but only a fixed-point observation. Because that's enough information, both epidemiologically and in terms of infection control. There is no accurate data on how many cases of the common cold occur each year in Japan. It's also a mistake to say that you can tell by looking at the receipt data, because many cold patients (like me) don't see a doctor and wait until they are cured naturally. Not only in medicine, but also in economics and political science, data are mostly based on sampling to estimate population numbers, and "whole numbers" is an inefficient way of grasping the situation.
感想：ちょこちょこ変えてある。日本語の文章が多少おかしくなっているのは勘弁してほしい。接続詞を適切に入れると格段に翻訳が正確になる。
6 We have not seen the devastation in Japan as in Italy, Spain or New York City. There is no medical collapse in a critically ill patient, no use of the operating room as an ICU, no piling up of bodies on a skating rink with no place to put them. Even if the "numbers" are not known, it is a fact that the current situation in Japan (including Tokyo) is much better controlled than in other countries.
7 Even so, you may be interested in "Well, what about the actual situation? There are estimates. For example, Dr. Hiroshi Nishiura and his group estimate that the number of mild illnesses in Japan may be twice the reported number. The catch rate is 0.44, with a 95% confidence interval of 0.37-0.50.
8 Although the study was based on data from China, there is no guarantee that the Chinese COVID-19 demographic is the same as the Japanese one. Also, since the original study did not include asymptomatic patients or those with minor illnesses that did not require hospitalization, the number of infected patients estimated on that basis would inevitably be an underestimate. If you are more paranoid, it's not unreasonable to believe that "the Japanese and Chinese viruses are different because of the mutation" (although I don't think so).
9 This does not diminish the value of the paper itself. The model must always use existing parameters, and it is often impossible to prove the external validity of these parameters. If the underlying parameters are not reasonable, the predictions will not be correct. A model assumes a simplified world insofar as it is a model. A model without simplification, which is an adjectival contradiction.
数理モデルのこうした「前提」にイチャモンを付けるのは、例えばAという疾患を対象にランダム化比較試験をしたときに、「Bという疾患については説明できないじゃないか」と文句を言うようなもので、業界の仁義に反する意味のない揚げ足取りである。
To complain about these "assumptions" of the mathematical model is like complaining, for example, "You can't explain disease B," when a randomized controlled trial is conducted for disease A. This is a meaningless tirade against the honor of the industry.
感想；「分からない」を「説明できない」に変えた。多分これでいいと思う。思いたい。
However, it is different for the reader of the paper.
A mathematical model that assumes a certain hypothesis should have internal academic validity, but it is the responsibility of the reader, as a resident of the real world, to appraise it in the real world.
Aという疾患を対象にしたRCTの知見をBという疾患に使ってはならないように、数理モデルの制限を理解し、現実世界にアプライするときに十分注意するのは当然だ。
Just as the RCT findings for disease A should not be used for disease B, it is natural to understand the limitations of the mathematical model and to be careful when applying it to the real world. For example, it would be wrong to read the paper and conclude that the total number of infected people in Tokyo is about 500 as of March 26.
感想；「読み手は別である」を「読み手にとっては別である」に変更し、「制限や限界」は「limitations and limitations」になったので片方削った。
11 People make mistakes. The models are also wrong. Being wrong is not a big deal. The problem is to notice your mistakes and make corrections. Already, a group at Imperial College London has admitted that its original estimate that the peak of the infection should be moderated was "wrong" and has revised its prediction that the ICU will soon fail if it does not fight the virus fairly aggressively.
ニコラス・ネグロポンテ (Nicholas Negroponte) MITメディアラボ創設者・名誉教授
ローレンス・レッシグ (Lawrence Lessig) ハーバード大学法学部教授
ピーター・コーヘン (Peter Cohen) MITメディアラボ前開発部長
（セス・ロイド（Seth Lloyd） MIT機械工学教授）
リチャード・ストールマン (Richard Stallman) MITコンピュータ科学・人工知能研究所 (CSAIL) 客員研究員、GNUプロジェクト創始者、フリーソフトウェア財団 (FSF) 代表
Reid Hoffman apologizes for role in Epstein-linked donations to MIT
My few interactions with Jeffrey Epstein came at the request of Joi Ito, for the purposes of fundraising for the MIT Media Lab. Prior to these interactions, I was told by Joi that Epstein had cleared the MIT vetting process, which was the basis for my participation. My last interaction with Epstein was in 2015. Still, by agreeing to participate in any fundraising activity where Epstein was present, I helped to repair his reputation and perpetuate injustice. For this, I am deeply regretful.
