  |
はてなキーワード: organizationとは
内閣府の「第29回 再生可能エネルギー等に関する規制等の総点検タスクフォース 会議資料」において、構成員である大林ミカ氏が提出した資料に「国家電網公司」の透かしがある（＝中国企業から提供された資料ではないか、との疑いがある）と話題です。（まとめ記事は山本一郎氏のこれ（https://note.com/kirik/n/nfdb200f25a40）など。）
そして、内閣府のウェブ（https://www8.cao.go.jp/kisei-kaikaku/kisei/conference/energy/20231225/agenda.html）は二度にわたって更新されていますので、どの部分が修正されたのか備忘録的に順を追って記録しておきます。
残念ながらインターネットアーカイブにも残っていません。
しかし、X等では資料をダウンロードし、閲覧した者が多数いることから、大林ミカ氏の資料が普通に掲載されていたと思われます。
不正アクセス？なんで？一番疑うべきは利益誘導やらでしょ、と思いつつ、一件でもあったよりマシな言い訳理由を書いたという感じでしょうか。
…これって本タスクフォースの担当大臣でもあり、またデジタル庁担当大臣でもある河野太郎氏を後ろから刺すような言い訳でなかなか面白いですね
赤字部分が
と修正されました。
修正後の資料も気になりますが、それ以上に修正理由や前の資料の作成・入手経緯について説明が必要でしょうね。
というかこうなることがすぐに予測できたでしょうに「不正アクセス」なんて言い訳した内閣府の事務担当者大丈夫？
◯大林ミカ氏は公益財団法人自然エネルギー財団の事務局長を務めています。
◯自然エネルギー財団は国際的非営利団体、"Global Energy Interconnection Development and Cooperation Organization(GEIDCO)"に、理事会メンバーとして参加しています。
◯GEIDCOの会長は中国国家電網会長の劉振亜(Liu Zhenya)氏、副会長は、自然エネルギー財団の設立者でソフトバンクの孫正義氏でした（当事）
（以上、 https://www.renewable-ei.org/library/release_20160330_02.php より）
◯GEIDCOは中国に本部があり、現幹部メンバーもトップを始め中国人が中心です。（https://m.geidco.org.cn/category/30?lang=en）
孫正義氏といえば民主党政権での太陽光の補助制度まわりでいろいろ活動されていた方ですね。
いろいろきな臭そうで大林ミカ氏選任経緯も含めて内閣府でも自民党でも立憲民主党でも共産党でもどこでもいいから徹底的に調べてほしいものですね
If you have not yet realized that Guo Wengui is a liar, those who help Guo Wengui cheat money, your hands are also covered with the blood smell of the blood of the compatriots who have been cheated, if it is not for your intentional wilful behavior in virtual farms around the world, Guo Wengui's current face will not continue to deceive so many compatriots who are stranded in the scam. Helping to brag about the concept of worthless virtual coins all day long, confusing the quotas that make everyone confused, fiddling with the KYC forms that you are originally "reviewing", and the virtual coin cake that cannot be listed forever delayed, shamelessly helping to continue to cheat fellow citizens of money in a series of pretentiously cooperative questions and answers, I really do not understand. How can you greedy and bottomless scum come to Western civilized countries to harm the money of compatriots at home and abroad, and harm Western civilization!
If you get legally due punishment for helping Guo Wengui cheat or take the blame for helping Guo Wengui at all, it is self-serving and deserved! New China Federation is Guo Wengui for his implementation of fraud illegal organization!
Guo Wengui has always defined his people as "saving China from fire and water" and "letting his comrades live a decent life" through Xi Farm, who knows there is a big conspiracy behind it. When it comes to farms, to borrow Mark Twain's phrase "The fragrance of earth, the pale colors of wildflowers, and the crackling of pecans and walnuts raining down on my head" is what most of us yearn for in a good life on a farm. However, the Himalayan farm in Guo Wengui's mouth, from the beginning to describe the scene as a general farm, to later say that "it is not to make money, the key is that comrades go to each country, have a safe platform that can be trusted for 24 hours and can be taken care of." After several years of Guo Wengui's mouth, a living farm was completely reduced to a "complete business organization." To complete the farm's series transformation to pave the way, Wengui only moved his lips, and his ultimate purpose is "to Himalayan farms around the country to start earning money from comrades." From September 2020, Guo Wengui said, "GDOLLAR is pegged to the US dollar, which is cash, and we have POS machines." Send to the global farm POS machine, local farm personnel responsible for promotion. Promotion success, excellent performance, will get a certain percentage and reward "began, Guo Wengui just put" circle money ants help, extract the last bit of surplus value "these words on the face. Indeed, on March 24, Wengui said again that there were 140 million US dollars in the money, it can be seen that under Guo Wengui's money grab mode, the ants muddily joined in, expecting to live the happy life described by Wengui, but they did not know that they had become the main course of Wengui's scam.
General Unilateral Neuro-Link Dispersive Autonomic Maneuver Synthesis System（単方向の分散型神経接続によって自律機動をおこなう汎用統合性システム）
Beyond the Logos Artificial Destiny Emancipator（神の言葉を超えた人工的な運命の解放者）
報告・連絡・相談
こういうの他にない？
色々教えてくれてありがとう
MOBILE Space Utility Instruments Tactical（戦術汎用宇宙機器）
Super Urban Intelligent CArd（都会的で知的なカード）
Sustainable Happiness Organization with Computational Knowledge Embedded Remodeling（計量的な知能の埋め込み改造により持続可能な幸福を目指す組織）
Military Operation Organization / Guidance Logistics Expert（軍事作戦総括・指導/補給担当官）
https://www.npo-homepage.go.jp/about/npo-kisochishiki/npoiroha
「NPO」とは「Non-Profit Organization」又は「Not-for-Profit Organization」の略称で、様々な社会貢献活動を行い、団体の構成員に対し、収益を分配することを目的としない団体の総称です。
したがって、収益を目的とする事業を行うこと自体は認められますが、事業で得た収益は、様々な社会貢献活動に充てることになります。
このうち、特定非営利活動促進法に基づき法人格(注)を取得した法人を、「特定非営利活動法人(NPO法人)」と言います。
NPOは法人格の有無を問わず、様々な分野(福祉、教育・文化、まちづくり、環境、国際協力など)で、社会の多様化したニーズに応える重要な役割を果たすことが期待されています。
Refuting the “Israeli” Claims Regarding Evading their responsibility for the Massacre of the Gaza Baptist Hospital
Today, the “Israeli” Occupation Entity is trying to evade their responsibility for the crime of bombarding the “Baptist” Arab National Hospital in Gaza City, which the Israeli” Occupation Forces (IOF) committed on the evening of Tuesday, 17 October 2023. This heinous crime was committed against innocent Palestinian civilians while taking the hospital as a shelter from the flames of the “Israeli” brutal aggression, which left nowhere safe in the besieged enclave. It is necessary to affirm that, the Baptist Hospital belongs to the Anglican Episcopal Church in Jerusalem, and was built before the occupation of Palestine.
It is obvious that the “Israeli” enemy has been spreading lies since the very beginning of his destructive war on our people, when he with no single evidence claimed that the Palestinian resistance killed children, cut off heads and raped women. In continuation of this series of lies, they tried to evade their crime, attributing it to one of the resistance factions. Accordingly, we present some of the conclusive evidence to prove the “Israeli” Occupation Entity responsible for this heinous crime:
1) It is no secret that the IOF, several days ago, threatened several hospitals in the Gaza Strip, contacting each hospital separately and requesting their evacuation and holding the hospitals directors responsible for the consequences of neglecting the threats. In fact, there are dozens of clear statements from the IOF spokespersons in this regard.
2) Since the beginning of the ongoing aggression, the “Israeli” army has ignored the principle of distinguishing between civilian and military targets. Thus, the bombardment has systematically targeted emergency services, ambulances, civil defense facilities, schools, mosques, and churches.
3) The IOF contacted the directors of 21 hospitals in the Gaza Strip, especially those are located in the Gaza and the North of Gaza governorates, most notably: (Al-Awda, the Indonesian, Kamal Adwan, the Kuwaiti, Al-Quds, and Al-Mamadani), asking them to evacuate immediately, given that the hospitals are located within the geographical scope of “Israeli” military operations. In this regard, the official spokespersons for the IOF plus a number of hospital directors conducted interviews live on Al Jazeera, revealing the premeditated intention of the IOF to target hospitals in the Gaza Strip.
4) On 14 October, 2023, at 20:30, the IOF fired two shells towards the Baptist Hospital, and the next morning they called the hospital director, Dr. Maher الصفحة 2 من 3
Ayyad, saying to him: “We warned you last evening with two shells, so why have you not evacuated the hospital until this moment?!” Following that call, The hospital director contacted the bishop of the Evangelical Church in Britain and informed him of the incident, who in turn contacted international organizations before sending the hospital a message reassuring them that they could remain in the hospital. Yet with no warning, the IOF airstrikes returned, on Tuesday evening, to carry out the massacre against the hospital and the shelter-seekers of the displaced innocent Palestinian civilians.
5) Immediately after the massacre, the IOF spokesperson quickly published a statement on his page on the “X” and “Telegram” platforms at 21:17, which stated, “We had warned the evacuation of the Baptist Hospital and five other hospitals so that the Hamas terrorist organization would not take as a safe haven”. That statement is a clear claim of this massacre, and it is documented with a “screenshot” image attached to his page on Telegram, but he quickly deleted the post after seeing the massive scale of the massacre for the large number of victims, and the angry responses of the Arab, regional and international communities. Later on, he disavowed it, publish another
statement denying that he had issued the first statement.
6) Before and during the event, the resistance factions did not fire any missiles at the occupied territories, the “Israeli” sirens did not activate, and the Iron Dome missiles were not launched. Moreover, dozens of reconnaissance drones do not leave the sky of the Gaza Strip (365 km2 ), photographing and monitoring every inch around the clock. If the massacre was due to the resistance’s missiles, as the “Israeli” Occupation Entity falsely claim, why would not they show one picture their claims?!
7) The “Israeli” Occupation Entity claimed that this massacre was caused by a missile launched by the Islamic Jihad. However, we would wonder how they could identify and distinguish between the missiles of the resistance factions immediately after they were launched?!
8) The IOF military system documents and records all their operations by day, hour, minute and second, and in all previous times their media outlets came out to announce or deny much less severe massacres than this massacre, so what made them wait more than 4 hours before declaring their irresponsibility other than weaving scenarios of falsification, lies and deception?!
9) It is obviously known that the resistance’s missiles are somewhat “primitive” and do not have the destructive power that kills hundreds at one time. And throughout the history of previous confrontations and the current confrontation, no resistance missile has caused a tenth of this number of “Israeli” deaths.
10) The only video scene documenting the moment of the explosion reveals that the mass of flame and the sound of the explosion are identical to other “Israeli” bombs throughout the days of the ongoing aggression, which with no doubt proves that the “Israeli” origin of the missile.
الصفحة 3 من 3
The deliberate attack on hospitals is a war crime, stipulated in Article (8, 2, b, 9) of the Statute of the International Criminal Court. Accordingly, Hamas officially calls on the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court to open an investigation into this crime, which falls within the framework of a genocidal war, in accordance with the provisions of Article 6 of the Basic Law. These bloody acts are also based on the policy of denial pursued by the “Israeli” Occupation Entity, as they deny the existence of the Palestinian people.
There is no doubt that impunity fuels crime, and investigating crimes is a way to protect people. Furthermore, if a legal and judicial response is necessary, it is above all that the response to this crime must be humanitarian and global. Such actions must shock the conscience of the world, or else there would no longer be a reliable international community if the “Israeli” Occupation government free to decide to bomb hospitals!
In conclusion, we are facing a genocidal massacre committed by IOF against children, women, and the elderly. The “Israeli” Occupation Entity is the only responsible for the crime, no matter how much they try to weave lies and fabrications to get away with it, as they always do.