私の数少ないジェフリー・エプスタインとの関わりは、伊藤穣一の求めによるもので、MITメディアラボの資金集めのためのものです。会う前に、私は伊藤穣一からエプスタインはMITの審査手続きをクリアしたと聞きました。それがエプスタインに会った理由です。エプスタインと最後に会ったのは2015年でした。エプスタインが出席した資金集め活動に何であれ参加することに同意したことで、エプスタインの名誉を回復し、不正を長続きさせることを手助けしました。これについて、私は深く後悔しています。
MIT Media Lab founder defends embattled director's decision to accept money from Jeffrey Epstein (The Boston Globe)
In an e-mail to the Globe sent after the meeting, Negroponte said he told Ito that “he should” take Epstein’s contribution, and “I would say that again based on what we knew at the time. . . . “Epstein is an extreme case. But then do you take Koch money? Do you take Huawei money? And on and on?” Negroponte said.
（MITメディアラボ総会で、「ジェフリー・エプスタインからの資金を今でも受け取れと所長に言う」との発言を）総会の後に届いたメールでは、「所長は受け取る「べき」だ」、「あのときわかっていたことを基にすれば、同じことをいう」という意味だと説明した。（略）「エプスタインは極端な例だ。しかしコーク・インダストリーズ（アメリカの保守勢力コーク家の同族企業）の金なら受け取るのか？ファーウェイの金は？じゃあ他はどうなる？」とネグロポンテは言った。
I had known of Joi’s contact with Epstein since about the beginning. He had reached out to me to discuss it. We are friends (Joi and I), and he knew I would be upset by his working with a pedophile.
Joi（伊藤穣一）がエプスタインと連絡を取っていたのは、最初から知っていた。彼はそのことを私に相談していた。彼と私は友人で、自分が小児性愛者と仕事をしていることで、私が動揺することを、彼は知っていた。
Joi believed that he did not. He believed Epstein was terrified after the prosecution in 2011. He believed he had come to recognize that he would lose everything. He believed that whatever else he was, he was brilliant enough to understand the devastation to him of losing everything. He believed that he was a criminal who had stopped his crime. And nothing in his experience with Epstein contradicted this belief.
エプスタインはもう虐待者ではないと Joi は信じていた。エプスタインは2011年に起訴された後、恐怖に襲われている、と伊藤穣一は信じていた。エプスタインはすべてを失うことになるのを認識するに至ったと伊藤穣一は信じていた。いずれにせよ、エプスタインはすべてを失うという絶望を理解する十分な知性があると、伊藤穣一は信じていた。エプスタインはもう犯罪を犯さない犯罪者だと、伊藤穣一は信じていた。伊藤穣一はエプスタインに会って、その信念に矛盾することを何も感じなかった。
IF you are going to take type 3 money, then you should only take it anonymously. . . . Good for them, for here, too, transparency would be evil.
タイプ3の資金（犯罪者からの犯罪でない方法で得た資金）を受け取るなら、匿名でのみ受け取るべきだ。（略）（学生の学歴を秘密にするように、資金を受け取る場合も）透明性は悪になる。
Sure, it wasn’t blood money, and sure, because anonymous, the gift wasn’t used to burnish Epstein’s reputation.
確かにエプスタインの資金は犯罪で得られたものではなく、確かに匿名で受け取ったので、その資金提供はエプスタインの名声を高めるために使われていない。
I know that Farrow’s article is crafted to draw the following sentence into doubt: Everything Joi did in accepting Epstein’s money he did with MIT’s approval. I trust the MIT review will confirm it (yes, I remain exactly that naive). So why is he resigning, rather than others in the administration?
ファローによるニューヨーカーの記事は「Joi はMITの承認の下、エプスタインの資金を受け取った」ことが疑わしくなるように整形されている。MITの調査はそれを承認したと、（ええ、馬鹿正直だと思うが）私は信じている。そうなら、MITの経営陣ではなく、なぜ彼が辞職するのか？
And if Ito must go because Epstein’s wealth was accepted anonymously, who else should go because of blood money accepted openly? Will the planet have an equal advocate who demands justice for the Koch money? Or the victims of opioid abuse for the Sackler money?
もし、エプスタインの資金を匿名で受け取ったことで、伊藤が辞職しなければいけないなら、顕名で犯罪により得た資金を受け取った人は辞職すべきだろうか？保守勢力のコークインダスリーの資金に対して、正義を求める平等主義の弁護士はこの地球にいるのだろうか？サックラー家の資金に対してオピオイドの被害者は？
So put the parts together: The MediaLab accepted an anonymous contribution from Epstein through the help and direction of Joi. The Lab did not (as “Professor Anonymous” wrote to me, his outrage apparently blinding him to irony) “help reputation-launder a convicted sex offender.” It would have, had it not be anonymous; but that’s the point about it being anonymous.
要点をまとめると、メディアラボは Joi の補助と指示によりエプスタインから匿名の寄付を受け取った。メディアラボは有罪の性犯罪者の汚名を雪ぐことは何もしていない。匿名でなければ、汚名を雪ぐことがあったかもしれないが。それが匿名であることのポイントである。
Peter Cohen, a former director of development and strategy, said in a statement that when he joined the Media Lab in 2014, it already had established procedures for handling Epstein’s contributions. Cohen said he understood that those policies were “authorized by and implemented with the full knowledge of MIT central administration.”
MITメディアラボ前開発部長のピーター・コーヘンは声明で、2014年にメディアラボで仕事を始めたとき、エプスタインの資金提供を扱う手順（匿名化、少額分割）はすでに出来上がっていた。これらの方針は、MITの経営陣の中心が十分理解したうえで承認され、実行されていた、と彼は理解した。
少女虐待容疑の米富豪のMIT寄付、理事長が容認 大学ぐるみで匿名化 (AFPBB)
MITのセス・ロイド（Seth Lloyd）教授がエプスタイン被告から寄付を受けたことに対する感謝状に、ライフ氏の署名があることを、同大とエプスタイン被告との関係を調査している法律事務所から知らされたという。
Letter regarding preliminary fact-finding about MIT and Jeffrey Epstein（不正資金に対する調査の途中経過報告）
Second, it is now clear that senior members of the administration were aware of gifts the Media Lab received between 2013 and 2017 from Jeffrey Epstein’s foundations. Goodwin Procter has found that in 2013, when members of my senior team learned that the Media Lab had received the first of the Epstein gifts, they reached out to speak with Joi Ito. He asked for permission to retain this initial gift, and members of my senior team allowed it. They knew in general terms about Epstein’s history – that he had been convicted and had served a sentence and that Joi believed that he had stopped his criminal behavior. They accepted Joi’s assessment of the situation. Of course they did not know what we all know about Epstein now.
メディアラボが2013年から2017年の間にジェフリーエプスタインの基金から資金提供を受けたことを、MIT経営陣の上層部が知っていたことが明らかになった。メディアラボがエプスタインの資金を初めて受け取ったことを2013年に上層部が知ったとき、伊藤穣一に連絡を取ったことがわかった。伊藤穣一はその資金を返却しない許可を求め、上層部は許可した。伊藤穣一と上層部はエプスタインの経歴について、有罪になって刑に服したという一般的な事柄を知っていた。伊藤穣一はエプスタインが犯罪行為を止めたと信じていた。上層部は伊藤穣一による評価を受け入れた。エプスタインについて今わかっていることを、当時彼らは知らなかった。
Joi sought the gifts for general research purposes, such as supporting lab scientists and buying equipment. Because the members of my team involved believed it was important that Epstein not use gifts to MIT for publicity or to enhance his own reputation, they asked Joi to agree to make clear to Epstein that he could not put his name on them publicly. These guidelines were provided to and apparently followed by the Media Lab.
伊藤穣一は、ラボの研究者支援や設備購入などの一般的な研究目的の資金を求めた。かかわった経営陣のメンバーは、伊藤穣一にエプスタインから次の事項に対する了承を得るよう求めた。MITへの資金提供を公にしたり、エプスタインの評判を良くしないように、資金提供で名前を公表しないこと。これらのガイドラインはメディアラボに提供され、メディアラボはガイドラインに従った。
Information shared with us last night also indicates that Epstein gifts were discussed at at least one of MIT’s regular senior team meetings, and I was present.
エプスタインの資金提供について、少なくとも1度は上層部の定例会議で議論された。理事長である私も出席していた。
I am aware that we could and should have asked more questions about Jeffrey Epstein and about his interactions with Joi. We did not see through the limited facts we had, and we did not take time to understand the gravity of Epstein’s offenses or the harm to his young victims. I take responsibility for those errors.