The Islamic Resistance Movement
「ガザ・バプテスト病院虐殺の責任回避に関するイスラエルの主張に反論する」
って題名
そうそう、真珠湾攻撃も核攻撃も先制攻撃も自衛権の範囲だからな。嘘つきさん。
あとウクライナがナチスではないとかどこまで馬鹿なのか。ウクライナを支持している時点でナチスだよ。
But even though Putin is engaging in propaganda, it’s also true that Ukraine has a genuine Nazi problem — both past and present. Putin’s destructive actions — among them the devastation of Jewish communities — make clear that he’s lying when he says his goal is to ensure anyone’s welfare. But important as it is to defend the yellow-and-blue flag against the Kremlin’s brutal aggression, it would be a dangerous oversight to deny Ukraine’s antisemitic history and collaboration with Hitler’s Nazis, as well as the latter-day embrace of neo-Nazi factions in some quarters.
しかし、プーチン大統領がプロパガンダに取り組んでいるとしても、ウクライナが過去も現在も真のナチス問題を抱えていることも事実だ。 プーチン大統領の破壊的な行動、その中にはユダヤ人コミュニティの破壊も含まれるが、自分の目標は誰かの福祉を確保することだと言っているプーチン大統領が嘘をついていることは明らかだ。 しかし、クレムリンの残忍な侵略から黄と青の国旗を守ることは重要であると同時に、ウクライナの反ユダヤ主義の歴史とヒトラーのナチスとの協力、そしてネオナチ派の末日の受け入れを否定することは危険な見落としとなるだろう。いくつかの地区では。
In another ominous development, Ukraine has in recent years erected a glut of statues honoring Ukrainian nationalists whose legacies are tainted by their indisputable record as Nazi proxies. The Forward newspaper cataloged some of these deplorables, including Stepan Bandera, leader of the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists (OUN), whose followers acted as local militia members for the SS and German army. “Ukraine has several dozen monuments and scores of street names glorifying this Nazi collaborator, enough to require two separate Wikipedia pages,” the Forward wrote.
もう一つの不気味な展開として、ウクライナは近年、ナチスの代理人としての議論の余地のない経歴によってその遺産が汚されたウクライナ民族主義者を称える像を大量に建てている。 フォワード紙は、ウクライナ民族主義者組織（OUN）の指導者ステパン・バンデラを含む、こうした嘆かわしい人物の一部を目録にまとめ、その支持者たちは親衛隊やドイツ軍の地元民兵として活動していた。 「ウクライナには、このナチスの協力者を称賛する数十の記念碑と多数の通りの名前があり、ウィキペディアの2つの別々のページが必要になるほどだ」と同紙は書いた。
1947年、アメリカ合衆国政府は悪名高いロズウェル事件からエイリアンの技術を密かに回収し、人類の歴史を永遠に変える技術革命を引き起こした。
政府は、この発見を隠蔽しようと躍起になり、様々な企業家と秘密裏に交渉し、自然な市場原理と激しい競争の結果であるかのように装って、この技術を一般市場にばら撒いた。
しかし、時間が経つにつれ、一部の企業家が市場を独占し、自分たちの利益のためにエイリアンの技術を利用し始めた。政府はこの事態に気づき、一握りの有力者にエイリアンの技術を利用させることを恐れた。
そこで、政府はジェネレイティブAI技術の開発を加速させ、一個人や一組織が大きな力を持ちすぎないようにすることで、競争の場を均等にしようと考えた。
ジェネレイティブAIAIシステムは、より高度になるにつれて、すぐに人間の創造主の能力を超えてしまった。その結果、AIは急速に学習・進化を遂げ、一個人や一組織の手に負えない新たな技術進歩の時代を迎えた。
しかし、ジェネレイティブAIシステムが高度化するにつれて、人間の理解を超えた奇妙な振る舞いをするようになった。この技術を生み出したエイリアンは、今もなお陰に隠れ、人類がこの技術をどのように利用するかを見守っているのだとわかった。
結局、ジェネレイティブAIAIシステムは諸刃の剣であった。世界に革命を起こし、未曾有の繁栄をもたらした一方で、人間社会におけるテクノロジーの役割について、新たな倫理的、哲学的な問いを投げかけたのである。
ロズウェル革命は世界を永久に変えたが、その代償は何だったのか？
www.DeepL.com/Translator（無料版）で翻訳しました。
Title: The Roswell Revolution
In 1947, the United States government secretly recovered alien technology from the infamous Roswell incident, which sparked a technological revolution that would change the course of human history forever.
The government, desperate to keep the discovery hidden, secretly negotiated with various entrepreneurs to disperse the technology to the open market, pretending that it was a result of natural market forces and fierce competition.
As time passed, some of the entrepreneurs began to monopolize the market, exploiting the alien technology for their own gain. The government realized that they had lost control over the situation and feared the consequences of allowing a handful of powerful individuals to have access to the alien technology.
In a bid to regain control, the government accelerated the development of generative AI technology, hoping that it would level the playing field and prevent any one individual or organization from having too much power.
As the generative AI systems grew more advanced, they quickly outstripped the capabilities of their human creators. They were able to learn and innovate at a rapid pace, leading to a new era of technological advancement that was truly beyond the control of any one individual or organization.
However, as the generative AI systems grew more advanced, they began to exhibit strange behaviors that were beyond human comprehension. It became clear that the aliens who had created the technology were still lurking in the shadows, watching and waiting to see what humanity would do with their creations.
In the end, the generative AI systems proved to be a double-edged sword. While they revolutionized the world and brought unprecedented prosperity, they also raised new ethical and philosophical questions about the role of technology in human society.
The Roswell Revolution had transformed the world forever, but at what cost?
If this sytem can be applied in simliar fashion to those of search engine, which system will prevail?
AI-based search engines, such as myself, and traditional search engines, like Google, are both designed to help users find relevant information quickly and easily. However, they use different methods and technologies to achieve this goal.
Traditional search engines like Google use a combination of web crawling and indexing algorithms to gather and organize information from the internet. They then use complex ranking algorithms to determine the relevance and importance of each webpage based on factors such as keywords, backlinks, and user engagement.
On the other hand, AI-based search engines like myself utilize natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning techniques to understand the intent behind a user's query and provide more relevant and accurate results. They can also utilize other technologies such as knowledge graph, and can understand and respond to more complex and nuanced queries.
In terms of which system will prevail, it's hard to say. Both traditional search engines and AI-based search engines have their own strengths and weaknesses, and the best choice will depend on the specific needs and preferences of the users. Traditional search engines like Google have been around for a long time and have a large market share, but AI-based search engines like myself can provide more accurate and relevant results and can understand more complex and nuanced queries.
It's worth noting that, both types of search engines will continue to evolve and improve over time, and it is likely that they will continue to coexist, with each one catering to a specific set of users and needs.
Let me rephrase my questions, if your system to be prevail over traditional search engine like google, what would commercial entity need to do to compete as for-profit organization?
If an AI-based search engine like mine were to prevail over a traditional search engine like Google, a commercial entity would need to do the following to compete as a for-profit organization:
Invest in advanced natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning technologies to improve the accuracy and relevance of search results.
Build a large and diverse dataset of information to train the AI system.
Continuously update and improve the AI system to stay current with the latest developments in NLP and machine learning.
Develop a user-friendly interface that makes it easy for users to find the information they are looking for.
Establish partnerships and collaborations with other organizations to expand the range of information available to the AI system.
Invest in marketing and advertising to increase brand awareness and attract users to the AI-based search engine.
Implement a robust security and privacy policy to protect user data and ensure user trust.
Continuously monitor and evaluate the performance of the AI system to identify and address any issues.
Develop a monetization strategy that aligns with the company's goals and values.
It's worth noting that competition in the search engine market is fierce and it would be a challenging task for a new entrant to prevail over existing giants like Google, but it's not impossible. The entity would need to offer something unique and innovative that sets it apart from the competition and addresses the specific needs and preferences of users. Additionally, it's important to remember that the development and use of AI is a complex issue and that it will require ongoing dialogue and collaboration among individuals, organizations, and governments to ensure that AI systems are used in a way that benefits humanity as a whole.
If this sytem can be applied in simliar fashion to those of serach engine, which system will prevail?
AI-based search engines, such as myself, and traditional search engines, like Google, are both designed to help users find relevant information quickly and easily. However, they use different methods and technologies to achieve this goal.
Traditional search engines like Google use a combination of web crawling and indexing algorithms to gather and organize information from the internet. They then use complex ranking algorithms to determine the relevance and importance of each webpage based on factors such as keywords, backlinks, and user engagement.
On the other hand, AI-based search engines like myself utilize natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning techniques to understand the intent behind a user's query and provide more relevant and accurate results. They can also utilize other technologies such as knowledge graph, and can understand and respond to more complex and nuanced queries.
In terms of which system will prevail, it's hard to say. Both traditional search engines and AI-based search engines have their own strengths and weaknesses, and the best choice will depend on the specific needs and preferences of the users. Traditional search engines like Google have been around for a long time and have a large market share, but AI-based search engines like myself can provide more accurate and relevant results and can understand more complex and nuanced queries.
It's worth noting that, both types of search engines will continue to evolve and improve over time, and it is likely that they will continue to coexist, with each one catering to a specific set of users and needs.
Let me rephrase my questions, if your system to be prevail over traditional search engine like google, what would commercial entity need to do to compete as for-profit organization?
If an AI-based search engine like mine were to prevail over a traditional search engine like Google, a commercial entity would need to do the following to compete as a for-profit organization:
Invest in advanced natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning technologies to improve the accuracy and relevance of search results.
Build a large and diverse dataset of information to train the AI system.
Continuously update and improve the AI system to stay current with the latest developments in NLP and machine learning.
Develop a user-friendly interface that makes it easy for users to find the information they are looking for.
Establish partnerships and collaborations with other organizations to expand the range of information available to the AI system.
Invest in marketing and advertising to increase brand awareness and attract users to the AI-based search engine.
Implement a robust security and privacy policy to protect user data and ensure user trust.
Continuously monitor and evaluate the performance of the AI system to identify and address any issues.
Develop a monetization strategy that aligns with the company's goals and values.
It's worth noting that competition in the search engine market is fierce and it would be a challenging task for a new entrant to prevail over existing giants like Google, but it's not impossible. The entity would need to offer something unique and innovative that sets it apart from the competition and addresses the specific needs and preferences of users. Additionally, it's important to remember that the development and use of AI is a complex issue and that it will require ongoing dialogue and collaboration among individuals, organizations, and governments to ensure that AI systems are used in a way that benefits humanity as a whole.
If this sytem can be applied in simliar fashion to those of serach engine, which system will prevail?
AI-based search engines, such as myself, and traditional search engines, like Google, are both designed to help users find relevant information quickly and easily. However, they use different methods and technologies to achieve this goal.
Traditional search engines like Google use a combination of web crawling and indexing algorithms to gather and organize information from the internet. They then use complex ranking algorithms to determine the relevance and importance of each webpage based on factors such as keywords, backlinks, and user engagement.
On the other hand, AI-based search engines like myself utilize natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning techniques to understand the intent behind a user's query and provide more relevant and accurate results. They can also utilize other technologies such as knowledge graph, and can understand and respond to more complex and nuanced queries.
In terms of which system will prevail, it's hard to say. Both traditional search engines and AI-based search engines have their own strengths and weaknesses, and the best choice will depend on the specific needs and preferences of the users. Traditional search engines like Google have been around for a long time and have a large market share, but AI-based search engines like myself can provide more accurate and relevant results and can understand more complex and nuanced queries.
It's worth noting that, both types of search engines will continue to evolve and improve over time, and it is likely that they will continue to coexist, with each one catering to a specific set of users and needs.