ジェフリーエプスタイン自身と、彼と伊藤穣一とのやりとりについてもっと質問できたし、すべきだった。知りえた少ない事実を精査しなかった。エプスタインによる加害行為の重大さや若い被害者への危害を理解する時間を取らなかった。これらの過ちの責任は理事長である私にある。
Famed Computer Scientist Richard Stallman Described Epstein Victims As 'Entirely Willing' (The Vice)
Early in the thread, Stallman insists that the “most plausible scenario” is that Epstein’s underage victims were “entirely willing” while being trafficked.
メーリングリストのスレッドの初期に、「最も可能性のあるシナリオは、エプスタインにより被害を受けた未成年者は、売春を強要されている間、完全に自ら望んでその状況にあったとすることだ」とストールマンは主張した。
メーリングリストに投稿されたストールマンのメールを含む一連のスレッドは、記事の最後にPDF ファイルで閲覧できる。
制限文字数を超えたため、続きは寄付隠蔽みんなで騙せば怖くない MITと他もいくつか 続きに書きました。
合計は重複含む
| 賞種別 | タイトル | PC | PS4 | NS | XB1 |
| GAME OF THE YEAR | ゴッド・オブ・ウォー | x | |||
| アサシン クリード オデッセイ | x | x | x | x | |
| Celeste | x | x | x | x | |
| Marvel’s Spider-Man | x | ||||
| モンスターハンター：ワールド | x | x | x | ||
| レッド・デッド・リデンプション2 | x | x | |||
| BEST ACTION GAME | Dead Cells | x | x | x | x |
| コール オブ デューティ ブラックオプス 4 | x | x | x | x | |
| Destiny 2 孤独と影 | x | x | x | ||
| ファークライ5 | x | x | x | x | |
| ロックマン11 運命の歯車！！ | x | x | x | x | |
| BEST ROLE PLAYING GAME | モンスターハンター：ワールド | x | x | x | |
| ドラゴンクエストXI 過ぎ去りし時を求めて | x | ||||
| 二ノ国II レヴァナントキングダム | x | x | |||
| OCTOPATH TRAVELER | x | ||||
| Pillars of Eternity II: Deadfire | x | x | x | x | |
| RE: Charge | |||||
| BEST NARRATIVE | レッド・デッド・リデンプション2 | x | x | ||
| Detroit: Become Human | x | ||||
| ゴッド・オブ・ウォー | x | ||||
| Life is Strange 2: Episode 1 | x | x | x | ||
| Marvel’s Spider-Man | x | ||||
| BEST SCORE/MUSIC - PRESENTED BY SPOTIFY | レッド・デッド・リデンプション2 | x | x | ||
| Celeste | x | x | x | x | |
| ゴッド・オブ・ウォー | x | ||||
| Marvel’s Spider-Man | x | ||||
| 二ノ国II レヴァナントキングダム | x | x | |||
| OCTOPATH TRAVELER | x | ||||
| BEST ART DIRECTION | Return of the Obradin | x | |||
| アサシン クリード オデッセイ | x | x | x | x | |
| ゴッド・オブ・ウォー | x | ||||
| OCTOPATH TRAVELER | x | ||||
| レッド・デッド・リデンプション2 | x | x | |||
| BEST VR/AR GAME | ASTRO BOT：RESCUE MISSION | x | |||
| Beat Saber | x | x | |||
| Firewall Zero Hour | x | ||||
| Moss | x | x | |||
| TETRIS EFFECT | x | ||||
| BEST FIGHTING GAME | ドラゴンボール ファイターズ | x | x | x | |
| BLAZBLUE CROSS TAG BATTLE | x | x | x | ||
| ソウルキャリバーVI | x | x | x | ||
| ストリートファイターV アーケードエディション | x | x | |||
| BEST FAMILY GAME | Overcooked 2 - オーバークック2 | x | x | x | x |
| マリオテニス エース | x | ||||
| Nintendo Labo | x | ||||
| スターリンク バトル・フォー・アトラス | x | x | x | ||
| スーパー マリオパーティ | x | ||||
| BEST STRATEGY GAME | Into the Breach | x | x | ||
| The Banner Saga 3 | x | x | x | x | |
| BATTLETECH | x | ||||
| Frostpunk | x | ||||