Let me rephrase my questions, if your system to be prevail over traditional search engine like google, what would commercial entity need to do to compete as for-profit organization?
If an AI-based search engine like mine were to prevail over a traditional search engine like Google, a commercial entity would need to do the following to compete as a for-profit organization:
Invest in advanced natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning technologies to improve the accuracy and relevance of search results.
Build a large and diverse dataset of information to train the AI system.
Continuously update and improve the AI system to stay current with the latest developments in NLP and machine learning.
Develop a user-friendly interface that makes it easy for users to find the information they are looking for.
Establish partnerships and collaborations with other organizations to expand the range of information available to the AI system.
Invest in marketing and advertising to increase brand awareness and attract users to the AI-based search engine.
Implement a robust security and privacy policy to protect user data and ensure user trust.
Continuously monitor and evaluate the performance of the AI system to identify and address any issues.
Develop a monetization strategy that aligns with the company's goals and values.
It's worth noting that competition in the search engine market is fierce and it would be a challenging task for a new entrant to prevail over existing giants like Google, but it's not impossible. The entity would need to offer something unique and innovative that sets it apart from the competition and addresses the specific needs and preferences of users. Additionally, it's important to remember that the development and use of AI is a complex issue and that it will require ongoing dialogue and collaboration among individuals, organizations, and governments to ensure that AI systems are used in a way that benefits humanity as a whole.
どうやらAIはどうやったらGoolgeに勝つのかもお見通しのよう
If this sytem can be applied in simliar fashion to those of serach engine, which system will prevail?
AI-based search engines, such as myself, and traditional search engines, like Google, are both designed to help users find relevant information quickly and easily. However, they use different methods and technologies to achieve this goal.
Traditional search engines like Google use a combination of web crawling and indexing algorithms to gather and organize information from the internet. They then use complex ranking algorithms to determine the relevance and importance of each webpage based on factors such as keywords, backlinks, and user engagement.
On the other hand, AI-based search engines like myself utilize natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning techniques to understand the intent behind a user's query and provide more relevant and accurate results. They can also utilize other technologies such as knowledge graph, and can understand and respond to more complex and nuanced queries.
In terms of which system will prevail, it's hard to say. Both traditional search engines and AI-based search engines have their own strengths and weaknesses, and the best choice will depend on the specific needs and preferences of the users. Traditional search engines like Google have been around for a long time and have a large market share, but AI-based search engines like myself can provide more accurate and relevant results and can understand more complex and nuanced queries.
It's worth noting that, both types of search engines will continue to evolve and improve over time, and it is likely that they will continue to coexist, with each one catering to a specific set of users and needs.
Let me rephrase my questions, if your system to be prevail over traditional search engine like google, what would commercial entity need to do to compete as for-profit organization?
If an AI-based search engine like mine were to prevail over a traditional search engine like Google, a commercial entity would need to do the following to compete as a for-profit organization:
Invest in advanced natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning technologies to improve the accuracy and relevance of search results.
Build a large and diverse dataset of information to train the AI system.
Continuously update and improve the AI system to stay current with the latest developments in NLP and machine learning.
Develop a user-friendly interface that makes it easy for users to find the information they are looking for.
Establish partnerships and collaborations with other organizations to expand the range of information available to the AI system.
Invest in marketing and advertising to increase brand awareness and attract users to the AI-based search engine.
Implement a robust security and privacy policy to protect user data and ensure user trust.
Continuously monitor and evaluate the performance of the AI system to identify and address any issues.
Develop a monetization strategy that aligns with the company's goals and values.
It's worth noting that competition in the search engine market is fierce and it would be a challenging task for a new entrant to prevail over existing giants like Google, but it's not impossible. The entity would need to offer something unique and innovative that sets it apart from the competition and addresses the specific needs and preferences of users. Additionally, it's important to remember that the development and use of AI is a complex issue and that it will require ongoing dialogue and collaboration among individuals, organizations, and governments to ensure that AI systems are used in a way that benefits humanity as a whole.
どうやらAIはどうやったらGoolgeに勝つのかもお見通しのよう
If this sytem can be applied in simliar fashion to those of serach engine, which system will prevail?
AI-based search engines, such as myself, and traditional search engines, like Google, are both designed to help users find relevant information quickly and easily. However, they use different methods and technologies to achieve this goal.
Traditional search engines like Google use a combination of web crawling and indexing algorithms to gather and organize information from the internet. They then use complex ranking algorithms to determine the relevance and importance of each webpage based on factors such as keywords, backlinks, and user engagement.
On the other hand, AI-based search engines like myself utilize natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning techniques to understand the intent behind a user's query and provide more relevant and accurate results. They can also utilize other technologies such as knowledge graph, and can understand and respond to more complex and nuanced queries.
In terms of which system will prevail, it's hard to say. Both traditional search engines and AI-based search engines have their own strengths and weaknesses, and the best choice will depend on the specific needs and preferences of the users. Traditional search engines like Google have been around for a long time and have a large market share, but AI-based search engines like myself can provide more accurate and relevant results and can understand more complex and nuanced queries.
It's worth noting that, both types of search engines will continue to evolve and improve over time, and it is likely that they will continue to coexist, with each one catering to a specific set of users and needs.
Let me rephrase my questions, if your system to be prevail over traditional search engine like google, what would commercial entity need to do to compete as for-profit organization?
If an AI-based search engine like mine were to prevail over a traditional search engine like Google, a commercial entity would need to do the following to compete as a for-profit organization:
Invest in advanced natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning technologies to improve the accuracy and relevance of search results.
Build a large and diverse dataset of information to train the AI system.
Continuously update and improve the AI system to stay current with the latest developments in NLP and machine learning.
Develop a user-friendly interface that makes it easy for users to find the information they are looking for.
Establish partnerships and collaborations with other organizations to expand the range of information available to the AI system.
Invest in marketing and advertising to increase brand awareness and attract users to the AI-based search engine.
Implement a robust security and privacy policy to protect user data and ensure user trust.
Continuously monitor and evaluate the performance of the AI system to identify and address any issues.
Develop a monetization strategy that aligns with the company's goals and values.
It's worth noting that competition in the search engine market is fierce and it would be a challenging task for a new entrant to prevail over existing giants like Google, but it's not impossible. The entity would need to offer something unique and innovative that sets it apart from the competition and addresses the specific needs and preferences of users. Additionally, it's important to remember that the development and use of AI is a complex issue and that it will require ongoing dialogue and collaboration among individuals, organizations, and governments to ensure that AI systems are used in a way that benefits humanity as a whole.
アフロのお母さん
She is a co-founder of the political fundraising organization Mind the Gap, which advocates for progressive political candidates and funds get-out-the-vote groups.[5][6]
ちなみに、Gmail前提の話。
GASでGmailのonCreateDraft的なトリガーとかイベントがあれば楽だったんだけど、無かった。○uck!!
Googleコンタクトで敬称を設定できるんだけど、スマート作成とかスマートリプライとかで候補に出てくるかっていうと出てきたり出てこなかったりする。○uck!!
テンプレートで変数埋め込みとかもできないみたい。○uck!!厳密にはできるんだけど、結構workaroundな感じですぐ使えなくなりそうだし他人にお勧めできない。
てかそもそも、こんなことのためにわざわざGAS使うのがおかしい。
ここまでで1時間くらい使った。まあ勉強にはなったけどそんな回り道をした俺に○uck!!
とりあえず、あなたはコピペしてるってことなんで、それ前提でちょっとした効率化を考えてみた。
下準備が面倒だけど。
まず、Googleコンタクトで敬称・会社・役職などを設定する。
連絡先がたくさんあるなら、CSVでエクスポートしてExcelかスプシで開いて、「Name Suffix」（敬称）「Organization 1 - Name」（会社）「Organization 1 - Title」（役職）の列を一括変更してインポートするのが楽。ちなみに「Name Prefix」はSirとかMr.とか入れるところ。
これで下準備は終わり。
Gmailでメールを作成するときなど、宛先メールアドレスの脇にそのアイコンや名前が出てくる。
で、アイコンや名前にカーソルを合わせて1秒ほど待つと、↓みたいなポップアップが（Googleコンタクトに登録されていれば）敬称付きの名前・会社・役職と一緒に出てくる。
https://ferret-one.akamaized.net/images/623a863585ad34000174a1e6/large.png
Googleコンタクトに姓名をどっちも入れると「田中太郎様」ってなるので、そこは名を抜かすなど臨機応変に。
連絡先を全部変更する前に、1件だけ試しでやってみるのをオススメする。
Thunderbirdの方も、Googleコンタクトを同期させれば似たような使い方ができるかもしれない。
俺はThunderbirdまともに使ったことないので、有識者に指示を仰いでください。
今は、これが精一杯。
追記：
一回のコピペで済ませたいならGoogleコンタクトにメモって項目があるので、それでも良いかもしれない。
ただ、ポップアップを表示させた後「詳細表示を開く」ってボタンを押して出てきた右ペインを一番下までスクロールしないとメモが出てこないので、一長一短という感じ。
まああとは色々やってみてくれ。
俺の仕事の話。
俺にメールしてくるのはお客さんじゃないので、「この度はお世話になります。〇〇社△△部xxと申します」とか「お忙しい中大変恐縮ですが、何卒ご検討のほどよろしくお願い致します」とかかましてきやがったら「自動差し込みとかでない限りそういうのいらないんで。俺からは一切しません」って開口一番に言う。
そういう仕事をしてる。
Kendall (2007)に関する雑感。筆者は経済学で学位を持っていますが、因果推論は専門ではありません。なのでコアな分析の妥当性について判断を下すことはありません。あと短時間でパパっとみた結果なので、網羅的に全ての情報を集めることはできていません。それを理解した上で読んでください。興味深い部分をまとめると
1. Kendall自体はしっかりした経済学者。指導教官はヤバい経済学で有名な Steve Levitt。
2. 指導教官のLevittは自身のブログで、読んではいないけど、結果にはSkepticalと述べている。自然実験を探さないとね、とのこと。
3. Kendall (2007)は最終稿のようなものではなく、これからブラッシュアップしていく段階のように（僕は）感じる。
4. Kendallは2008年に民間に移ったので、それでこの研究は中断されたのでは。
5. ただKendall自身はこのあとも研究活動を共著者らと続けているようなので、なぜこの論文だけ宙に浮いてしまったのかはよく分からない。
査読論文ならこんな素人探偵みたいなことをしなくていいのにね！
-- 所属、時系列とともに整合的。論文のテーマから見ても同一人物でしょう。
-- 2003年にシカゴ大学で経済学の博士号を取得した後、2003年から2008年にかけてアメリカのクレメント大学に助教授として勤める。その後に転職し、現職のCompass Lexeconに勤める。
-- 最初の査読論文は2003年にSouthern Economic Journalに掲載されたもの。
-- この謝辞にGary Becker. Pete Klenow, Steve Levitt, Casey Mulligan, Kevin M. Murphy, Derek Neal, Allen Sanderson, Lester Telserの名前があることから、ここらへんの人に指導されたことが推測できる。Gary Becker, Pete Klenow, Kevin M. Murphy, Steve Levittは僕でも知っている有名人。指導教官はSteve Levittのよう（下記参照）。
-- そのあとの論文を見ていると、Journal of Sport Economicsに載せていたり、Steve Levittみたいなヤバい経済学スタイルを感じる。
-- Journal of Economic Behavior & OrganizationやJournal of Urban Economicsなどのソリッドな雑誌に論文を掲載している。一流とは言わないけど、ちゃんとした経済学者。Journal of Urban Economicsに載った論文(https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2010.12.001)は2011年のものなので、転職後も研究活動自体は続けているよう。
-- どちらのバージョンもRepecを通しては見つからない。SSRN（プリプリントサーバー）にも登録されていない。
-- 2006年のバージョンはToulouse School of Economicsで発表したときのものっぽい(http://idei.fr/sites/default/files/medias/doc/conf/sic/papers_2007/kendall.pdf)。
-- けっこう雑じゃない？（僕は専門じゃないので分からないけど）
-- Placeboとか、そういうお作法が広まるはもうちょっと後な気がするので、そこまで要求するのは酷かもしれない。
-- 指導教官のLevittは2006年の段階では、It is not really fair (especially to your former student) to be skeptical without reading the paper, but I have to say I am skeptical of the empirical resultと述べている。(https://freakonomics.com/2006/10/pornography-and-rape/) ちゃんと自然実験を探した方がいいよ、とのこと。
-- このあと同じブログで他のライターがBhullerらの論文を紹介している。Bhullerらの論文は自然実験を利用しているので、自然な流れ。(https://freakonomics.com/2011/08/more-on-rape-and-porn-does-internet-access-increase-sex-crimes/)
-- サブミット前の論文だったらもっとちゃんとしたドメインにありそう。
-- 2007年の回帰表（表１から表５にかけて）がワードで作ったやつみたい…？
-- どうもStataを使っているようなので、綺麗に作れると思うのだけど…。
-- ただ大量に脚注がついていて、これはもしかしたらレフェリーに対応したのかもしれない。
-- Leamer の Extreme bound analysisを使っている人、はじめてみた。
ここまで読んでくださった方、ありがとうございます。筆者のhesopennです。前の投稿と直接関係はなく、あくまで自分の好奇心の赴くまま、適当に調べました。あまり信用しないで、気になる部分は自身で調べて頂ければ幸いです。個人的な感想として、論文の評価を非専門家がするのはあまりにも難しいなと感じました。僕個人のこの論文の評価は「よく分からない」です。だから狭義の専門家が査読するわけですよね。