| 戦場のヴァルキュリア4 | x | x | |||
| BEST INDEPENDENT GAME | Celeste | x | x | x | x |
| Dead Cells | x | x | x | x | |
| Into the Breach | x | x | |||
| Return of the Obra Dinn | x | ||||
| The Messenger | x | x | x | x | |
| BEST SPORTS/RACING GAME | Forza Horizon 4 | x | x | ||
| FIFA 19 | x | x | x | x | |
| マリオテニス エース | x | ||||
| NBA 2K19 | x | x | x | x | |
| ウイニングイレブン 2019 | x | x | x | ||
| BEST GAME DIRECTION | ゴッド・オブ・ウォー | x | |||
| A Way Out | x | x | x | ||
| Detroit: Become Human | x | ||||
| Marvel’s Spider-Man | x | ||||
| レッド・デッド・リデンプション2 | x | x | |||
| BEST ONGOING GAME | フォートナイト | x | x | x | x |
| Destiny 2 孤独と影 | x | x | x | ||
| No Man’s Sky | x | x | x | ||
| オーバーウォッチ | x | x | x | ||
| レインボーシックス シージ | x | x | x | ||
| BEST AUDIO DESIGN - PRESENTED BY DOLBY | レッド・デッド・リデンプション2 | x | x | ||
| コール オブ デューティ ブラックオプス 4 | x | x | x | x | |
| Forza Horizon 4 | x | x | |||
| ゴッド・オブ・ウォー | x | ||||
| Marvel’s Spider-Man | x | ||||
| GAMES FOR IMPACT | Celeste | x | x | x | x |
| 11-11 Memories Retold | x | x | x | ||
| Florence | |||||
| Life is Strange 2: Episode 1 | x | x | x | ||
| The MISSING - J.J.マクフィールドと追憶島 - | x | x | x | x | |
| BEST ACTION/ADVENTURE GAME | ゴッド・オブ・ウォー | x | |||
| アサシン クリード オデッセイ | x | x | x | x | |
| Marvel’s Spider-Man | x | ||||
| レッド・デッド・リデンプション2 | x | x | |||
| シャドウ オブ ザ トゥームレイダー | x | x | x | x | |
| BEST MULTIPLAYER GAME | フォートナイト | x | x | x | x |
| コール オブ デューティ ブラックオプス 4 | x | x | x | ||
| Destiny 2 孤独と影 | x | x | x | ||
| モンスターハンター：ワールド | x | x | x | ||
| Sea of Thieves | x | x | |||
| 計 | 56 | 79 | 38 | 53 |
措置入院を減らすべき、というのはもう何十年も言われていて、治療者側からは、治療のための要求として、地域治療への移行を求めてきたのに対し、おっしゃるとおり、行政側は医療費削減の文脈で、医療保護入院等への移行を進めてきたので、措置入院が約１０分の１になっても、その分以上に医療保護入院が増えているので結局措置入院を減らす、という数値目標のために治療的性格を無視した措置入院、そこからの拙速な退院となっているのでしょうと思います。
イタリアだけでなく、基本的に精神保健支出入院医療から地域治療へと変更していく方向はオーストラリアやカナダでも勧められているようです。オーストラリアのMental Health Strategyによって、地域治療への支出と入院治療への支出がほぼ均衡するようになって、利用者満足度が大きく向上したというような報告がでているようですね。（National mental Health report 2013）
アメリカは州によって大きく異なるようですが、少なくともカリフォルニアやフィラデルフィア、ニューヨークなどの主要な州では、措置入院のような入院(involuntary treatment)を２週間とか１ヶ月とか継続するには、医師が裁判所に出向いて、人権抑制の必要性を説明せねばならないというような制度が整備されているようです。しかしそれでも、必ずしも患者、家族のQOLが低下しているということもないようですし、実際に人口あたりの精神病床数はドイツやイギリスよりも相当低くなっているようです。。
措置入院件数の違いは精神保健指定医の偏在ももちろんそうでしょうし、彼らのポリシーによっても大きくかわるだろうということはそのとおりだと思いますが、他の先進国と同様に、精神治療に関わるケアワーカー等への投資を進めていくべきなんだろうと思います。もちろんリソースの拡大も必要でしょうし、病院（１兆円）から地域ケア（５００億円）へと移行していくべきだと思います。オーストラリアでは、配分を変えたことで、ケアワーカーの数は２倍以上になったようですし、イギリスでも医師よりも患者、家族のケアワーカーがより多く増加しているようです。海外の先進国にできて、日本にできないということはないように思うんですが。