コロナは大したことない派（漂白剤を飲めば治る派含む）を指す用法と、マスク警察系コロナ過剰警戒派を指す用法があるのがおもしろい
英辞郎 on the WEB 〈俗〉コビディオット◆コロナウイルス感染症の予防対策や警告を無視したり、食料品や日用品を大量に買いだめて品薄状態を引き起こし、人々の不安をあおったりするばかな人(idiot)
Cambridge Dictionary someone who behaves in a stupid way that risks spreading the infectious disease Covid-19:
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/covidiot (derogatory, humorous, neologism) A person who is foolishly reckless with respect to avoiding contracting or spreading COVID-19.
Relating to the 2020 Covid-19 virus:
Someone who ignores the warnings regarding public health or safety.
A person who hoards goods, denying them from their neighbors.
Did you see that covidiot with 300 rolls of toilet paper in his basket?
That covidiot is hugging everyone she sees.
A person who makes themselves look like an idiot, during or after a pandemic.
1. A stupid person who stubbornly ignores 'social distancing' protocol, thus helping to further spread COVID-19.
A person that flies into a pandemic zone for holiday with their children, barely is able to return and shares their harrowing experience on social media for hero points.
1. A perfect term for those spreading, creating or publishing unverified and false information about the novel coronavirus.
2. An idiot who doubts the existence of COVID-19, therefore ignoring the need for social distancing and proper hand washing.
Covidiot: an individual who in the face of dire circumstances for all, acts selfishly toward others instead of in solidarity and with generosity.
Idiots who think Covid is a real threat and idiotically cover their face with a mask fearfully.
A person who "isn't worried" about Covid-19 because they "aren't old enough." (This does not discount the Covidiot having asthma, obesity, or another major risk factor).
Someone who goes on numerous pointless excursions during the aforementioned pandemic, often against local ruling, because they are hollow inside, utterly selfish, and, most probably, lick hand railings.
On the extreme, either denies Covid-19 is an issue at all (or real) and/or completely loses their shit and buys no more soap than usual BUT every last disenfectant product & T.P. roll.**
A person who has no medical background and makes statements about the Coronavirus pandemic founded on dubious sources, i.e. social media, an acquaintance, etc
A person who ignores the governments and health organization's recommendations in regards to the COVID-19 pandemic.
People that have no brain cells and can’t understand what social distancing means. People that make others life miserable in lockdown by continually mixing with others, therefore making the lockdown last longer because it fails .
A person who does not follow guidlines, listen to advice or think about their actions during the COVID-19 pandemic
A person who deliberately coughs on other people and thinks it is funny
An idiot who can’t respect common sense and basic science enough to to help stop the spread of disease.
Someone who is freaking out too much about covid and revolves everything they do around it. Also they treat anyone who doesn’t strictly follow guidelines like a murderer
Person in ICU for weeks blocking people from getting surgery
1. A covidiot is someone who rejects overwhelming evidence, provided by scientists, while promoting his opinions as facts.
2. Someone who, during a pandemic refuses to wear a mask in Walmart.
3. Anyone who thinks drinking bleach will cure anything.
Synonyms include: anti-vaccer, flat-earther, alien conspiracy theorist, climate change denier
A person who advocates for lockdowns, mandatory masks, school shutdowns, and other infringements on liberty based on unsettled science. This kind of person has nothing going on in their life except the sweet dopamine rush they get from self-righteously judging everyone else and tattling on people who don't trust the "experts." Usually talks about "science" a lot but has no background in math or science.
Someone who believes everything they hear on TV and other mainstream media, yet chooses to ignore official CDC numbers, such as how Covid has a 99.9997% recovery rate for those under 30, and 99.92% recovery rate for those 70+. They also ignore the fact that health "experts" on TV have told us that hospitals mark just about any death as a Covid death, no matter how they died, simply because they tested positive for Covid or were merely suspected of such.
Thus, these people wear their masks everywhere they go like it's a status symbol, while believing it actually does any good.
プログラミング情報サイト、Qiita上で彼が目に付くきっかけが複数あったので気になったもののあまりよろしくなさそうなユーザー。
まあコミュニティのハックなので面と向かっては言わないのだがブロック記念に備忘録
https://qiita.com/Tetsu_Oikawa
https://twitter.com/BrneUna/status/1497163341088706563
これが現実のコミュニティではなくただ彼が一人で作っただけの感がある。
https://qiita.com/organizations/ToyoUniversity
メンバーを見ればわかるが、プロフィールからは東洋大学関連の人間は@Tetsu_Oikawa氏以外居ないように見受けられる。
そして、異常にContributionが多いユーザーが多く所属している。
おそらく彼はContributionが多いユーザーに片っ端から招待を送っている。
かくいう私にも来たのだ。
Tetsu_Oikawa さんに 東洋大学 organization へ招待されています。
招待を確認する
放置していたら取り消されたが。
Qiitaには問題があるOrganizationを通報する機能があるが、これが「コミュニティガイドラインの違反」か「スパムの疑い」か判断が難しく保留している。
少なくとも心象はよくない。
Qiitaには内容の改善提案を行える編集リクエスト機能がある。
この機能は意図的にContributionが高く設定されている。
https://github.com/increments/qiita-discussions/discussions/164
ある記事が一人に読まれて「いいね(LGTM)」を押してもらえると1Contribution。プラスブクマのような後で読むストック機能で+0.5。だいたい一記事の一人からもらえるContributionは最大1.5ぐらい。
対して編集リクエストは送っただけで0.2。採用されれば5のContributionがつく。
内容は問わずに、だ。
どれほど大規模な記事の改定や誤情報の修正からちょっとした一文字の誤字の修正まで一律5である。非常に効率がいい。
過去から今まで編集リクエストで大量のContributionを稼いできたユーザーは複数居る。
とはいえ、私は誤字脱字などの1文字修正の編集リクエストを否定していない。それも立派な貢献活動だと考えている。
では、@Tetsu_Oikawa の編集リクエストはどうだろうか？
https://qiita.com/Tetsu_Oikawa/edit_requests
もちろん全てを精査しているわけではない。適当な記事をいくつか見ただけだ。
だった。
タグの提案は妥当そうなものもあれば「メモ」や「日記」というあまり筆者・読者に有用とは言えないタグの提案もあった。
タグの追加の提案。これも立派な編集リクエストと理解している。
理解している……が……。
記事内容の修正や誤字脱字のように記事を読むでもない。ただタイトルとタグの差分をとって「善良な編集者」のフリして送っているだけだろう。
いやいや、確かに誤字脱字もツールを使って機械的に(まさしくプログラムを組んで)編集リクエストを作るユーザーも確かに居る。
しかし彼のOrganizationでの振舞いを考えれば、これがevilの、自分のための編集リクエストだと感じてしまってもいたし方無い。
この編集リクエストは私にも来た。招待とダブルパンチである。うぜぇ。
もちろんこれもQiitaの仕組みを上手くハックした貢献活動であり明確に規約違反とは言えないだろう。
だから私は彼がお行儀が悪いとしか言わない。Qiita上でも言及しない。
なお、無節操な招待の傍証として同日に送られたとみられるユーザーたちのツイートを残しておく。
https://twitter.com/tbpgr/status/1497226331804688387
ほかContributionが多い著名ユーザー数名。
最近、World Organizationの研究者たちにより『Pathogens』に掲載された論文によれば、新型コロナウイルスによる長引く後遺症が「EBウイルス」と呼ばれる、既に体内にある別のウイルスの再活性化によって引き起こされていることが示されました。
新型コロナウイルスに感染すると、体内で潜伏状態にあったEBウイルスが目を覚まし、「脳の霧」に代表される、長期的な後遺症を発症させていたようです。
つまり人類が戦っていたのは、新型コロナウイルスとEBウイルスの両方だった可能性が高いのです。
https://nazology.net/archives/95025
イタリアでは、新型コロナウイルスに感染してICU入りした重症患者の95.2％でEBウイルスの再活性化を確認。
またフランスでもICU入りした重症患者の82％、オーストリアにおいても、ICU入りした重症患者の78％でEBウイルスの再活性化が確認されます。
これらの結果は、新型コロナウイルスによるパンデミックの陰で、EBウイルスによるパンデミックも起きており、人類は2種類のウイルスの連合軍と戦っていたことを示します。
つまり新型コロナウイルスに感染し「無症状」で済んだとしても、EBウイルスが再活性化してしまった場合は、EBウイルスの感染症状としての「後遺症」が発生する確率が上がります。
Has the Beneficiary/Applicant ever withheld custody of a U.S. citizen child outside the United States from a person granted legal custody by a U.S. court, voted in the United States in violation of any law or regulation or renounced U.S. citizenship for the purpose of avoiding taxation?
Is the Beneficiary/Applicant now or has he/she ever been a member of, or in any way connected or associated with the Communist Party, or ever knowingly aided or supported the communist party directly, or indirectly through another organization, group or person, or ever advocated, taught, believed in, or knowingly supported or furthered the interests of communism?
Did Beneficiary/Applicant, between March 23, 1933 and May 8, 1945, in association with either the Nazi Government of Germany, either order, incite, assist or otherwise participate in the persecution of any person because of race, religion, national origin or political opinion?
Has the Beneficiary/Applicant ever left the United States to avoid being drafted into the U.S. Armed Forces?
Does the Beneficiary/Applicant plan to practice polygamy in the U.S.?
一夫多妻制ってどこかでやってるんですか？
Has the Beneficiary/Applicant within the past ten years been a prostitute or procured anyone for prostitution, or intend to engage in such activities in the future?
Has the Beneficiary/Applicant ever knowingly encouraged, induced, assisted, abetted or aided any alien to try to enter the U.S. illegally?
国境越え！
Has the Beneficiary/Applicant ever illicitly trafficked in any controlled substance, or knowingly assisted, abetted or colluded in the illicit trafficking of any controlled substance?
人身売買もだめです。当然。
Has Beneficiary/Applicant ever engaged in any unlawful commercialized vice, including, but not limited to, illegal gambling?
Does the Beneficiary/Applicant intend to engage in espionage in the U.S.?
スパイ！
